I'll be in town Wedneday to work on my exhibit, that way I don't have to
transport the whole thing from New Jersey. Anyone want to hang out
Wednesday night for dinner / drinks? (I have plans already for Thursday).
Friday, of course, is VCF set-up day at the museum.
Staying at the Quality Inn Mountain View, best way to reach me will be cell
phone (646.546.9999) or periodic email.
Wish I could get my IBM Simon working alongside my Treo. ;)
-----------------------------------------
Evan Koblentz's personal homepage: http://www.snarc.net
Computer Collector Newsletter: http://news.computercollector.com
Mid-Atlantic Retro Computing Hobbyists & Museum:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/midatlanticretro/
Paul wrote:
> "Flip Chip" as a DEC trademark simply designates the PC board with
> stuff on them that implements some function and can be plugged into a
> backplane.
That's what it ended up meaning, and most of the modules indeed were made up of discrete wire-lead components and DIP's on
a plug-in card.
But DEC's original intention was a much closer bonding
of a hybrid module to a PCB sans wires. See my thread
in a.f.c. on this topic in 1998 :-).
Tim.
>From: gtulloch at shaw.ca
>
>Well, ok, in that case ...
>
>I'm building a Z80 based microcontroller as a telescope controller, to
>run a few stepper motors, calculate and correct for periodic errors as
>well as XYZ errors in the mount. The driver circuit is done
>(http://www.bbastrodesigns.com/cot/steppercircuit.html), and
>currently runs off a DOS app which uses the parallel port to pulse
>the motor windings. However, I prefer not to use a dedicated
>DOS PC so I'd like to put a Z80 in front of the driver with an RC
>circuit connected to the NMI so I know how long the duration between
>interrupts is and can thus calc the steps required to track. For historic
>reasons the code will be written in FORTH - a PC connected via serial
>will do all the heavy lifting as far as telling the Z80 where to point
>and how. Comments on the veracity of this architecture welcome!
>
>I have a few questions I'm hoping someone can answer for me, starting
>with the following: I have a Z80A and a 4 mhz TTL clock
>oscillator - I'm wondering if it would be ok to connect the clock
>directly to the CPU or is it wise to connect it via a parallel or
>serial resonant oscillator circuit like those described here:
>
>http://www.z80.info/uexosc.htm
>
>Why be so elaborate? The data sheets for the oscillator doesn't say
>"Make sure you connect via a parallel or serial resonent oscillator
>circuit!"
>
>Thanks for any light you can shed on this, Google hasn't been helpful.
>I have references that do it both ways without explanation so I'm
>confused!
Hi
I think you are confusing a crystal oscillator with a crystal.
The circuits shown are for the crystal alone and you provide
the oscillator.
If you are using a crystal, one needs to match the type of
crystal, parallel/series, to get it to work at the stated
frequency. This has to do with the phase shift that the crystal
provides for the oscillator. In one case, the phase is 0 degrees
while the other, it is 180 degrees. Even so, using ttl parts
for oscillators can have issues. If the crystal is over driven,
it will age quickly and drift in frequence or even fail to
oscillate. Also issues like startup time need to be addressed
in some applications. You'd want the oscillator running well
before releasing reset on a CPU.
Dwight
>
>Regards,
> Gord
>
>cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org wrote on 26/10/2005 09:25:58 PM:
>
>> Gord wrote...
>> > I'm building a Z80 based computer as a stepper motor controller, and
>it
>> > would be nice if there was a homebrew newsgroup to ask questions on
>since
>> > I don't think this is the group to do so - any recommendations?
>>
>> Um... I would certainly think developing a new system around a classic
>> processor (Z-80) is certainly ok on this group :)
>>
>> Jay
>>
>
Scott Stevens <chenmel at earthlink.net> wrote:
> How well do they encrypt the ZIPs? There are some pretty powerful
> ZIPcracking tools out there.
Well, it's no longer a concern for me. I don't give a damn about Xilinx
any more. I've just got the CD with Altera's Quartus for Linux and it's
all normal tarballs, which I have unpacked just fine manually without
using any installer. Then after giving it a bootleg license file I've
got the command line tools working.
So, reiterating for those who haven't caught the gist - I now have
working command line tools under Linux (no Winblows, no GUI, no X display
needed) for compiling Altera FPGAs. I start with Verilog sources and
get an SOF (SRAM object file) for the FPGA, all command line controlled
by a Makefile, just like compiling C code with cc under UNIX. Isn't
this something to celebrate?
MS
> From: Chuck Guzis
> Sent: 10/27/2005 2:40 AM
> Subject: Re: PC Ephemera
>
> Way OT: Does anyone have a Xenix boot disk for a TRS-80 Model 16?
> Does it require a hard disk or can you run with the two floppies?
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
Do you want a copy of one of the original disks? I have version 3.1, but
that requires a PAL update to the 68000 board. I MAY have version 1.1 or 1.3
around somewhere.
Do you want 5.25" or 8" media?
As long as you have the 68000 board and memory intstalled, you can boot with
a floppy and a file system diskette, but you don't have many of the tools.
What are you trying to do? I loved the diskutil, but that doesn't actually
require loading Xenix.
If you have a later generation hard drive controller in your machine, you
can probably use just about any RLL/MFM interface drive to get going. If you
don't then If you have the middle generataion (without the red bus lines),
you'll need the external primary drive case with a working 12 meg or larger
MFM drive installed.
Kelly
Brent wrote:
> Across the history of ICs, DIP packaging begins to look like a
> 25-to-30-year sidebar.
I like the way "flip chip" (not just the term, but the concept) is coming
back into vogue, forty years after DEC registered it as a trademark.
Tim.
William Donzelli wrote:
> Ever notice that in the 60s and 70s, they did not use flatpacks all that
> properly? For some reason, the philosophy was to have the leads quite
> long. No real reason for that, is there?
The "official" way of mounting flatpacks also required you to
mill a chunk of the board away so the IC sits in the PCB, and
then you have to weld (not solder) the leads to the PCB. Maybe
in the 60's it made sense but with multilayer boards today getting
rid of all those signal traces (as well as the ground and power
planes!) just won't fly.
It's possible that the long leads had somethng to do with welding
them.
I got the impression that flatpacks weren't about increasing
density but were an over-reaction to problems with hermetic
seals and bent leads.
Tim.
>
>Subject: Z80 Telescope Controller (was Homebrew newsgroups / forums?)
> From: gtulloch at shaw.ca
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:36:51 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Well, ok, in that case ...
>
>I'm building a Z80 based microcontroller as a telescope controller, to
>run a few stepper motors, calculate and correct for periodic errors as
>well as XYZ errors in the mount. The driver circuit is done
>(http://www.bbastrodesigns.com/cot/steppercircuit.html), and
>currently runs off a DOS app which uses the parallel port to pulse
>the motor windings. However, I prefer not to use a dedicated
>DOS PC so I'd like to put a Z80 in front of the driver with an RC
>circuit connected to the NMI so I know how long the duration between
>interrupts is and can thus calc the steps required to track. For historic
>reasons the code will be written in FORTH - a PC connected via serial
>will do all the heavy lifting as far as telling the Z80 where to point
>and how. Comments on the veracity of this architecture welcome!
RC circuits drift with temerature and voltage, not an accurate source of
time or position information. A better whay uses a timer chip like the
Z80 CTC or 8253. Though a PIC or other micro(8048, 8051) usually has a
timer counter on board.
Generally speaking using a micro as a morot controller is commmonplace.
The real trick is being able to start at a calibrated point and return
back to it (resetability) as well as move to any point with accuracy.
So beside the mechanical problem of movement there are the issues of
knowing where you are or at least where the start point is.
>I have a few questions I'm hoping someone can answer for me, starting
>with the following: I have a Z80A and a 4 mhz TTL clock
>oscillator - I'm wondering if it would be ok to connect the clock
>directly to the CPU or is it wise to connect it via a parallel or
>serial resonant oscillator circuit like those described here:
Yes, you can if CMOS, if not then add a 330 ohm pullup resistor.
The Z80 requires a clock that swings closer to ground and Vcc
than all the other pins.
>http://www.z80.info/uexosc.htm
>
>Why be so elaborate? The data sheets for the oscillator doesn't say
>"Make sure you connect via a parallel or serial resonent oscillator
>circuit!"
Because most digital hackers would not know what it is maybe?
A parallel or series resonant osc refers to the whay the crystal is
connected in and used. The inportant thing is to meet the rise and fall
times as well as the logic high and low voltages that the Z80 requires.
and that wasn't addressed well there.
>Thanks for any light you can shed on this, Google hasn't been helpful.
>I have references that do it both ways without explanation so I'm
>confused!
If google isn't helpful then you asked the wrong question. There is literally
mountains of z80 information out there.
Allison
Hi all:
I'm building a Z80 based computer as a stepper motor controller, and it
would be nice if there was a homebrew newsgroup to ask questions on since
I don't think this is the group to do so - any recommendations?
Yes, I know I'm 30 years behind the curve, and yes, I know a
microcontroller would save me some time, but where's the fun in that?
Regards,
Gord
Forwarded from vmsnet.pdp-11 with permission by poster
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PDP-11 Collection for Sale
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:02:57 -0400
From: Will Kranz <will_kranz at softhome.net>
Organization: Info-PDP11<==>vmsnet.pdp-11 Gateway
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
Gentlemen:
My dad passed away over the weekend. He has be acquiring 11/23 systems and
componets
for something like 25 years. Its time to clean out the basement. I don't
want to give things
away, but do want some of this to go to good homes where I know it will get
the love and
care that it deserves. I thought I'd give you guys the opportunity before
posting anything on
Ebay.
I'm starting a web page where I will attempt to maintain a list of
equipment:
http://www.fpns.net/willy/pdp11/forsale.htm
The stuff is located in Darien, CT just off I-95. You'd have come pickup
or arrange shipping
as I do not have the energy for it. Please make me an offer I can't
refuse. Use the email
address above, or the contact information on the web page.
Be well, Will
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/147 - Release Date: 10/24/2005
----------
To unsubscribe (or subscribe) from (to) this list, send a message to
info-pdp11-request at village.org, with the first line of the message
body being "unsubscribe" or "subscribe", respectively (without the quotes).