Someone just posted this handbook on the Heathkit listserver, and looks
pretty good at a first glance.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
HANDBOOK FOR
STORAGE SHELF LIFE AND
REFORMING PROCEDURES FOR
ALUMINUM ELECTROLYTIC FIXED CAPACITORS
It is online in PDF format at:
http://www.multi-volti.com/hb1131.pdf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jules Richardson
> Sent: 03 August 2004 12:25
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: rarest computers. was: RE: Xerox Alto
> Restoration + Emulation
>
> I found an RML advert in an old comp magazine at Bletchley of
> a pair of cream 480Z's along with a *white* 380Z at the
> weekend. I'm assuming it was a mock-up as I've never known of
> a white 380Z before.
*cough* Who found it? :)
I think I'll borrow it next weekend and scan it on sat night. Can you
remember which mag it was in?
Cya
w
I am looking for a Steve Loboyko that use to work for VSI and BellSouth
in Charlotte. If this gets to you Steve, this is coming from John
Calvert, please send a reply to me. THANKS!
Joseph S. Barrera III <joe(a)barrera.org> wrote:
> > > Half of everything I have has something wierd about it, like the
> > > MAC with an Apple-II card in it or the uVAX-II GPX that was said to
> > > be Stallman's.
> >
> > Ew. Did you sterilize the keyboard before using it?
>
> Can you imagine Stallman hairs coming out of it for years afterwards?
>
> Best to sterilize it in a furnace.
Stallman? Do you mean Richard Stallman of GNU fame? If so, what's
so bad or contageous about him? While it's well known that I'm quite
disapproving of GNU (which is strictly because GNU is anti-UNIX and I'm
well known to be a priest of Holy UNIX), I have nothing against RMS
personally and I'm quite shocked to see people make comments concerning
him ("sterilize the keyboard" etc.) that one would expect to be made
about, say, Dark Emperor BillG.
MS
Hi ben
A good picture of it can be seen at:
http://www.omahug.org/vcf40/v02.jpg ( the Wyse terminal is not original )
It was used as a processing unit for a nuclear magnetic
resonance spectrometer. This did chemical analysis. The upper
part of the panel is related to the data acquisition while
the lower part is the blinking lights part.
Mine has 12Kx20 of core but they also had a 24Kx20 setup
with an expansion chassis. The 12K core comes in 3 stacks.
Most used a hard disk but mine is floppy bases. I'm always
looking for more programs to run on this ;)
Sellam has another one of these and there is a fellow in
England that has one as well. These are the only remaining
machines that I am aware of. These were in competition with
the Varian machines of the time. Nicolet was one of the
last manufactures to make core bases processors and made
processors for use on subs because of cores resistance to
radiation.
The instruction set is funny as well. It used the typical
conditional skip instruction of the time but the ALU was
interesting because it used a 5 port input. It has hardware
for doing multiply and divide because it's primary output
was the result of doing FFT's on the data input. Fast
multiply and divide are desirable.
I have running a BASIC ( with matrix operations ), an
assembler, an editor and several games. I also have
a floating point package as well and some diagnostic programs.
Any more specific questions?
Dwight
>From: "ben franchuk" <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I was just wondering. What people on this list consider their
>> rarest computers in their collections. Here is my list
>>
>> 1. Nicolet 80 ( 20 bit mini with core. working condition. Only know
>> of 2 others. I doubt there are more than 10 left
>> anywhere. )
>
>Hmm, I want to hear more of this mini.
>Ben.
>
>
Tony Duell writes:
>
>> just get into different tools then older people who didn't have a computer
>> to play with when they grew up. When I was young I went out and purchased
>> some ram chips to fix my dead C64 (was stupid and touched a staticy TV while
>> my other hand was on the keyboard, ESD), equipment was expensive. Today if a
>> pc card breaks its cheaper to chuck it and get a new/used one then it is to
>> even think of looking for the parts to fix it, same with all other
>
> We've had this before, and I still don't believe it. If you can honstly
> tell me that it's cheaper (and quicker) to replace some large PCB costing
> several hundreed pounds/dollars than to find the dead I/O buffer chip
> (which sould cost a few 10s of pence, and which would take me about 10
> minutes to find at most), then I have to wonder what planet you're on.
How about replacing a card costing $25 to $50, vs. replacing the fried
surface-mounted ASIC (one of only two or three chips on the card), which
incidentally is only available to OEMs in the first place?
In order to make mass-market electronics so cheap, they have had to be tailored
to large-scale industrial producers, rendering them inaccessible to mere
mortals. To take one extreme example, the single IC of modern calculators isn't
packaged at all in the conventional sense--the chip is mounted right on the
printed circuit board and encased in a blob of resin to protect it.
And, of course, the logical conclusion of integrated circuit technology is to
get rid of the circuit board and separate components entirely.
Colin
Hi,
I have a ServGate EdgeForce documentation pack here, consisting of a
CD-ROM, Quick Start Guide Version 2.5 and SGOS 2.5 Administrator's Guide
(book).
Free, but you pay postage. Contact me within 14 days if you want it, or it
hits the trash.
Regards,
Ed.
>From: "SHAUN RIPLEY" <vax3900(a)yahoo.com>
>
>I copied the Z8038 part from the book "The Z8000
>microprocessor, A design handbook" by Bradly, K.
>Fawcett. I remember that somebody on the list tried to
>make a collection of zilog chip documents. I'd like to
>mail the 20 pages to him. Please send me email if it
>is you. Thanks.
>
>
Hi Shaun
Does your book describe the floating point processor
( that was never released ). I was wondering because
the CP/M-8000 that I've been playing with ( accually
the C compiler ) uses the floating point processors
instructions and then exception traps them to execute
the floating point code. The format for using these
traps would be the same as was expected for the
real FPU.
Dwight