>> Magnevox Odyssey 1 - Not really a computer (It was analog!), but farily
>> uncommon, and predecessor to the really-a-computer Odyssey 2.
I have one of these, but I'm missing most of the overlays. Also the rifle
for some of the games is long since trashed. Some day I'll dig the thing
out and see if the system itself still works.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>From: "Cameron Kaiser" <spectre(a)floodgap.com>
>
>> > He got red in the face when I asked him how he's teaching kids any
>> > base OS principles such as state-saving and interrupting. Meaning,
>> > kids don't go there, pretty much. The next major version of a
>> > known OS will probably be without interrupts, as none of the
>> > programmers will have any knowledge about them anymore ;-)
>
>> OH, like DOS again!
>
>DOS is an operating system? ;)
>
Windows is not. It is an application interface.
Dwight
>From: "SHAUN RIPLEY" <vax3900(a)yahoo.com>
>
---snip---
>In my eyes X86 is not bad at all. Every divert from
>X86 Intel made was a failure. I432, I860, I960,
>Itanium, all failed. Maybe 8051 is an exception. Also
Hi
I'd not say that either the 432 or 8051 were spawned
>from the X86. Also, even though Intel doesn't deal
with it anymore, the 186's are still quite popular
for embedded.
Most CISC processors of today run with a RISC core.
CISC has the advantage of more efficient use of bulk
memory bandwidth while RISC can be more easily handled
for things like pipelining and multiple execution
engines.
Dwight
>CISC won the battle with RISC finally. It might be
>better for DEC to develop faster VAX than to develop
>Alpha.
>
>vax, 3900
>
>>
>> William Donzelli
>> aw288(a)osfn.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
>
I didn't bid on this (was preparing to snipe), but finally talked to the
other bidder and was sure the documentation would be preserved on bitsavers.
--
Copies of those documents have been scanned, and are in the queue to be pdf'ed
I probably should put up a list of what has been done to see if people would
volunteer to postprocess the scans. On a good day, I can finish about 1000 pages
while on average I have been scanning about 4x that per day. I just checked the
/scan directory and it's around 80gb, with only about 25gb postprocessed.
>From: "Ed Kelleher" <Pres(a)macro-inc.com>
>
>I get requests for MRV11-D's regularly, like once a week.
>Had a bunch and sold them.
>Still have several in the field and have never seen one fail.
>
>Are these things going bad?
>Can't believe people are building new systems with them.
>There's nothing much on them, just 2 boot ROM's and a simple QBUS interface.
>The set of MXV11-B2 boot ROMs I have are 2764A's.
>Do these die after awhile?
>Just sitting here scratching my head.
>
>Ed
>
>
Hi Ed
Most EPROMs are rated for 10 years. That doesn't mean that
every one will last that long. Also, many of these types
of systems were all made with EPROMs from the same lot.
If there was a long term issue, they'd all fail.
Dwight
>From: "John Honniball" <coredump(a)gifford.co.uk>
>
>Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>> 3. Olivetti M-20
>
>I want one of these!
---snip---
Hi John
These were also labeled as L-1's with slightly different
add-on hardware options. Some had color but mine is only
black and white. I believe there was a M-30 as well with
the Z-8000 but I've never seen one of these.
I'm quite enjoying reading about all the unusual items
that are in many collections. It seems we all have some
interesting items.
Dwight
>From: "Paul Koning" <pkoning(a)equallogic.com>
---snip---
>
>For autonomous timekeeping independent of technology, the state of the
>art was a second per year or so (that's 10^-8, roughly) around the
>early 1900s. First with pendulum clocks (Shortt clock), then around
>the 1940s or so crystal clocks came in that could match this. And not
>too long after that there came the rubidium (10^-10) and cesium
>(10^-14) clocks. Some of that would be found in military gear, I
>think (Rb at least, Cs somewhat less likely). Consider GPS
>satellites, which have either or both built-in.
>
> paul
>
>
Hi
I thought I'd mention that GPS satellites are very precise
but no longer accurate. The world standards like UTC are not
on the same second as used for GPS. I don't recall how
far things have changed but for political and other reasons,
the world time standards have been changing. GPS are still
locked to being relative to particular data and time. Every
one else has had a few leap seconds here and there. There
is a chart someplace on the web that shows how things are.
Dwight
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces(a)classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Pope
> Sent: 03 August 2004 16:30
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: rarest computers
>
> > Magnevox Odyssey 1 - Not really a computer (It was analog!), but
> > farily uncommon, and predecessor to the really-a-computer Odyssey 2.
>
> Wow! I didn't know this.. (that it's analog) .. very cool! :)
Mine's been disassembled here:
http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/Museum/Magnavox/odyssey.php
'all' that circuitry can generate is 2 player objects, a ball object and
optionally a net object down the middle. Top stuff!
Cheers
w
Do you still have this card?
Connie Kreis
Financial Manager
High Reliability Systems
469 Decorah Road
West Bend, WI 53095
p 262-268-0911
f 263-268-0967
hrs-accounting(a)wi.rr.com