I have a set of pages about this unit on my website...
http://www.geocities.com/macemulist/nutek.html
I'd like to buy one of these, if I can find one.
If anyone on this list has one in any condition
(hopefully working or repairable), please contact me
off list...
Basically, this was an attempt to clone the Mac
including making a Clone OS.
If you have one of these, I'd love to get copies of
any floppies that came with it, manuals, and a dump of
the ROMS even if you don't want to sell yours.
It would be interesting to see if the ROMS would work
on one of the many Mac Emulators, or could be made to
work.
Regards,
Al Hartman
(Macintosh Emulation List Host)
http://www.topica.com/lists/MacEmuList
Enlightenment means taking full responsibility for
your life.
- William Blake
I seem to have a couple hundred MB15140s in their original Fujitsu IC boxes.
Does anyone have an idea what they are?
Picture at http://members.aol.com/innfosale/MB15140A.JPG
Is there a Fujitsu chip list on the Internet available? Google did not bring
anything up for me.
The date codes are 8809 so they are on topic. I got them from Fujitsu nearly
10 years ago and uncovered them recently. I would not be surprised if they
were for the Fujitsu 8" or 14" hard drives since I bought a lot of new parts
when they dismantled their 8" line in Hillsboro, OR.
Any help appreciated.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
>From: "Bryan Pope" <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
>
>Hey all,
>
> Awhile ago there was a thread about electrolytic capacitors popping and
>then destroying the motherboard they are on. One of the ideas was to
>replace them before they go.
>
> Now I was wondering about another idea... Would it be okay to encase
>the capacitor in silicone gel? Then when the capacitor pops, it wouldn't
>spread its electrolyte all over the motherboard.
>
> But would this cause other problems with heat or something? Would it
>further shorten the life of the capacitor?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bryan
>
Hi
There isn't much you could cover it with that would stop a cap
>from blowing. The pressures can get to several thousand PSI
if there isn't a relief someplace. Wrapping several layers of
paper towel around them might be better. This would at least
keep the mess from the PCB.
There was an article about some bad capacitors made in the
last few years. According to the story, someone stole a formula
for the electrolyte and the formula was missing some key
ingredient ( most likely a depolarizer ). The caps made this
way would out gas and rupture.
Dwight
See below. Contact original sender.
Reply-to: <bernhardbang(a)netscape.net>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 19:43:03 -0500
From: bernhardbang(a)netscape.net
Subject: Zerox 16/8
Gentlemen,
I have a Zerox 16/8 computer, complete with instruction manuals. Barely
used.
Includes Monitor and keyboard.
Is it of any value?
Do you want it?
Who might want it?
Thank you for your reply!
Bernhard Bang
4208 Wickford Road
Baltimore, MD 21210
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
On Feb 10, 8:03, Paul Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com wrote:
>
> > E8 means they're 128KB, or 1 Megabit. The part numbers you quote
are
> > listed in Compaq Assisted Services online catalogue at $4 apiece,
so
> > you might still be able to get them from DEC/HP.
>
> I am not sure I have the URL for this, unless it is something I know
by
> another name....
Try a web search for "Compaq Assisted Services" or for the 23- part
numbers you quoted? :-)
Or http://www-legacy.digital.com/CAS-Catalog/pric.html
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Feb 10, 10:58, Bryan Pope wrote:
> Awhile ago there was a thread about electrolytic capacitors
popping and
> then destroying the motherboard they are on. One of the ideas was to
> replace them before they go.
>
> Now I was wondering about another idea... Would it be okay to
encase
> the capacitor in silicone gel? Then when the capacitor pops, it
wouldn't
> spread its electrolyte all over the motherboard.
>
> But would this cause other problems with heat or something?
Would it
> further shorten the life of the capacitor?
Well, it's not going to improve its life, and it does mean that when it
goes, it will make a louder bang, since it will be harder for the
electrolyte to get out. Silicone isn't terribly strong, so it won't
stop it. If you look at most electrolytic caps, you'll see they're
designed to come apart under stress without turning into small
grenades; the ends are scored, or the seals are deliberately made less
strong than
the aluminium case.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Feb 8, 11:06, Jim Keohane wrote:
> The reference to "one cycle" instruction may have been referring
> to there being 2 cpu cycles per clock cycle. Also, there's the
"pipelining"
> some say the 6502 does when the last (or only) byte of an instruction
is
> acted upon simultaneous to next instruction's 1st byte (opcode) being
> fetched
>
> So perhaps "one instruction per clock cycle" may be awfully close
with
> pipelining and with use of zero page.
You must be thinking of some different 6502 to the rest of us :-) As
Sellam said, no 6502 opcode takes less than two clock cycles to
execute, and most take more (up to 7): the only 2-cycle instructions
are the ones with implied addressing, like RTS, CLI, TAX, ... This is
why a 6502 running typical well-written code, running on a 2MHz clock,
manages at best around 0.7 MIPS.
There's no pipelining at all in a 6502. No overlap of instructions
whatsoever.
Zero-page instructions like LDA $12 take three clock cycles.
There aren't two CPU cycles per clock cycle. Perhaps you're thinking
of the fact that the 6502 uses a two-phase clock, and does part of the
CPU cycle during phi-1, and part during phi-2?
> Of course, we're talking Apple ]['s which, if I can trust my
memory,
> steal every other clock cycle to refresh memory.
I believe you're thinking of how it uses part of the clock cycle when
the CPU isn't accessing memory, not alternate clock cycles.
> > > p.s. I also did quite well with 6502 asm code in cpu speed tests
vs
> > > 80x86 and Z80 programmers. The zero page, for all intents and
purposes,
> > > is 256 registers.
That was the designers' intention, but you have to remember that it
takes an extra clock cycle to access a zero-page location rather than a
register.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Had I known that I might have bid on the first one that came up on eBay
recently. I thought it might be just a fancy paperweight without the proper
keyboard. I'll watch for a reasonable deal on one of those to show up again
sometime.
>From: Eric Dittman <dittman(a)dittman.net>
>
>The ELT320 can use either an AT-type keyboard or an LK201-type
>keyboard (I have an LK401 connected to mine).
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
>Can anyone tell me exactly what a PACEMIPS PIMM - 33SG144C is? It's
>made byPerformance Semiconductor but it's not listed on their (POOR!)
>website. I THINK it might be an R33000 embedded processor but I'm not
>sure.
Performance Semi, AFAIK, generally does semiconductors for
military/aerospace applications. I recall dimly that they made some
MIL-SPEC MIPS devices; this would perhaps be one of them. The part number
you cite is not familiar, but might be one of the line of R3000+R3010
derivatives. Not as esoteric as their relatively popular MIL-STD-1750A
processors, but unusual none-the-less.
I've actually got some Performance Semi 1750A chipsets...I must think of
something to do with them...
Ken