test-drb April 2002

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

280 participants
1162 discussions

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Allison [mailto:ajp166@bellatlantic.net] > It has been done. At one time you could get "cp/m processor" > cards for VAX, > PDP-11 and several other machines. Most had several Z80s for multiple > users. Not exactly "mainframe," but do they come in QBus modules? :) That would make one hell of a CP/M machine. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 8 months

QBUS VAX and M7941 under VMS - info needed!

by dave＠naffnet.org.uk

Hi all, I have a MicroVAX (BA123 enclosure, KA650 CPU) that I would like to put to work... to this end I have two M7941 (DRV11) parallel I/O cards that I would like to bring into service. The Micronotes say that this card is compatible with the 22-bit QBUS, and I have the Field Service print set so I can set the CSR and vectors to appropriate values. Of course, VMS does not have a driver for these cards, but I am not too frightened by the prospect of a little code - here lies the problem! Can anyone tell me just how this card maps into the I/O space, given the CSR? I would like to know just where to read from and write to in order the drive the beastie... Thanks in advance for your help, Dave.

22 years, 8 months

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

From: Christopher Smith <csmith(a)amdocs.com> >I suppose such a product would be good if you need it. It could do >better than to run NT. Maybe they should "port CP/M" to the mainframe. It has been done. At one time you could get "cp/m processor" cards for VAX, PDP-11 and several other machines. Most had several Z80s for multiple users. Allison

22 years, 8 months

No subject

by dpeschel＠eskimo.com

list classiccmp list classiccmp-digest

22 years, 8 months

"Toy" computers http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Moyers [mailto:rmoyers@nop.org] > A real box can total flood a bundle of gigabit fiber > the diameter of your right leg, its the I/O that sets > these monsters apart really, their CPUs are no > slouch, but not any faster than a common modern > PC chip. So, by "emulated," you didn't mean to imply that they were emulated in such a manner as to be replaced by the peesee -- that is the misunderstanding here, I'm sure. :) Anyway, I've always subscribed to the school of thought which says that the CPU should do only that which can't be accomplished with special purpose chips. It makes things much more elegant. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 8 months

Open source -- non computer topics

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: James B. DiGriz [mailto:jbdigriz@dragonsweb.org] > If you're saying that whether somebody is right or not, or whether > substantive matters of potentially great import hang on this, is more > important to some people than having their ass sucked, to the extent > that a Stallman's reasons don't even enter in, then you may > be right. So > what? It doesn't address the issues at all. Actually it's his presentation of those reasons that concerns me. I'm only re-iterating that he would find more sympathetic ears if he weren't so rigid about the whole thing. > Think we've reached the agree to disagree point here, Chief. > It's ceased > to be topical anyway. Suits me. There are certainly more important and interesting things to discuss. Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 8 months

Open source -- non computer topics

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: James B. DiGriz [mailto:jbdigriz@dragonsweb.org] > > If you mean that the FSF deserves some credit and respect, sure, > > but that's not the way for him to get the former, and it certainly > > has lost him lots of the latter, even if the project may still be > > relatively well thought of. > I think you can make the case that he isn't entirely > unjustified. He and In wanting credit? No, he's not unjustified at all. Only in demanding that the credit take whatever form he likes. :) > the FSF have a lot invested in it. I don't see anything more > objectionable in it than the average corporate trademark claim. It Well, you should see what I have to say about most of those. > certainly annoys a lot of people, though. It might behoove > him to find a > better way of dealilng with the issue if he can. I'll go > along with that. I'll say that it shows an incredible lack of taste and social grace on his part to take offense at everyone who doesn't see it his way (right or not...) That said, he can do what he likes -- I just may not agree with it. > The snide attempts at ad hominems are unwarranted, though. I hope that's not directed towards me. I'll say now that I have nothing against Richard Stallman personally. Only against some opinions that it seems he'd like codified into law. Any "fun" made of him is simply caricature to drive the point home. I have, though, thought about making a BSD/Linux in protest. ;) Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 8 months

LJII Memory Cards

by DAW＠yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu

> From: Marvin Johnston > > I have two Memory cards for the HP Laserjet II, both with no > documentation. One is fully stuffed and looks to be 4 MB; the second is > partially stuffed and with what appears to be 1 MB. Best offer over > $10.00 for both plus shipping ($3.50 USPS Priority Mail) by Tuesday. > > If you are not going to follow through quickly, please don't make an > offer or say you want them. > - Does anyone know if these would work in a DEC Laser 2100? - If not, does anyone know of/have any memory for a DECLaser2100 that they are willing to part with? - I remember someone said they had an extra legal tray for an HP LaserJet II/III. That would fit in my (newly acquired) DECLaser 2100. Please e-mail me. -- --- David A Woyciesjes --- C & IS Support Specialist --- Yale University Press --- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu --- (203) 432-0953 --- ICQ # - 905818 Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001 Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash

22 years, 8 months

"Toy" computers (was Re: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)

by csmith＠amdocs.com

> -----Original Message----- > From: Raymond Moyers [mailto:rmoyers@nop.org] > Today that campus worth of hardware is emulated in the hercules > s360/370/390/ zSeries emulator http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules > running on a PC running linux or winbloZ I do hope Sridhar will take his time to address this. :) Chris Christopher Smith, Perl Developer Amdocs - Champaign, IL /usr/bin/perl -e ' print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n"); '

22 years, 8 months

I'm getting sick of this shit! Re: BS al a Erlacher

by xds_sigma7＠hotmail.com

I agree, I don't much like having 20 or so e-mails like that in my inbox... especially because hotmail will start deleting stuff when the mailbox is full enough! I personally junk apple IIs also, though I pitch the power supply and take the boards to the scrapyard. I have nothing against Dick, he's given me lots of neat stuff, and while I'm sure I don't share all of the same opinions that he does, what he does with his property is his own perogative. That's my 1865 2 cent piece worth, Will J _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

22 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
117
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb April 2002