I goofed. The earth wire in the 4D is, indeed, green.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
M H Stein <mhstein(a)canada.com> wrote:
> Any ideas from you Apple experts how I tell CP/M software
> to use an 80 column card? Display is 40 col from motherboard,
> all I get from 80 col card is a blinking cursor.
If you're using a ][ or ][+, put the card in slot 3.
There was a convention for what cards went in which slots:
#1: printer interface
#2: communications (modem/serial) interface
#3: display interface
Pascal and CP/M would probe the C[123]00H ROM spaces for these slots
to determine if there was a capable card in the slot, and if so it
would use the card for that function.
The neat thing about this was that it meant you could stick either a
parallel or serial interface in #1 depending on what kind of printer
you had, or you could stick either a serial or 80-column card in #3
-- you would use the serial card if you wanted to use Pascal or CP/M
with an external 80-column terminal.
> No switches or id on 80 col card; it has 3 EPROM sockets,
> but only ROM2 & ROM3 are present. No reason why ROM1 should
> have been removed, so I'm hoping it was an option.
Could be (IIRC Videx cards supported an optional character set ROM),
or it could be the ROM that would appear at C300H with the card in
slot 3. If it's the latter, CP/M won't see the card.
-Frank McConnell
> ----------
> From: Jeff Hellige
>
> > .pkg is probably specific to NeXT, as I haven't heard of it under
> Unix.
>
> As the name might suggest, it is a 'package' containing the
> program and all it's associated files, likely to include installation
> scripts and anything else needed. That then generally creates an
> .app file, which is actually a directory wich includes the files but
> is seen by the NeXT as being a single executable file.
>
... And now Mac OS X as well ( But Mac OS's >= 9 would see it as a folder
only). Then again, Stevie did create NeXT, and now he's got Apple under his
thumb...
> > -spc (And on every Unix system I've used I've found tar ... )
>
> Drop to the CLI on a NeXT and you'll find tar there as well.
> --
>
You know, I would like to eventually get myself a NeXT system, to
see where (parts of) OS X came from. Before, I thought Windoze98 was better
than MacOS (not by much, though). Now that I'm using Mac OS X as my
workstation, I'm liking it much better.
Sorry, I'll try to keep it On Topic. If anyone in the New Haven CT
area does have a NeXT system available, let me know. BTW, I'm kinda poor
right now... :-/
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
Another weekend project of mine has been working on a VT131
terminal. The terminal seems to work fine when receiving data.
The terminal always powers up with a "4" in the corner
(keyboard error?). Typing characters on the keyboard will give
no response from either the terminal, or the system to which
it's connected. The lights flash (all at once), and the speaker
beeps when power is applied to the terminal. No lights are ever
activated afterwards, though.
Having taken apart the keyboard, it does have an empty socket for
a DIP. Anyone know what this is?
Is it possible that this is a "lookalike" keyboard? Did DEC make
different models for different VT100 terminals -- were they
compatible? If this is an authentic DEC keyboard, will it be
marked as such somewhere? If so, how?
The key layout _looks_ like VT100, but...
The reason I'm asking about the brand is that there was another
terminal at the junk yard, completely trashed, which looked like
a VT100, but had a completely different branding. I forget the
brand right off, but I'm afraid I may have picked up the keyboard
for the dead terminal, and that it may not be compatible at all.
Failing a way to positively identify the keyboard, are there any
common modes of failure along these lines?
Also, I'm guessing at this point that the terminal is in good shape.
Does anyone know where to get a keyboard?
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> ----------
> From: Rick Bensene
>
> Quite off-topic, but probably of interest --
>
> For small Unix machines, how about the wristwatch that runs Linux and
> uses X11 for the display, developed at IBM?
>
> The original prototype used a small backlit LCD display, but the latest
> version uses an Organic LED (OLED) display that is absolutely stunning!
>
> The machine runs with an ARM 7 CPU (Cirrus Logic EP7211), 8 Megs of
> flash memory and 8 Megs of DRAM. The OLED display is 640x480. It has a
> built-in Bluetooth transceiver, Lithium Polymer rechargeable battery, a
> combination of touch screen and a jog dial for user interface, infra-red
> interface. The watch 'program' is 'xclock'!
>
> There's a great article (with lots of pix) about the development in the
> latest edition of IEEE's "Computer" journal (January 2002).
>
> Regards,
> Rick Bensene
> The Old Calculator Web Museum
> http://www.geocities.com/oldcalculators
>
>
>
>
Sounds pretty neat. Do you know of a link for this story, or was it on
paper?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
Any ideas from you Apple experts how I tell CP/M software
to use an 80 column card? Display is 40 col from motherboard,
all I get from 80 col card is a blinking cursor.
No switches or id on 80 col card; it has 3 EPROM sockets,
but only ROM2 & ROM3 are present. No reason why ROM1 should
have been removed, so I'm hoping it was an option.
Both video outputs and the built-in RF out all use RCA
connectors, BTW :)
And in reply to the question about SO239 (AKA UHF or 83 Series)
connectors for video, the commercial (as opposed to homebrew)
video out adapter on my PET uses one; other than that, in my
experience the mass-produced systems used either RCA or
proprietary connectors, and S100 & similar multi-card chassis
used BNCs when they had internal video.
mike
> ----------
> From: Matt London
>
> Hi,
> I've been playing...
>
> It turns out the box seems much happier if the only devices on SCSI-A
> are the RX23 and the RZ23 - no CORRPTN messages so far with that setup.
> But that means I can't fit both the 1G VMS drive and the 1G NetBSD drive
> in the case :&/
>
>
Well, if it's anything like the VAXServer 3100, can't you plug into
SCSI-B inside the case? Maybe a new cable, or some sort of tap into the
existing cable?
No, I've never actually _seen_ a MV3100, either the guts or the
outside... :-)
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
A good model railroad hobby shop (or a major suppliers like
www.walthers.com) will have mould making and resin casting kits. Some of the
current casting resins should be strong enough to use as a gear. You can
make an open mould, pour the resin, then put a glass plate over the open
side to smooth the casting, or just sand it smooth when it has cured.
Another thing to try would be to make a mould from dental plaster or
Hydrocal (a harder-than normal plaster of paris, available at hobby shops),
then heat it and open cast with a low melting point metal. What I would do
here is make the mould double-deep, then file the resulting casting to the
correct thickness.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk [mailto:ard@p850ug1.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 4:07 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: 1520 plotter (was RE: Your VIC-20 is worth $300!!! W@W!)
<snip>
> > There seem to be several possibilites :
> >
> > 1) Make a mould and injection-mould them yourself. I think the David
> > Gingery injection moulding machine could easily do it, but the mould
> > would be very hard to make (cutting internal teeth on a mould that size)
>
> Might not produce a clean casting, either.
I bet the originals were moulded rather than machined.... Maybe then
cleaned up by machining, though, but I doubt it, actually. The original
gears are not that good quality.
<snip>
>While the offer to scan them was certainly noble, I really wouildn't expect
>anyone to actually do it. We're talking about perhaps 10,000 pages of
>documents here!
I'm not offering but ... I use a sheet-feed
scanner that can work its way through maybe
300 double-sided Legal pages in about two hours
of casual top-up-the-in-tray-on-the-way-to-coffee
usage.
So that's 10 weeks max.
Now if you had to do the pages manually
with a desktop scanner, you'd want payment
plus medical bills :-)
Antonio
Andreas Freiherr wrote:
>Even if you were using a true 1200dpi device, you would end up with less
>than 30dpi after blowing up the image 1:42 back to it's original size.
>Sure, that's not what we want.
I've seen fiche scanners available
commercially (I just did a google search
when this came up a few months ago).
All the ones I found seemed to be $10K+ ...
>Some years ago, a friend of mine managed to get a couple of frames
>printed off these fiches, but the results weren't too good: poor
>contrast was the main problem. If you'd scan these prints, the results
>would certainly be unreadable.
Back in the early 1990s, I had access to
a fiche printer - i.e. something that would
print an A4 page of whatever the fiche reader
was looking at. No automation (if you
wanted the whole fiche as a set of pages
you had to line it up yourself and hit a button
for each page).
That produced reasonable quality copy.
If I still have any around I'll try to scan
a sample page.
I have no idea how much this thing cost
but it was about the same volume as
three or maybe four 21" monitors.
Antonio