I have seen these before. We got Nuclear Data stuff from Hanford. It is used
as a computer that ran process instrumentation in the Nuclear Power
Plant/Research s. Usually they were 11/03s, sometimes upgraded to 11/23s, in
a small Qbus cage.
Often there are a lot of custom cards for the process instrumentation. What
cards are in it, or did you mention and I just miss it.
Things to look for are EPROM cards. Does it boot? What is the floppy drive
hooked up to?
Often there are custom display cards. Sometimes A/D & D/A cards.
Did you check to see if it glows in the dark? :-) Any idea where it
originally came from?
Paxton
Astoria, OR
> > How many people on this list still have their 1st computer?
> second? third?
> > every computer you ever used/owned?
Let's see .... my original 8k PET 2001 from 1978 that my parents
bought for me, my father's Exidy Sorceror that he bought in 1979, my
VIC20 from 1980, my C64 from '82 then every machine I've bought or
built since.... currently occupying three rooms & still growing :-)
cheers,
Lance
(Oh yeah, the PET is still used on a nearly daily basis.....)
----------------
Powered by telstra.com
On Jan 31, 18:07, Julius Sridhar wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Doc wrote:
>
> > > Will there be anybody able to tape it and then convert it to an AVI
file
> > > or mpg
> > > for download?
> >
> > Pretty please, NO avi. I'd hate to have to install Windows.
>
> I view AVI's on UNIX all the time.
Maybe, but which codec? I can only view about the half the ones I come
across. Some codecs only exist for Windows.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Yep, I have and many did. It was there to provide the migration
path for those people that had outgrown PDP-11/70s but also
needed the platform to put up new code on. Early VMS would
run RSX-11 apps directly and could also support RT-11 and
RSTS.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Gunther Schadow <gunther(a)aurora.regenstrief.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:16 PM
Subject: so, can you run UNIX on a PDP11/03 or not?
>I hear mixed messages about that. Is there someone who knows,
>and not only if any, but also which version of UNIX would run?
>I want to give it a shot.
>
>Also, has anybody ever run a VAX11 in PDP mode for real? Sound
>pretty wild to me to spend so much money only to not use the
>virtual memory.
>
>cheers,
>-Gunther
>
>--
>Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
>Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
>Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
>tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
>
>
Actually VMS was ok but VMS as everyone knows is also
chock full of utilities and tools... many of which would remain
as base PDP11 code (coded as RSX-11 compatable) for a
while. I think V2.mumble . Some would be recoded as VAX
native and live another version.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: William Donzelli <aw288(a)osfn.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: so, can you run UNIX on a PDP11/03 or not?
>> The only use of the vax11's pdp11 compatibility mode that I've ever
>> heard of was to run RSX-11 binaries under VMS.
>
>I think VMS 1.0 used it because it was not really ready to ship (what a
>suprise). The RCS VAXgeek said that some old PDP-11 code was
>kludged in with a big hammer (and the compatibilty mode) to get the
early
>VMS to work. The kludges were dropped shortly afterwards.
>
>William Donzelli
>aw288(a)osfn.org
Yes, I used to ru RT-11 on a 11/780 so I could have a few of
my favorte apps that werent on the VAX. That was a long
time ago.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: so, can you run UNIX on a PDP11/03 or not?
>> has anybody ever run a VAX11 in PDP mode for real?
>
>I did, but not seriously.
>On an 11/780 for one, you could say "MCR PDP" IIRC
>and do some basic operations. I think it was intended
>to help people do porting without having to have the
>other machine present.
>
>John A.
>
>
>
From: Andreas Freiherr <Andreas.Freiherr(a)Vishay.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Nuclear Data 66?
> Strangely enough... it's the VT103! Had optional dual drive TU58
mounted
> under monitor (got one, gotta replace the rollers with tygon tubing).
I think I also saw one a _couple_ of years ago that had dual floppy
drives on top of the VT1xx box. Is it possible that there was something
like a VT180? Or was it the "Robin"? - Too long ago. "Dave ... my mind
is going ... I can feel it ..."
If it had two TU58 then it was a PDP-11 cousin called the PDT11/130.
FYI if it is the driver for RT11 is PD as the tape and serial ports are
handled very differently than the generic -11 I/O. Same for the
PDT11/150
that had two RX01 drives.
Allison
> The ethernet card *is* the right-angle adapter. I swear. There's no
>logic on the daughtercard.
> Crud, I may have to jerk it out & take a picture.
> And I never heard of The Diskless Mac, but it sounds cool.
Interesting. I haven't seen one of those, I've always seen them as a
"IIsi & SE/30" ethernet card, and then a seperate IIsi adaptor card (with
or without an FPU).
I just pulled out my files of The Diskless Mac. It is by Sonic.
I originally found the stuff just sitting on their FTP site (so naturally
I downloaded it). I've never used it, but from what I can tell of it
works with Sonic ethernet cards, and a BootP server (they even include a
mini unix BootP server), and lets you use create a "Boot Image" that gets
stored on the ethernet card. So they have a sort of Boot RAM instead of a
Boot ROM.
Their readme does make a mention of NOT installing the "secure boot
extension" without having the TDM 2.0 Boot ROMs installed. So either the
roms are flashable, or maybe can be pulled and replaced, or possibly are
an optional part entirely (meaning that socket might very well be for the
boot rom, and not an FPU).
I tried running the TDM admin on this machine (PM 6500 with stock Apple
10b-T card), and it didn't recognize it as a valid machine to admin. It
would be interesting to see if it would recognize your card, since you
have a sonic card. (maybe once I get my PB 1400 running again, I will try
it on my Sonic PCMCIA ethernet card)
You can still download the software from their FTP site (I just checked).
Go to ftp.sonicsys.com/pub/software/Unsupported/The_Diskless_Mac. They
also have the latest version of their Ethernet drivers there (v7.8), so
maybe that has a newer version of a diagnostic tool to see if your card
is still good.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>> I'm not willing to go for the "hosed" option yet. And no, of course
>> there's no part number anywhere. It has a right-angle PDS pass-through,
>> what looks like an empty FPU socket, and AUI & BNC connectors.
>
>How many pins is the empty socket? It might be for a boot rom, but if it's
>a 40 pin dip, it could have been where the card's cpu went. What kind of
>large chips are on the board?
The empty "fpu looking" socket might very well have been for an FPU.
most of the IIsi PDS right angle adaptors (commonly found with IIsi
ethernet cards), had an FPU option, since the IIsi didn't have one
natively. The adaptors were all the same, it was just a matter of if the
vendor filled the socket.
But that would only be the case if this empty socket is on the right
angle adaptor, and not on the ethernet card itself. If it is on the enet
card, then yeah, it might be a boot rom... but did the early mac's
support boot roms? I don't think they did. I base this on the "oh wow"
factor of the Netboot that arrived with OS 9/Original OS X Server, and on
the old "TDM - The Diskless Mac" setup by Sonic(?).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On Jan 31, 13:14, Tothwolf wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, David Woyciesjes wrote:
> > How about using something like a (photograph) slide scanner type
> > setup? I would say just try it.
> Well, the problem is that a scanner does not have enough resolution to
> scan the reduced microfiche images. The only way to get a good print is
to
> optically enlarge them (which is part of the printing process), then scan
> the enlarged version.
I don't think David meant the sort of backlight arrangement you use to scan
slides on a normal desktop scanner, I think he meant a proper 35mm slide
scanner. Now a 35mm slide is roughly 2-3 times the size of a microfiche
page (in both dimensions) but I think it might be worth a try if you could
actually get the fiche into it.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York