> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Schaefer [mailto:rschaefe@gcfn.org]
> I'm looking for info on one of these. I's some kind of XT
> clone, with an
> eight-bit passive backplane and an upgraded V20 on a CPU
> card. It runs
> MSDOS, and
> currently boots into dosshell. A little googling turns up
> numerous resumes
> containing Kaypro PC, and a number of old classiccmp posts
> regarding them,
> but no real info. kaypro.com seems to be down ATM. I'd
> especially like to
> know what the switch and pushbutton on the back of the CPU
> card do. IIRC
> it's not a reset button, but I might be mis-remembering.
Well, I have one of these. It was given to me a week ago. I have both the computer itself, and a kaypro monitor (in original box ;). No documentation or anything.
Let me know if you find out anything interesting. I haven't tried powering it on yet.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Happy Holidays!
*<:)
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
On January 4, ysgdhio wrote:
> > Insert drummer joke here.
>
> Q: How do you know when there's a drummer at your door?
> A: The knocking keeps getting faster.
AHEM. B-|
-Dave, drummer
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
Hello everybody and Happy New Year (if applicable).
I did the first tests with the DQ614P.SAV program and my Dilog DQ614
MFM controller board. This board simulates up to four RL01/02 units
in one PDP-11 using one or two MFM hard disks. I am using:
* One PDP-11/23 PLUS with 128 Kwords of memory
* One PC connected to the second SLU simulating one TU58
double unit (thanks, Will Kranz !)
* One Dilog DQ614 Revision S
* One Quantum MFM Hard Disk Q540 (Aka. RD52-A)
* RT-11 v.4
Environment tips:
* I have configured the Dilog board to work under one PDP-11/23 PLUS
like the manual suggest.
* I did the probes simulating one up to four emulated RL02/01 disks.
* I assume the vector addresses of the unit is 174400 and 160.
The software used is the DQ614P.SAV diagnostics program Revision 0,
and one DL.SYS driver that came with the DQ614P program.
Well, the program starts ok. There is no apparently problem with the
OS environment. It works with its DL.SYS module, with the own DL.SYS
module of the RT11 V.4, and without it too.
The program startup and asks me if I'm working with a C.R.T (I assume
it speaks about a terminal). Later the program asks me about the
access vector for the controller. By default it uses 174400 and 160
values. I assume them too. The next step is to select one MFM hard disk.
My disk is the 73, one Quantum Q540. Inmediately, the program permits
me to select how much DL disks I want to emulate. I can emulate two
RL02 and two RL01. The program asks me: "Are you sure ?". My answer is
yes. The process begins... and some seconds later, the program send me
a message telling: "UNEXPECTED RESPONSE IN ADDRESS 00000160 (sometimes
is the address 00000000). I've tried to change the cable selection,
the address selection, etc... In this case, the message tells me that
the unit can't be accessed.
Like a final indication, the Q540 hard disk have 5 jumpers named
DS1, DS2, DS3, DS4 and ^. Actually is selected the DS1.
What is wrong ? I suspect that the program must be the same revision
than the board (Revision "O" the program, revision "S" the board).
If somebody can supply it to me, I'll agree a lot.
Any other suggestion about the vector address, etc, are welcome.
Thanks and Greetings
Sergio
I am just observing this thread, and have refrained from commenting
until now; several posters have echoed my sentiments and thus I will
reserve further comments save that, in my lifelong study of the structure
and beauty of the English language, I find the use of "sms/icq/chat"
formatting, **when used outside of those fora**, to be excruciatingly
juvenile and 'cutesy'... the modern equivalent of dotting all one's 'i's
with circles or (shudder) smiley faces. And don't get me started on
so-called "emoticons", either. ;}
As well. I have nothing to add concerning the 'contributions' of
AOLamers to the Internet (since Mr. Case first opened the sluiceways)...
alt.aol.sucks is there for all to peruse and react to as they see fit.
THAT BEING SAID: Since no one seems to remember why we're here -
What I want to know from the Gentleperson, 'from the arts' as you say
[what form of art? I have studied piano and music for more than 40 years,
I am a paid (occasionally) writer, some published poetry, scored a few
crummy movies, FYI...] is this: what comprises your collection, or
interests, in Classic Computing? Do you have a specialty area? Mine is
PDP-era DEC machines. I also collect and restore vintage electronic
musical instruments and outboard gear.
Do you work on / restore / re-sell classic computers?
Do you use classic computers in your Art? I sure do...
Do you have a particular name you'd rather be addressed as (other than
your 'screen name')?
I'm sorry the topic drifted to your choice of communication style. I
can share with you that, because a good deal of my professional writing is
for three or four consumer audio magazines, and since I provide an e-mail
box for readers to use, I am sometimes quite overwhelmed with high-school
and college-age correspondants who either 'sms' themselves into
incomprehensibility or bludgeon me WiTh HaX0R pRiNtIng D00DZ!!!!! I AM
3LIT3!!!!!
It does not, I assure you, impress. My two cents.
Please have a happy New Year, and I am very interested in hearing about
your involvement in classiccmping.
Cheers
John
As early as next week, I will launch the Classic Tech Eletter. It is a free,
twice-monthly newsletter with short news items on vintage computing
resources, collections, rescues, sales of important systems, and events. The
eletter's audience is primarily folks who have an interest in collecting
and/or preserving vintage systems.
If you want to receive the eletter, please send me a note at
eletter(a)classictechpub.com. You can see a sample issue at
www.classictechpub.com under the News heading. Your contact info will not be
sold or shared with anyone else.
Anyone who has a news item or announcement is welcome to send it along. I'm
eager to hear about your site updates or launches, availability of new
emulators, or interesting new finds.
Hope you enjoy the eletter.
--Mike
Michael Nadeau
Editorial Services
603-893-2379
>
>P.S i hope the grammer helps you understand this.
^^^^^^^
GRAMMAR
SteveRob
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
From: "Carlini, Antonio" <Antonio.Carlini(a)riverstonenet.com>
I have zero technical info so anything vaguely
technical would be nice. I've looked through
your list of docs, and apart from WPS, OS/8
(does that apply??) and docs with 78 in the date
I don't see any stuff that applies. Printsets,
tech manuals, anything that will help me fix it
(I'm sure it will break sometime in the next
thirty years or so ...) would be nice.
The OS/78 would be the applicable OS version for it and that is in the
document list. Some RX01/RX02 drive information is also
online. The prints I was referring to having are not scanned yet. I
probably have scanned half my documentation. These prints are about
an inch of double sided 11x17 pages. 11x17 is more difficult with my
scanner so tend to be lower on the scan priority list.
If somebody has failed hardware I will move the relevant prints to the
scan soon pile, otherwise they will appear eventually.
(I'm sure it will break sometime in the next
thirty years or so ...) would be nice.
I plan to have this all done in 25 years so you should be all set :-).
If you know the UK people need a particular portion of it let me know. I
don't have the time to scan it all in the near term. Email me the
request directly, with the list traffic I might miss it.
A local general purpose mechanic who mainly works on Ski-doos in the
winter and pumps and everything else in the summer gave me a complete
Adam (!) collecting dust on the shelf, when I told him I collect computers. He
mentioned he could use an old box to keep track of his parts inventory if I
had any spares. I volunteered to supply him with something that would serve
simple needs thinking of everything from a C-64 to an A2 or an XT to a 386
and that there must be 100s of programs that would be available. And no I
don't want to configure a Database program.
I did a Google search and found only the newest Gee-Whiz Winblows 9x,
2k, XP, and OSX programs, and while I haven't searched Simtel, out of
frustration I've decided to defer to the list about older programs to track
inventory and if it also has billing and labour, so much the better.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. It would serve as an example that
older machines don't have to be delegated to land-fills. This area is in north-
central Manitoba,Canada and not exactly a hotbed of technology. The
temperature at present is -20 C, but the air is breathable.
Lawrence
Lawrence
Reply to:
lgwalker(a)mts.net