A number of companies still make so-called scan accelerator
cards.. Kofax, Xerox, Canon.. Pretty much all they do is take
the scanned image over a SCSI connection and compress it
into a tiff or jpeg in hardware.. I've seen everything from
Phillips MIPS clones to AMD embedded processors for the
job. Never seen one based on a M68K tho.
Not too much demand for them these days. Well, considering
a PII 350 can handle 60ppm at 400dpi in software at a sane
level of system load.
Jim
On Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:20 PM, Dave McGuire
[SMTP:mcguire@neurotica.com] wrote:
> On August 14, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> > IIRC, it's possible it's associated with scanner/OCR processes.
One
> > of my
> > colleagues had a set of three or four ISA cards, each of which had
> > four 68030's
> > on it, each with what I then saw as a significant amount of RAM for
> > its task.
> > He was using that together with a pretty fancy set of software for
a
> > MAJOR
> > automatic transcription task, and, from what I gathered, it did a
> > good job.
> >
> > I don't know about your board, but the ones I saw were fully packed
> > on both
> > sides. It was, for the time, VERY impressive to see. The results
> > were pretty
> > impressive, too, as he'd converted about 6000 pages of text into a
> > searchable
> > document on a set of CD's.
>
> This sounds like some boards made by Calera that I used back in '90
> or so. They were pretty impressive.
>
> -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire
> Laurel, MD
On August 14, LUCAS J CASHDOLLAR wrote:
> My university used pine until about a year ago when they switched
> to mulberry a graphical bloat-wear email program. It takes 20 times
> longer to load, but its got grpahics and it likes to crash a hell of a
> lot. All hail the bloat-wear nazis and their inefficiency at making our
> lives easier.
Is it possible to bring in your own software? If pine is what you
prefer, why not use a local copy of it in your home directory?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
>
> > Simple solution, software people should unionize.
>
> And why should they be ionised in the first place?
Severe belly cramps are probably keeping anyone from
replying to this one, Tony...
Some bosses *should* be ionized... that way, sh*t _would_
stick to them...
-dq
Pete Rickard <pete.rickard(a)carlingtech.com> wrote:
> This is my first posting (I'm on SurvPC primarily).... I found the list
> during a google search for *HP-UX*, trying to find other HP9000
> series users.
There's a *very* quiet list for the 9000 series 500s at nvc.cc.ca.us.
(Last message was in March.) I think the subscription instructions
are to send an e-mail message as follows:
To: hp9000-500-request(a)nvc.cc.ca.us
Subject: subscribe hp9000-500
-Frank McConnell
> > I dispute that: Computers and computing go from strength to strength.
> > There's more than just PCs out there; the mighty mainframe still rules the
> > roost in many places, there's Apple Macs, VAX minis, Crays, and probably
> > many others I can't even think of. And, for the soldering-iron fans,
> > embedded computing is probably stronger than it ever was - *everything's*
> > got a computer or three in it...
>
> In many places? The mainframe rules the roost period. What do you think
> serves the databases that run the neato little things your PCs do on the
> internet? IBM DB2/390.
Hmmm... probably true for the commercial sites, of which I spend
virtually zero of my personal time. Unless Google uses the OBM iron...
> > That's a bit elitist, isn't it? Besides, most of the self-taught
> > programmers of whom you speak are not really programmers; they're merely
> > users with enough knowledge to be dangerous. Besides, if it wasn't for the
> > microprocessor and all that it begat, this list wouldn't even be here...
>
> I don't know if I necessarily think this anymore, but whenever I used to
> see droves of mindless PC zombies getting on the 'net, I used to think,
> "Hmmm. Fresh meat."
If Horace Greely was right about him, then P. T. Barnum would
love living in this age...
> > It wasn't the PC that made cutting corners easy; it was the near-universal
> > use of BASIC - a fundamentally unstructured language - that is responsible
> > for the bulk of the "bad programmers"; and I say that as a professional
> > programmer who uses BASIC....!
>
> That and all the stupid ass "crackers" who learned assembler just to get
> free shareware.
I dunno; I haven't run into too many of these people in the orkplace...
> > Maybe if PASCAL had been the language de jour, today's self-taught
> > programmers would be better at it...
>
> How about something like LISP or SML? Maybe Prolog (!)... I know I'm
> pushing it with that one.
Fine languages.
> > >No, not only will I not celebrate it, but I need to
> > >find a black armband to wear the rest of the month.
[..snip..]
> I would've loved to have seen the Atari computers take over. I still have
> a couple of Hades I use regularly.
>
> > Well, I'm off to dabble with my CBM PET, or maybe the MZ-80K. They're fun,
> > but I wouldn't like to have to use them every day, day in day out...
>
> I'll be off tinkering with my big-iron VAX and my S/390 G5 (ot).
Cool.
-dq
On August 14, Mike Ford wrote:
> Who reads their email the most Classically?
>
> I am not classic at all, running Eudora on a PowerMac, but somebody out
> there must be farther back than pine in the email evolution chain, who is
> it?
Surely this is a matter of opinion, and I'm not a Pine user myself,
but I haven't seen many mailers that I'd consider "further evolved"
than Pine.
Myself, I use VM under XEmacs.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> Who reads their email the most Classically?
>
> I am not classic at all, running Eudora on a PowerMac, but somebody out
> there must be farther back than pine in the email evolution chain, who is
> it?
I use the following, Eudora on a G4/450 PowerMac, Elm on my ISP's Linux shell
(sometimes telnet'd in from a PDP-11), and VMS Mail or Mailbox on VMS (I use
Mailbox when sending as it's got a good address book, and VMS mail for
reading and replying as it's got the better interface).
Zane
Hello, group-
This is my first posting (I'm on SurvPC primarily).... I found the list
during a google search for *HP-UX*, trying to find other HP9000
series users. Glad to have found this group, if for no other good reason
than to be able to point to someone else when *normal* people come to
my house and remark, "Gad! What a massive pile of old junk down here!"
My own HP model 540 still has *OLD* HP-UX 5.-something on it. It also
has compilers for Pascal, ForTran and 'c' (of course). It was the host
to an '80s GrafTek GMS CAD system, 12+ users, from which I also
saved a Meteor II workstation (including a Summagraphics Bit Pad 2 tablet
and a huge Hitachi HM4119, EIA RS-343A compatible monitor).
I've not much to offer except that I have quite a bit of mid-80's HP
docs on this system... anyway, most hardware that I saved is as follows:
HP 9050A - The basic unit, 8Mb RAM, 2x8 multiplexers, IOP (2) CPU's, etc.**
HP 9144A - DC cartridge drive, works as emergency boot system (if lucky)
HP 7914 - Hard disk drive, 128Mb, original in 1985
HP 7958 - Hard disk drive, 130+Mb "compact" (the root disk)
HP 7974A - 9 track tape drive (the 'Man from U.N.C.L.E.' drive,
as my big brother refers to it :-)
HP 2934 - Dot-matrix printer (HP-IB) on top of its original cabinet
HP 2392A - System console, green-on-black screen (saved 2 of these!)
**includes 27125A LAN card CIO 802.3 (10mbps) BNC (there were
two networked 9000's) and 28641A ThinLAN micro-MAU (RG58C/U),
IEEE 802.3 spec...(throwing all the specs in there to anticipate queries...)
-I could use an HP-IB floppy drive I suppose, if one happens along...
Oh, BTW- here at work I use an iMac connected to our DEC Alpha using
VersaTerm PRO terminal emulator. Login message includes this:
"OpenVMS (TM) Alpha Operating System, Version V7.1-2"
Regards, -Pete
<jarkko.teppo(a)er-grp.com> wrote in part:
> A reasonable weekend:
> - - HP 9000/834 + 7959 disk with HP-UX 8.x.
> Interestingly the 834 case is the same as the 9000/550 case.
"640k ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981
- - - - -
Pete Rickard
Product Engineer
Carling Technologies
Plainville CT USA
Going through my old Qbus and Unibus cards getting them ready to sell I found
a very interesting card with four Z80 based computers on a Qbus card. It
appears to me to be four complete 8 bit computers on a quad card, each with
CPU and memory but no I/O. It is all socketed chips with the only other large
chips being a pair of 2901 bit slicers.
It is copyrighted 1983 by Virtual Microsystems and called the Z-Board. Made
in the USA.
Any idea what it was and what it was used for? Google turned up nothing other
than VM was bought and sold several times.
Three pictures at http://members.aol.com/innfogra/zboard.jpg
A single one at http://members.aol.com/innfogra/zboard2.jpg
If interested in purchase please contact me off list, here or at
whoagiii(a)aol.com.
Paxton
Astoria
> >> I know that the PC turns 20 this month,
> >> but does anyone know the actual date of introduction?
> >>
> >> It's tough going through August without a holiday, so
> >> I'm looking for something to celebrate :-)
Sorry I waited so long on this one, but...
For me, it should be a date to *mourn*, not to celebrate.
Now in fairness, the PC has brought us high-speed
commodity computers. However, it has also dumbed-down
a signficant portion of the field of computing.
Inasmuch as the PC was created as a reaction to the
Apple II, I must tell this story.
I cow orker and I had been fixing the various cold solder
joints on an IMSAI 8080 construction attempt done by the
head of the Physics Department (and soon to be D-I-T).
We'd run it successfully for a few weeks, and had begun
using it in a Psych experiment involving reaction times.
Then the 8212 went to heaven.
We took it to the recently-opened Computerland, wherein
a guy I mistook for an electronics technician (he was an MBA)
rolled up his sleeves, heated up the iron, clipped off the
fried 8212, soldered in a socket, plugged in a new chip...
But I digress. While he was doing this, I was looking
around the store, and saw the Doom of Computing in the
form of a computer that didn't require a soldering iron
to build and use- namely, an Apple II.
The beginning of the end. I knew it then, and I was
proved right. Again, it's nice to have fast, cheap
computers, but I for one would have been just as
happy for the next 20 years having fast, cheap TERMINALS
to hook to the mainframes. And the continued high cost of
entry would have kept from coming into existence an entire
generation of self-taught (and poorly so) programmers who
have and continue to crank out some of the worst software
imaginable. In the halcyon days, most of the bad code was
writtwn by the lusers themselves...
Easy access to fast, cheap computers drove the genesis of
an entire generation of self-taught programmers who didn't
give a whit for structured programming or anything else that
resembles a methodology, and who single-handedly changed the
expectations that managers have about how quickly things
get done. Sure RAD helped speed programming along, but not
nearly as much just cutting corners... which the PC made
easier... damn, I feel a song coming on again:
--
obSimpsonSongLyric:
Shary: If there's a task that must be done,
Don't turn your tail and run,
Don't pout, don't sob,
Just do a half-assed job!
If... you... cut every corner
It is really not so bad,
Everybody does it,
Even mom and dad.
If nobody sees it,
Then nobody gets mad,
Bart: It's the American way!
Shary: The policeman on the beat
Needs some time to rest his feet.
Chief Wiggum: Fighting crime is not my cup of tea!
Shary: And the clerk who runs the store
Can charge a little more
For meat!
Apu: For meat!
Shary: And milk!
Apu: And milk!
Both: From 1984!
Shary: If... you... cut every corner,
You'll have more time for play,
Shary & OFF: It's the American waaaaay!
--
No, not only will I not celebrate it, but I need to
find a black armband to wear the rest of the month.