Hello again,
Many of you are into PDP-11, both the blinkenlights
variety and the simpler dump front panels, as well as
VAXen and such with console-based front panels.
Do any of these machines, if they have a really bad
problem that might preclude the use of the console,
flash an LED to mean something?
In particular, do any of you have familiarity with
systems that flash the on or power light as an
indicattor, sopecifiecally, of a power supply
problem?
Would anyone venture what a 2 Hz flash rate on the ON
LED of a Prime might mean?
Thanks again,
-doug q
Since these two are probably the only not-yet-functional machines I haven't
posted questions to this list about, I've decided to ask about them. Easy
one first:
Can anybody give me the pinout of the power-connector for the PC-Jr. I
don't have a power cord. Failing that, has anyone got a spare? :) (If I
understand properly, the power supply is inside, and the power running
through the cord should be AC, right?)
Next, the hard part:
I have a Sequent Symmetry S81. It's in need of at least the following:
CPU boards
RAM boards
Drives, but I can probably handle that...
A version of DYNIX which will support it (likely on QIC-120)
For those of you who don't know it, this is a 1987 model mini that used
Intel CPUs in parallel. Up to 30 (IIRC) 386/16 cpus, on boards which
contain sets of two could be used. Each CPU had a dedicated Weitek
co-processor, too. I believe it was UMA/shared memory. I also believe that
the peripheral bus was VME. I have quite a set of boards in that bus right
now, whatever it is, and would be interested in any help I could get in
cataloging them and figuring out what I've got.
I believe that the system was board-for-board compatible with the S27, and
the only difference was the enclosure. Speaking of which, I could also use
help in determining whether I can hope to get this running on normal
wall-power. The system is built-in to a rack, which has an inch-thick cord
(no plug :/) coming out of it. It seems on the inside of the rack that the
power is broken out into something more manageable, and, IIRC, 115 - 120
volts. (It's been a while since I've pulled it out and looked.)
I would like to get this system working, so...
Does anyone know where to find parts or system software?
Is there anyone who could possibly help me ID some of the parts already in
the system? I'll try to get all the serial numbers, etc, from the boards if
there are any takers.
What are my chances of getting this thing to run off of wall-power without
blowing anything up?
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Just found this in a box... Has anyone here ever heard of a Gateway
2000 Handbook computer? It's like a palmtop/laptop computer, 10"x6"x1.5"...
using a Chips & Tech. 8680 "PC on a chip". It has the 2MB RAM upgrade, to
bring it to a whopping 3MB!
And would you look at that, 40MB HDD... With the null modem cable,
it would make a great ultra-portable terminal...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
> I had a hard time finding beef tongue or brains in the U.S. These are
> considered a delicacy in many other places. %-)
In this part of the midwest, pork brains are a bit more
common than beef brains... dad loved 'em, I thought they
were cool to look at, but never tried 'em.
I hope we don't drift into discussing that strangest
beef organ meat of all...
;)
On December 14, Chad Fernandez wrote:
> Dave, did you have to close your eyes during the "Chilled monkey brain"
> scene in Indiana Jones :-)
YES.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>
>The 8250 was a fine chip for the application, though I wonder why they used
the
>DIP version. There were better choices available, but they didn't want to
lose
In 1981 there was only the DIP version as surface mount was not a widespread
technology yet.
>the serial port board business by putting two of them on the same card, and
by
>that time serial I/O chips tended to have between 2 and 8 ports on them.
In 1981 they did exist, those with more than two ports didn't have second
source and they werent cheap. The 8274 ( the 8088 bus version of the
Zilog SIO) was about 4 times the cost of the 8250(in the fall of 1981)
though it was a far better part and intel would have loved the business.
What's funny is my Leading Edge Model D PC clone used 8251 and put all
the video, floppy, printer and COM1 on the mother board. In my book the
clones often {but, not always} improved a dumb design.
Allison
! From: Boatman on the River of Suck [mailto:vance@ikickass.org]
!
!
! On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, David Woyciesjes wrote:
!
! > Sridhar ---
! > I might be able to use your help soon... I have a Cardinal
! > Technologies PC10. It's a 386, with a 10" color (?) screen,
! > and it's built
! > just like a Mac SE! It's mfg in May '92, so it's almost
! > on-topic. Has anyone
! > seen one of these, or know of any docs for it?
! > I'm wondering if I should put DOS6.22/Win3.11, or
! > NetBSD on it. Of
! > course, I still have a Win95 CD around. Maybe I could
! > shoe-horn that on!
!
! I would stay away from Windows95, as it runs *really* *really* slow on
! 386's. Do you know how fast of a 386 and how much RAM? It
! would help in
! my telling you whether or not NetBSD will work well.
Yeah, the Win95 comment was more of a wise-ass joke :) As for the
details on the PC10, I'm gonna fire it up next week, and connect the
Handbook to it, to back up the Handbook. It (the Handbook) has MS Interlink
on it! Heh heh heh...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
On December 14, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> > Back in those days, many people were skeptical about using a non-Intel
> > processor when running Windows.
> >
> > There was a big marketing effort by the likes of Cyrix, AMD, and whoever
> > made the "WinChip" to convince people that those processors would run
> > Windows okay.
>
> Well, I suppose every chip must aspire to mediocrity. :-P
Wait...woudn't that make it a "LoseChip"? ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL
On December 14, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> It was put on there to basically state that it works well with MS Windows,
> not only with MS Windows.
Perhaps so, but that's not what it *says*. "Made for Microsoft
Windows" implies much more than "Works with Microsoft Windows".
I wouldn't be surprised if AMD got a substantial amount of money
>from Microsoft to paste that sticker on those chips.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL