I saw one of these yesterday. It looks like a monitor with floppy
drive in the bottom, at the back was a plug for the power and another
labelled video. I could not see anyplace for a keyboard to be
attached.
Does anyone know anything about this machine?
Collector of Vintage Computers (www.ncf.ca/~ba600)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tothwolf [mailto:tothwolf@concentric.net]
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Christopher Smith wrote:
> > Well, on one hand, yes, but on the other hand, I like my
> Indigo 2 Elan with
> > no texture memory just fine. I'm also considering trying
> I didn't know you had another SGI box ;)
Yep.
> A couple people I've known who ended up with old SGI gear thought they
> were going to create some kind of fancy animations with this kind of
> hardware, so I never know what to think now.
Depends on what you mean by "fancy animations." It will probably do better
out of the box than most new peesees depending on what you'd like to
animate. (and whether it requires texture memory, of course) Both of my
SGIs, for instance, have analog video in/out, which is a start. On the
other hand, you can't really do a good animation with anything "out of the
box." It usually takes a lot of strange stuff.
The graphical prowess of the machines is still something, though. For
instance, the ability of the machine to provide individual color-maps for
different windows on the screen, without the nasty palette-flashing that's
seen in xfree86 on an intel box (for example) when you try the same...
> Sounds like you at least have an original VGX chassis then.
> It is possible
> someone upgraded some of the boards, but the only way you'll
> be able to
> tell is to pull them and cross reference the part numbers.
I'm thinking about doing that. The label on top of the chassis actually
says "4D/440 VGX" or something to that effect.
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I need an RM03, preferrably within sane driving distance of Peoria, IL.
Having a KS10 as a paperweight is absolutely no fun. I can trade PDP-11
stuff for one, I have all sorts of 11 kit that I'd be more than willing
to trade for KS10 stuff.
Also, if anyone has the 120V-AC plug that goes in a TM02, I am short one
of those as well - I have the 220 volt version (but the rest of the drive
is all 120 volt parts; Odd!)
Basically, I'm sick of using the KS10 as just emulation validation and I want
to get it running. ^_^
-------
Okay, in order to pose this question I have to come clean here and admit my
age:
Right around 1960 or '61 (I was five or six years old at the time) I was
given a toy computer. I suppose it was meant to represent a mainframe
(what else could it have been, given the era?) and there was a rectangular
(4 x 8? 5 X 7?) array of blinkenlights on the front of it. There was also
a tray in the front which accepted a small punched card. A set of these
cards came with the toy. Each card had a multiple-choice question printed
on it, as well as four answers to choose from, numbered A through D.
Additional card sets could be purchased separately.
When a card was placed into the tray and the tray was then closed, the
blinkenlights would display a "random" pattern for a couple of seconds
(always the same pattern) and then the array would display the correct
answer to the printed question, A B C or D. It didn't take long for me to
be able to read the holes in the cards, and I even "modified" a couple of
them so that the toy displayed an incorrect answer.
Does *anyone* remember this thing? It must have cost a few bucks back
then. What was it called?
Glen
0/0
Mark Crispin <MRC(a)CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote:
> Stacks are very useful, but they are not the solution to everything.
Absolutely agreed.
> One of the biggest deficiencies of C is its lack of co-routines, since
> it only has the stack style of subroutine calling. Yeah, I know about
> setjmp/longjmp, but those are one-way, not true co-routines.
Well, setjmp and longjmp are pretty powerful. see
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/opsys/threads/
for a machine-independent user-level thread package implemented in C using
setjmp and longjmp for control transfers between threads. It comes very
close to what a real coroutine afficianado would like. (Writing the
thread launch code in a machine independent way was murder.)
Curiously, the same thing can be done without longjmp()! I had a student
write me a thread package in Pascal once. All he needed was a mechanism
to convert pointers to integers and back again (easy enough in standard
Pascal, so long as it doesn't check variant records). Given this, his
code did essentially the same thing as my thread package.
> Of course, talking about co-routines to youngsters is likely to get
> their eyes to glaze over, since they won't have a clue as to what I'm
> talking about.
Indeed.
Doug Jones
jones(a)cs.uiowa.edu
Fred Cisin wrote
> In place of current accepted sloppy terminology,
> how many remember what they were called THEN?
Most of the engineers I work with have never heard of Amphenol or Cannon,
let alone "blue range" or "red range" (popular Cannon connectors)
It's a classic chicken and egg thing. Ampenol connectors were adopted as
a "standard" connector for Centronics printer, IEEE-488 and SCSI interface,
but are often mis-named. As I don't have an Amphenol catalogue to hand,
I'm afraid I can't tell you what Amphenol's designation is for this connector.
On the subject of D-sub connectors I've sometimes come across some with
metric threaded jackscrews instead of the usual UNF thread, or is it UNC ?
Chris Leyson
There's another Nile with 4 large racks of drives in a scrapyard in
Ottawa. I doesn't look like it's been there long. I should have spent
more time checking it out.
Likely Mike Kenzie could take a look at it and report back since I only
get to Ottawa occasionally.
Please see my post to follow with questions on the Pyramid 90x.
Dan Cohoe
> > > Does anyone know what sort of machine is in the car's
> > > onboard controller? A few pictures I've found make them
> > > look like PC104's. These machines are hitting zero value
> > > quickly and may not last 10 years unless picked up now.
> >
> > What car? They don't all use the same controllers, you know...
>
> Want a fuel injection "brain" from a 1968 VW Squareback?
Had Bosch come up with EFI already by 1968?
Every VW (and Audi & MB, etc) of that vintage that I've seen used
CIS, which was a purely mechanical system.
I have seen a 1969 Audi Super 90 (wagon) that had an aftermarket
Capacitative Discharge Ignition (CDI) System... by 1974, Audis
had those as stock, while CIS was still 1 year off...
My 1986 Audi 5000 CS Turbo Quattro uses a Motorola 6802-based
controller... very simple to upgrade, too.... ;-)
-dq
Sorry, a little overwhelmed by all this at the moment; will get back to ya.
Ethan, AIM65 stuff is ready to go.
John, still waiting to hear what you need for the Cromemcos.
Will be off 'Net till Monday.
mike
---------------Original Message-----------------
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Punch cards, punch & mag tapes (Toronto)
- --- "John R. Keys Jr." <jrkeys(a)concentric.net> wrote:
> Has anyone claimed these yet ? If not I will take them.
I tried to. Haven't heard back. Don't know who the lucky winner is,
but I suspect several people expressed interest.
- -ethan