From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> I used to think that CP/M was great but I just got a system with
ZCPR3
>and it's dynamite!
>
> Joe
To make a point. ZCPRx is CP/M! ZCPR is a replacement for the
rather anemic CCP (console command processor) and a few
additional utilities. Of ten the BDOS and BIOS are unchanged
and that is the core of CP/M. The CCP is user interface.
The DOS analog of that would be Windows3.1 is not DOS.
See the point!
Now ZRDOS or ZSDOS is a totally different codebase and
non DRI product that is CP/M compatable and draws form
the ZCPRx lineage.
Allison
> At 06:47 PM 11/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> >
> >>I used to think that CP/M was great but I just got a
> >>system with ZCPR3 and it's dynamite!
> >>
> >> Joe
> >
> >To make a point. ZCPRx is CP/M!
I spent a log of time customizing ZCPR 2.2, but never
got around to moving to ZCPR3.
Can anyone give a thumbnail sketch of the differences,
keeping in mind that I'm fairly familiar with the 2.2
version?
In addition to tweaking & adding stuff to ZCPR2.2, I
also adapted someone else's take on implementing
resident system extensions (RSXs) under CP/M 2.2/ZCPR,
as well as putting together a small library of RSXs
that would work with it (as well as CP/M 3).
Any interest in that stuff? I think the floppies may
still be readable...
-dq
Jeff,
It sounds to me like you don't want to live very long. Big power
hungery computers and old inadaquete wiring just don't work well together.
Joe
At 06:15 PM 11/1/00 -0500, Jeff wrote:
>What ground? ;-)
>
>I live in an older house with cloth-covered wireing and no three prong
>jacks except in the laundry room, the kitchen, and the bathroom. I know,
>I'll get around to rewiring, but everything has been running just great
>groundlessly.
>
>You don't want to walk barefoot on the slab in the basement and touch
>anything metal though.....
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeff
>
>
>In <20001101172512.22087.qmail(a)brouhaha.com>, on 11/01/00
> at 06:15 PM, Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> said:
>
>>> The phase shift is 180 degrees! :-) Yes, it's 220 VAC, center tapped
>>> and the center tap is tied to neutral (not ground). The neutrals aren't
>>> supposed to be tied to ground but a lot of people do it anyway.
>
>>Unless things are much different in Florida, the neutral is supposed to
>>be tied to ground in *exactly* one place for the entire building, and
>>that place is at the main breaker panel. So I assume you meant that
>>people add additional neutral-ground connections elsewhere, which is
>>*bad*.
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>Jeffrey S. Worley
>President
>Complete Computer Services, Inc.
>30 Greenwood Rd.
>Asheville, NC 28803
>828-277-5959
>Visit our website at HTTP://www.Real-Techs.com
>THETechnoid(a)home.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
From: Andreas Meyer <ysgdhio(a)yahoo.com>
>
>I'm sure someone here can tell me...
>Does the DEC VT05 terminal use RS232 or is it 20ma loop?
In a word. Yes. Both.
Allison
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> NSdos is what I plan on doing the initial tests of the
>machine with anyway, given it's smaller memory requirement. It's
>manuals seem to do a decent job at describing how to config it for
>various hardware. With luck, at least one of these hard-sectored
>diskettes will still prove usable!
NS* DOS is a good place to start. Once you have the IO right for that
then doing it for CP/M will be fairly easy.
Allison
Upon the date 12:33 PM 10/31/00 -0800, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) said something
like:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Hans Franke wrote:
>> > Possible - it seams like you got way to much stuff.
>> > As a matter of our friendship I may offer my help
>> > and order a 40' container to help - I may even pay
>> > the shiping cost :)
>
>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Sellam Ismail wrote:
>> Hans, bring a few containers. You can have it all. Come and get it.
>> Don't say I never did anything nice for you :)
>
>In the interest of international relations, we'll ALL help fill Hans'
>containerS.
Right on Fred! I've got almost half of my garage full of big DEC gear Hans
could use as swapping material in Deutschland. (You've seen it Hans)
Servus, Chris
-- --
Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
Member of Antique Wireless Association
URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > Additionally, this is not a Honeywell 6180 being offered,
> > but a DPS-8/M.
>
> I wonder if my DPS-6 could run Multics? I would like to think it has to
> have some coolness factor other than being big and impressive :)
No. The DPS-6 cannot run Multics. In fact, a DPS-8 can't run Multics,
only the DPS-8/M can (in addition to the 6180 and GE 645).
However, Multics could be re-implemented on any architecture
that either provides a paged, segmented virtual memory with
rings of protection, or, on any architecture fast enough that
those features could be emulated.
regards,
-dq
Hello,
I found this group while looking for information on an archaic computer
system.
I have several systems at home that may qualify as 'classic'
computers...
a Heathkit 6500 computer trainer (I think) with documentation
SWTPC 6800 - in storage with a hefty 4k RAM
Amiga 1000
Amiga 4000
...and a few others.
I am going home tonight to look at them and see if I might have
something of interest for someone else.
Intel (360?) Multi-Bus I system used for development... complete with
software and manuals.
I also have much documentation. I'm a packrat when it comes to User's
Manuals.
But it is now time to clean out the storage room. <sigh>
I have information for those of you with Amiga 4000's for repairing your
A3640 CPU boards. This is on my web site.
Also - for replacing the capacitors in the Audio section. (This applies
to any of the Amiga series. They used polarized caps in a uni-polar
output stage of an op-amp.)
Regards,
James Jackson
James Jackson Oztronics
1631 Escalon Ave., Suite B San Antonio, TX 78221-3126
210-921-1758 FX: 210-921-0124 http://joj.home.texas.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: CP/M 1.3 memory requirement
> I show that DR copyrighted CP/M in May, 1976. Around what
>time did they actually start shipping it and what was the first
>'usable' release?
>
> Jeff
There was 1.2 but usable is not what I'd call it. I'd say 1.4
was the first commercially viable version but, 1.3 was the
first complete working one.
Allison