Hi Group:
I am in need of an M7891-DB or similar memory board for my pdp-11/34A.
The specs on this memory are: 128 Kword, 18 bit, parity RAM. Size is not
important in this case, I'll take a compatible board with less RAM on it.
Please reply to the news group. list, or to me directly. I have stuff to
trade or will purchase if necessary!
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
Yep, it's been 2 months and I still am not able to get my basic membership
yet. Today I tried rejoining (3rd time) and now I get internal server
errors. At this rate I'll never be able to get the OpenVMS CD kit.
BTW, if I have 2 VAX do I need to order 2 kits?
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:46:41, Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:25:34, Jeffrey l Kaneko <jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:53:32 EST Mzthompson(a)aol.com writes:
>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> 3) Sigma Information Systems
>>>
>>> This card appears to be a disk controller. It has 4 WDC TR1865PL
>>> controller
>>> chips on it and there are 4 ten pin header connectors on the card
>>> edge.
>>>
>>> Numbers:
>>> Assy 400200
>>> CPX-6-0
>>
>>This is probably a serial I/O card; the TR1865's are UARTS . . . .
>
>
>Jeff is probably right. Here's part of a message that I posted a month or
>so ago about a 11/23 that I have. It also has a Sigma Information Systems
>card in it and the card is connected the TT and LP0 ports. I didn't make a
>list of the chips while I had the card out. Sorry.
>
> Joe
>
> to On September 22, Joe wrote:
>
> <snip>
Thanks guys for the correction. In my haste to complete the list I saw
'WDC' and jump to the conclusion about being a disk controller. I did
not pause to look up the IC in the IC Master or any data books. Duh!
Although I removed the card cage and boards from the box, I did go
check and sure enough, the only ten pin connector goes to a DB25
coming out the back.
Again, thanks, and sorry 'bout that.
Mike
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> Certainly even the earliest of CP/M releases offered more
>than the North Star DOS that would've shipped with thier disk
>systems? This system included DOS ver. 2 and BASIC ver. 6, Release 3
>and is also copyright 1977.
Actually no. NSdos was a simpler file system but actually robust and
very fast. It lacked editor/assember/debugger but did have a good set of
diags for ram, monitor and NS* BASIC. Which for it's time was pretty
good. Also it could boot in as little as 4k of ram and run basic in 24k.
Allison
Hi,
Yes, I'm interested in the disks! A friend of mine wants to try and
install it on a H-89. I'll look through my ZCPR stuff and see if I can find
out what the differences are in verson 2.2 and 3.0 and report later.
Joe
At 09:31 AM 11/2/00 -0500, you wrote:
>> At 06:47 PM 11/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
>> >From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>> >
>> >>I used to think that CP/M was great but I just got a
>> >>system with ZCPR3 and it's dynamite!
>> >>
>> >> Joe
>> >
>> >To make a point. ZCPRx is CP/M!
>
>I spent a log of time customizing ZCPR 2.2, but never
>got around to moving to ZCPR3.
>
>Can anyone give a thumbnail sketch of the differences,
>keeping in mind that I'm fairly familiar with the 2.2
>version?
>
>In addition to tweaking & adding stuff to ZCPR2.2, I
>also adapted someone else's take on implementing
>resident system extensions (RSXs) under CP/M 2.2/ZCPR,
>as well as putting together a small library of RSXs
>that would work with it (as well as CP/M 3).
>
>Any interest in that stuff? I think the floppies may
>still be readable...
>
>-dq
>
Greetings
I have an elderly version of ultrix (4.2A) which knows nothing of disks of
mind boggling capacity such as the two gigabyte RF73.
Does anyone have a later version of Ultrix with the dimensions of this
disk specified in the /etc/disktab file?
(p.s. has anyone else noticed that Altavista seems to be lamed
deliberately or otherwise so that Linux or Netscape clients can no longer
search properly? I have noticed this for a couple of weeks...I go into
work and use Internet Extorter on NT and everything is fine.)
Thanks in advance
Paul
OK.
I've been quiet long enough, I think. <grin>
Now it is time to ask a question.
I have an old Cadnetix 50000S workstation. It still works - sortuv.
I would like to find a replacement board for the ailing one (graphics),
or locate technical manuals on this beastie.
What is a Cadnetix 50000S? It is a CAD workstation that performs
Schematic Capture, PCB Layouts, runs Berkeley unix (I think it's
Berkeley), uses a 68020 processor, and can still run rings around many
Windows CAD software packages... ok, just barely. <grin>
What I'd _really_ like is to find one of the Sun-2 Cadnetix platforms.
(I think it was a Sun-2 - it's been a while folks.)
Now, these puppies - they could really scream!
Anyway, I saw a bit on the 50000S platforms a while back - was just
wondering if anyone might still have one and want to swap something or
other.
I know where there is a Cadnetix burial ground - it's just that I'd have
to pay homage to the groundskeeper.
Regards,
James Jackson
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I'm interested in the disks! A friend of mine wants to try and
> install it on a H-89. I'll look through my ZCPR stuff and see
> if I can find
> out what the differences are in verson 2.2 and 3.0 and report later.
Ok, if I have time (I've tenatively got a rescue planned for this
weekend), I'll try to dig them out this weekend.
Regards,
-dq
> Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > We only just in the last few weeks finally got a listing of the
> > full DPS-8/M instruction set (or was it the Level 68?) posted to
> > the web. So at least one of the most important resources for
> > getting started is now available...
>
> Oh, do you have a link?
You'll find them near the bottom of:
http://www.multicians.org/features.html
-dq
I don't know but enjoy it while you can! I gave up on Yahoo, Hotbot and
the others because they took too blasted long to load (and still didn't
find as much).
Joe
At 12:36 AM 11/2/00 -0500, Jeff wrote:
>I have to agree. Though Google returns a lot of unuseable information, it
>has proved to be my best resource when searching the impossible. Google
>is the God of search engines. I'd use it even if the did have as as do
>most competitors.
>
>Why don't they have ads? It mystifies me.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeff
>
>
>As for AltaVista I gave it up for Google.com, why? because google's search
> page is advertisement free and it returns better hits than Altavista
>does.
>
>--Chuck
>
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>Jeffrey S. Worley
>President
>Complete Computer Services, Inc.
>30 Greenwood Rd.
>Asheville, NC 28803
>828-277-5959
>Visit our website at HTTP://www.Real-Techs.com
>THETechnoid(a)home.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>