From: Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com>
>> the BASIC interface rather than DCL. Yes, I mean the user enviornment
is
>> inside basic and the command line would be BASIC. I used LLL BASIC
>> to do it as its available as source and all. So what if CCP {or ZCPR}
>> is nominally 2k, I changed the load point in the BIOS and allowed 8k
for
>> that.
>>
>> Is the user interface different? Yes. Is it CP/M, still? Yes.
>
>Nifty, Allison!
> - don
Now you understand where I get the idea that CP/M can do anything or
at a minimum will not get in the way! When you consider the bdos is
3.5k and the bios can be smaller than 512bytes it's a pretty powerful
package in 4k. The rest is user programming.
Allison
I've been watching the Altair, IMSAI, and SOL-20 listings on
eBay lately, more out of curiosity to see what they go for than
anything else, but noticed something odd about a SOL-20 image. In
the listing, the picture definately showed a SOL-20, but instead of
the normal front panel showing 'SOL Terminal Computer' in both white
and yellow lettering, this machine has a single 'Interactive
Computer' in whie stylized 'computer font' across the front. Is this
an OEM version of the SOL-20 sold under another name? The URL for
the image in question is:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=463806006&ed=9719976…
Thanks and take care
Jeff
--
Power Computing PowerCurve, 400mhz G3, Mac OS 9.0.4
Collector of Classic Microcomputers and Video Game Systems:
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
>That's interesting! I was comparing the quoted sizes of a couple of HDL
>versions available on the web. The smalles 650x I found was about 3200
>gates, while the smallest Z80 was listed at 9200. It's difficult to say
This is true. It is a larger cpu.
>Eric Smith reminded me some weeks back that the Z80 has two complete
>register sets, which pretty quickly leads me to conclude it's justified
in
To be exact the z80 has
A A' 8BIT
BC BC' 16BIT
DE DE' 16BIT
HL HL' 16BIT
IX 16BIT
IY 16BIT
SP 16BIT
F F' ~8BIT FLAGS
PC 16BIT
I 8BIT (HIGH 8BITS OF INTERUPT VECTOR)
R 8BITS (REFRESH ADDRESS)
6502
A 8BIT
X 8BIT
Y 8BIT
PC 16BIT
SP 9BIT (HIGH BIT =1)
STATUS 8BIT
Big difference in the number of bits for storage alone. It accounts for
most of the
die area (ram/registers that is).
>consuming considerably more resources in an array than the 650x core.
One
>might conclude that the 8080 should lie between the two, since it has
more
>registers than the 650x, yet fewer than the Z80. The transistor count
is
>not quite reflective of the register resources, but it does appear that
the
>8080 has more transistors used than the 650x.
8080 is not near as efficient in logic usage as z80.
The different is in memory vs register usage in programming. A
reasonably
complex 6502 program will always use more ram than similar in z80 if only
due to need for multiple pointers, local storage and parameter passing.
A while back I said I passed on an cmos ASIC project that was going to
use 8088 (actually 80186 core) as a embedded app. the client insisted
on it and planned to inegrate 32-64k of rom and at least 4-16k of ram
with
it. Application, remotely read peaking power meter. People do this!
Compared to the 80186 core the z80 is tiny!
Allison
God speaks...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2000 08:52:15 -0800
From: Lee Felsenstein <lee(a)nerditude.com>
Subject: Re: PT SOL-20 question (fwd)
Sellam,
I have never seen such a label either. The labels were never
fastened in, and it was understood that a VAR or equivalent could replace
the factory label with anything. We considered this a feature.
The Nepali character conversion is most interesting and puts the
machine in a unique category. From the photo it looks hand-built, and one
can imagine how few machines were sold into Nepali use.
If it shows up on display at VCF, it's a good contender for the
"obscurity" prize.
---
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
I've been lurking here for about a month now. A friend of mine told me there
were a lot of DECheads here, so I signed up. I've been puttering around with
big iron for about a few years, but I don't have anything left (had two VAX
730's and several PDP-11's - an 11/34, 11/73 and what I think was either an
11/04 or an 11/03... I'm sorta regretting getting rid of any of them... I'd
like to get back into hacking Unibuss stuff someday)
Anyways, I recently got a VAXstation 4000/60 from e-bay, for what I
considered to be a nice price. Works fine. Had VMS 5.5-2 on it, but I got
the hobbyist license and VAX/VMS 7.2 CD from montagar (good deal!).
It only has 24mb of RAM - 8mb built in, and four 4mb chips, leaving two
slots open. Unfortunately, the best I can do on that setup would be 32mb
RAM. I know the machine can do 104mb (96mb in chips, I guess that would be
six 16mb chips), but I'm not sure of the type of memory used.
It also has two RZ25's, which are a bit tight. What limitations do I have on
drives that can be installed?
I'm not using the frame buffer. My intention even before I received it was
to run a serial console. But I think it might be fun to run a graphical
display. Have no idea what type of frame buffer is installed, except that it
has an odd sub-D connector with three mini-BNCs inside. What's the specs on
the monitor that can be connected? Can I get an an adapter cable to connect
it to my PC monitor?
From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
>The Z80 core is about three times the size of the 650x core and really
can't
>do anything the 650x core can't do quite a bit faster. If you clock the
two
That may be true, I don't care. It's a "but, who cares" thing. If a
manufacturer used z80 in a product and wanted an improved product
do you think they will drop z80 or find a way to to package it tighter.
>Gate arrays are not relevant to the typical microcontroller application.
>The gate arrays are handy when an MCU is not fast enough, but for short
>runs, where the MCU's shine, the FPGA's and CPLD's are much slower to
>develop.
You only have worked with low volume stuff then. In the high volume
world it's common for vendors to suff parts into ASICs as a cost
reduction
or product design protection.
>The single-chip examples I think about when I'm considering what to use
are
>frequently the Scenix SX family. They're as fast as a core in an FPGA,
and,
Who cares. I didnt' exclusivly say speed was the issue. You did.
Allison
I have a lovely Z80 starter kit (in my office at work) and would like to
know if any has the DOC's to this computer.
This one is nice because I got it for $10. The power supply/case was hand
built with a punch and press. And the board was modified with wire wrap.
The person who built it did a beautiful job. Which is why I'll never
sell that computer! I use it to show how we used to do things, it's
kind of art work (that you can program! :-).
Man my hands hurt just looking at it.
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
From: Don Maslin <donm(a)cts.com>
>Now Allison, he just proved the point that ZCPR does not increase the
>bulk of CP/M, whereas Win3.1 does. Therefore, ZCPM is better!
Stull no arguement, just not the question at hand. DOS like CP/M
can have any number of user interfaces, size for the moment is
unimportant
as it GUI vs Command line.
You'd like the version I did for laughs that looked a lot like RSTS
running
the BASIC interface rather than DCL. Yes, I mean the user enviornment is
inside basic and the command line would be BASIC. I used LLL BASIC
to do it as its available as source and all. So what if CCP {or ZCPR}
is nominally 2k, I changed the load point in the BIOS and allowed 8k for
that.
Is the user interface different? Yes. Is it CP/M, still? Yes.
Allison
Here's a detailed list of what's available.
HP9888A
HP7946 (HDD&tape drive)
HP7957 (HDD)
HP7945(HDD)
HP 332 (Workstation)
HP50960A (qty 4) SRM (server)
HP2397A (graphics adapter?)
HP9121 (qty 2) dual 3.5" drives
HP9135A
HP9895A (qty 2) dual 8" floppy
HP9127A (qty 3) 5.25" floppy
HP340 (qty 6) workstation
HP340 expander box (qty 3)
Series 100/150 touch screen workstation (this is a pretty neat looking
little box - like a short, fat Mac, with an LED/phototransistor array along
the edges of the display to tell where your finger is)
HP 45500A (this is a _really_ funky looking terminal or workstation of some
sort - it looks like the top half of the original "space wars" game - or
like it came from the set of Space 1999...)
Misc:
HP98550 card
HP340 Human Interface Card (qty 4)
HP HIL tablets (A-size digitizer)
HP35741A monitor (qty 2)
HPIB cables (about 50)
Aydin 1986 vintage color monitor (RGB&composite sync)
Televideo TS1608
IBM original XT with hard drive (believed to be working)
lots of HP backup tapes (the ones half the size of a cigar box)
miscellaneous HP books
Your cost on any of these would be shipping plus packing at Mailboxes,
Etc., plus $5 per item "earnest money" for us to haul them from the
basement, put them in our trailer, tote them to Mailboxes, and fill out the
paperwork.
If you're interested, let me know ASAP, as they go to the scrapper on
Monday, 10/30/00 when the company's lease runs out. Just trying to save
some good, old hardware from the shredder.
It's located in Lincoln, Nebraska, so if you're within driving distance this
weekend, we can probably arrange something to save you shipping and
handling. If you'll haul it out of the basement for us, it's free. (Which
is, incidentally, the same deal the scrapper offered them... :-(
-Bill Richman (bill_r(a)inetnebr.com)
Web Page: http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
Home of the COSMAC Elf Microcomputer Simulator, Fun with
Molten Metal, Orphaned Robots, and Technological Oddities.
>> Megan Gentry's early emulator work seems to have disappeared, maybe
>> it's just no longer accessable online.
>
>Megan has the real thing, tho, doesn't she?
Yes, I do...
And I removed mine a few months ago for various reasons, some legal.
I hope to make it available again at some point... heck, I hope to get
a chance to work on it again at some point... but I think Tim Stark's
effort is the best chance at the moment...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+