My bulletin board system has over 4 gigs of classic computer games. They are
all games that haven't been sold since 1993. I also have the really old DOS
versions. I know it is illegal to have pirated games and software, but this
is stuff that you just can't find or buy ANYWHERE and there is no commercial
demand for such programs.
Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodrigo Ventura [mailto:yoda@isr.ist.utl.pt]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 3:12 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Classical Computing software?
Hi. Are there any repositories on the net containing ancient
software? For instance, tape dumps of very old UNIX versions, or
Symbolics LISP system. Is anyone collecting this kind of stuff in
elecronic form?
Cheers,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Web page: http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Teaching Assistant and MSc Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, PORTUGAL
*** PGP fingerprint = 0119 AD13 9EEE 264A 3F10 31D3 89B3 C6C4 60C6 4585
Small but fairly important...
I need drive mounting trays for a MacIIfx, floppy and HD. If someone has
these for cheap, let me know...there are a couple on eBay but I don't want
to wait the week and a half it would take to complete the transaction...
Thanks,
Aaron
In a message dated 09/29/1999 3:04:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes:
> > Interestingly, with this system when a disk is formatted it is required
> that
> > the number of TPI be input. This is then stored on the disk so I might
> have
>
> I assume that's total number of tracks, or something similar.
Yes, the total number of tracks.
> LDOS (and related OSes) on the TRS-80s does much the same thing. When you
> format a disk it asks you for the number of sides and number of tracks.
> And provided the hardware is capable of handling what you ask for, it
> will format and (correctly) use the disk.
Interesting -- I'd _not_ be shocked to find out that the maker of the system
I use "borrowed" the idea from RadShack.
BTW my understanding is that all 5.25 diskettes made today are bin-sorted --
that is, they shoot for DSHD and the fallouts are sold as DSDD. I have a
number of "DSDD" diskettes here which work well when formatted with 50+
tracks, although how this is possible with "40 track" DSDD drives I haven't a
clue. Perhaps you do.
> On the model 1, the original drives were 35track, but all later ones
> could do 40 tracks (or a little more, like 42 tracks). Needless to say,
> the extra storage, particularly on 'system disks' came in handy back then
:-)
Fortunately this system doesn't require "system disks" (the os is on an
eprom) but I know what you mean. In a floppy based system a few extra KB can
_really_ make a difference ;>)
Regards,
Glen Goodwin
0/0
Since I've been unable to dispatch these old manuals about which I wrote last week to the VCF for handoff to Hans Franke, I've decided that I may just hold onto them until I've had time to scan them and find a suitable web site at which I can make them available to all who desire. In the meantime, if there's one you need, contact me, as I'll put your request on the pile to scan in order of the resulting precedence. That will cost less and motivate me to make sure the sheet feeder on my scanner works properly.
Dick
Hello, port-vax and classiccmp folk!
I'll be de-subscribing until Monday so I don't get inundated with mail
while I'm off at the Vintage Computer Festival.
This means if you want to get in touch with me, you'll need to send me a
personal note (though I fully expect to see a lot of you at VCF). ;-)
Later!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
Hi- I fired up my System/34 tonight for the first time since it was
retired in '95. Everything seemed to come up OK, except the 4 model 62PC
disk drives started squealing as soon as they were powered on. It was
deafening for about 10 seconds and gradually went away in about a minute.
It came back a couple of times softly during the 10 minutes I ran them.
While I fired up I was listening for ting-ting-ting of HDI and all I could
hear is this squeal. I was also shining a light over the disk surface
(clear HDA's are great- why aren't all disks this way?) on one of the
drives and I didn't see any scratches forming, nor did I see them after
powering off. The head actuators were unlocked (I've always moved the
machine with them locked, but they were never locked at the company I got
them from).
Any ideas what might have caused this? My best guess was the spindle
motor brakes, but it's impossible to tell with my head in a box full of
squealing drives. Is is safe to run like this? I haven't moved the heads
yet, but they seemed to quiet down after running for a while.
Thanks,
Richard
Grumpy Ol' Fred wrote:
In a message dated 9/30/99 11:41:38 AM EST, cisin(a)xenosoft.com writes:
<< The 96TPI head can not do very good job of erasing or writing over the
wide track. Some people claim success, but _I_ want better quality than
that. >>
Hit 'em with a bulk tape eraser first.
<< This must be a new meaning of "successfully" of which I was not previously
aware. Did you store data on them?
Yup.
<< Did you read the data?
Yup.
<< Did the data last for more than a few days?
Yup.
<< Do you CARE about the reliability of data?
Nah - just a bunch of 0s and 1s anyway ;>) Actually my concern is with the
reliability of the _media_ -- plenty of _data_ is crap regardless of the
nature of the media it's stored on . . .
Glen Goodwin
0/0
In a message dated 09/30/1999 5:07:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, donm(a)cts.com
writes:
> > ISTR formatting DSHD diskettes to 360 KB in an emergency (we're talking
> > IBM-type pcs here) but only after hitting them with a bulk tape eraser
to
> > wipe them clean, and then using the proper DOS FORMAT parameters . . .
>
> Was this in a 1.2mb drive? I never tried that, only in a 360k drive.
>
> Hmmm! Interesting, I just tried it and it seems to work. Even wrote to
> it in a 360k drive and it was readable. Question is, how long?
It was in a 1.2mb drive (although others on the list will doubtless say this
can't be true). As for stablilty, this was a long time ago but ISTR reading
one of the disks a few weeks later.
Glen Goodwin
0/0
On Sep 30, 19:13, Tony Duell wrote:
> Subject: Re: RCA 1861, NTSC and a DEC VR-201
> > Blue-Red-Black-Gold = 62 ohms 5% tolerance
> >
> > The last is rather unlikely, since it's not an E12 or even E24
preferred
> > value.
>
> Isn't it? It's certainly a fairly common resistor value, and I thought it
> was the one between 56 and 68 in the E24 series.
Er, I may have meant E6/E12. 62 *is* part of E24. I'm glad someone was
reading it carefully :-) It's not particularly common though; E12 values
are still more commonly used, in my experience.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Sep 30, 10:25, Mark Tapley wrote:
> Subject: Re: RCA 1861, NTSC and a DEC VR-201
> ethan said:
>
> >Yellow-Purple-Gold-Gold resistor, then tied to ground via
> >a Grey-Red-Black-Gold (might be Sky Blue-Red-Black-Gold) and then
through one
> >of the rear pots. I would spec the values, but I'm not used to such odd
> >colors
> >in the significant digits of resistors (just as tolerance bands). Would
a
> >EE care to translate these? Might that second one be 92 Ohms? Could
the
> >first one be 7.5 Ohms?
>
> Puzzles me too.
>
> Silver 1e-2
> Gold 1e-1
> 1 Black 1e0 First 2 digits give mantissa,
> 2 Brown 1e1 3rd digit gives exponent,
> 3 Red 1e2 4th band gives quality of resistor (if present),
else +/- 20%
> 4 Orange 1e3 (silver = +/- 10%, gold= +/- 5%, red = +/-
2%)
> 5 Yellow 1e4 5th band (if present) gives reliability (mil-spec,
etc.)
> 6 Green 1e5
> 7 Blue 1e6 Example: red-yellow-orange-gold = 2,4,10^3, 5% =
24k Ohm, 5%
> 8 Violet 1e7
> 9 Gray (From Horowitz & Hill, The Art of Electronics, 1st
Edition
> 0 White pp. 645-646)
>
> No I'm not an EE but with Horowitz and Hill *anyone* can play an EE on
TV,
> so here's my guess:
>
> Yellow-Purple-Gold-Gold : 5 8 1e-1 5% = 5.8 +/- 0.29 Ohms
> Grey-Red-Black-Gold : Confederate Oil-filled resistor :-) ok, ok....
> 9 3 1e0 5% = 93 +/- 4.65 Ohms
>
> Ok, if a *real* EE hasn't already appeared, please do so and set me
straight.
> - Mark
Your colours are off by one :-) Black=0, white=9.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York