test-drb July 1998

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

154 participants
898 discussions

by foxnhare＠goldrush.com

Actually... Quantum Computer Services started off Quantum Link from the old Commodore 64 Play-Net network and later developed Apple and PC link as those developed (from the old Q-Link system) Quantum Computers changed their name to AOL and later shut down the Commodore Q-Link service after leting it suffer a slow-agonizing demise for a few years. Pitty, it was a good service. There are still a bunch of Q-Link ideosyncracies in the system such as 10 character screen names. There is a web page out there that gives the whole story, I came across it a while back in my surfing. Hopefully Doug Coward will read this and fill us in better, as he was an actual Q-Link employee for many years (read he actually worked there, not a Q-Guide or some sub-op position). -- -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (300-2400bd) (209) 754-1363 Visit my Commodore 8-Bit web page at: http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/commodore.html -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-

26 years, 5 months

Mag periph's drive info

by blindpete＠stratos.net

Hi every One I found a web page that was helpfull when I was looking for drive specs ect, it is: www.fdisk.com It has links to a lot of interesting pages, including links to hard drive manufactures and search for. Pete Net-Tamer V 1.11 - Registered

26 years, 5 months

LISA (fwd)

by yowza＠yowza.com

Respond directly to the seller, not to me, if you want his Lisa 2. If it turns out to be a Lisa 1, don't tell me about it :-) -- Doug ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 17:27:07 +0000 From: Rich Bull <rbull(a)post.cis.smu.edu> Subject: LISA Mine has a 5 or 10 meg hard drive....Its a completed system with mouse and keyboard and is in exceptional condition...neat little machine...If your interested I need $200.00 and you pay shipping... Thanks rbull(a)mail.smu.edu Richard E. Bull email: rbull(a)mail.smu.edu Information Technology Services voice: (214)768-3450 Southern Methodist University Fax: (214)768-9999 Dallas, Texas 75275-0262

26 years, 5 months

Never pass an $8 computer [Apple IIc swapmeet story]

by thomas100＠home.com

Hi, So I bought two Apple IIcs last year, one from at the Capitola Swap Meet for $8 with no power supply and a bad keyboard and the other at a ham radio swap meet for $15 with the cute little monitor, stand, power supply, TV adapter, printer and a bunch of other junk [Printshop and... what a thrill- typing tutor!] I bought the two machines some time apart from each other and was moving about the time I picked up the second. So finally today I found that the first one work while the complete system I bought is broken. Well... it's no problem since I can make one working model out of two. Fortunately the first one also has a case with no yellowing problem. The moral of the story: Never pass up a $8 retro-computer... even if it's broken and incomplete! Thomas

26 years, 5 months

RL02 ID number button

by wanderer＠bos.nl

>The encoding scheme is quite simple, actually, and the answer is that >you >can't make a 2 or a 3 from a 1 or a 0 > >The explanation is as follows. There are 2 pegs at the sides of the >lamp >cap, each with 2 edges (top and bottom). Each edge is either cut down >or not. > >An edge which isn't cut down closes a contact in the lampholder (there >are 4 such contacts, of course). An edge which is cut down doesn't. > >One edge is always present (not cut down). This contact tells the drive >that there is a cap fitted. > >The other 3 edges set the drive ID. One isn't used (it is on the RK07, >etc). The other 2 form a binary code, with the contact closed = 1. So >you >can change a '1' bit into a '0' bit by filing down the appropriate >edge. >But you can't change a '0' into a '1'. And the latter is what you'd >need >to do to make a 2 or a 3. Just unloaded the 11/24 from the car and did take the number plugs out. If the only problem is the edge, then applying a drop of 2 component epoxy glue and file the excess away after hardening should then do the trick, would is not? Edward -- The Wanderer | Geloof nooit een politicus! wanderer(a)bos.nl | Europarlementariers: http://www.bos.nl/homes/wanderer | zakkenvullers en dumpplaats voor Unix Lives! windows95 is rommel! | mislukte politici. '96 GSXR 1100R | See http://www.bos.nl/homes/wanderer/gates.html for a funny pic. of Gates!

26 years, 5 months

XEROX 860 IPS

by cad＠gamewood.net

Hi Folks: I was donated a XEROX 860 IPS. Portrait oriented Hi-Res display, 2 8" floppies. Keyboard with a circular 'touch pad' on the right end (of the keyboard) The Problem? I was just getting to the point of trying to 'backup' the software (disks), and look around in the system, and the 12v portion of the power supply died. No 12v, no boot. Anyone have any schematics for the power supply? Chuck . -- ----------------------------------------------------------- He, who will not reason, is a bigot; William Drumond, he, who cannot, is a fool; Scottish writer and he, who dares not, is a slave. (1585-1649) While he that does, is a free man! Joseph P. 1955- ----------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Davis / Sutherlin Industries FAX # (804) 799-0940 1973 Reeves Mill Road E-Mail -- cad(a)gamewood.net Sutherlin, Virginia 24594 Voice # (804) 799-5803

26 years, 5 months

OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was M

by Philip.Belben＠powertech.co.uk

Pete Turnbull wrote: > On Jun 30, 18:04, Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk wrote: >> > Other people insist a microprocessor is one chip only. >> >> So I notice. But by that definition _none_ of the micro PDPs were true >> microprocessors, or at least none up until the 73. The Micro J-11 >> processor in the 73 was implemented as two chips on a large ceramic >> carrier. Was this also the case with later J-11s? > > Yes, it is. But if you allow a J-11 as a microprocessor, you must also > allow the F-11 (as in 11/23, 11/24) since it too has the complete CPU on > one (40-pin) carrier. The other devices that make up the chipset are truly > optional. You'd also need to allow the T-11 processor. I must admit I'd not met the T-11. I stand corrected. As for the F-11, hadn't I just agreed with Tony that a chipset like the F-11 was a microprocessor? Philip.

26 years, 5 months

OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was M

by pete＠dunnington.u-net.com

On Jul 1, 17:41, Philip.Belben(a)powertech.co.uk wrote: > > As for the F-11, hadn't I just agreed with Tony that a chipset like the > F-11 was a microprocessor? Sorry, having rapidly skimmed a boxful of emails, i thought you were saying something *slightly* different :-) -- Pete Peter Turnbull Dept. of Computer Science University of York

26 years, 5 months

OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macin

by allisonp＠world.std.com

<Yes, I agree with that one. Slight grey area here - things like the <floating point unit in the LSI11 or the CIS in the KDF-11 - are they <part of the microprocessor chipset or are they coprocessors? Depends, For the KD11 it's additional microcode. For the KDF-11 it's either more microcode(EIS/FIS chips) or a FPU (FPP-11 board). <> Byt that definition, anything built out of TTL, 2900 series, 3000 serie <> etc is _not_ a microprocessor. Those chips have uses other than for What about the 29116? It falls right on the cusp I'd say. <So I notice. But by that definition _none_ of the micro PDPs were true <microprocessors, or at least none up until the 73. The Micro J-11 <processor in the 73 was implemented as two chips on a large ceramic <carrier. Was this also the case with later J-11s? Unknown here. You forget the T-11 which was a single die and a single 40 pin chip that was used on the KXT-11 series boards (falcon etal). Allison

26 years, 5 months

720K drives on an original PC was Re: Way to iden

by manney＠lrbcg.com

Driver file? What driver file? You mean that's been my problem? manney(a)lrbcg.com > >720K drives will work fine on the original drive controller AFTER you load >the driver file. I've done it dozens of times to connect my NEC >Multi-Speed drives to the PC. The only problem is that you can't boot from >them since the driver has to be loaded for them to work. I don't *think* >the 1.44 Mb drives will work on the controller though. > > Joe > >At 01:24 AM 6/27/98 +0100, you wrote: >>> The 3.5" drive requires a special controller card that I find rare. Snag >it! >> >>My IBM XT is looking worried. It's been running fine for years with the >>original IBM controller linked to 2 360K drives and 2 720K 3.5" drives. >>And you're telling it it shouldn't work? >> >>720K 3.5" drives work fine on the original IBM controller using a >>suitable cable and not other mods. I believe drive A: should be a 360K >>drive, but apart from that there's no real problem. >> >>-tony >> >> >

26 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb July 1998