> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 11:33:09 PDT
> Reply-to: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> From: "Max Eskin" <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com>
> To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers" <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Zuses (Was: Re: Overhyped Innovations (was Re: OS's In ROM'
>> [About first Computers/Zuses]
>>Big ? Hmm. The Z1 could be described as a desktop computer,
>>since Zuse (and his friends) bulid it on his parents kitchen
>>table - but it tool up the whole table.
> More questions, then:
> What did they do? I guess they couldn't have been that powerful if the
> ENIAC took up a whole building...
The Z1 for shure, but compared to the ENIAC, the Z3 had
a comprehensive calculating speed. One problem is the
different technologie used - ENIAC used a 10 digit fixed
point decimal system, while Zuse already used binary
floating point like todays computers.
The ENIAC could do 14 fixed point multiplication per
second, while the Z3 did (only) 0.3 floating point.
Its the old thing of big money vs. no money - or government
fund projects vs. private - for the ENIAC, upenn had (almost)
unlimited government money, while Zuse didn't get any singe
cent - so he had to use junk telephone relais instead of new
one, and this also is the reason why he used a relais system
istrad of tubes - he just couldn't aford it -
It's the same in all ages - if you don't have to count every
transistor, byte, megabyte (M$) you'll use everything available.
(The ENIAC-on-a-chip project also took 174,569 transistors to
rebuild the function :)
Zuse:
>After the War was finally over, news of the University of
Pennsylvania ENIAC machine went all round the world - "18,000
tubes!". We could only shake our heads. What on earth were all
the tubes for? Schreyer and I parted company after the War.
At that time it was prohibited to develop electronic equipment in
West Germany.<
They had plans for a 2000 tubes computer around 1937, but
didn't get the money, since the authorities belived that the
war wouldn't need it, because the planned two year development
would be to late ... Helmut Schreyer had build a small experimental
machine for calculating 10 Digit numbers with something
around 100 tubes, running in 1944. Not a complete comuter -
more like a calculator.
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Yes, the DCT11 (t-11) is a single chip... it has no memory management
(except for a strange implementation on one of the vax line... Venus,
I think...)
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry(a)zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg(a)world.std.com |
| Digital Equipment Corporation | |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
OK, inquiring minds want to know. I just got a large pile of microfiche
today, and in it is a stack an inch thick or better with a header of
DEC/X11, and dates between about 1973 and 1981. I've a strange feeling
it's got something to do with XXDP. It looks to all be source code, I
would guess in assembly language (I've not taken a decent look at it yet).
What on earth is this stuff?
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
On Jun 30, 22:22, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> Subject: DEC/X11 Fiche
> OK, inquiring minds want to know. I just got a large pile of microfiche
> today, and in it is a stack an inch thick or better with a header of
> DEC/X11, and dates between about 1973 and 1981. I've a strange feeling
> it's got something to do with XXDP. It looks to all be source code, I
> would guess in assembly language (I've not taken a decent look at it
yet).
> What on earth is this stuff?
It's the stuff I've been looking for for ages :-)
If it's an inch thick, you only have a small part of it. But it is the
listings of (some of) the XXDP diagnostics. It's common to refer to these
so you can see what the setup options etc are for the various diagnostics.
IIRC, a complete PDP-11 set took up most of a microfiche file box. Wasn't
this stuff also on-line at Digital once upon a time? Names like STARS and
TIMA come to mind too (my spelling might be wildly wrong, of course). What
happened to all that information?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
I have a full copy of Windows NT workstation 3.5 that was opened but
never used to get out of my way. Any offers, cash or trades? I'm sure
someone in this list has a need for it. More info email me direct
please.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Blakeman
RB Custom Services / Rt. 1 Box 62E / Harned, KY USA 40144
Phone: (502) 756-1749 Data/Fax:(502) 756-6991
Email: rhblake(a)bbtel.com or rhblake(a)bigfoot.com
Website: http://members.tripod.com/~RHBLAKE/
ICQ UIN #1714857
AOL Instant Messenger "RHBLAKEMAN"
* Parts/Service/Upgrades and more for MOST Computers*
--------------------------------------------------------------------
On Jul 1, 0:41, Tony Duell wrote:
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macin
> > optional. You'd also need to allow the T-11 processor.
>
> Isn't the T11 a single chip? The one in my York Box certainly seems to be
> a simple 40 pin plastic DIL package.
Exactly! :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Oh, I'll be back. I'm simply going to unsubscribe until I get back from my
annual scrounging trip to the Bay Area. Given that I've seen as many as 60+
messages/day, and I'll be gone for (effectively) ten days, I would prefer
not to come home to 600+ messages!
Have a fun and safe Fourth of July! I shall return!! ;-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."