Not to beat a dead horse, but I believe Tim's question was relevant. I
read about optical storage using holography well over ten years ago
but am unaware of its present use or status. This may not strictly
qualify as classic computer subject matter but shouldn't we give a 12
year-old a break? Tim should be commended and encouraged for his
interest in computer science and preservation, not hen-pecked over the
fact that he related his question to a Star Trak episode.
Keep asking questions Tim and don't let anybody intimidate you into
silence.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/10/98 2:09 PM
Star Trek is a television show.
Do you really think that this question is appropriate?
Two words... alt.startrek
van
>Sorry, but this has been bugging me for quite some time. In Star Trek, they
>use "Isolinear" based memory circuts to store information in both the short
>and long term. So, from the looks of it, it's some kind of crystal, and can
>transmit it's data very quickly, and with no moving parts, so I'm guessing
>that it's similiar to today's RAM. Now, for the hard part: It can hold
>entire encyclopedia's in tiny amounts. In one episiode, they had nanites,
>little robot-bugs that could hold "gigabytes of information," and were
>microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
>ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the data
>intact.
> Was crystaline storage ever attempted like this? Is it possible?
>Feasable?
> Thanks,
>
>Tim D. Hotze
.........................................................................
@
/
/ Shift Lever
(D)/
\===================================== @ ================ Floor Plan ===
BNL |- - -Phase Shifter- - - -|--/ Get Wired!
- ------------]=[]@----------------------@ 415.276.4979
Trans- ] ]](A) Toll Free 1.888.208.6655 (B) ? (C) Rear Connection
mission ]]]]]]]]]]]]Driveshaft]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
] ]]
71 ------------] web superstation of the stars...
van burnham http://www.futuraworld.com
production manager
wired 520 third street fourth floor san francisco ca 94107 united states
.........................................................................
for immediate emergency wireless access send email to van-page(a)wired.com
van(a)wired.com van(a)futuraworld.com pingpong(a)spy.net vanburnham(a)aol.com
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr10.140909.1767.36428; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 14:09:15 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id LAA18051; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:03:44 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id LAA63546 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998
11:03:35 -0700
Received: from wired.com (get.wired.com [204.62.131.5])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id LAA04060 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:03:34
-0700
Received: from [206.221.206.170] (wrs.wired.com [206.221.206.170])
by wired.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA15918
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:01:03 -0700
Message-Id: <v03110700b1540e831ecb(a)[206.221.206.170]>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 11:14:44 -0700
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Van Burnham <van(a)wired.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
In-Reply-To: <001001bd64a0$934d3ee0$3167bcc1@hotze>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: van(a)pophost.wired.com
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
At 01:07 AM 4/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>I agree. Ebay is definitely NOT indicative of "actual market value". Its
>all based on scarcity, and scarcity varies from area to area around the
>country and the world. Someone thinking they got a great deal on a
>complete C64 system for $25 got ripped off since I can pick up something
>similar locally for less than $10.
Well, "actual market value" is exactly what eBay is -- the value of an
object (i.e., what it sells for) on the open market. Ya can't get much
more open than eBay, what with it's internationalism.
As to whether prices on eBay represent what experienced, knowledgeable
collectors will pay, that's another story.
And lastly, yes, values are determined in large part by scarcity. Here in
San Francisco, a postcard with a picture of the Golden Gate Bridge will
cost me 25 cents (or so). In New York, I'd probably have to pay a bit more
for one, and still more if I were in, say, Ayr, Scotland.
Here in the SF area, a lot of computers are readily available, and
affordable. This is a very technically aware locale, and a lot of the
people here were early-adopters of computer technology (unlike, say, parts
of Pennsylvania that are primarily Amish.) So they'll be cheaper here than
elsewhere. So people in PA can either pay higher prices there, buy over
the net (including eBay), or hop a plane to SF.
As a side note, it always makes me laugh when at antique shows when I see
some item for sale for $15 that I know can be bought at Disneyland, brand
new, for $3. But people pay those prices, because not everyone goes to
DLand every year.
>Ugh! Don't do that! Sell it to someone who would appreciate and
>actually use it (like me! :)
That's a tough call. Do you sell it to someone who will use it and
appreciate it for what you paid for it, or do you put it on eBay so you can
pay the property taxes? I haven't got an answer to that one yet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Well, it really depends. After asking my self, I said "No." Then, after
contemplating it, and asking again, I have to say "Yes." First of all, it
deals with the preservation of data, something that collecters must be
knowledgable about, especially if they have origional/interesting software.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, April 10, 1998 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (Storage) (Off-topic?)
>
>This is a Star Trek question and has absolutely no place on this
>discussion.
>
>When posting a message to ClassicCmp, ask yourself this question: "Does
>this REALLY have ANYTHING to do with old computers?" After you answer it
>to yourself, ask it again, but this time put extra emphasis on the word
>"REALLY".
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but this has been bugging me for quite some time. In Star Trek,
they
>> use "Isolinear" based memory circuts to store information in both the
short
>> and long term. So, from the looks of it, it's some kind of crystal, and
can
>> transmit it's data very quickly, and with no moving parts, so I'm
guessing
>> that it's similiar to today's RAM. Now, for the hard part: It can hold
>> entire encyclopedia's in tiny amounts. In one episiode, they had
nanites,
>> little robot-bugs that could hold "gigabytes of information," and were
>> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
>> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
>> intact.
>> Was crystaline storage ever attempted like this? Is it possible?
>> Feasable?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tim D. Hotze
>>
>>
>
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
>
> Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
> [Last web page update: 04/08/98]
>
Amen, Sam. Enrico, please use discretion in these issues. Personal
issues should stay between individuals, not aired on the list. Tell us
about your classic computer collection. I'm eager to hear about it.
Marty Mintzell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: TRS-80 Model 4 (128k) for sale
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/8/98 3:22 PM
A real gentle-man!
enrico
Sam Ismail wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Enrico Tedeschi wrote:
>
> > You are demontrating AGAIN that you don't care about other people feelings
and
> > problems. You are NOT in charge of policing this mailgroup. If you don't
want
> > to see this sort messages anymore help me to fix my problem.
>
> I'm not going to help you do shit. This is YOUR problem. This is NOT the
> problem of classiccmp! Therefore, DON'T POST YOUR PROBLEMS ON CLASSICCMP!
> I don't post how much of an ass I think you are, so don't post your
> personal crap either! And you'd better bet that when I do take over the
> list, I'll make sure YOU are on the list of moderated members since you
> have proven time and time again that you can't police yourself. So show
> some restraint and respect and KEEP YOUR GARBAGE IN PRIVATE E-MAIL PLEASE!
>
> Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
>
> Coming Soon...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
--
========================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54 Easthill Drive, Brighton BN41 2FD, UK
Tel/fax(+01273) 701650 (24 hours) and 0498 692465 (mobile)
please visit my website at: <http://www.brighton-uk.com>
========================================================
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr08.152223.1767.36036; Wed, 08 Apr 1998 15:22:26 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id MAA28636; Wed, 8 Apr 1998 12:09:33 -0700
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id MAA24588 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Wed, 8 Apr 1998
12:09:23 -0700
Received: from andromeda.ndirect.co.uk (andromeda.ndirect.co.uk
[194.74.254.17])
by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id MAA27472 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Wed, 8 Apr 1998 12:09:21
-0700
Received: from ndirect.co.uk (th-pm01-62.ndirect.co.uk [195.7.225.126]) by
andromeda.ndirect.co.uk (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA31705 for
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Wed, 8 Apr 1998 20:09:19 +0100
Message-Id: <352BD991.37692194(a)ndirect.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 20:10:01 +0000
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Enrico Tedeschi <e.tedeschi(a)ndirect.co.uk>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: TRS-80 Model 4 (128k) for sale
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980407113208.29252B-100000@shell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
I am pretty sure that the TI itself works. I plugged in a commodore
5-pin monitor cable. The video pinouts differ, I guess, but the audio
worked. It beeped when I turned it on, and booped whenever I pressed
a key. I checked the modulator box cable, and it's fine. Also, the
box is getting power. Still, the little led on it does not light up,
and ISDN (It Still Does Nothing).
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>This is a Star Trek question and has absolutely no place on this
>discussion.
>
<snip>
>
>On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Hotze wrote:
<snip>
>> microscopic. Furthermore, in some episodes, they find Chodak and T'Kon
>> ruins, between 900,000 to 700,000 years old, with half or more of the
data
>> intact.
I think 700,000 years old qualifies as being over the ten year mark :-)
-- Kirk
I love the ads, anytime. I don't care how classic equipment is offered
up just as long as it is being made available. I don't have any
problem with commercialism either.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Re.: How about a weekly FS/T list? (was Sale postings to
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 4/10/98 12:50 PM
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> How about making Friday the "classifieds section" day? You know, like
> the local newspaper. Although classifieds appear in newspspers daily, it
> seems that one day has many more than the others.
>
> This would reduce the daily FS/T traffic, but still enable people to
> trade stuff. I see ClassicCmp as a great resource, not only for information
> not available elsewhere, but also for physical equipment and software which
> is obviously no longer made or supported by the manufacturer.
Even if everyone could agree on this it would last for about 1 week and
then go back to status quo. I really don't mind the ads. They are not
excessive, they are reaching a good market where there is a win-win (the
seller gets some money and space back and the buyer gets first crack at
cool stuff), and they are more on topic than the drivel that has been
plaguing us for the last four weeks or so.
Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't blame me...I voted for Satan.
Coming in September...Vintage Computer Festival 2.0
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 04/08/98]
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists3.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Apr10.125015.1767.36399; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 12:50:16 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with SMTP
id JAA12125; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:37 -0700
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
id JAA63678 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998
09:43:28 -0700
Received: from shell.wco.com (root(a)shell.wco.com [199.4.94.16])
by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
id JAA26839 for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:26
-0700
Received: from shell (dastar@shell [199.4.94.16])
by shell.wco.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/WCO-18jul97) with SMTP id JAA14087
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980410094013.8124C-100000@shell>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Re.: How about a weekly FS/T list? (was Sale postings to
Classiccmp)
In-Reply-To: <005501bd6480$ddf42b40$6521a7cd@bothell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Sender: dastar@shell
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Scanning today''s messages gave me an idea. I don't know if this has
been discussed before, but I don't remember it being discussed.
It's sometimes hard to follow the list with all of the quoted-replies;
maybe tracking deep-threaded messages is just not my strong suit :-)
Anyway, as part of my Microsoft beta testing, I belong to a small group
of "elite" testers. Called ClubWin!, we have a private administrative
newsgroup that requires a login name and password. Having a ClassicCmp
newsgroup would provide a threaded conversation capability. We could also
hang an e-mail gateway off of the news server to provide e-mail messages for
those who can't or want to use a newsgroup.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com> wrote:
>Very true. You euro-doods could make a killing on us stupid Americans if
>you started auctioning off easy to find Sinclairs, Orics and Thompsons on
>Ebay. The only obstacle to overcome would be shipping, but I'm sure a
>little creative direct advertising towards us could overcome that concern.
So what does it cost to send a standard shipping container from London
to San Francisco on a slow boat? With a container a month, you could
stock an esoteric used computer store, bi-directionally.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>