>Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 22:36:51 -0700 (MST)
I feel bad for companies that replace junk for free. In a way, it's
great support, but it also indicates that they expect this stuff to
go bad. I almost never have hardware problems (some people fry their
mobo every day), but floppy drives are definitely the least reliable of
all modern PC technology (maybe next to monitors).
>I'm curious. I've got 3 zip drives in use, and they've all performed
flawlessly
>except that the one in my PC croaked. I called them and they fed-exed
me
>a new one, and I sent them the old one. *shrug*
>--
>Jim Strickland
>jim(a)DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
-----Original Message-----
From: jpero(a)pop.cgocable.net <jpero(a)pop.cgocable.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Friday, 13 November 1998 11:21
Subject: Re: Old, but not "Classic"
>win95 is too much for anything less than 486dx2, 500~1GB and 16MB plus.
Not really, it depends on what you are doing with it.
I have some 486SLC and DX 33 machines with 10 mb and 270Mb HDDs in the
cafe here, happily running Win95, Ishare client (for the net) Netbeui & IPX
protocol stacks
with Netware (have a 3.12 Server here) and Microsoft network clients, Plus
an assortment
of Netscape/Agent/Mirc/BP FTP etc etc etc. They work pretty well, my
customers will soon
complain if they don't.
I
>Win98 needs new machines.
Can't agree with that at all. I have had several P60's (yes the original 5v
Pentiums) with
16mb and 408mb hdds running 98, Ishare with the Active Desktop and full IE4
suite running in the cafe here for up to 3 months. Never had an ounce of
trouble with any of them. Again, it depends on what you are doing with it.
>All 3.x, 95/98 must have cdrom drives,
Highly desirable, though not essential if you have another machine who's cd
it can share.
Network cards are very cheap now, and a small lan is far cheaper to setup
than retrofitting
a CD rom.
Footnote: The P60's I sold earlier had 32x cdroms and 16bit sound cards
fitted when they
were eventually sold to customers. Again, I've had none come back with
problems.
>too many hardware and software are on cds.
Hardware on CD???? What sort of compression software does that!!! ;^)
Cheers
Geoff
Computer Room Internet Cafe
Port Pirie
South Australia.
netcafe(a)pirie.mtx.net.au
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Max Eskin wrote:
>Also: Could someone tell me the model number of the original NEC
>Multisync? NEC's site has nothing about it, and I want to know if
>that's it at the thrift store. Could someone also confirm that it
>can do VGA modes?
While surfing a while back, I came across the "NEC Technologies
Knowledge Base". On my printouts, the address was:
http://128.191.16.10/customersupport/finals/noncurrent.htm
The MultiSync I (JC-1401P3A) is one of the monitors listed. The site
has fairly good detail of the monitors in question.
Under PC Compatibility, the monitor is listed as:
640 X 480: 56 to 62 Hz vertical refresh
800 X 560: 56 Hz vertical refresh
I strictly an Apple IIgs man and do not have a clue what the above
means, but maybe the site or info above could help.
**** bpvh Internet: bpvh(a)primenet.com Delphi: BPVH ****
**** Posted by an Apple IIgs using my own Proterm 3.1 Macro File ****
From: dave dameron[SMTP:ddameron@earthlink.net]
Subject: Re: 8-bit FORTH
>>the right balance of control - not as terse as assembly, and
>>not as handcuff'd as BASIC.
>>
>I found FORTH to be _more_ terse than any other language, except maybe
>APL.
>I tried a forth computer 80188 SBC with FORTH in EPROM (Used in the
Ah, won't argue with that. As was pointed out, one loves or hates it,
sometimes get branded a 'religion', uses the HP calc style 'reverse
polish' stack, etc. I'm not aware of many 'killer apps' written in
FORTH, it seems to live in real-time controllers, telescopes, etc.
>they could write on a single line. Very difficult to read!!!
>476#!@NXDUP&+
>(just joking)
One of the points in the TIL book was you can make your language
as custom and weird as you want - if you want '$' to mean 'add two
numbers', go for it. Some places call that 'job security'. :>
Chuck
cswiger(a)widomaker.com
That seems sort of overpriced. I mean, 4 kilobytes of code for $150? Was
this a reasonable price at the time, or were there similar programs for
less?
>Altair 4K BASIC - $150
> w/ purchase of an Altair 8800, 4K of Altair memory and
> an Altair I/O board - $60
>
>8K BASIC - $200
> w/ purchase - $75
>
>Entended BASIC - $350
> w/ purchase - $150
>
>
>Altair PACKAGE ONE (assb, edit, monitor) - $175
> w/ purchase - $75
>
>Altair DOS - $500
> w/ purchase - $150
>
>Note: when ordering, specify paper tape or cassette.
>
>
>
>
>Uh, is that a bootable paper tape ?
>
>
> Chuck
> cswiger(a)widomaker.com
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 09:42 AM 11/12/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Another project in the tapes is an 'OS' based on a Byte book called
>'Threaded Interpretive Languages' - just curious what opionions
>are out there about FORTH as an 8-bit os. It seemed like just
>the right balance of control - not as terse as assembly, and
>not as handcuff'd as BASIC.
>
I found FORTH to be _more_ terse than any other language, except maybe APL.
I tried a forth computer 80188 SBC with FORTH in EPROM (Used in the
"Radio-Elextronics" Robot - 1986, 1987), and never became a great fan. I
quess partly is I knew people who had pride on how complicated a program
they could write on a single line. Very difficult to read!!! 476#!@NXDUP&+
(just joking)
-Dave
From: Alex Knight[SMTP:aknight@mindspring.com]
Subject: CompuCorp "Micro Computer"
>guts of a couple of CompuCorp "Micro Computer" (at least
>that's what _they_ called them) calculators on my
>web site. They might weigh 3 1/2 pounds but some folks
Hi Alex;
Interesting site. I'm curious if you (or anyone else here) has
heard of a programmable calculator by, I beleive' "Calcomp". We had one
in high school in mid 70's - it came with an integrated printer, probably
about 40 columns, can't recall what the display was, maybe blue
flourescent, - and the interesting thing is you could program it with
punch cards. Once you code something, you put a card into a hand
held card punch holder that was a rubber backing with slots beneath
all the holes, and use a stylus to punch out the holes. Then you could
program it by feeding the cards into a little motorized reader plugged
into the Calcomp.
That was my first programming experience which led to a lust
for Mark-8's and Altairs, etc.
Chuck
cswiger(a)widomaker.com
Cameron Kaiser:
> * CHESSmate (thanks Martijn van Buul) -- contains 6530 RIOTs, for you KIM-1 freaks
and from the page:
> 6530 RIOT (identical to KIM-1; 64 bytes RAM, 1KB ROM, 2 I/O ports, 8-bit timer),
> [...]
> The 6530 RIOT chip is identical to the twin RIOTs in the KIM-1, a
> custom multifunction chip developed by MOSTek originally for that
> system though versions of the RIOT also appear in the Atari VCS. The
> MOS 6532 is not compatible with the 6530, however, and the 6530 is
> unfortunately no longer manufactured.
6530s have been used in several Commodore boxes. Especialy within
FD units. But they are _not_ identical to any KIM-1 6530, same as
the 6530s on the KIM are not identical - The CS logic is always
specific to each of the Models (althrough some have used the same
schema) and of course the ROM content differs. Also some versions
used less CS lines to recover some I/O lines.
The 6530 was also not a special developed for the KIM, the KIM is
only the most visible device using it. The idea of the 6530 was to
offer a solution for small designs used in lagre quantity products,
where the Chipcount is esential, and an additional ROM will raise
the cost - and since such products, at least at this time tends
to use ROMS, a genuine ROM production run has to be done any way,
the usage of an 6530 lowers the cost, since the production process
is the same from the customers view than with a ROM.
Also the 6532 is somewhat compatible - this schould be changed
into 'not pin compatible'.
But beside that - nice page - great work - thank you.
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
To add to my burgeoning collection, I must admit after joining this list I
don't go past a 'second-hand' store without going in for a look :-)
Over the last couple of weeks i've acquired..
* Various dumb terminals VT220's etc, some work some don't
* An Apple IIc complete with monitor etc, now suitable modified with a
4-pin power plug to accomodate a PC 12v supply, and a DB-25 attached
directly to the board for serial comms to my PC. Interestingly this IIc is
an original motherboard, but with a Crystal hand-wired onto the board in
place of the 74LS chip, thus avioding the IIc serial problem. I'll get
around to documenting this mod soon, as I have not seen it anywhere.
* A Mac+ suitable for conversion to a MacQuarium
* A rather interesting Barcode reader/analyser with some form of
microprocessor, an Intermec Trakker 9440, the Battery is totally dead, and
I can't seem to find any info on the power supply voltage and as such
haven't been able to power it up, but it's 10 years old (date 1988), at
least I should be able to do something with the barcode wand. Anyone got
any info on these?
* A DEC TK50Z (found at the local recycling centre, and works fine)
Cheers
Karl
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Karl Maftoum
Computer Engineering student at the University of Canberra, Australia
Email: k.maftoum(a)student.canberra.edu.au
I finally got to look at the old DEC equipment. There is a complete
11/780 system with several rl someting I assume are disk drives. This
system is in several cabinets and is currently still cables together in
a clean raised floor computer room. There are close to 100 pieces of
VT220 terminals, some old ethernet hubs, some what I believe are old
serial i/o hubs of some kind, dot matrix printers, printer/terminals
like large old teletype machines, several older DEC laser printers like
old HP laserjets, a large line printer like the old mainframe style. I
will also probably get a PDP 11/34 in the near future.
I'm not into DEC's but will act as a middleman for anyone who wants this
stuff. Let me know, as I have to get it out of the plant pretty soon
and I really don't have a lot of storage space. It is located about 60
miles north of Dallas. The PDP 11 is not ready to be released yet, the
11/780 is ready now.
James