Can you tell us more about the type of auction this is?
Is it one of those auction where you can walk away with a pentium for $5 or
is it more of the upper type wher you pretty much have to be within 105 of
the retail valu in order to win it?
Have you had any experience with this sort of auction?
What I'm getting at is I've seen a few things on the list that I like but
hve no idea what to bid on them.
Also it seems like the terms for payement are very tight 2 days to send the
money or you're out how do you propose to proceed? Are you going to send a
"big" check for the bid and hope that everybody follow up on their bid?
Thank you for the post.
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon/
>I am on a major computer manufacture's surplus equipment bid list.
>The list that came out today has a lot of equipment that would be of
>interest to people on this list.
>I am not interested in making any money from this all that I ask is that
all
>costs will be covered. I will have to pay the shipping from them to me and
>that will needed to be figured into the final cost. I have just spoken to
>Bruce Lane about this and he is putting it on his web site. I would also
>ask that anyone that is interested in putting in a bid just email me with
>the line of interest and $ they want me to bid per unit. You can bid on
any
># up to the quantity listed. Please include your Phone # In case of any
>questions.
>If there are multiple bids on one item I will try my best to use the time
of
>the bid to
>choose priority. I have no intention of making any money from this and
hope
>people will understand if I get flooded I may have to cut things off.
>To give me time please let me know of any interest by Sunday Oct. 25 to
give
>me time to reformat and sort everything for sending in the final bid by
noon
>Monday.
>
>Also please keep any phone calls to before 10:00 PM eastern time. I try to
>keep peace with the wife :)
>Thanks
>Dan Burrows
>336-376-0468
>dburrows(a)netpath.net
>
>
>
Hi,
Since I was sorta plugging using the Z180 in consumer electronics earlier
today and this thread about the Z80 is running around, I tho't I'd post this
link. The article covers Zilog history in brief and where they think they're
headed.
Zilog has been plugging the Z8 for awhile but I think the Z180 represents
the company's real family jewels.
Thomas
----
Revamped Zilog aims for the top in chip markets
-------------------------------------------------------
http://www.scmp.com/news/template/Tec-Template.idc?artid=19981019192016031&…
< Are z80's still being produced?
Yes.
<If so, are they the same as the 1980 ones?
actually the z80 is 1976 design and yes. The z180 is an enhanced part
that is very popular in controls and other embedded uses.
<I would think so, since the TI-86 (still in production) uses
< a z80. BTW, I guess comparing the multi-Z80 system to a 386 isn't too
< fair.
It's fair as the z80s were only running at 6MHz.
<How much faster is it than 1 z80 running the same program?
Not terribly. The actual test only used one. The rest were doing
background tasks (printing). Z80 excels at IO and byte oriented tasks.
The real advanatge was the system had highly optimized IO channels for
everything and the disks had track caching. The other minor advantage is
the z80 code used was tight and by time 386s got in PCs code bloat had
already set in.
FYI: the machine was originally designed to tackle several things more
speed from a cpu, Multiprocessing/multitasking and more efficient IO
systems. The IO systems part proved to be the key to using one cpu more
efficiently. Multiple CPUs had a minor advantage that was offset by
fairly complex programming. To this day that system runs but with only
one master cpu installed(the other three are spares).
Two years later Compupro would come up with the MPX1 combined with
their frequent use of DMA to make one of the fastest s100 systems
available (for any given cpu). Basically doing the same work I did
earlier for myself and proving that multiple CPUs and DMA can be a
performance enhancement when applied to the bottlenecks (most tend to
occur at the IO level).
<Why is everyone making multi-z80 machines, anyway?
Partially to capitalize on available software (mountains of it all free)
and experince.
<Why not 6502 or 6800 or even (gasp!) 8088?
Because those were done also. I have a trackstar128, two 6502s. IT
has a lot to do with the way the CPUs interface and the ability to
interconnect them so they don't fight each other. The 8088 has a
selection of bus interface chips that allow for multiple CPUs on the
same buss (8289). Also multiple CPUs are a cost/complexity vs
performance race and some win better in that contest.
Allison
i've got slackware 3.0 two disk set somewhere around here i'll let go for $5
In a message dated 10/23/98 8:30:17 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
bwish(a)pcfa.org writes:
> You could get someone to burn you a CD copy, or find someone willing to
> give away their old distribution CD. I was able to get a copy of RedHat
> 5.1 burned for $5. I'm sure you could find someone fairly easily who
> would do something similar.
>
> I ran across a web page that listed people with old distribution CD's who
> would either give them to you or let you borrow them.
Chuck McManis wrote:
>You guys don't get it. :-)
>
>You play the game like this:
> 1) Scout for a surface deposit of Coal and start mining coal.
> 2) Scout for (surface) deposit of iron ore and start mining ore.
>...
> 15) Using generator create electricity.
> 18) Mine tungsten and build lightbulb.
> ...
>First one to a PDP-8 wins :-)
>
Oh, I got it. I used to play that game with myself, but with the
goal being "First one to match orbits and dock at the space station in
polar orbit wins." I could never figure out a workable way to do it in one
lifetime. (ObCC: guidance computers were a serious problem. Relays I built,
clicking away in the vibration environment induced by a rocket I built?
Right....Sequencers? Stable time reference? Oy.)
I guess I'd have to start out:
1) Scout for native woman.
2) Establish dynasty.
3) Found school/religion to keep dynasty on task
4) Gosub Chuck's #1) above.
...
:-)
- Mark
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
Are z80's still being produced? If so, are they the same as the 1980
ones? I would think so, since the TI-86 (still in production) uses
a z80. BTW, I guess comparing the multi-Z80 system to a 386 isn't too
fair. How much faster is it than 1 z80 running the same program? Why
is everyone making multi-z80 machines, anyway? Why not 6502 or 6800
or even (gasp!) 8088?
>< connections is good, soldering them helped a bit but no dice.
>
>Huh? I have 6 cards, s100 protoboards with about 25-40 pieces of mos
and
>TTL on them that I wrapped in 1981 still running. Ohmic losses? What
were
>you doing wrong. Remember #30 is for signals not power!
>
>< Have data transfers done with DMA, all memory mapped and irq driven
>< to knock subCPU as needed to grab data then place it in CPU's lap.
>< Leave CPU alone for processing. How about that?
>
>Those 6 boards built a multi z80 system with DMA and slave processors
for
>things like IO and disks. It helps but the z80 bus is so busy that
it's
>very hard to slip inbetween cycles so you steal cpu cycles by holding
it
>off with BUSRQ/. Z280, z8000 and Z380 use burst mode access to the bus
so
>that other devices can get in and get a few cycles without holding up
the
>cpu. Even with slaves you reach a bottleneck between memory management
>and overhead to move data around. Still the results with 6mhz z80s
were
>enough to blow away 386/16 class machine for text oriented
applications.
>
>Allison
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I'm going to look at some DEC hardware, a PDP-11/34 and some VAX
equipment. I'm not into DEC's so I thought I'd look at it as possibly
a rescue setup. This company is going to want some residual value
payment. how much is this stuff worth? It was taken out of service a
couple of months ago. I'll try to get a list of what's available. It's
located about 60 miles from Dallas. I might want one of the Vax boxes,
but I don't want any PDP hardware. Anyone interested?
James
Hi, group.
My 128k Mac went south on me. When I first got it a year ago, it turned on and
the screen came up and asked for a floppy. Not having a system disk that old, I
just put it in storage until I came across one.
Needless to say, next time I turned it on the floppy made funny noises and
kept spitting the disk out and no video.
Does anyone have a schematic for the little beast so I can get it cooking
again? If I have to, I can use my Mac Plus for my history presentations, but I
would rather use the original, if possible.
Thanks.
Paul Braun
NerdWare -- The History of the PC and the Nerds who brought it to you.
nerdware(a)laidbak.com
www.laidbak.com/nerdware
On Oct 23, 14:04, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> > Where is my copy of '101 basic games' ?
> Mine's at home, but I do happen to have a version I ported to the PET
> in 1978 that is sitting right here on my SPARCstation disk. I've got
> xpet, and a directory full of my old tapes that I converted to .d64
> emulator disk format. I'd post HAMMURABI.BAS, but I suspect that more
> than one person would get annoyed.
I'm sure I've seen a copy on one of the Vax sites somewhere. I'm fairly
sure I have a copy on one of the hard disks here, too. Somewhere :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
This question has been rattling around in my head for some time. Perhaps
one of the UK people has the answer.
I enjoyed the Manchester Mark I recreation. I saw the programming contest,
thought about writing something really fantastic (a small computer language,
whatever), looked closer at the architecture of the machine, and changed my
mind. It's pretty limited. I was *quite* impressed by the noodle-timer
program that won the contest, though.
But I always liked the EDSAC much more than the Manchester Mark I (baby or
full version). It has a very elegant design and you can get actual work done
with it. (Because the Mark I ran a stored program first but was in proto-
type stage, I see the EDSAC as the first working modern stored-prgoram
computer, followed soon after by the finished Mark I.) And the Initial
Orders are STILL one of the most ingenious programs ever.
Except I haven't heard anything about an EDSAC recreation, and the 50th
anniversary date is coming up! (Is it June 6 1999 or some time in May?)
And M. V. Wilkes has remained active in the field, so he might be inclined
to do something like this. Is anything planned?
If nothing ends up happening, I intend to get an autographed copy of the
Wilkes/Wheeler/Gill book.
P.S. IMO history shows that British computer designs are often MUCH more
sensible than their American contemporaries. They treat the computer as a
tool to be used rather than a hunk of hardware with software slapped on later.
Too bad history shows that British computer *sales* are LESS successful than
their American counterparts.
-- Derek
