Hi all,
I am in the market to obtain the PDP-8/e small computer handbook in the form of a real book. There is one on ABE books available which is softcover. I always worry about a 500 page book in softcover in terms of the binding and general sturdiness. Was there a hardcover version of this book and does anyone have one for sale?
Thanks
Eugene W2HX
The following is for sale, or trade possibly. (I've tried to send this
earlier, but it didn't appear in the list, so this is my second try to post
htis...)
Most of the listed items I've used together with SGI IRIX and HP/Compaq/DEC
OpenVMS and Digital/Tru64 UNIX systems and served me very well.
I need to sell this by the end of the month (Nov-2016), else I'll have to
potentially scrap a considerable bunch of it.
I probably forgot to mention a number of things and perhaps I made a few
mistakes here and there. I'll try to update (and if needed, correct) this
list with follow-up posts. For now, this is the list of items:
- SGI systems, e.g. MIPS R5000 and R5200 processor equipped O2s
notably, perhaps also a teal Indigo? with 250-MHz R4400, at least 256
Mbytes (also up to 1 Gbyte available) of RAM, various types of CPUs
available, along with various other options in terms of disks, video I/O,
etc. (ask me) --> suggestion: if you don't care for IRIX, an O2 would
still make an excellent X terminal to any e.g. other system, too, as they
don't consume a lot of power and they're wonderfully small;
- SGI parts, like an SGI Tezro dual-processor 700-MHz R16000 system
board and an SGI DMediaPro DM10 IEEE-1394a FireWire PCI card plus cable and
manual;
- DEC Multia/UDB VX40B, maximized, with 166-MHz LCA4/21066
processor, the maximum amount of RAM (256 Mbytes), large 73.4-Gbyte 2?"
SCSI HDD (with Tru64 UNIX V5.1B[-5?] optionally pre-installed, OpenVMS V7.2
also works on it, the original vertical stand and documents are present,
too), Ensoniq AudioPCI (16-bit 48-KHz) audio card, replacement NVRAM/TOY
back-up battery, experimental SRM console, PCI audio card and
custom-shoehorned, etc.;
- various older/non-x86 or compatible computer (besides earlier
mentioned SGI, e.g. DEC, Compaq and HP) bits & parts, think of FireWire
(e.g. IEEE-1394a), audio, etc. cards, cables and such ... included are
things like an AlphaServer DS15-compatible PCI audio card, HP IEEE-1394a
FireWire PCI card (rare, should work in some HP Integrity systems) and more
(ask me for details);
- Exar/Neterion/S2io 10-Gbit fiber-optical (10GBASE-SR) PCI-X
Ethernet NICs including transceivers, besides x86/-64 also OpenVMS and IRIX
compatible (and tried/used in various systems, including HP rx2600s,
rx2620s and a DS15 and also an SGI Tezro), LC FC cables optionally
available, too;
- Mellanox 40-Gbit InfiniBand PCI-E adapters (3 total), optional
copper and fiber-optical cables, in various lengths, are also available;
- various (e.g. HP) HBAs, notably SCSI (e.g. Ultra160 and Ultra320)
and FC (e.g. 2-Gbit and 4-Gbit), for PCI/-X or PCI-E, many PCI/-X cards
also compatible with IRIX and even OpenVMS, some include the HP-branded
"combo" types, providing both dual-channel FC (HBA) and Ethernet (NIC);
- various optical/tape drives and media (e.g. DVD-RAM, various data
& cleaning tapes, of which many brand new), DDS/DAT of many types (e.g.
DDS-2/DAT12, DDS-3/DAT24, DDS-4/DAT40 and DDS-5/DAT72) Ultrium (mostly
LTO-1 and LTO-3), mostly of brands like HP (notably), Quantum and Sony...
to summarize several:
-- HP Ultrium LTO-3 SCSI half-height tape drives
-- Quantum Ultrium LTO-1 SCSI full-height tape drive
-- various Ultrium LTO-3, -2 and -1 cleaning and data cartridge
tapes (mostly HP-branded)
-- various (HP and Sony-branded) DDS-4/DAT40 tape drives, also one
DDS-5/DAT72 drive, all with
-- various DDS-5/DAT72, DDS-4/DAT40, DDS-3/DAT24, DDS-2/DAT12 and
DDS-1/DAT8 tapes;
- various DVD-RAM discs, both with and without the plastic caddies;
- various HP, AXUS and Ciprico brand Ultra320 SCSI/S-ATA-bridged &
2-Gbit or 4-Gbit FC external enclosures, for HDDs (optionally including
large capacity HDDs, also hardware RAID functionality depending per
enclosure), 5?" devices and more (these can be tricky to ship, but not
impossible), to summarize some of it:
-- AXUS Demon SA-16U4P Ultra320 SCSI<=>S-ATA RAID storage
enclosure, including 16 * 1-Tbyte S-ATA HDDs and spares --> advantages:
relative low power consumption and triple-redundant power
-- Ciprico/Huge Systems MediaVault 4-Gbit FC/FC-AL RAID disk array,
including transceivers, 10 * 250-Gbyte P-ATA HDDs plus one or more spare
HDDs --> advantages: low power consumption and rather silent
-- HP StorageWorks M5313A FC/FC-AL 2-Gbit (JBOD) disk array,
including transceivers and 14 * 146.8-Gbyte FC HDDs and one or two spare
HDDs, too --> note: perhaps not useful for OpenVMS users as-is, as JBOD
and FC-AL are a no-go, but it can be used in a larger SAN setup;
- various types of printed documents/documentation (various manuals
and reference guides, from e.g. SGI and Intel);
- APC Smart-UPS 3000 XLM (heavy-duty, 3000VA capacity) UPS back-up
battery aggregate power system, plus special APC RJ-45 USB cable (the whole
unit is perhaps hard to ship, but not impossible I guess), this UPS can
sustain e.g. several 2U and even some 4U HP Integrity servers for up to
30~40 minutes (depending on the loads, of course);
- HP OpenVMS Alpha V8.4 SPL (Software Product Library) July 2010,
including the original box and 'documents';
- lots of relatively recent 300-Gbyte and 146.8-Gbyte 80-pin
(SCA/-2) and 68-pin 10K and some 15K RPM, hot-swap, SCSI HDDs (most are
HP-branded);
- older <=9-Gbyte SCSI disks, from various vendors, some with (e.g.
DEC) firmware, with 50-, 68- and 80-pin (SCA/-2) connectors (many DEC and
Compaq/HP-branded ones, relevant for OpenVMS and Digital/Tru64 UNIX, too);
- HP StorageWorks 3U external 5?" SCSI expansion enclosure, room for
4 (68-pin) SCSI devices (including optical drives, tape drives and
including full-height models);
- PCMCIA and PC card items: SanDisk CompactFlash card reader, SIIG
IEEE-1394a adapter, USB 2.0 adapter and an Adaptec Fast SCSI adapter plus
cable;
- Apple ADB and serial items: Griffin iMate adapters (2 total, 1 in
original packaging) and Keyspan adapter;
- Chieftec SNT-3141 S-ATA HDD backplane plus sleds and I can provide
3 * free 250-Gbyte S-ATA HDDs --> suggestion: perhaps useful for in a
system like the HP zx2000 (if it fits, of course; I never tried it);
- IBM System x central fan tray (P/N: 90P4618, FRU P/N: 26K4761) and
also (e.g.) x346 rack rails (might fit on other devices/systems, too), SCSI
HDD caddies, fans and more (ask me);
- HP KVMIP console (PN 262589-821) 8-port extender hub, no power
supply required for this;
- Gefen 1080p HDMI scaler, professional grade (original box
present), useful for some computers and monitors to correct aspect ratios;
- non-computer items, or indirectly: professional SDI equipment,
like JVC-branded CRT and LCD monitors, Miranda bridges (including for
IEEE-1394a FireWire to SDI) and more, also many cables of various lengths
available and also photo & video equipment (e.g. Nikon D70 plus Nikon
Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm f/1:3.5-4.5G zoom lens, a barely used Sony HDR-FX1000/E
plus accessories and various bits & parts and a Tamron TV Zoom Lens
12.5-75mm f/1.8 with C mount with constant aperture over the zoom range).
All the items are located in the Netherlands. I'll provide more
information and pictures on demand.
As far as possible trades go. I'm mostly interested in lenses (mostly in
Nikon F/G, Pentax K, Leica M, Leica M39, M42 and Sony E-Mount mounts), in
particular fast longer telephoto lenses (135mm and above), also enlarger
lenses.
- MG
A friend of a member from another mailing list has some DEC kit to dispose of.
Here is what I know at present:
?
Rudiments of 2 microvax 2000s, a SCSI disc, a TK50 drive and a Vaxstation 3100
An X-terminal.
A couple of VT220s
An LQP02 - the drive belts have rotted :(
A Vaxmate
A Rainbow
Full inventory to follow, will have to wait for a sunny day.
?
Would anyone care to suggest if any of this is worth money?
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? Google Mail/Talk/Plus: lproven at gmail.com
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven ? Skype/LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)
Eugene - I never saw a hardcopy... ed#
In a message dated 11/28/2016 7:24:05 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
w2hx at w2hx.com writes:
Hi all,
I am in the market to obtain the PDP-8/e small computer handbook in the
form of a real book. There is one on ABE books available which is softcover.
I always worry about a 500 page book in softcover in terms of the binding
and general sturdiness. Was there a hardcover version of this book and does
anyone have one for sale?
Thanks
Eugene W2HX
It tested good with my DVM when I first had it.. but the cap is original for sure... maybe I will invest in a new one even though it seemed ok.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: "Ian S. King" <isking at uw.edu>
Date: 2016-11-28 11:37 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: SWTPC 6800 issues again
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Brad H <vintagecomputer at bettercomputing.net
> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> You might recall a while back I was having issues where I'd have to power
> up/power off multiple times before I'd get the 6800 to start up correctly
> and give me the SWTBUG prompt.? What I did was remove an overwrought
> modified RAM board and replaced it with a more basic 4K board set to the
> $A000 range.? That worked great for a while, but not we're getting back to
> the situation where I power up many times and get either ? marks, a string
> of 4s, or some other random character.? I have to power off and on several
> times before I get the $ prompt.
>
>
>
> I figured out how to run a proper RAM diagnostic and no errors came back.
> I
> wasn't sure how to properly test the $A000 board -? I assumed I couldn't
> let
> the test test the address space used by the test program itself, so I set
> it
> to run from A07F to AFFF (I think I did that right, I set the MSB in A002
> to
> A0 and LSB in A003 to 7F, and for the upper limit MSB in A004 to AF and
> A005
> to FF).
>
>
>
> I'm wondering now if this is really a RAM problem or maybe something else.
> I don't think it's the serial card.. I've tried both the MP-C and MP-S and
> no change.
>
>
>
> I have an NOS MP-B2 motherboard here.? The 'check pins' on the molex
> connectors for the cards haven't even been cut.? I could set that up for
> testing although, being totally unused I'm hesitant about altering it.
> What
> do you think on that?
>
>
>
> Brad
>
>
My first question (and pardon me if this was addressed in your earlier
thread) is, have you checked the power supply?? If possible, use a scope,
but even a good DVM will tell you if you're maintaining voltage.? And if
the filter cap is the original, just replace it - they have a limited
lifespan.? I bought one from Digi-Key for $19.? Hope that helps -- Ian
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical
Narrative Through a Design Lens
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."
Hey guys,
You might recall a while back I was having issues where I'd have to power
up/power off multiple times before I'd get the 6800 to start up correctly
and give me the SWTBUG prompt. What I did was remove an overwrought
modified RAM board and replaced it with a more basic 4K board set to the
$A000 range. That worked great for a while, but not we're getting back to
the situation where I power up many times and get either ? marks, a string
of 4s, or some other random character. I have to power off and on several
times before I get the $ prompt.
I figured out how to run a proper RAM diagnostic and no errors came back. I
wasn't sure how to properly test the $A000 board - I assumed I couldn't let
the test test the address space used by the test program itself, so I set it
to run from A07F to AFFF (I think I did that right, I set the MSB in A002 to
A0 and LSB in A003 to 7F, and for the upper limit MSB in A004 to AF and A005
to FF).
I'm wondering now if this is really a RAM problem or maybe something else.
I don't think it's the serial card.. I've tried both the MP-C and MP-S and
no change.
I have an NOS MP-B2 motherboard here. The 'check pins' on the molex
connectors for the cards haven't even been cut. I could set that up for
testing although, being totally unused I'm hesitant about altering it. What
do you think on that?
Brad
Van: william degnan<mailto:billdegnan at gmail.com>
Verzonden: maandag 28 november 2016 01:28
Aan: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts<mailto:cctech at classiccmp.org>
Onderwerp: Re: DEC M9312 Configs for a 11/40
I have a CPU backplane populated as follows, I have checked the jumpers on
the CPU cards to verify that they're correct to the options installed
1: empty
2: M7253
3: M7232 (1-4) M7237(5)
4: M7231
5: M7233
6: M7235
7: M7234
8: M7236
9: empty with GC
FWIW, slot 1 is only for M7239 and slot 2 is only for M7238.
I assume what you have in slot 2 is a typo, it can only be EIS.
Slot 1 is for FIS.
- Henk
Hi folks.
As I begin getting my 8e running, after checking the PS for proper voltages and ripple I connected up the front panel. This picture is with all cards removed, just the PS and front panel.
http://w2hx.com/x/VintageComp/PDP-8e/power-applied-no-cards.jpg
Can anyone tell me if I have burned out bulbs (7 not illuminated in total)? Or is this inconclusive because they may be in some random state? Or, with all cards out - should I expect all lamps to illuminate? I have read all of the info/threads on bulb this great community has produced, I found a company with a stash of OL-2 which I will probably go with once I determine if I have a bulb problem or not.
Thanks
Eugene W2HX
I vaguely recall a T-1 network controller with a 8x300 series
controller in an X.25 node about 30 years ago, but I don't have any
supporting doco. I think it's pretty clear that uses other than disk
controllers were very rare.
KJ
> From: Pontus Pihlgren
> The machine also has a qbus which is somewhat peculiar to find in a
> desktop VAX.
I don't know much about Vaxen, but I think the early desktop ones all had a
QBUS. I'm not sure if it was ever used for memory access; I know some used it
as an I/O bus (to take advantage of all the existing QBUS I/O devices), and
used an 'over-the-back' cable system for the memory bus.
> However, I don't have the cables necessary to attach a QBUS expansion.
> Does anyone have a set? What do they even look like?
They are a pair of boards connected with a pair of 50-pin cables. The boards
are different on each end, because the QBUS does not have in/out connectors
which separate from device slots, like the UNIBUS; it only has regular QBUS
slots, and those have grant in on different pin from grant out. So on the card
at the end of one backplane, the grant line is connected to the 'grant in'
pin, and on the other card, to the 'grant out' pin.
There are a whole bunch of different card and variants thereof for this, with
and without termination resistors, etc; the M9400/M9401 pair are for Q18
(which you won't want, I'd be pretty sure), and the M9405/M9405 for Q22. One
set I know of is an M9404/M9405-YB.
There's a fair amount of discussion of multi-segment QBUS systems in the QBUS
PDP-11 processor/etc manuals, as far as the termination, etc goes.
As to finding a set, there are some available on eBait at the moment for a
not wholly unreasonable amount of money.
Noel
Hi all...I am hoping there is someone here who has an 11/40 or 11/35 and a
M9312 ROM terminator card. I'd like to know how you have yours jumpered.
I took photos of the jumpers installed in my M9312:
http://www.vintagecomputer.net/digital/PDP11-40/M9312/
Here is the page from the manual that describes jumpers per UNIBUS system
type:
http://www.vintagecomputer.net/digital/PDP11-40/M9312/M9312_Jumper-configur…
1) Yes or no - Did I correctly identify the location of W8?
2) Yes or no - Should W8 be in for am 11 40/25/10/05 or is the /40 special?
Here is the issue....when I jumper W8 the CPU can do very little and I
cannot activate the CONSOLE ROM. I put in posts into what I believe is W8
so I can switch back and forth without having to re-solder. With W8 out
the system works better, and I can at least get to the CONSOLE prompt.
Looking for opinions as to whether my card is correctly configured. I am
trying to determine why I can't bootstrap and run a TU58 nor RL11, yet I
can load and run BASIC just fine. I think I may have a UNIBUS problem OR
a CPU card problem, but I can't load XXDP either to determine for sure.
There are more problems, I can't bootstrap the RL11 nor TU58 manually
either, I am working through everything CPU and UNIBUS too.
Is there a complete XXDP tape that I can download from PDPGUI? I found
TU58 image but I can't get the TU58em emulator to work yet. If I could
just figure out why I can load BASIC and not RL02 RT11 I'd make my day.
Thanks
Bill
Hi
I brought up a VAX 4000-100 yesterday to test DSSI disks. It worked like
a charm.
The machine also has a qbus which is somewhat peculiar to find in a
desktop VAX. However, I don't have the cables necessary to attach a QBUS
expansion.
Does anyone have a set? What do they even look like?
Kind Regards,
Pontus.
Hi folks,
This is my first vintage computing project. I have a PDP-8/e with the following boards in this order.
FRONT PANEL
M8330 KK8E CPU Timing board (system clock), replaces M833
M8300 \ KK8E CPU Major registers
M8310 / KK8E CPU Major register control
M837 MC8E Extended Memory and Time Share Control
M849 SHIELD
CORE1 \
CORE1 /
CORE2 \
CORE2 /
M8320 KK8E Bus loads
Each core pair is 16KW. There are a bunch of other non-DEC boards (ECRM) that I have removed for the time being. You will notice that I have no serial board (yet. I have a line on one).
I have cleaned up the machine, removed and clean out the foam, cleaned the card sockets and card edges, tested the power supply. I am ready for the next step.
Next, I will put the boards back in and start testing. I am looking for some very simple programs that I can key in from the front panel to do some basic testing. I have found simple programs on the internet but they are all in assembler and I don't yet have the knowledge/tools to convert them to switch-enterable programs. For example, here are some good test programs but not directly enterable on the front panel (or at least I don't know how).
http://dustyoldcomputers.com/pdp8/pdp8i/testprogs/index.html
Can someone direct me to some simple sequence of switch settings to do some basic testing?
Many thanks in advance
Eugene W2HX
PS. Here is more on the machine as received:
http://w2hx.com/x/VintageComp/PDP-8e/
Also as you will find on the internet, the ECRM boards are from a company that produced electronic character recognition systems.
Sorry for the bandwidth. Looking for Jos Dreesen who back in 2005 mentioned on this list that he had documentation on the ECRM OCR system. Please contact me if you can.
Thanks
Eugene
Does anyone know off hand what polarity that Mac Portable requires? I know that the original was 7.5V @ 1.5A, but not sure of the polarity.
I did have have a PB100 power supply that I used with mine, but (unfortunately) no longer have it.
Also (if it still works) what is the easiest way to image the old Conner SCSI drive? It doesn?t appear to have a standard connector.
I have googled this, but didn?t come up with anything useful.
Thanks,
Chris...
I am not certain exactly what you mean by polarity in this case, but I?m guessing that you are asking which contact is positive and which is negative.
If that?s the case, the center socket is positive, and the outer jacket band is negative.
I hope this helps.
smp
--
Stephen M. Pereira
Bedford, NH 03110
KB1SXE
> On Nov 27, 2016, at 1:00 PM, cctech-request at classiccmp.org wrote:
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 16:26:43 +1000
> From: Chris Pye <pye at mactec.com.au <mailto:pye at mactec.com.au>>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org <mailto:cctalk at classiccmp.org>>
> Subject: Macintosh Portable
> Message-ID: <00D543B1-7E32-40DE-8829-91E3EBFCBF4A at mactec.com.au <mailto:00D543B1-7E32-40DE-8829-91E3EBFCBF4A at mactec.com.au>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Does anyone know off hand what polarity that Mac Portable requires? I know that the original was 7.5V @ 1.5A, but not sure of the polarity.
>
> I did have have a PB100 power supply that I used with mine, but (unfortunately) no longer have it.
>
> Also (if it still works) what is the easiest way to image the old Conner SCSI drive? It doesn?t appear to have a standard connector.
>
> I have googled this, but didn?t come up with anything useful.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Chris...
>
>
>
I've just dug out and inventoried two boxes of magnetic media. A
little of it is not mine; a little more is stuff I'd like copies of if
I can make it happen.
But most of it is just going to leave soon, one way or another. I'd
rather see it go to someone who can actually use it, but it is not
worth the costs of keeping it around to me. I do not currently have
any system on which I can check the contents of any of these (while
it's possible I might get one or more set up, I can't count on it, and
it's unlikely to happen soon). So, while the labeling might be
accurate, it also might not.
There are a bunch of TK50s (or something similar; I know there are
other, similar, tapes, some similar enough to fool a quick inspection;
I didn't look in detail to be sure every one is a TK50). They have
labels, some printed, some scribbled, some carefully handwritten.
Here, \ indicates a line break.
SW/gnu \ Nov 28/91
/usr/local \ 91/10/26
6.0 + 797493
ULTRIX V4.2 \ SUPPORTED SUBSETS \ VOL. 1
ULTRIX V4.2 \ SUPPORTED SUBSETS \ VOL. 2
Sunclock \ 91/11/21
AQ-PE1F0-01 C01 \ DEC FORT ULTRIX V3.2 BIN \ TK50
AQ-PE1F0-01 \ DEC FORT ULTRIX V3.2 BIN \ TK50
ULTRIX V4.2 \ MANDATORY UPGRADE
Kermit5A \ 91/11/21
DEC FORTRAN \ V3.0 (crossed out and "obsolete" written in)
K2 /usr/local \ 1991/03/14
LOTUS 1-2-3 \ 91/11/19
/usr/users \ 91/10/20
swTeX.tar.Z \ 91/11/02
ULTRIX V4.2 \ UNSUPPORTED SUBSETS
There are numerous quarter-inch cartridge tapes (the DC600 formfactor;
many are DC600s or DC600As, but some are other sizes/lengths/formats).
Some have no label. Three of these have absolutely no label, not even
a manufacturer/brand label. Nine more have a brand label but no
indication of their contents. One has a printed label which has been
ripped off enough that all I'm sure of is that it had the usual
boilerplate text for US Government users. Two others have ripped-off
labels; on one, all that remains legible is "tix" at the end of a word;
the other, I can see enough of a logo to be fairly sure it was an
Accelr8 label.
Four more have labels that are short and simple enough to fit on a
single line:
89/02/22(F) ISC0D0S0
TO BE CHECKED
89/02/17 ISC0D0S0
/files! execlude ./digests & ./misc 90/10/08 cd /files
Twenty-six tapes are labeled with just their sizes. These are written
in my hand, so I feel fairly sure they are the result of me
capcity-testing the tapes:
SIZE: 30605 ?512
SIZE: 30643 ?512
SIZE: 30611 ?512
SIZE: 30730 ?512
SIZE: 30730 ?512
SIZE: 114081 ?512
SIZE: 115168 ?512
SIZE: 116769 ?512
SIZE: 118878 ?512
SIZE: 119721 ?512
SIZE: 119870 ?512
SIZE: 119891 ?512
SIZE: 120345 ?512
SIZE: 120352 ?512
SIZE: 120412 ?512
SIZE: 120586 ?512
SIZE: 120741 ?512
SIZE: 120756 ?512
SIZE: 121719 ?512
SIZE: 121722 ?512
SIZE: 121917 ?512
SIZE: 122116 ?512
SIZE: 122343 ?512
SIZE: 122608 ?512
SIZE: 122664 ?512
201796?512
Five more have sticky-notes (one on the box, one on the tape) and a
size sticker. I _think_ the 3.5 here refers to version 3.5 or
something (SunOS is a likely candidate).
--
sticky-note: 3.5
sticky-note: Tape 1
sticker: SIZE: 121372 ?512
--
sticky-note: 3.5
sticky-note: Tape 2
sticker: SIZE: 118586 ?512
--
sticky-note: 3.5
sticky-note: Tape 3
sticker: SIZE: 119293 ?512
--
sticky-note: 3.5
sticky-note: Tape 4
sticker: SIZE: 122624 ?512
--
sticky-note: 3.5
sticky-note: Tape 5
sticker: SIZE: 120216 ?512
--
The rest are a grab-bag:
--
NESTAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
S.O. # INT4406 PLAN 5000 (tm)
Boot Utility Tape QIC24
SERIAL # 6050221 SYSTEM RELEASE 5.2
(C) 1982-1986 NESTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
--
NESTAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
S.O. # INT4406 PLAN 000 (tm)
PLANPAK # 712 IA BACKUP TAPE QIC
SERIAL # 6060238 SYSTEM RELEASE 5
(C) 1982-1986 NESTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
--
Nestar Systems, Inc.
Subsidiary of DSC Communications Corporation
PLAN Series (tm)
Boot Uility Tape QIC-24
FS# UPGRADE Star Plus FS Release 1.10
160-12676-002
(c)1982-1988 DSC Nestar Inc
--
various indistinct writing; legible bits include:
90/2/19
/FICRSI
90/04/10
DIGEST
NeXT, SUN-SPOTS, SUN-386i
92/12/19
--
/HOME/ICH 10/10/90 , 11/17/90, 16/15/90 1/30/91 2/1/91
22.4.91
--
3/15, 5/8, 7/26 (various further dates and words crossed out)
SUG89 (INTERESTING STUFF ONLY) 90/12/16
--
IFUJ1 IFUJ1 90/03/19 TAR HOME/ICH 92/12/10
89/3/8 MPAQUETT 90/04/30
89/5/1 MPAQUETT 90/05/25
(indistinct) / 92/12/08
--
LAB B
YEAR END
2/2
--
LAB J
A3 MAY 7/93
--
LAB F
YEAR END
1/2
--
LAB F
YEAR END
1/2
--
LAB F
YEAR END
1/2
--
LAB F
YEAR END
1/2
--
LAB B
YEAR END
1/2b
--
LAB B 4 OF 4
LAB B
4 4 HP
JAN 15 1993 n/u
--
(crossed-out text omitted)
ABBOTT INCR DUMP
OCT-1-87
4 MAY 87 (1of2)
--
NESTAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
PLAN 1000 (tm) Print Server Version 1.1
IA BACKUP TAPE QIC- 11 P/N 160-12170-002
(C) 1981,1982,1983,1984,1985,1986,1987
NESTAR SYSTEMS, INC. Licensed Program
--
SUPERSKETCH REL 6
? A. PENTLAND 1985,1986,1987
--
LAB B
3 4 HP
JAN 15 1993
--
Fall- 8AT
LAB B
1 (unclear)
End of Semester backup
--
Accelr8
DESCRIPTION DCL8 (2,0) EDT8 (2,0)
PART NUMBER 8-812-001, 002 RELEASE #:
TAPE 1 OF 1 . NUMBER OF FILES BPI
SN: 000646
--
(SUN 3.2 SUNBIN EXPORT 68020
logo) 1.4" Tape (boot format), 2 of 4
Part Number: 700-1256-02 Rev. A
--
box: KEE 3.1
Genera 7.1
tape: 3.5 EXPORT SUNBIN 68020
1.4" Tape (boot format), 3 of 5
Part Number: 700-1600-02 Rev. A
--
13/3/89
Relax 1of2
LFRL system and
saved results
--
13/3/89
Relax 2of2
--
LAB J
A2 MAY 7/93
--
LAB F
YEAR END
2/2
--
LAB B
2/4
--
LAB J
A1 MAY 7/93
--
There are also a bunch of 5?" floppies. 34 of them are unlabeled,
possibly completely unused:
9x Sony branded, DSDD 48tpi
6x Sony branded, "MD-2HD"
6x 3M branded, DS, DD, RH, MARK Q
9x BASF branded, 2S/2D 48tpi
4x Unbranded
The BASF floppies from the above list are marked as being for sale to
government and educational institutions only, not for resale; I don't
know whether that has any bearing.
Of the remaining floppies, some have labels short enough to be
reasonably represented on a single line:
QuickBasic 1of3
QuickBasic 2of3
QuickBasic 3of3
FW Macros
d|i|g|i|t|a|l branded, unlabeled
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 28/28 85/10/28 (scratched out)
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 27/28 85/10/28 (scratched out)
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 26/28 85/10/28 (scratched out)
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 25/28 86/10/28 (scratched out)
?ACKUP ????OVMS 4.1M 6/28 85/10/28 (partially ripped off)
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 5/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 4/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 3/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 2/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 1/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 9/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 8/28 85/10/28
BACKUP MICROVMS 4.1M 7/28 85/10/28
MS-DOS boot
AG2012
Maxell branded, label ripped off, all that's legible is "FEB85"
QuickBasic 1
QuickBasic 2
QuickBasic 3
Network Boot DOS 3.1
There is also a set of original Borland Turbo C diskettes:
INSTALL/HELP A2B0427471
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT
COMMAND LINE/UTILITIES
LIBRARIES
HEADER FILES/LIBRARIES
EXAMPLES/BGI/MISC
and two sets of six which appear to be working copies of the above.
There are three Microsoft-branded floppies:
Microsoft Mouse Setup/Mouse Menus 1
Microsoft Paintbrush Program/Mouse Menus 2
Microsoft Paintbrush Utilities Disk
and two that don't fit any of the above:
--
label partially ripped off: remaining text is
BL-N639C-BH
P/OS HARD DIS
DISPATCH
VOLUME LABEL "PROD
1983
? Digital Equipmen
--
BitFax for Windows V2.08A
(01/25/93)
BitCom Deluxe with MNP5 v5.1
(06/20/91)
--
This is all in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. In general, I suck at getting
things shipped; local pickup, either in person or by proxy, is much
preferred. I can try to find the round tuits to ship, but it's usually
a losing proposition (I have at least two boxes of stuff that have been
awaiting shipment for months at this point).
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
>
> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 08:07:00 +0000
> From: Rod Smallwood <rodsmallwood52 at btinternet.com>
> Subject: Front Panels - PDP-8/L
>
> Hi Guys
>
> In addition to good stocks of PDP-8 panels as below I
> have artwork ready to produce PDP-8/L
>
> panels. In order to gauge the size of the first batch please indicate
> your interest.
>
> Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
>
> --
> PDP-8/e PDP-8/f PDP-8/m PDP-8/i
> Front Panels ex Stock - Order Now
How about making the overlay panel that goes at the top of DEC 19" racks?
My PDP-8/e has the plastic part at the top of the cabinet, but the
orange/yellow panel is missing. It probably uses the same colors as the 8/e
front panel.
--
Michael Thompson
Hi,
I am trying to do a clean install of RSX-11MP 4.6 on simh. I have found the install magtapes on Bitsavers, and they work fine.
However, trying to install DECnet, I found only 1 of the 2 (or 3) install tapes.
What is missing is the decnet11mp46-deckit tape. The accompanying **netkit** tape is on Bitsavers, but not the **deckit** tape. So you cannot complete the install process...
Does anyone have this tape? I know there's an installed simh *disk* image, I also know you can fix the problem with it.
But there is just nothing like having a full, proper install process to come up with your own setup :)
And it would be nice if the last version is preserved completely.
Kind regards,
Oscar.
For reference:
A. installation magtapes for RSX-11 M PLUS 4.6:
1. http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp11/magtape…
2. http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp11/magtape…
B. installation magtapes for the accompanying DECnet 11mp46:
1. http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/www.bitsavers.org/bits/DEC/pdp11/magtape…
2. MISSING: the DECKIT tape.
Hi Guys
In addition to good stocks of PDP-8 panels as below I
have artwork ready to produce PDP-8/L
panels. In order to gauge the size of the first batch please indicate
your interest.
Rod (Panelman) Smallwood
--
PDP-8/e PDP-8/f PDP-8/m PDP-8/i
Front Panels ex Stock - Order Now
> From: Todd Goodman
> Did you have any issues with customs bringing in the racked equipment
> from Toronto?
No; it just sailed right through. The fact that it was Canada->US probably
helped.
IIRC PakMail in Toronto picked a customs broker - or maybe we were talking
about doing that, and he decided we needn't bother? I forget now.
> Both times the carrier knew it was unpalleted computer equipment and
> did a good job using blankets and strapping them into the trucks.
> ...
> The other carrier did a great job .. They mostly ship antiques and
> pianos and other items that can be fragile and not palleted
> ...
> Both were very competitively priced in my experience.
Sounds like these were both so-called 'white glove' shippers, who do things
like furniture, etc.
Those are also an option, but in my experience, somewhat more expensive: when
I was shipping a pair of -11/84's from California to Virginia, the shipping
cost just about doubled when I had to switch from freight to 'white glove' for
them. Hence my advice to palletize stuff, and send it freight (at least for
cross-continent, where the difference really adds up).
Noel
> From: Devin Davison
> I am uncertain of a good service to use for the task, i need the
> machines to be packaged up / put on a pallet at the pickup location
I have had good luck with PakMail (http://www.pakmail.com/); I've had them
ship a couple of 6' racks (one from Arizona, one from Toronto), and been very
happy with the results.
The shipping cost in the Arizona case may not have been the absolute lowest
possible I could have secured had I been on the spot, looking around, but.. I
wasn't on the spot, looking around; and it was pretty reasonable (I've
shipped a number of large items from the West Coast, so I think I'm
reasonably well calibrated).
And they went to the person's house, picked the thing up, put it on a pallet,
and shipped it.
A tip for keeping costs down when shipping via freight (i.e. on a pallet,
which generally is a key thing to do to keep costs down) to one's house (i.e.
not a place with a loading dock): if you have a vehicle which can hold the
item(s), have it/them delivered to the nearest freight terminal, not the
house, and go pick it up. That way, they won't have to roll a truck with a
lift-gate to your house, which is an extra cost.
Every line I've ever used (SAIA, FedEx Freight, etc) were happy, when one
arrives to pick it up, to dump the shipment in their yard, and let one take
everthing off the pallet and load it all into your vehicle. (But check with
your local terminal first, to make sure they're OK with it. And check the
weather prediction to pick the day to go get it! :-) And you generally save a
couple of days, too.
I have discovered that a Ford Taurus wagon nicely holds an H960 6'x19" rack
(I joked that the car must have been designed by someone who collects old
gear :-), so I have been able to pick up a shipment consisting of _two_
H960's this way: one inside, and one on the roof rack. With only one person,
one has to remove the heavy units first, and put them in the car separately,
but it can be done.
Noel
I have purchased 3 large SGi crimson computers and need them shipped from
california to florida. I am uncertain of a good service to use for the
task, i need the machines to be packaged up / put on a pallet at the pickup
location, the owner is unable to do so. Usualy I would use YRC freight,
however they do not offer the service to package the machines on site.
Hopefully someone here can make a suggestion. Ive never dealt with shipping
something this large before. I did have a Microvax 3800 shipped with YRC
freight, however that was purchased through a business and was packaged
before shipping. The crimsons will be a bit larger.
I have the machines paid for, but figuring out the shipping has had me a
bit stumped for the past few days.
--Devin
we liked our winstar that was on a taurus wagon chassis I was told...
wish we still had it hauled a lot of stuff in it!
currently have a subaru forester... unfortunately is is not as much
volume as the winstar with the seats out! I hear the outback has a
longer cargo area.Ed#
In a message dated 11/25/2016 8:57:21 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
elson at pico-systems.com writes:
On 11/25/2016 05:49 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I have discovered that a Ford Taurus wagon nicely holds an H960 6'x19"
rack
> (I joked that the car must have been designed by someone who collects old
> gear :-), so I have been able to pick up a shipment consisting of _two_
> H960's this way: one inside, and one on the roof rack. With only one
person,
> one has to remove the heavy units first, and put them in the car
separately,
> but it can be done.
>
No, it was designed by a guy whose wife plays harp in the
symphony. My cousin does that, and the Taurus from years ago
was the only station wagon that would fit it. The others
came up short by just one inch!
Jon
well that is good stuff and your scan were well done many thanks !
Ed#
In a message dated 11/25/2016 8:24:55 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
silent700 at gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:03 AM, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com> wrote:
> These are very nice! thank you for posting them!
> do you have anything else twx, telex or teletype?
Not that I've run across yet. There are some more terminal brochures
to come, however. Informer, among others.
j
These are very nice! thank you for posting them!
do you have anything else twx, telex or teletype?
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 11/24/2016 10:52:06 P.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
silent700 at gmail.com writes:
I received another big pile of random documentation this week and
these floated to the top and landed directly on my scanner:
http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing/WesternUnion
Circa 1968-9 Western Union TELEX brochures, rate charts and a little
bit of ASR32 technical data. Really interesting stuff for fans of
early data networks, as well as groovy graphic design!
Enjoy...
-j
This system has several tape drives, and possibly some Eclipse era
processor. If someone knows what this is they may want to rescue it.
There are three what appear to be 6' racks with various tape devices,
and a desk high cabinet. There are two 3 or so switch front panels,
one on one of the 6' racks, and one on the low boy rack, may be a simple
reset run power type panel for each.
Lincoln Nebraska
4822.33 bucks
Data-General-Model-CS-Series-200n-Commercial-Series-Terminal-Controller-Vintage/
http://www.ebay.com/itm/282212431051
No interest, just reporting. May want to ask the vendor if there is
more to this, and whether a possible system was scrapped. If so
explain to them that they have scrap iron, and should have sold the
system cabinets for real money.
thanks
Jim
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 08:46:19 -0800
> From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
> Subject: Re: Are there mailing lists or groups just tor ...
>
> There are none that I know of. I've been doing a lot of work this year
> archiving
> VME information and firmware.
>
> there's not a lot out there for software, though beyond NetBSD
>
> On 11/24/16 10:51 AM, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> > VME based systems ? I've been given a VME chassis and want to build up a
> > 68K based system for fun.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > -pete
>
My employer is a member of VITA, the group that does the VME standards. I
am working with VITA management to get members to send AL documentation on
older VME products, and hopefully software too.
I am sure that there are plenty of people on this list that would help you
get a VME system running. Early Sun systems were VME based, and their
documentation on the VMEbus is very good.
Michael Thompson
Pete,
You can start with www.m88k.com
You can email me for information.
BR Matti
On 11/24/16 10:51 AM, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> VME based systems ? I've been given a VME chassis and want to build up a
> 68K based system for fun.
>
> HP 9000/3xx ? I think I asked this one before. But can't find searching the
> archives or my email.
>
> TIA
>
> -pete
>
VME based systems ? I've been given a VME chassis and want to build up a
68K based system for fun.
HP 9000/3xx ? I think I asked this one before. But can't find searching the
archives or my email.
TIA
-pete
Gmail is only the single most reliable mail provider in the world, and bounces never happen. Is anybody ever going to fix this brain dead, bone headed bug, or can we expect to continue getting memberships disabled every couple of weeks?
I wanted to wish all American readers of this list a very happy
Thanksgiving Day from a reader in Canada. Reading 'Classic Computing'
still plays an important part in my appreciation of the role of
computers from earlier years in why I still enjoy working with
computers. Happy computing. Murray :)
I received another big pile of random documentation this week and
these floated to the top and landed directly on my scanner:
http://chiclassiccomp.org/docs/index.php?dir=%2Fcomputing/WesternUnion
Circa 1968-9 Western Union TELEX brochures, rate charts and a little
bit of ASR32 technical data. Really interesting stuff for fans of
early data networks, as well as groovy graphic design!
Enjoy...
-j
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Graham Toal wrote:
> Not so. By doing nothing (ie NOT creating an SPF record for the sending
> domain) you pretty much guarantee a lack of problems. (At least, these
> specific problems). It's the smart aleck admins who do create SPF records
> etc who cause the problems, in conjunction with recipients that think these
> records are worth paying attention to. The irony is that SPF was invented
> by the advertising industry to ensure that their so called 'legitimate'
> bulk mail gets through; it does very little to stop actual spam and it
> completely messes up mailing lists and people who use traditional SMTP mail
> while travelling. Sorry, I shouldn't start on SPF, it just drives me
> crazy. If you are a DNS admin, *please* don't fall for the SPF bullshit.
> (For some reason Microsoft are totally enamored of it and twist their
> clients' arms to enable it :-/ )
You are preaching to the choir. Some of the first implementers of SPFs
were outfits that the rest of us would call spammers. As for Micro$oft,
my employer trashed our Zimbra and PMDF servers and sent us over to
Office365 so now I spend my time babysitting Exchange in the cloud,
writing PowerShell scripts, and waiting a Micro$oft minute for things
to happen that used to be immediate.
And you are right, Micro$ofts loves SPFs but they do nothing at all to
expedite our mail through their servers.
And in honour of Micro$oft, SPFs, and my 21st century managers, I am
retiring in 29 days.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
I've been working a little bit off-and-on for years on reverse-engineering
the WD1000 and WD1001 disk controllers (8X300/8X305-based), and their
clones. I've only made any significant progress within the last few days,
after hacking together my own disassesmbler which deals with the Fast I/O
Select PROM. I do NOT recommend using this disassembler yet, for reasons
that are explained in the README, but I've put it on github:
https://github.com/brouhaha/s8x30x
I've made some progress interpreting the firmware of an early WD1000, which
only had 512 words of firmware, and didn't support run-time configurable
sector size selection. So far I've figured out how they handle the host
reading and writing the task file, dispatching the commands, and much of
the sector ID search.
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
> I was thinking of changing my email to another provider even though I've had
> this one for at least 12 years. But if it's because of a configuration
> problem, then other providers may react the same way so will it do any good?
I doubt that changing your email provider will help.
My mail is constantly being disabled now that I am using my ISP address
but it wasn't while I was using my work email address but I think that
is a coincidence - the problem did not manifest itself until a few
weeks after I changed my email address.
By the way, I am my employer's email administrator and I know that I was
not doing anything special to make the email go through - no spf records,
no nothing.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
seems odd some list serves have this problem and some do not out
there... which would suggest it may be a matter of the way the listserv is
configured. I hear people with yahoo mail complain about some list serves but
they also say some cause no problem at all.
Most of it is a mystery to me as I have not run a listserv on a server
or a mailserver..
Ed#
In a message dated 11/23/2016 10:05:13 P.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
johnhreinhardt at yahoo.com writes:
On 11/23/2016 8:00 PM, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016, Michael Brutman wrote:
>> Gmail routinely marks these emails as spam. And Gmail clearly says: "
It
>> has a from address in aol.com but has failed aol.com's required tests
for
>> authentication."
>>
>> Digging deeper into the header one finds:
>>
>> "Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
>> cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org designates 199.188.211.196 as permitted
>> sender) client-ip=199.188.211.196;
>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=(a)mx.aol.com;
>> spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
>> cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org designates 199.188.211.196 as permitted
>> sender) smtp.mailfrom=cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org;
>> dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=aol.com"
>>
>>
>> I'm no expert on dmarc, but that looks to be the source of the pain.
>
> Do we have any evidence that his messages are affecting the rest of us,
> though?
>
I get disabled regularly. My address is at Yahoo. Currently I'm sitting
at 2.0 out of 5.0 for my bounce score. The previous disabled messages came
at:
11/20/2016
11/06/2016
10/25/2016
10/18/2016
10/13/2016
10/05/2016
09/26/2016
09/10/2016
08/23/2016
08/11/2016
08/06/2016
08/01/2016
07/19/2016
07/10/2016
07/01/2016
A fairly uneven distribution. None repeating sooner than 5 days and
sometimes taking up to 18 days before hitting the 5.0 bounce limit.
I was thinking of changing my email to another provider even though I've
had this one for at least 12 years. But if it's because of a configuration
problem, then other providers may react the same way so will it do any
good?
John H. Reinhardt
Ditto although my timing was odd and I may have gotten the notice prior to replying. ?I emailed Jay off list but understandably he should be having some family time during this holiday break and not having to worry about us right now :-)
Hopefully there's a log or something noting what the mail service did or what bounced if anything.
-------- Original message --------From: Adrian Stoness <tdk.knight at gmail.com>
Weird I got one of these notices today when I replayed to a thread
Dunno if this will appeal to any of the readership, but Electronics
Goldmine is offering a box of 30 new Papst 80 mm 24 volt fans for $10.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G21651A
I like Papst as a good brand. I just have no use of 30 24 volt fans.
--Chuck
Should we do some sort of tradition of what vintage computing item we're thankful for? If ?that's too much of a repeat it could be a vintage project this year that you're thankful for.
I know we're all thankful for Jay and classiccmp.org.
I'm thankful for my recent successful visit to San Jose. ?I was fortunate enough to get to experience both Weird Stuff (first time) and the CHM (2nd time but previous was VCF 10). Was great to hear some other visitors at the museum bringing up memories and some chatter about teaching kids about old tech. One visitor was talking about how he had a class do a sort of human logic array so they'd hold hands if it was true or false (like the battery, thread spindle/paperclip, light bulb intro form building your own computer books).
Picked up some Byte magazines from Weird Stuff as a souvenir and of course bought some shirts and a donation to support the museum. On the 8.5 hour drive back to wgere i was supposed to be I listened to some old RCR podcasts I think it was David Greelish, Bill Degnan, Earl Evans and Jason Scott) lol. Probably one of the first couple episodes. Good time and you all kept me awake on a dark Pacific Highway 1. So thankful for you all too.
:-p?
- John
no the only one that gets bounced is me.
and I have to re enable it every so often
not a lot though.... just sometimes
In a message dated 11/23/2016 4:57:44 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
charles.unix.pro at gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> wrote:
>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, Ian Finder wrote:
>
>> Not an expert on mailing lists, but I wonder if the fact that gmail
always
>> puts COURYHOUSE into the spam folder due to AOL weirdness is the signal
>> source for the bounce?
>>
>
>
^^^ Mis-attributed; I (Charles) said that, and I have no data to go on --
pure speculation.
-- Charles
Used Dave's emulator to image the hd in an Intel SYP310 and to my
surprise it had an iRMX II (286) development toolchain on it. The
MAME guys got it running in simulation in about 30 minutes.
Anyone have any documentation or software distributions?
iRMX development stuff is extremely hard to find, esp the 286 version.
From: jim stephens
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:21 PM
> the Ultimate system was the only Non IBM written supervisor / system
> that ran on mainframes at the time.
You're going to have to be more specific than that. At what time? On
what mainframe(s)? Are you saying that by the time Ultimate, whatever
that is when it's at home, was running, no other non-IBM OSes were
running on IBM hardware, all others being dead? Or that Ultimate was
earlier than, say, MTS on IBM hardware? And are you claiming that no
other manufacturers' systems are mainframes? What are you saying?
Rich
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Living Computers: Museum + Labs
2245 1st Avenue S
Seattle, WA 98134
mailto:RichA at LivingComputers.orghttp://www.LivingComputers.org/
I think it's the hardware or server company folks might have an attachment towards. I only saw novell 3.x and up but it was all standard x86 arch. Did they support other platforms?
-------- Original message --------?Not many here seem to be into preserving Novell servers and such.
?? I could be mistaken.
Bill
Help! Looking for rolls of paper tape for teletypes, twx and telex
all widths.
As we have an array of these machines at SMECC and like to demo them
and always need tape to print on and punch!
Size varies between just smaller than 3/6 inch to one inch wide and
several sizes in between.
Please check your closets and storage... you may have some and not
know it!
drop a note off list please to us.
Thanks Ed Sharpe Archivist for SMECC
Van: Guy Sotomayor Jr<mailto:ggs at shiresoft.com>
Verzonden: woensdag 23 november 2016 17:29
Aan: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts<mailto:cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Onderwerp: Re: ISO: PDP-11/40 LTC and Stack Limit options
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 7:11 AM, william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 3) I would not mind getting something like Guy's UA11 to test with. Are
> these available?
>
Yes, they are still available (along with KM11s)
TTFN ? Guy
------
I soldered my two KM11?s last Sunday!
I bought them from you at least eight years ago!
Going to put them to good use solving issues in my 11/10 and 11/40 ?
BTW, my 11/35 booted from RL02. But at the moment the 11/35 has issues ?
Regarding an SLU in slot 9: AFAIR, the M7800 does not use nor connect NPR,
So the M7800 will go well in slot 9 regardless of BG and NPR present or not.
The "scrapper" in NC that has the Triad contacted me directly, he had seen
the discussion of the system in the classiccmp archives.
He wasn't sure how to get his contact info out there, so he emailed me with
his name and direct phone number. I don't want to just post it publicly
(although it may already be out there somewhere, I don't know).
If someone is spearheading the effort to save this machine, please contact
me offlist and I'll provide the contact info.
Best,
J
> From: Josh Dersch derschjo at gmail.com
> see if the same is true for other bus grants -- I can run the system
> with no grant continuity card at all in slot 9 and everything works.
Well, the BG4-BG7 grants definitely _are_ run through the SPC slot 9 (see
below) - at least, on a stock system. It's _possible_ that the software
you're loading doesn't use interrupts. (I have this vague memory that, unlike
the -11/34, the /40 doesn't complain if there's a non-continuous grant line.)
Or perhaps someone wired them across on that slot, to avoid knuckle-mashing
trying to put a G727 down there.
Anyway, the wire list in the drawings show all four lines (although they are
listed in two places, under "BGx" and "BUS BGx"). E.g. BG4 is shown on pg. 79
as going from D07E2 (Source - K4-6, pg. 63, top right) to D09S2 (which is the
correct BG4 'in' pin for SPC), and as BUS BG4 on pg. 84 as going from D09T2
(SPC BG4 'out' pin) to B09E2 (correct BG4 UNIBUS 'out' pin).
> I now have the system booting XXDP
Yahh!!
> I did find out why there was that wire missing on the backplane; the
> KW11-L requires a wire (carrying one of the bus grant signals) be
> removed from slot 3.
Right, BG6 is wired through that KW11-L slot because the clock needs
interrupts - the wire list shows that on pg. 79, where the BG6 entry is longer
than the other BGn entries, because of that. If I'm reading the notations
correctly, it shows the jumper installed by default - I guess it was removed
by hand on systems sold with a KW11-L?
There must also be some way to indicate that the jumper should be wired on
top at both ends (so the F03V2 to D09M2 wire wouldn't have to be removed to
pull the F03R2 to F03V2 jumper) - although maybe they just did _all_
multi-pin runs as alternating low on both ends, high on both ends, repeat to
make removal/replacement easier.
Speaking of notation, dunno if you knew this (I didn't), but the wire list
for the 11/40 includes etch also; you can tell etch entries from an 'H' in
the "Q" column and 'P' in the "Remark" column. Don't confuse them with the
'H' in the "A/P" column, which also also has some 'L' entries; not sure what
that is about, unless it tells whether the signal is asserted high or low.
Noel
The following is for sale, or trade possibly. (I've tried to send this
earlier, but it didn't appear in the list, so this is my second try to
post this...)
Most of the listed items I've used together with SGI IRIX and
HP/Compaq/DEC OpenVMS and Digital/Tru64 UNIX systems and served me very
well.
I need to sell this by the end of the month (Nov-2016), else I'll have
to potentially scrap a considerable bunch of it.
I probably forgot to mention a number of things and perhaps I made a few
mistakes here and there. I'll try to update (and if needed, correct)
this list with follow-up posts. For now, this is the list of items:
- SGI systems, e.g. MIPS R5000 and R5200 processor equipped O2s
notably, perhaps also a teal Indigo? with 250-MHz R4400, at least 256
Mbytes (also up to 1 Gbyte available) of RAM, various types of CPUs
available, along with various other options in terms of disks, video
I/O, etc. (ask me) --> suggestion: if you don't care for IRIX, an O2
would still make an excellent X terminal to any e.g. other system, too,
as they don't consume a lot of power and they're wonderfully small;
- SGI parts, like an SGI Tezro dual-processor 700-MHz R16000
system board and an SGI DMediaPro DM10 IEEE-1394a FireWire PCI card plus
cable and manual;
- DEC Multia/UDB VX40B, maximized, with 166-MHz LCA4/21066
processor, the maximum amount of RAM (256 Mbytes), large 73.4-Gbyte 2?"
SCSI HDD (with Tru64 UNIX V5.1B[-5?] optionally pre-installed, OpenVMS
V7.2 also works on it, the original vertical stand and documents are
present, too), Ensoniq AudioPCI (16-bit 48-KHz) audio card, replacement
NVRAM/TOY back-up battery, experimental SRM console, PCI audio card and
custom-shoehorned, etc.;
- various older/non-x86 or compatible computer (besides earlier
mentioned SGI, e.g. DEC, Compaq and HP) bits & parts, think of FireWire
(e.g. IEEE-1394a), audio, etc. cards, cables and such ... included are
things like an AlphaServer DS15-compatible PCI audio card, HP IEEE-1394a
FireWire PCI card (rare, should work in some HP Integrity systems) and
more (ask me for details);
- Exar/Neterion/S2io 10-Gbit fiber-optical (10GBASE-SR) PCI-X
Ethernet NICs including transceivers, besides x86/-64 also OpenVMS and
IRIX compatible (and tried/used in various systems, including HP
rx2600s, rx2620s and a DS15 and also an SGI Tezro), LC FC cables
optionally available, too;
- Mellanox 40-Gbit InfiniBand PCI-E adapters (3 total), optional
copper and fiber-optical cables, in various lengths, are also available;
- various (e.g. HP) HBAs, notably SCSI (e.g. Ultra160 and
Ultra320) and FC (e.g. 2-Gbit and 4-Gbit), for PCI/-X or PCI-E, many
PCI/-X cards also compatible with IRIX and even OpenVMS, some include
the HP-branded "combo" types, providing both dual-channel FC (HBA) and
Ethernet (NIC);
- various optical/tape drives and media (e.g. DVD-RAM, various
data & cleaning tapes, of which many brand new), DDS/DAT of many types
(e.g. DDS-2/DAT12, DDS-3/DAT24, DDS-4/DAT40 and DDS-5/DAT72) Ultrium
(mostly LTO-1 and LTO-3), mostly of brands like HP (notably), Quantum
and Sony... to summarize several:
-- HP Ultrium LTO-3 SCSI half-height tape drives
-- Quantum Ultrium LTO-1 SCSI full-height tape drive
-- various Ultrium LTO-3, -2 and -1 cleaning and data cartridge
tapes (mostly HP-branded)
-- various (HP and Sony-branded) DDS-4/DAT40 tape drives, also
one DDS-5/DAT72 drive, all with
-- various DDS-5/DAT72, DDS-4/DAT40, DDS-3/DAT24, DDS-2/DAT12
and DDS-1/DAT8 tapes;
- various DVD-RAM discs, both with and without the plastic caddies;
- various HP, AXUS and Ciprico brand Ultra320 SCSI/S-ATA-bridged
& 2-Gbit or 4-Gbit FC external enclosures, for HDDs (optionally
including large capacity HDDs, also hardware RAID functionality
depending per enclosure), 5?" devices and more (these can be tricky to
ship, but not impossible), to summarize some of it:
-- AXUS Demon SA-16U4P Ultra320 SCSI<=>S-ATA RAID storage
enclosure, including 16 * 1-Tbyte S-ATA HDDs and spares --> advantages:
relative low power consumption and triple-redundant power
-- Ciprico/Huge Systems MediaVault 4-Gbit FC/FC-AL RAID disk
array, including transceivers, 10 * 250-Gbyte P-ATA HDDs plus one or
more spare HDDs --> advantages: low power consumption and rather silent
-- HP StorageWorks M5313A FC/FC-AL 2-Gbit (JBOD) disk array,
including transceivers and 14 * 146.8-Gbyte FC HDDs and one or two spare
HDDs, too --> note: perhaps not useful for OpenVMS users as-is, as
JBOD and FC-AL are a no-go, but it can be used in a larger SAN setup;
- various types of printed documents/documentation (various
manuals and reference guides, from e.g. SGI and Intel);
- APC Smart-UPS 3000 XLM (heavy-duty, 3000VA capacity) UPS
back-up battery aggregate power system, plus special APC RJ-45 USB cable
(the whole unit is perhaps hard to ship, but not impossible I guess),
this UPS can sustain e.g. several 2U and even some 4U HP Integrity
servers for up to 30~40 minutes (depending on the loads, of course);
- HP OpenVMS Alpha V8.4 SPL (Software Product Library) July
2010, including the original box and 'documents';
- lots of relatively recent 300-Gbyte and 146.8-Gbyte 80-pin
(SCA/-2) and 68-pin 10K and some 15K RPM, hot-swap, SCSI HDDs (most are
HP-branded);
- older <=9-Gbyte SCSI disks, from various vendors, some with
(e.g. DEC) firmware, with 50-, 68- and 80-pin (SCA/-2) connectors (many
DEC and Compaq/HP-branded ones, relevant for OpenVMS and Digital/Tru64
UNIX, too);
- HP StorageWorks 3U external 5?" SCSI expansion enclosure, room
for 4 (68-pin) SCSI devices (including optical drives, tape drives and
including full-height models);
- PCMCIA and PC card items: SanDisk CompactFlash card reader,
SIIG IEEE-1394a adapter, USB 2.0 adapter and an Adaptec Fast SCSI
adapter plus cable;
- Apple ADB and serial items: Griffin iMate adapters (2 total, 1
in original packaging) and Keyspan adapter;
- Chieftec SNT-3141 S-ATA HDD backplane plus sleds and I can
provide 3 * free 250-Gbyte S-ATA HDDs --> suggestion: perhaps useful
for in a system like the HP zx2000 (if it fits, of course; I never tried
it);
- IBM System x central fan tray (P/N: 90P4618, FRU P/N: 26K4761)
and also (e.g.) x346 rack rails (might fit on other devices/systems,
too), SCSI HDD caddies, fans and more (ask me);
- HP KVMIP console (PN 262589-821) 8-port extender hub, no power
supply required for this;
- Gefen 1080p HDMI scaler, professional grade (original box
present), useful for some computers and monitors to correct aspect ratios;
- non-computer items, or indirectly: professional SDI equipment,
like JVC-branded CRT and LCD monitors, Miranda bridges (including for
IEEE-1394a FireWire to SDI) and more, also many cables of various
lengths available and also photo & video equipment (e.g. Nikon D70 plus
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 18-70mm f/1:3.5-4.5G zoom lens, a barely used Sony
HDR-FX1000/E plus accessories and various bits & parts and a Tamron TV
Zoom Lens 12.5-75mm f/1.8 with C mount with constant aperture over the
zoom range).
All the items are located in the Netherlands. I'll provide more
information and pictures on demand.
As far as possible trades go. I'm mostly interested in lenses (mostly
in Nikon F/G, Pentax K, Leica M, Leica M39, M42 and Sony E-Mount
mounts), in particular fast longer telephoto lenses (135mm and above),
also enlarger lenses.
- MG
Hi folks,
Still working on this STC Executel and it looks like the CPU isn't too good
given how hot it gets within a minute or so. The display is the same whether
there's a CPU physically present or not. I built this circuit to test it:
http://saundby.com/electronics/8085/freerun.shtml
Using a 4mhz crystal the address lines are all over the place - I'm using a
logic analyser rather than LEDs.
Has anyone got a spare they'd like to sell me? I'm struggling to think of
something I've got that may have a socketed 8085...
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
what is it? looks too new for me,.... do not remember this one....
Ed#
In a message dated 11/21/2016 9:30:06 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
drlegendre at gmail.com writes:
The vintage computing world is in your debt, Steven.. ;-)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Steven Maresca <steve.maresca at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Ian Finder <ian.finder at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Someone go rescue this:
> > http://nwct.craigslist.org/zip/5886266424.html
> >
> > Or palletize it and send it to me.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ian Finder
> > (206) 395-MIPS
> > ian.finder at gmail.com
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ian.finder at gmail.com');>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ian Finder
> > (206) 395-MIPS
> > ian.finder at gmail.com
> >
> I'm in CT close enough to make a rescue..I've reached out to the poster.
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
Hi Al & list,
Sorry for the delay, but the files should be readable now.
On 18-11-16 19:00, Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org> wrote:
> Fred, could you make these files readable, please
Apparently Filezilla in the new configuration needs more configuration.
The URL again: http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/divcomp/NCD/
Greetings,
Fred Jan
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016, Antonio Carlini wrote:
> There is a rogue that runs on VAX/VMS as I definitely played it a little back
> in the day.
>
> I don't think I had the sources, just a .EXE, so that may not work so well
> for Alpha.
Now THAT is interesting! I wonder where it went to?
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
Not that I'm aware of. I can do it, but I don't have daily access to
the machine so it will take a couple of months.
>
> has the firmware been dumped from this?
>
> On 11/21/16 6:54 AM, Anders Sandahl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 11/18/16 12:02 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
>>>> This is great! Thanks Mattis, Jonas and Al.
>>>>
>>>> Somewhere I have an early DNIX system image from a development machine.
>>>> I don't know if that is interesting to put on bitsavers as well?
>>>>
>>> yes, I think so
>>>
>>
>> And I have documentation and software to the Luxor ABC1600 as well.
>>
>> Temporary link: http://blue.abc80.net/archive/luxor/ABC1600/
>>
>> Most of it is in Swedish though.
>>
>> /Anders
>
> It's possible that they didn't bother wiring NPG to that slot, but sent
> it directly to the NPG pin on the 'UNIBUS out' connector
Sho'nuff; the 11/40 prints indicate (pg. 86) that "BUS NPG" goes directly from
C07P2 ("Source" - you can see the generation on print K4-5, pg. 62, lower
right side), to A09U1 (NPG on the UNIBUS Out connector), do not pass through
SPC slot 9, do not collect a grant.
I dunno about any other oddities you're seeing, but I think this one is
solved. :-)
Noel
On Sun, 20 Nov 2016, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> There's a Rogue for the Alpha Micro. I don't have source for it either,
> but it runs very well.
What is an Alpha Micro?
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
> From: Josh Dersch
> There appears to be no continuity between CA1/CB1 of slot 9 and CA1/CB1
> of the SPC/MUD slots in the rest of the system.
Is that the only issue? If so, that should be 'not too hard' to track down.
It's possible that they didn't bother wiring NPG to that slot, but sent it
directly to the NPG pin on the 'UNIBUS out' connector; when the -11/40 was
done, there were no single-board DMA devices.
> It's very puzzling.
BTDT! :-)
> I have an RK11 and an RK05
Ah, you're good then - Unix V6 will run fine with a single RK. (Ah, memories:
my first experience as a sys-admin was on an 11/40 with a single RK...) The
standard V6 distro include systems that will run on an RK. (The V7 distro
does not, but it's possible to build RK-based systems. You'd need to bring it
up on an emulator to do so.)
> (with the option of a 2nd RK05 if I ever get some mounting rails for
> it.) I know the RK05s are tight storage-wise.
Well, you can't put all the source and documentation online with a single RK
(or even two), but that shouldn't be an issue. If you were actually trying to
do _real work_ on the system, a single RK might be something of a PITA.
> I also have an RL02 but I need to repair an RL11 first.
Put that online, and you'll have plenty of room. Also, with two controllers,
you'll get higher performance (not that you care :-); you could put e.g.
swapping on the RK, and most files on the RL.
> I should be able to wrangle bits onto media either using what I have,
> or by using stuff at the LCM, but the VTServer option sounds nice too.
OK, I'll probably get back to work on it 'soon'.
> The RL bootstrap and driver would be very useful to have, thanks!
They're available on my "Bringing up V6 Unix on the Ersatz-11 PDP-11
Emulator" page, here:
http://mercury.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/V6Unix.html#RL
That page (and it's partner, "Improving V6 Unix") probably contains some
other useful stuff, if you're serious about running V6.
One off the top of my head: the C on the 'vanilla' V6 distro is fairly
primitive. There are no longs or unsigneds, casts don't work, etc, etc. There
is a later version (which I think might be the so-called 'phototypsetter C'),
available from the 'Shoppa disks', you might want to get that.
Noel
Ah! Ok!
heard of it but never seen an installation.
Great find!
I am a little foggy on it but I somehow remember it being able to
control external devices for process use
vs. the usual IBM stuff that was just 'data processing'
Ed#
In a message dated 11/22/2016 12:31:26 A.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
ggs at shiresoft.com writes:
The IBM Series/1 was introduced in 1976 and withdrawn in 1988. There were
originally 2 models and another 2 models were added later. I always knew
them by their code names ? different varieties of peaches?so named because
they were developed by IBM?s GSD division which was headquartered in
Atlanta, GA (even though all of the development was done in Boca Raton,
FL).
TTFN - Guy
> On Nov 21, 2016, at 10:11 PM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
>
> what is it? looks too new for me,.... do not remember this one....
> Ed#
>
>
> In a message dated 11/21/2016 9:30:06 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
> drlegendre at gmail.com writes:
>
> The vintage computing world is in your debt, Steven.. ;-)
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Steven Maresca
<steve.maresca at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Ian Finder <ian.finder at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Someone go rescue this:
>>> http://nwct.craigslist.org/zip/5886266424.html
>>>
>>> Or palletize it and send it to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Finder
>>> (206) 395-MIPS
>>> ian.finder at gmail.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ian.finder at gmail.com');>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Finder
>>> (206) 395-MIPS
>>> ian.finder at gmail.com
>>>
>> I'm in CT close enough to make a rescue..I've reached out to the
poster.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Steve
>>
>
> From: Josh Dersch
> The 11/40 is mostly working ... but I've been unable to boot anything
> (like XXDP, for example).
What are you trying to boot from?
> Slot 9 of the CPU backplane is supposed to be an SPC slot but it
> doesn't seem to work
Missing/hard-wired BG/NPG jumpers on that slot, maybe?
If not, plug one of Guy's UA11's into that slot, and see what's up! :-)
> I assumed I needed the KJ11-A because the KT11-D manual specifies
> (bottom of page 2-1): "When the KT11-D Memory Management Option is
> added to an existing PDP-11 system, the KJ11-A Stack Limit Register
> Option must also be added." So I assumed the MMU required this option
> be present...
Hmm, I didn't recall that; not sure I ever knew that! (Sorry!)
I spent a short time looking at the KT11-D and KJ11-A prints, trying to see
exactly what the KT11-D wanted, but I wasn't able (yet) to fully grok the
interaction.
>From the KJ11-A prints, you can probably work around not having a KJ11-A card
by strapping the relevant outputs high or low (as the case might be), i.e.
simulating a KJ11-A which is not reporting a problem. Like I said, V6 doesn't
use the SLR for anything, so it's it's not actually working (i.e. reporting
stack transgressions), no biggie.
If you're determined, I did scan in a KJ11's PCB, so it would probably be
possible to produce 'after-marked' ones - it's not a very complicated card.
>> You will also need the KE11-E (M7238), as the Unix C compiler emits
>> MUL, DIV etc, and even the bootstrap uses them. The KE11-F (M7239) is
>> useless; the V6 Unix C compiler doesn't generate that type of PDP-11
>> floating point.
> Yeah, that might be harder to find, I'd forgotten about that
> requirement. I suppose I could run Ultrix-11 instead (I have that on my
> 11/34 at the moment) as it'll run sans floating point hardware,
We seem to be having a communication failure. You don't need floating point
to run V6 or V7 on an 11/40. In addition, the hardware floating point
hardware on the 11/40 (the FIS) is a variety that Unix doesn't support anyway
(in the sense of, the C compiler doesn't generate FIS instructions).
It's the Exteded Instruction Set (EIS) card (which supports MUL, DIV, ASHC,
etc) which is necessary. No way UNIX (of any flavour) will run without those
instuctions (and thus, that card). If you don't have an M7238, start
looking....
BTW, what is your mass storage device? RL's? If so, vanilla V6 doesn't support
RL's, but I do have a V6 RL driver, I can either build you a system that will
run on an RL, or (if you bring up V6 under an emulator, so you can build
systems, etc) provide it so you can add it. You'll also need an RL bootstrap
(again, those are available, but not in vanilla V6).
Also, how are you getting the bits onto the mass storage? V6 can only be
'cold installed' onto a blank machine from a TM11 or TM02 tape drive. Failing
that, you have to put a V6 filesystem onto a disk on some other machine. Do
you have the ability to write packs on another machine/OS, and the ability to
get a Unix file system onto that system? Failing that, I'm in the process of
getting VTServer working to transfer V6 over a serial line to a blank machine
(my situation) - I got distracted before I got 100% finished, but I have it
all scoped out, and can get it done in a couple of hours from where I am now.
Noel
http://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=658
Hot business women posing with classic UNIVAC hardware and a link to a very
rare 1968 business proposal by UNIVAC to Philip Morris, an attempt to sell
either a 418-III or 9400, pricing, comparison with IBM 360 models.
Included with the proposal were a handful of product brochures. I scanned
some of my favorite photos.
Bill
> From: Josh Dersch
> I'm finally turning my attention back to my 11/40 (which I started
> working on 7 years ago and never quite got around to finishing -- I've
> learned a lot since then and I'm hoping to be able to debug it properly
> now).
A KM11 might help, if you have one: there are a couple of sources for new ones
(I got mine from Guy), it will allow you to single-step the microcode, etc,
etc.
> My ultimate goal is to run V6 or V7 UNIX on it -- I have the MMU but
> I'm looking for an M787 (line-time clock) and M7237 (stack limit
> register) to complete the set.
You don't need the SLR to run Unix V6 (in fact, IIRC, it doesn't use it). For
the clock, you don't absolutely have to have a KW11-L, you can substitute a
KW11-P - but V6 _has_ to have one or the other, or it panic()'s - some things
in the kernel have to have a working clock.
You will also need the KE11-E (M7238), as the Unix C compiler emits MUL, DIV
etc, and even the bootstrap uses them. The KE11-F (M7239) is useless; the V6
Unix C compiler doesn't generate that type of PDP-11 floating point.
Noel
Hi all --
I'm finally turning my attention back to my 11/40 (which I started working
on 7 years ago and never quite got around to finishing -- I've learned a
lot since then and I'm hoping to be able to debug it properly now).
My ultimate goal is to run V6 or V7 UNIX on it -- I have the MMU but I'm
looking for an M787 (line-time clock) and M7237 (stack limit register) to
complete the set. I have other DEC stuff for trade, drop me a line...
Thanks!
Josh
>
> On 11/18/16 12:02 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
>> This is great! Thanks Mattis, Jonas and Al.
>>
>> Somewhere I have an early DNIX system image from a development machine.
>> I don't know if that is interesting to put on bitsavers as well?
>>
> yes, I think so
>
And I have documentation and software to the Luxor ABC1600 as well.
Temporary link: http://blue.abc80.net/archive/luxor/ABC1600/
Most of it is in Swedish though.
/Anders
Hi
I've just brought home a 42U rack and started mounting things currently
in shelves and on the floor. But I'm missing some hard to get slide
rails.
Does anyone have a spare set of rails for an Integrity rx2620 or QBUS
BA23 box for sale?
The Integrity rails look like this:
http://www.trademoon.com/assets/images/default/A6939AZ.JPG
BA23 shelves look like this (except some missing parts):
http://www.plccenter.co.uk/en-GB/Buy/DEC/702076101
Kind Regards,
Pontus.
> From: Josh Dersch
> Someone should try to rescue that; they're very rare...
I personally don't want to get into this (I'm already knee-deep in PDP-11
stuff), but I can help with the logistics; I'm down in SE Virginia, very
close to the NC line. So if someone wants to do this, but is e.g. on the West
Coast, I can wrangle getting it, and getting it shipped out.
Noel
> From: Jon Elson
> if they were doing mostly RPG work, then a /20 could do that.
This is a _long_ time ago, and I was a junior operator, not a programmer, but
I know most (maybe all) of their work was in RPG.
Noel
Some may recall the Nova 3 front panel discussion some months back. I
bought a Nova 3 front panel just for the heck of it, and we discussed
replacing lamp, and have the correct lamp info now.
Nova 3 CPU, 2 16K boards, Basic I/O and
Anyway the Nova 3 karma system was watching and guess what.
http://jimsoldtoys.blogspot.com/2016/11/data-general-nova-3.html
So now I may really be doing work on the lamps on both my system and on
the spare front panel.
Maybe the Star Trek gods are doing this, since we have a DG copy of Star
Trek too. Getting scary.
thanks
Jim
spent way too much time on this the past few days
I dug up everything I had on the system, took pictures and dumped firmware and floppies
Maybe someone will figure out how to remove the serialization some day
bitsavers.org/pdf/fortuneSystems floppy images under bits/
I also started reverse-engineering the board, mostly to see how the mmu worked.
Pretty basic, four base/bound sets made up of two 12 bit registers in three bytes
the 12 bit adder is applied to A10-21
This all looked familiar, esp the bus pinouts. I think I had docs at one point for
expansion board developers. Have no idea what happened to that.
I found this ad!
>From what I knew of him he was more of an admin type person than
a hands on person..
If anyone else finds something related to him at EAI let me know.
When I worked for him before I had started my computer business
and stayed at his house I do not remember much of any hoarded stash of
anything...
must be from living then Army life for over 20 years where you moved
all the time..
=============================
anyway here is the ad I found!
==========================
230 Dataplotter
Designed for time-share users I self-contained, desktop device, compatibly
interfaced to keyboard terminals and acoustic couplers / operates at
maximum speed in all directions'l includes easy-to-use FORTRAN plot ting
subroutines.
Electronic Associates, Inc. 185 Monmouth Pkwy. West Long Branch, N.J. 07764
Attn: Ed Sharpe
COMPUTERS and AUTOMATION for March, 1971
Ed Sharpe ( the younger) Archivist for SMECC _www.smecc.org_
(http://www.smecc.org)
I did not go back thru the list for the prior discussion of this, but
found this pile listed again, local pickup in Austin. IIRC, the seller
was a flake listing and relisting it a number of times. This time the
Buy it Now price id $999
Local Pickup Austin
MUSEUM-VINTAGE-COMPUTER-LOT-COLLECTION-FLOPPY-APPLE-NORTHSTAR-IBM-TI-XEROX-TEJAS/
http://www.ebay.com/itm/3617774590138
So I am 35 days from retirement and I have been cleaning up the office
and my Redhat Linux workstation and in /usr/local/src I found:
linuxrogue-0.3.7-roguecentral.tar
So I exploded the tar ball and compiled it and it crashed so I carted it
over to one of our Tru64 Unix Alpha boxes, took the 'g' off "gcc" in the
makefile, used sed to change ncurses to curses where ever it could be
found and compiled it. AND IT WORKS SWELL!
Rogue is as addictive today as it was in 1982 on the VAX-11/780 running
4.2bsd. I think I will port it to OpenVMS and run it on my AS4100.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
> From: William Degnan
> for all that I have read about the actual use of the /20 that was not
> what it was for. IBM used the /20's as a smart terminal and that kind
> of thing. The thing in between the mainframe and something else
> operating in a remote location, and so on.
When I was working at IBM Bermuda (as sort of an intern), they used a 360/20
as their main service bureau machine. (I'm pretty sure it was a /20, and not a
/30.) It had a card reader/punch, 4 (IIRC) tape drives, and a 1403 printer.
They had just gotten in a System/3, to replace it, but only one client had
transitioned to using it.
Noel
> Check out the module utilization chart .. On a stock RK11-C, slots 1-8,
> rows C-D (the bottom two rows) are empty. ... (I'll be documenting the
> added Flip Chips in the Double-Buffered variant 'soon'.)
I've added a module chart for the double-buffered variant here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/RK11-C_disk_controller
I'm working on the prints now. (Any idea what I should call this thing?
There's already an "RK11-C_Engineering_Drawings".)
Noel
> From: Chuck Guzis
> On 11/18/2016 10:00 AM, william degnan wrote:
>> Hot business women posing with classic UNIVAC hardware
> Models?
Yup. Definitely too hot to be business-women!
(Hope Chuck doesn't mind being quoted out of context, but it was just too good
to let pass... :-)
Noel
So, I was glancing at pair of M784 Flip Chips, on early production, one late,
and I noticed that the early one used SP380A's (marked "DEC 380A"), and the
later one used DS8640's (marked "DEC 8640"), with the exact same PCB traces.
So probably the latter is an alternative for the former.
Noel
Has anyone determined what 48-bit and 56-bit ECC polynomials are used by
the National Semiconductor hard disk controllers? The DP8496/97 allows
choice of hard-wired 16-bit CRC, or 32-bit, 48-bit, or 56-bit ECC. The
32-bit ECC is a common polynomial known as the Glover polynomial, and it's
the same one used by WD and others. However, National was apparently
extremely proud of the 48-bit and 56-bit polynomials they chose, and the
data sheets say that they require a license agreement with National.
The more common DP8466 supports 32-bit 48-bit, but allows the user to
configure the polynomial. The data sheet states that National's 48-bit
polynomial is available under license.
WD wasn't as proud of their 56-bit polynomial; it's given in the WD42C22
data sheet. It doesn't seem to match National Semicondutor's 56-bit
polynomial.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [SIGCIS-Members] Jay Wright Forrester
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:27:40 +0000
From: Deborah Douglas <ddouglas at mit.edu>
To: Sigcis <members at sigcis.org>
I regret to announce the death of one of MIT?s leading computer pioneers Jay W. Forrester. Forrester died Wednesday,
November 16 at age 98. The New York Times has published an obituary; MIT?s is being completed as I write. There will
many who can offer comments on Forrester?s myriad contributions but here, I would add that he has been a stalwart
supporter of the MIT Museum and a regular participant in many programs. I am grateful for his enthusiasm for sharing
the details of his knowledge about the Servomechanisms Lab, Whirlwind, SAGE, Lincoln Laboratory, system dynamics and
management. As more information becomes available, I am happy to share with interested individuals. Debbie Douglas
*Deborah G. Douglas, PhD* ? Director of Collections and Curator of Science and Technology, MIT Museum, Room N51-209
? 265 Massachusetts Avenue ? Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 ? http://mitmuseum.mit.edu ?
http://museum.mit.edu/150 ? ddouglas at mit.edu <mailto:ddouglas at mit.edu> ? 617-253-1766 phone ? 617-253-8994 fax
A guy in Sweden made the effort to image the install media for DNIX 5.3 and
5.12 as well as ABCenix 5.12.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/96935524/Datormusuem/dnix-imd.tar.bz2https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/96935524/Datormusuem/ABCnix.tar.bz2
These are for computers made by DIAB (later part of Bull) DS90 and Luxor
ABC1600 (branded Luxor but developed by DIAB).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dataindustrier_ABhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_1600
They all were 68k based. The early DS90 had 68010 + 68451 MMU. The ABC1600
had 68008 and some homebuilt MMU. The ABC1600 is quite a nice machine with
768x1024 b/w portrait screen that can be twisted into landscape. It has a
simple windowing system. Actually half of the hardware that make up the
system is the graphics board. Unfortunately the 68008 makes it quite weak.
I hope that the imaged disk can end up in a safer place than my dropbox,
for example Bitsavers...
Thanks Jonas Malm for doing the disk images (I am just the messanger)!
/Mattis
Does anyone have a scanned (or hard) copy of this? I'm trying to locate
one, without much success. I'm mostly interested in the article entitled
"Capture and Display of Keyboard Music".
Thanks!
Kyle
Hi,
Some 20 years ago I briefly had some NCD16's and found some of the
tarred images and software from those days. Hopefully it survived the
various media transfers.
Fred Jan
Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net> wrote:
> Interesting. From around 1975 or so (...) A few years later (...)
> Not long after, Lippold Haken created a keyboard that's continuous rather than discrete (think of a keyboard like the fingerboard of a violin); a successor of that is still sold today.
This thing here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_Fingerboard ? Seems a bit like a digital successor to, or at least inspired by, the analogue 1930s "Trautonium" device (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trautonium) developed by Trautwein and Sala in Berlin, which used a length of resistance wire suspended over a metal rail. Both position (pitch) and pressure (volume)sensitive according to the description.
Arno, DO4NAK
> From: Fred Cisin
> Who has some time to go clean up Wikipedia?
I'll get right on it ... as soon as I finish bailing out the ocean with a
spoon.
Wikipedia - proof that if you give a million monkeys keyboards, they can
create something that vaguely resembles an encyclopaedia.
Noel (who was an early Wikipediast, until the Marching Morons arrived)
> From: Ethan Dicks
> I haven't even made an inventory of it. What would I look for to know?
Check out the module utilization chart, either in the RK11-C Engineering
Drawings, or here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/RK11_disk_controller
(at the top of the section "RK11-C Board chart/count tables"). On a stock
RK11-C, slots 1-8, rows C-D (the bottom two rows) are empty. In the "Double
Buffer" variant, they are full of Flip Chips.
(I'll be documenting the added Flip Chips in the Double-Buffered variant
'soon'.)
Noel
> Subject: Does anyone actually have a KT11-B?
> Date: Fri Sep 30 19:04:47 CDT 2016
> the ones shown in the images show it to be (mostly) an RK11-C.
> ...
> I say "mostly" because there appear to be extra cards on the right hand
> end; whether those are some sort of upgrade to the RK11-C, or whether
> someone just stored spare Flip Chips out there, I have no idea.
So this mystery has been solved (sort of). According to some drawings I have,
there is apparently something called a "Double Buffer Disk Control" variant of
the RK11-C. I looked online, but there was nothing about it there, and the
RK11-C Engineering Drawings at BitSavers don't cover this variant. Does anyone
out there have one of these?
Noel
Today in the age of pointer-graphics, ie., using a mouse, is a very
important day: Nov. 17, 1970, Doug Engelbart, of SRI, Menlo Park, CA,
invented the mouse or granted a patent for "X-Yposition indictator for
a grahics display." BTW he doesn't know who coined the word 'mouse'.
Happy computing!
Murray :)
I just picked one of these up the 1991 catalog describes
HP 6954A Features
A Rugged Rack-mountable Test System in a Single Unit Built-in
HP 9000 Series 310 or Series 332 Computer. and 20 Megabyte
Hard Disc Includes BASIC and HP 14753A CAT Programming
Package HP-IB, HP-HIL, RS-232, Audio and Video Interfaces ....
Anyone have a manual on this guy ?
So far I can't find where the hard drive goes, was it internal or
external via GPIB ?
BTW mine is older, the CPU is a 310 (98561-66515)
-pete
From: Mattis Lind <mattislind at gmail.com>
Subject: SPRAGUE capacitor for Tektronix 4051.
> One of the DC filter capacitors has gone open circuit in my Tektronix
> 4051.
> It is a SPRAGUE 9600 uF - 30VDC with a little bit unusual foot print.
Check out www.cedist.com - they have a pretty good assortment of these
old-style capacitors available.
~~
Mark Moulding
Out of curiosity, has anyone ever gotten Eric Smith's tumble pdf
creation program running under any version of BSD?
I ran into a problem porting it to OS X, in the way it used rewind()
and was wondering if anyone else ran into that on other BSDs
Could ?be a number of things. Usually the seller has setup the wrong email address in eBay. I.e. they put in an email address for their PayPal account that does not match the actual PP account. If he is real a quick call to eBay will get it fixed.?
-------- Original message --------
From: Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org>
Date: 11/16/16 12:30 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: eBay: 1982 Prime Computer
So I took a chance.....
Seller hasn't responded to any of the previous emails, nor have they acknowledged the purchase in any way.
Something I have never seen before in all my ebay transactions... when I go? into ebay instead of a greyed out $ symbol (unpaid) or black $ symbol (paid)... it has an hourglass. Hovering the mouse said "your payment is being processed". Kinda odd since the payment was from paypal funds already on account. So I logged into paypal....
Paypal says "eBay - fishslayer40 at XXXXXXXX (redacted) hasn't accepted yet." Google shows no trace of that email address and while not a red flag, usually something is in the search results for someone's email address.
I have never seen where paying someone on ebay via paypal required them to "accept the funds". They just "get them" I thought.
Crossing my fingers....
J
Ethan thanks for the heads up on this I will check them out!
In a message dated 11/16/2016 12:59:39 P.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
ethan at 757.org writes:
> PBS tonight...Watch TV along with Ed# Recording studio history...
This
> is the sounds of our music! - check your time guide for AZ pm - however
> calif and others can differ Soundbreaking - Painting with Sound #102
Tuesday,
> November 15, 09:00 pm on 8.1 ((AZ TIME Othere state PBS check your
Sched.
> Duration: 0:56:46 Description: Learn how the recording studio itself
became
> an instrument. From the advent of magnetic tape, chart the evolution of
> multi-track recording and the ingenuity of artists such as the Beatles,
Beach
> Boys, Pink Floyd and Fleetwood Mac.
> http://www.azpbs.org/previews/play.php?vidId=9753
If you're into this, you should also check out the documentary Sound City.
Also there is a Muscle Shoals recording studio documentary as well that is
on NetFlix.
--
Ethan O'Toole
PBS tonight...Watch TV along with Ed# Recording studio history... This
is the sounds of our music! - check your time guide for AZ pm - however
calif and others can differ Soundbreaking - Painting with Sound #102 Tuesday,
November 15, 09:00 pm on 8.1 ((AZ TIME Othere state PBS check your Sched.
Duration: 0:56:46 Description: Learn how the recording studio itself became
an instrument. From the advent of magnetic tape, chart the evolution of
multi-track recording and the ingenuity of artists such as the Beatles, Beach
Boys, Pink Floyd and Fleetwood Mac.
http://www.azpbs.org/previews/play.php?vidId=9753
Hi all --
I'm working on getting a TC11 + TU56 running at the LCM+L. We plan to use
it as a tool for various archival and restoration efforts.
After restoring the power supplies, I have it lashed up to a PDP-11/44 -- I
know this is anachronistic, but it's been a workhorse machine with ethernet
and SCSI, which makes it very flexible. So far, so good. I have RT-11
running and it can read and write tapes, although the left TU56 transport
seems to be a bit marginal.
I am running into a couple of issues, and I'm curious if anyone else out
there has experience here and might be able to shed some light before I
spend a lot of time on it:
1) In bringing the TC11 up, I've been attempting to run the TC11
diagnostics, with mixed success. ZTCB runs, but reports an error with the
ENDZ status bit not being set properly. So far as I can tell, ENDZ *is*
being set on normal operations, but I haven't exhaustively debugged the
controller yet. The other four diagnostics (ZTCA, ZTCC, ZTCD, and ZTCE) do
nothing when run -- nothing is printed and there is no response. If I run
them on SIMH configured as an 11/44, I see the same behavior. If I run
them on SIMH configured as an 11/20, then I get the printout described in
the documentation and listings. (See bitsavers --
http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/dec/pdp11/xxdp/diag_listin…).
I haven't yet dug in to see what accounts for the difference -- any ideas?
2) I'm looking for means to format DECtapes on the TC11. I have a few
marginal tapes and I'd like to see if reformatting them brings them back to
life. The maintenance manual only indicates "a special program supplied
with the TC11 system," and I haven't managed to find it. I *have* found
this:
http://mirrors.pdp-11.ru/inf.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdp11/dtf.mac
which I've assembled and run on RT-11 and it goes through the motions of
writing out the timing and mark tracks, but when it goes through the second
pass to write out the block numbers it fails immediately, with either
status 001207 (indicating a "Data Missed" error) or 020033 (Mark Track
Error). I haven't yet hooked up a scope to see if the T&M tracks are
*actually* being written, but given my experience with the diagnostics in
(1) above, I'm not averse to thinking there may be more than meets the eye
with this issue.
So in a nutshell: Anyone used a TC11 on a later PDP-11 (like the 11/44)?
Anyone have any thoughts on the diagnostics and formatter issues?
Thanks as always,
Josh
> Is the 701 based on the RacerX from LSI?
Good question...nice shout-out for an obscure MIPS variant. The
Explora 700 is, however, not a RacerX, but an R4700. With up to 256MB
of RAM. Which is nice.
KJ
I've been making a debugging ROM board to test out the various
parts of the KIM-1. It is based on taking over the KIM at reset
and running test.
So far I've got two test working. One is a basic, is it running test
that just blinks a light on the debug board.
The next is a test of the first 1K of RAM.
A little tricky to do without RAM.
I expect to write some more for the RRIOT ics.
If anyone has interest, they can follow me on the Vintage
Computer Forum or contact me here.
The board has 3 ttl ICs, a 2764/27128 EPROM, a couple
LEDs and a dip switch. Also a few pullup resistors and capacitors.
Dwight
From: Rico Pajarola <rp at servium.ch>
> Does no one have NCDWare 3.2.1 or earlier?
Nostalgia...I really liked the NCD 19 I used many moons ago.
Reasonably snappy at the time, nice mono screen, quiet. Funny enough
I recently resurrected an NCD Explora 701 (much later MIPS-based
xterminal). It's wildly faster than the 19 (with 10/100 enet instead
of just 10), but it's interesting to see how far modern X
implementation has diverged from NCDs time: 8-bit pseudo-color is a
showstopper for a lot of things, various desktops (Gnome, KDE, etc.)
break in strange ways if they run at all, lot's of contemporary code
has issues on 64-bit systems (like my old xview/olvwm code). TWM
still works fine, as does the butt-ugly built in NCD Motif-ish window
manager. Haven't had much time to work on it, but I'd like to get
something like i3 running. I bet Mouse can add more color commentary.
Reminds me...need to see if I can still get the Mouse terminal
emulator to run. Probably also need to get an SCO ODT or SVR4 VM
running for that old school feel.
I know I've got at least one 3.x release, but not sure which one or
what's in it. FWIW, I've also got some 4.x, a 5.0.x and 5.1.x;
running 5.1.140 on the 700. I'm in Dublin until next week so won't be
able to check until then. Ping me directly if you don't hear from me
by, say, Thursday.
P.S. - If anyone has an NCD 700-series or HMX (esp HMXpro24) they
don't want, let me know.
KJ
Just on the off-chance... does anyone have schematics for the Perq 1
portrait monitor? Mine is sick... and there are none on bitsavers. On
first power-up there was a faint raster pattern but that quickly
vanished and now there's no sign of life from the tube heaters...
Thanks
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother.
Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame.
For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.'
In a box of my old stuff, I found a copy of the Mt. Xinu calendar for
1993, the last year that they did a calendar, and scanned it. Some of
you may fondly remember the Mt. Xinu calendars so I am hosting what I
scanned so folks can download it. It can be found at:
http://wildwestrally.org/afp/IMG_20161110_0001.pdf.
Enjoy,
alan
Hi all
I'm trying to resurrect my NCD19 for vcfe.ch but I can't find the firmware
for it (I have half a dozen different versions of NCDware, but most don't
contain the boot images, and none have the binary for the ncd19, only
ncd15b, ncd19r, ncd19c etc. which don't work). And all links I find on the
internet are dead ;(
I appreciate any help tracking that down.
Rico
One of the DC filter capacitors has gone open circuit in my Tektronix 4051.
It is a SPRAGUE 9600 uF - 30VDC with a little bit unusual foot print.
It might be common for other Tek equipment.
Google turned up one Ebay-hit for a completed auction but that's it.
Anyone has a reliable source for this type of capacitor:
http://i.imgur.com/P0Nz5KW.jpg
The interest in video terminals has been awoken again, and I am again searching for one.
I like the look/size of the VT220s, very nice and compact!
Anybody have extra DEC or IBM terminals in Toronto (Canada) ? I?m probably somewhat interested!
-brian
seeing if 'x'x'x' is tripping the list profanity filter
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: TSC UniFLEX 68xxx
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 12:38:38 -0800
From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
I wanted to see if anyone has any more information or software distribution disks
than what I just put up on bitsavers under tsc and gimix. I have a hard disk image
for the GMX Micro-20 that I just bought on eBay, but no distribution floppies.
I didn't realize that the 68K version was so uncommon, since the 6809 version seems
to be everywhere.
The person working on Integral PC emulation in MAME asked for it, so it's up now under pdf/hp/hp150
Unfortunately, what he was looking for was info on the graphics ASIC, which isn't really talked about at all :-(
Talk of the MX-80 has reminded me of a couple of more obscure models...
The first is the TX80. This, I think is a little older. The mechanism
is strange,
it has one DC motor (and no steppers). The motor drives a dual-pitch scroll
thing (sort of a coarse leadscrew) that as it turns in one direction moves the
printhead left to right and then returns it more rapidly. On the return journey
it (mechanically) causes a linefeed. I have never seen a complete TX80, but
the mechanism turned up in an early Commodore printer (2023 or some such)
and I think I have a logic board from the Epson one somewhere.
The other is a bit later. The HI-80. This is a 4 (ballpoint) pen
plotter. No, not
the well-known Alps mechanism. This has the 4 pens on a sliding mechanism
on the carriage. It is moved by running the carriage into the end stops (!).
There are the obvious 2 stepper motors (one for carriage movement, one
to move the paper) and a solenoid to lower the pen.
The HI-80 certainly has the connector for optional interface boards. I think
the TX80 does as well.
Incidentally I am looking for any manuals for the HI-80. Documentation on the
TX80 would be interesting too.
-tony
Just FYI the VAX/VMS (and Alpha VMS) ADA, BASIC, C, Pascal and Fortran
compilers can be found on the relevant CD images on VaxHaven. I've
tested each, since licenses for all are still part of the hobbyist
package, and a modern hobbyist license will work with the older versions
found on VaxHaven from the mid 90s just fine.
So if anyone just wants the compilers themselves rather than a specific
older version, that should work quite well for you.
I found Alps key switches at a small Swedish electronic surplus seller. The
resembled some switches I have seen before so I took a chance and bought
some. The price was the equivalent of 2 USD for ten switches.
I took a few photos in case someone could identify them:
http://i.imgur.com/L5agnfc.jpg
Could be interesting to know if they are used in some known machine.
The part number might be 58990003 and 58990002 which was the number
mentioned in the catalogue.
The company selling them is Belganet Data Elektronik and their catalogue is
at:
http://www.bde.se/skat11_1.pdf
/Mattis
Hi*
>> Any chance it could be put into 'production'?
*I placed an order today for 3 RL02 emulator interface boards from OshPark.
I expect it will take 2 weeks to get the boards back from OshPark.
I am leveraging RL02 emulator work from Reinhard Heuberger, but I am
using a newer FPGA board than his current design (the FPGA board that
he is currently usingis not available), so there is some porting work
required which will also take some time.
Regards,
Scott
So last week there was some conversation about lisp compilers and an
expressed interest in old VAX lisp comilers. Co-incidently, I was rooting
through the morgue at work on semi legitimate business and found
VAXlisp 2.2 copyright 1987. Sadly, it is on a TK50 and is the Ultrix
version.
Since it sparked my interest, I went through the rest of the pile but
no VMS lisp compiler was unearthed. I found o-l-d VAX/VMS ADA, C, basic,
pascal, fortran compilers but no lisp compilers and all on moldering
TK50s lying in wait for any hapless tape drive that may accept them.
Oh yes, this is all VMS 5.5-1 stuff, there seems to be an entire distro
there plus a lot of layered products. These are reduntant, my employer's
last VAX is now sleeping in my basement.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
https://www.ebay.com/itm/272433760795
This Helios II has been "sold" multiple times for varying amounts and then suddenly hours later appears for sale again. I'm done bidding on this each time it appears, because if I won, who knows what I'd receive or if the seller would cancel the auction.
corey cohen
u??o? ???o?
_____
WTS the following items:
3
Used
DEC
DSP3107L
1.07GB 3.5IN 3H SCSI 50PIN
4
Used
DEC
RH20E-DB
510 Meg SCSI Drive -DSP 3201L RH31K-AW
_____
Jim Firlik
Excess Enterprises
(817) 267-9700
email: jim at 4excess.com
_____
I have no idea what he wants for them. Not affiliated with the seller. I
just know these are getting harder to find.
Cindy Croxton
Electronics Plus
> From: Christian Corti
> Seems the original must have been the XXDP TC11 DECtape formatter
> program by Robert J. Collins. I have no clue where I found the RT11
> version of this
So that made me wonder if the V6 Unix version of tcf.s really was related to
DTF.MAC. I checked out the two of them, and it seems they are likely
un-related; very different structure, etc.
BTW, I noticed a couple of places in DTF.MAC where error checking code was
commented out, e.g.:
;EHLT4: XX ;HALT WITH BLK#IN LIGHTS, CONTINUE
; MOV #257.,R0 ;TO FIND DATA WORD POSITION
; ADD TOG1,R0 ;DETERMINE WHICH WORD IS WRONG
;EHLT5: XX ;HALT WITH #OF WORD IN LIGHTS. 0=REV. CHKSUM
; MOV @TCDT,R0 ;CONTINUE TO FETCH BAD WORD
;EHLT6: XX ;HALT WITH BAD DATA IN LIGHTS. CONTINUE
Maybe it would be useful to un-comment them?
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Josh Dersch wrote:
> I believe S/B is the expected data
Yes, probably stands for 'should be'.
Noel
> From: Josh Dersch
>> The UNIX V6 distro includes a standalone program, tcf.s, to format
>> DECtapes.
> I could probably get a V6 distribution running if I need to, but if you
> have the means to do so easily, that would be handy so I can at least
> have another tool to try out.
I had a look at tcf.s, and it depends on having been loaded by the V6 disk
bootstrap - it uses the console driver in the bootstrap (the bootstrap leaves
a pointer to it in R5).
So it might be easier to use that DTF.MAC, which seems like it's mostly the
same program, and which you apparently already have working?
If you'd still like to use the V6 tcf, due to the teletype driver issue,
probably the easist thing is that I could make up a miniature disk image
(RK05, if you have that available), with both the V6 bootstap, and tcf on it.
Otherwise, I might be able to cobble something together; a hacked version of
tcf including the console driver, or something like that.
> Something that XXDP can load would be useful.
I know nothing of almost any DEC software, alas - I'm assuming it can handle
.LDA files, but I don't know which format it prefers.
> From: Christian Corti
> I enhanced DTF with some useful messages and error/status output. IIRC
> the "original" version produced no messages at all.
Having just looked at the original :-), it did have two messages:
"ready drive 0 and type y"
and
"tcf: error"
(Shades of 'ed'.... :-)
Noel
I get hit by that every couple of weeks. ?I still have no idea what a 'bounce' is or what I'm doing or not doing to cause it to drop me. ?Kind of frustrating because it just drops me and then I miss chunks of conversations I'm watching.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Curious Marc <curiousmarc3 at gmail.com>
Date: 2016-10-22 2:42 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: OT: Excessive bounce notices?
Got the excess bounce warning and membership disabled too. Just clicked the link on the message to re-enable myself. Hopefully it worked, since I'm still here...
Marc
> On Oct 22, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 October 2016 at 17:27, Adrian Graham <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk> wrote:
>> Ditto, and ditto. I also thought it was due to the dyndns attack so just
>> resubbed after emailing Jay, but if everyone did that who got an excessive
>> bounce message the poor chap will have quite a full inbox.
>
> Yes, me too.
>
> --
> Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
> Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: lproven
> Skype/MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? LinkedIn/AIM/Yahoo: liamproven
> Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) ? +420 702 829 053 (?R)
I made some silly noise about a Sun-1 owner's manual recently (and I still
haven't sent it out). Today, while browsing in the morgue I found
an apparantly unused CDC Lark cartridge with a factory label declaring
it to be Unix 1.1 boot media.
Is there a functional CDC Lark surviving some place? Sure isn't one here.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
Cindy as in electronic plus?
-------- Original message --------From: "Tapley, Mark" <mtapley at swri.edu>
I'm trying to help Cindy find homes for some of what's left from her warehouse. I can hold them only temporarily ( :-) )
Hi,
my version of the MACRO11 cross-assembler for PDP-11 is now on
https://github.com/j-hoppe/MACRO11 .
Among others it fixes the "JMP Rn is illegal" error on "jmp (rx)" opcode.
Also I added the option "listhex" to produce a binary listing in hex
notation instead of octal.
I found this really necessary when analyzing test programs with a modern
logic analyzer.
Joerg
> From: Josh Dersch
> If I run them on SIMH configured as an 11/44, I see the same behavior.
> If I run them on SIMH configured as an 11/20, then I get the printout
> described in the documentation and listings. ... I haven't yet dug in
> to see what accounts for the difference -- any ideas?
The fact that the simulator produces identical results to the real hardware
would argue that it's not a bug in that particular hardware. So it must be
some real difference between the two.
There are subtle differences between the 11/20, and other 11's - e.g. on the
/20 SWAB does't clear the V bit - maybe it's one of them? It might be worth
trying setting the CPU type to other values, and see if it works on any other
machine type.
> 2) I'm looking for means to format DECtapes on the TC11. ... The
> maintenance manual only indicates "a special program supplied with the
> TC11 system," and I haven't managed to find it.
The UNIX V6 distro includes a standalone program, tcf.s, to format DECtapes.
I don't know if you have a running V6 system (real or emulated) to assemble
it one; if you want me to assemble it and provide it as binary (in a variety
of formats, e.g. .LDA format), let me know.
Noel
another rathole :-(
picked up some ST125 mfm drives and a multibus-ish floppy/mfm controller on ebay that came from a AR/Telenex
8600 Autoscope, which is a high-level protocol analyzer because it used an example of a hard disk controller
chip I had never seen used before (Signetics 68454)
http://www.ebay.com/itm/282236398895
found the manual for the 7000 series on line, and just bought a whole 8600 Turbo
http://www.ebay.com/itm/331829268184
so now I'm looking for software and manuals for that.
fortunately, it looks like the software is still on the hard disk in the one I bought.
Weirdstuff Warehouse has recently acquired a clean AS400 9406-170. It
was taken out of service where it was running. The lot includes
manuals, terminals, printers, cables, etc. I took a bunch of pictures
of the unit which are available via the link below:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7RetVDiFv-qS0FtVzdSNmZxV0k?usp=sha…
If you are interested in acquiring the lot, contact "Jim" at Weirdstuff.
DISCLAIMER: I am posting this as a client of Weirdstuff Warehouse and
have no monetary interest in any transaction related to this unit.
Cheers,
Lyle
--
73 AF6WS
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
Are there any Wang people on this list?
I came across a Wang 2243, which is an enclosure w/ 3 8-inch floppy
drives in it for $75 in the local surplus shop.
Is there a demand for something like this whole or is the value in the
drives?
I've been wanting to mess around with some 8-inch drives, but it seems a
crime to break this unit apart.
There's also a smaller Wang enclosure with dual 5-inch floppies in it,
but I wasn't able to get a model number off it. Also $75
There big to store, and cut into my retro computing budget a bit -- but
I'm tempted to grab them.. Is there any potential interest here in these
units before I go back for them?
--Jason
Looks like someone put in a high enough bid to hold onto the 11/20 that
went today. I guessed an amount around what it went for would be what
I'd pay, so don't know if I'd have gotten it or not, but didn't try
since that was around the 3500 dollar level. (it sold for $2961).
The fun thing is the buyer is also buying vintage clothing and the like
according to Epay's useless buyer history it gives out now.
There were three other bidders that doubled the price in the last 8 seconds.
It was a nice machine, though the seller said it had developed a problem
in the memory.
thanks
jim
http://www.ebay.com/itm/222300550527
now I know what ours is worth!
$ed
In a message dated 11/7/2016 5:55:19 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jwsmail at jwsss.com writes:
Looks like someone put in a high enough bid to hold onto the 11/20 that
went today. I guessed an amount around what it went for would be what
I'd pay, so don't know if I'd have gotten it or not, but didn't try
since that was around the 3500 dollar level. (it sold for $2961).
The fun thing is the buyer is also buying vintage clothing and the like
according to Epay's useless buyer history it gives out now.
There were three other bidders that doubled the price in the last 8
seconds.
It was a nice machine, though the seller said it had developed a problem
in the memory.
thanks
jim
http://www.ebay.com/itm/222300550527
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Ian S. King <isking at uw.edu> wrote:
> I love reading stories of component-level repair.
>
Assuming my notes and sketchy memory make any sense:
One of my PDP 8a CPU boards (the M8315) passed all the self tests I could
toggle in, EXCEPT, it would ignore HLT instructions. It'd just blow right
through them. That'll get you questioning your sanity real quick.
Several hours of squinting at schematics said I'm looking for the STOPL
signal - I found three or four places, one of which involved a ROM (at
least my notes say there is a ROM involved). Uh oh. Page 3-17 of the
microprocessor user manual lists when STOPL is asserted. Basically, front
panel or HLT. Page 4-39 has the logic for the front panel, and that was
enough to narrow it down to one instance of STOPL in the schematics, in the
middle of page H-9. E39 (an 8881 aka 7439) or E33 (a 7402). I swapped
those two out, repaired the trace that I busted, and viola! HLT now
works. I vaguely remember it was the 8881 at fault.
BTW, I'm open to suggestions as to how to even begin debugging an HP 1000 E
Series. There seems to be a case holding a power supply in the way of any
access to the motherboard. The machine fails to exit the 'counting' self
test right after power up. I plan on writing up a better description once
it gets cold and snowy out, so don't feel bad if you don't see this plea
for help.
Cheers!
b
I do a regular contest on RetroBattlestations called BASIC Week which is a sort of tribute to the days when it was common for programs to be published in books and magazines and people would type them into their computers. One of the neat things about distributing software through type-in listings is that there?s no need for working disk drives or tape drives, or to do complicated things like get a serial connection working and find a way to transfer files. If a computer has built-in BASIC just turn it on and start typing!
Past programs have displayed vector graphics, silly text screen animations, and a couple of games. This time around the program is called Winchester Drive and the concept is to explore a mansion to see what you can find. I decided this time around to try out true sprites and made a version for both the Apple II and Commodore 128.
I wanted to do a Commodore 64 version but couldn't find any line drawing routines written in assembly anywhere! I thought for sure in the last 33 years some book or magazine somewhere would have written a couple of simple routines to clear the graphics screen and draw some lines that you could POKE in and then call with SYS. Oh well, I will leave the C64 version to someone else. :-)
The challenge is more about honor and glory and getting an excuse to show off old computers and/or skills with porting, but I do give out vinyl decals & stickers for prizes (http://imgur.com/a/iAS5T).
I know that the TI-99/4A, Atari 400/800, Coleco Adam, MSX, and maybe some others also had sprites. Sprites aren?t really needed for porting to other systems, they?re just an easy way to move the player around the screen. The program could definitely be ported to systems that use simple character graphics or even plain text screens.
The complete source code has been posted to github, and you can see the full rules and check out other submissions here:
https://redd.it/3ko0nd
--
Follow me on twitter: @FozzTexx
Check out my blog: http://insentricity.com
Hi all,
finally found myself a SAGE II.
(no software)
Anybody could help me out with the floppies for it?
Was there a kermit version for it?
Cheers & thanks
Whoops, looks like I sent this to the wrong cct*** email, apologies!
My interest in video terminals has been awoken again, and I am again searching for one.
I like the look/size of the VT220s, very nice and compact!
Anybody have extra DEC or IBM terminals in Toronto (Canada) ? I?m probably somewhat interested!
-brian
So I'm working my way (more slowly than I probably should be) through my
systems, ditching ancient on-board batteries before they leak...
In the case of the Mac SE's, are there any critical settings which I should
make a note of before removing the on-board battery? Should I expect any
issues trying to run the machines without? (I'm not inclined to replace
batteries unless I have to, just so I don't have to worry about replacement
again in x years time)
cheers
Jules
>On 2014-10-26 3:07 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>>* On 21/10/14 7:38 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
*>>>* > From: Toby Thain
*>>>>>>* > Looking to see what the internal self-test returns as an error
*>>>* code
*>>>* > (that can be done with console ODT, it doesn't need a program) is
*>>>* > probably the first step in diagnosing.
*>>>*...
*>>* OK, after powerup, the bits of the VAR register (e/w/p 2000192c) are
*>>* D800, i.e. the test result bits VAR12:10 are 1,1,0 - meaning RAM test
*>>* failed.
*>
>Hi all,
>
>As an update to this project, I can report that the DELQA has been
>repaired with four new static RAM chips, and now the MicroVAX II's
>network is fully working (including netboot).
>
>Credit due to Joe Zatarski (joe_z) who did a beautiful job of
>desoldering and putting sockets in for the four RAM chips.
>
>--Toby
Glad to have helped :)
Joe Zatarski
>>>>* I must be doing something wrong running the test manually, though -
*>>>>>>>* d/w/p 2000192c 2000
*>>>>* Just leaves 2000 in the VAR register, permanently.
*>>>>* --Toby
*>>>>>>>>>>* Noel
*>>>>>>>
A very interesting story.
Now we do need detailed information, schematics, maintenance procedures and software for C1,C2,C38 as well for SPP systems. My SPP1600XA, which I used e.g. to heat my cellar stopped operation due to breaking the voltage limit using psu_util.
@Camiel: would you like to swap one of your C1 for an X or S-Class? My S-Class is using 48 PA-Risc processors.
Andreas
> Am 07.11.2016 um 14:50 schrieb steve wallach <steve.wallach at gmail.com>:
>
> all correct
>
> actually the story goes as follows
>
> .he had his sabattical year coming. however, he would still go into his office to use the convex.
>
> .so i offered him a FREE return C1 (returned after an upgrade to a C2). he would have to pay for the maintenance and pay for the electrical system needed in his basement.
>
> .prof jameson is brilliant and people all over the world would come to visit him. during his sabattical they would come to his house and he delighted in showing them his OWN SUPERCOMPUTER in his basement. also after his sabbtaical finished.
>
> .we sold several systems based on his use of the convex.
>
> .when he presented papers, he always said, ?i ran these simulations on my own convex supercomputer in my basement?. we got an enormous amount of press and good will.
>
>
>
> ---
> + Ex-Convex Mailing List, list at ex-convex.org, http://www.ex-convex.org/
> + To unsubscribe, send an email to leave-ex-convex at ex-convex.org
> + To subscribe, send an email to join-ex-convex at ex-convex.org
Folks,
I think I know the answer to this before I even ask, and that answer will be
'got a schematic' to which the answer's 'no and I doubt one exists any more'
but...
My recent Executel addition has a 5" screen with associated analogue board
that seems to be powered from a display chip I can't find any info on, and
at least one of the adjustment potentiometers has suffered metal fatigue and
broken:
http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/STCExecutelScreenPot.jpghttp://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/STCExecutelAnalogueBoard.jpghttp://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/STCExecutelDisplayChip.jpg
I've replaced it with a seemingly common 10K modern part that I had in my
spares box but it's unknown whether the display worked at all prior to it
being put in very damp storage, also the rating of the failed pot isn't
known but the capacitor next to it is 50V.
I've also removed, checked and replaced out of spec capacitors, one of them
was a 680nF 50V radial. I could only find a 63V PET version on cpc's website
and did much reading on differing capacitor types, concluding that it SHOULD
be OK.
Power supply is known good because it's one of my working ones, the original
is still dead.
Hence the question - am I wasting my time without a schematic for this
analogue board?
Cheers!
--
Adrian/Witchy
Binary Dinosaurs creator/curator
Www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the UK's biggest private home computer
collection?
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:11 AM, emanuel stiebler <emu at e-bbes.com> wrote:
> On 2016-10-31 08:48, Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
>> One of the great recent updates was backporting the MSCP driver from
>> 2.11 to 2.9. That opens up KDF11 MicroPDP-11s to running 2.9 with an
>> RQDX3. Prior to that availability, one needed an RLV12 or other Qbus
>> disk controller for that platform.
>
> I missed that :(
About 15 years ago, Jonathan Engdahl backported the MSCP driver to 2.9BSD...
> more details?
First hit:
http://home.windstream.net/engdahl/2_9bsd-mscp.htm
-ethan
Out of curiosity and ignorance what's with the solder joints on the cards in the pictures? That orange color seems like it's everywhere around cold looking solder joints. ?Is that rust, some sort or protection, or acid corrosion?
-------- Original message --------From: Mark G Thomas <Mark at Misty.com> Date: 10/31/16?
I had the pleasure of visiting Rick yesterday. Please see below
additional information about remaining items, with links to photos.
Please contact Rick directly if interested.
Original posting here:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:44:39AM +0000, steven stengel wrote:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> *************? Contact Rick below if interested.? *************
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: Rick Bunker
> Contact: rick at bunker.us
> Location: Jenkintown, PA???
10/30/2016 Update:----------------------
> The Altair 8800, a very early one, 4-slot motherboard, 1K ram, ceramic CPU,
> you will see: https://goo.gl/photos/3C1pzfwFoZ3koPgt9
>
On 2014-10-26 3:07 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
> On 21/10/14 7:38 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>> > From: Toby Thain
>>
>> > Looking to see what the internal self-test returns as an error
>> code
>> > (that can be done with console ODT, it doesn't need a program) is
>> > probably the first step in diagnosing.
>>...
> OK, after powerup, the bits of the VAR register (e/w/p 2000192c) are
> D800, i.e. the test result bits VAR12:10 are 1,1,0 - meaning RAM test
> failed.
Hi all,
As an update to this project, I can report that the DELQA has been
repaired with four new static RAM chips, and now the MicroVAX II's
network is fully working (including netboot).
Credit due to Joe Zatarski (joe_z) who did a beautiful job of
desoldering and putting sockets in for the four RAM chips.
--Toby
>
> I must be doing something wrong running the test manually, though -
>
>>>> d/w/p 2000192c 2000
>
> Just leaves 2000 in the VAR register, permanently.
>
> --Toby
>
>
>>
>> Noel
>>
>
>
My ISP (which I have used for 20-odd years) has decided to drop its e-mail
service....
My new address (at least for the moment) is :
ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com
If any of you mail me privately, please use that from now on....
-tony
Here is my daughter Gina, I thought you guys would like, Tek is still exciting.
Sure, we have lots of PC's around the house, but this is the first one that she is programming, and programming the 4051 creates a smile.
Randy
https://youtu.be/o0LiYkHG3iE
Noticed this on Nekochan:
http://forums.nekochan.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16731198
No affiliation
-----
Hi,
I have an IBM 5360 with all of the manuals, cables, etc. The monitor
is missing. There are boxes and boxes of manuals, modems, cables, etc.
This is free for someone who wants to pickup in Milwaukee. This
posting will be active for a week. If I do not have any takers, it is
going to recycling.
Thanks!
Kevin - - remember HP did this...
using the MX-80 also...
(data from hpmuseum.com)
Name: 82905 Product Number: 82905 Introduced: 1981 Division:
_Corvallis_ (http://hpmuseum.net/divisions.php?did=18) Ad: _Click to see with
HP-87_
(http://hpmuseum.net/upload_htmlFile/PrintAds/Ad1982_May_HP-87_Spectrum-32.j…) Original Price: $945 Catalog Reference: 1982, page 655 Donated
by: Russell Warmington, HP Australia.
Description:
The 82905A was a low-end, narrow-carriadge dot matrix printer made by
Epson. HP obtained this printer primarily for use with the _80 Series_
(http://hpmuseum.net/exhibit.php?class=1&cat=9) computers. The 82905A had a print
speed of 80 characters per second. The dot character cell was 9 x 9 and
graphics printing resolution was possible up to 72 x 120 dots per inch. The
82905B, introduced in 1982 (at $795) offered an optional HP-IL interface.
The 82905A was OEM'ed from Epson by the Corvallis Division. The product
was transferred to the Vancouver Division in 1982.
and then with the FX 80!
Impact Selection:
Name: 82906 Product Number: 82906 Introduced: 1983 Division: _Personal
Computer Division_ (http://www.hpmuseum.net/divisions.php?did=18) Original
Price: $995 Catalog Reference: 1984, page 594
Description:
The 82906A, like the _82905A_
(http://hpmuseum.net/display_item.php?hw=321) was also OEM'd from Epson (model FX-80) by HP. It was faster (160
characters per second), with a higher resolution dot cell matrix (9 x 11).
Maximum resolution in graphics printing was 72 dots per inch.
In a message dated 11/5/2016 8:57:56 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
kevenm at reeltapetransfer.com writes:
I tried this link this morning (from Utah US) and got the manual.
So the link must have gotten fixed.
I've placed here just in case:
http://www.3kranger.com/download/epson_-_mx-80_dot_matrix_printer_-_technica
l_manual.pdf
Keven Miller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Kevill" <scott at kevill.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sat 05 Nov 2016 01:24 AM
Subject: Re: Epson MX-80 Technical Manual?
On 05/11/2016, at 4:29 AM, Eric Smith <spacewar at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a scan of the MX-80 Dot Matrix Printer Technical
Manual?
>
> It's apparently intended to be available here:
>
>
http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/39747/Epson-MX-80-Dot-Matrix-Printer…
> but I was unable to actually download it.
Hi,
Does anyone have any available? I don't need the paddles, just the
the ON-OFF-ON momentary switches.
I got good ON-OFF address/data ones from Herb Johnson, but the momentary
ON-OFF-ON ones I have are worn out and do not return to center properly.
Mark
--
Mark G. Thomas (Mark at Misty.com), KC3DRE
> I don't usually post here so if I am somehow posting wrong please tell
> me.
Nope, you're good.
Good luck with the machine! And thanks ever so much for posting all the
info that goes with it.
Noel
I have got TSS/8 running on SIMH (actually it is a ready-made image that I
got for the PiDP8). I have set up SIMH to enable TTIX for a secondary line
to connect another terminal, but when I try to login from another line (ie
not the console) I get a message along the lines of a local login not being
permitted. I have looked through the TSS/8 manuals on Manx, but I can't find
anything that tells me how to enable local logins. Can anyone tell me how
you do this?
Thanks
Rob
Hi,
I've had this box for a few years and wanted to see if it's interesting
to anyone on the list.
http://imgur.com/a/dm1vR
Apparently everything but the software itself. :/
If there is genuine interest I can list the contents of the box. It
won't be cheap to ship though. Located in Toronto, ON.
--Toby
I got booted from the list when the original post came out for this. ?He isn't willing to ship I guess? ?I wouldn't mind buying the SWTPC 6800 case he has.. I have almost everything save a cpu card to build another 6800 unit.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: allison <ajp166 at verizon.net>
Date: 2016-11-04 3:50 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Altair, IMSAI, SWTPC, etc. for sale in Philly
That is from the first 2000 to 5000 units its a 8800 no suffix the
ribbon is either A or Bsuffix and
a different CPU board (uses 8224).
The orange is rosin flux that was not cleaned.?? Isopropanol would clean
that but it was built as a
kit (the K suffux on the serial number tag).? Its better to leave it
that way.? Authentic, never cleaned
mine either.
The PS looks to be the original version or the first update (higher
voltage transformer).
I'd expect power supply problems, suspect one-shots (front panel and CPU
clock) and
bus level noise issues.? Assuming the switches are still good.
Allison
On 11/04/2016 09:19 AM, Sam O'nella wrote:
> Out of curiosity and ignorance what's with the solder joints on the cards in the pictures? That orange color seems like it's everywhere around cold looking solder joints.? Is that rust, some sort or protection, or acid corrosion?
> -------- Original message --------From: Mark G Thomas <Mark at Misty.com> Date: 10/31/16
> I had the pleasure of visiting Rick yesterday. Please see below
> additional information about remaining items, with links to photos.
> Please contact Rick directly if interested.
>
> Original posting here:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:44:39AM +0000, steven stengel wrote:
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> *************? Contact Rick below if interested.? *************
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> Name: Rick Bunker
>> Contact: rick at bunker.us
>> Location: Jenkintown, PA???
> 10/30/2016 Update:----------------------
>
>> The Altair 8800, a very early one, 4-slot motherboard, 1K ram, ceramic CPU,
>> you will see: https://goo.gl/photos/3C1pzfwFoZ3koPgt9
>>
Very cool. ?I love how that display works. ?It's just like something from an early 80s movie.
I want one badly but not $3000 badly.
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Randy Dawson <rdawson16 at hotmail.com>
Date: 2016-11-04 5:03 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Tek 4051 with a 10 year old at the helm
Here is my daughter Gina, I thought you guys would like, Tek is still exciting.
Sure, we have lots of PC's around the house, but this is the first one that she is programming, and programming the 4051 creates a smile.
Randy
https://youtu.be/o0LiYkHG3iE
I've been looking for it for a while as well, the only place I've seen
that has it in any form is actually on the 11/780 running at the LCM
(which you can of course access with a free account, if you just want to
use VCL). I assume it must still exist elsewhere but it was removed
>from the old software product libraries prior to any of the sets I've
found archived anywhere, sometime around 90-91 I believe?
There were several other CL and LISP implementations for VAX VMS but
they've all fallen into the great memory hole as well. KCL in
particular seems like it might be easier to find since it was freely
available, but I've had no luck.
> From: "Mike Stein" <mhs.stein at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Reasonable price for a complete SOL-20 system?
> Message-ID: <B1054C1D081C4DB9881083349D0D5B64 at 310e2>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> Any chance you still have a copy of that CP/M port buried somewhere?
> We're sort of collecting the various Cromemco ports and emulators.
>
Sorry Mike, I didn't think so but went through my diskettes anyway and no go
- all CDOS. I do believe that there was a Cromemco CP/M in the Don Maslim
archives and another in the classicmp Dave Dunfield archives here
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/img54306/system.htm. If all else fails, I
have found a CROMCPM.TD0 file in my archives which is Teledisk format and is
607Kb but I don't have a functional Teledisk at the moment so can't tell
what it represents. I'm not sure of the source but would be happy to forward
it to someone with a functional Teledisk, or Dave Dunfield's converter from
TD0 to his IMD ImageDisk format.
James
Out of curiosity, since I've never done this either but have heard most folks suggest it. How do you seal the newly made jacket? Is it not necessary or folks using scotch tape??
> I suppose I should try and round up images of 19" x 5-1/4" PDP-10
> panels, too
So there are quite a few, although I'm not sure they are exactly the same as
the ones used in the PDP-11's, PDP-15's, etc. Those use a plastic bezel which
is the same as the blank panels in the H960 racks, into which the inlay is set
>from the front, and glued down to the lip inside the bezel. The PDP-10 ones,
>from the pictures, and my vague memory, use metal bezels which cover the
panels from the front, holding them on, so the shape of the inlay may be
subtly different.
Anyway, I found images (not great - all B+W illustrations in manuals) of the
following PDP-1 panels:
DF10
DA10
RC10
BA10
TD10
TM10
DS10
RM10B
DC10
RP10-C
MB10
MD10
I'll add them to the page at some point. If any has actual images of any of
these, they'd be appreciated. (And no, none of them is the mystery panel in
the RSTS manual.)
Noel
> I'm curious what the Systems 32/77 is..
>Wasn't Gould SEL? maybe an SEL system?
The 32/77-series was a 32-bit machine implemented in ECL, based on
earlier SEL designs, but is definitely Gould in design/manufacture.
Some of the machines in the series had a very powerful (for the time)
floating point unit (known as the IPU) that operated in tandem with the
main CPU that vastly increased the number-crunching power available
The machines were mainly intended for real-time control applications (as
used in the flight sim applications in the auction)
The machine ran a real-time executive called MPX-32.
More information: http://www.encore-support.com/htmls/32_77.htm
Years ago, I had some experience with these machines. They were quite
powerful for their time, and were also workhorses that just ran and ran.
Very robust design.
These are neat machines, and I hope that they end up in the hands of
someone that can care for them rather than ending up scrap.
--
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
I've heard Modula-3 (from DEC SRC and Olivetti Research Center) called
"the Ada regular programmers would adopt". They never did, of course,
because Olivetti decided research wasn't that important and DEC got
bought and a lot of other reasons that are documented elsewhere. Not
to get into a language pissing contest, but IMO it's an awfully nice
way to program, with threading built in, type safety, generics, a
reasonable GC, exceptions, etc. I really enjoyed it, but then I think
Ada brings a lot to the table.
What might have been, indeed.
Over the years I've played around with a few old CAMAC (*) modules, by
today's standard they pretty much have zero value, anyway that's another
story. Recently
I've been offered a CAMAC to Unibus board. A Kinetic 3912 Unibus Crate
Controller .
A Crate in CAMAC speak is just a chassis with a backplane.
The problem with CAMAC is there is almost no information out there,
Since I don't YET have a Unibus system, it more of a curiosity then
anything.
So .. anyone have the manual ?
(*) -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Automated_Measurement_and_Control
Hello, all,
Question of the day:
Will an Emulex MT-02 SCSI->QIC tape controller work with a Wangtek 5150EQ (QIC-150) Tape Drive?
I am trying to resurrect an old Tektronix 4132 Unix workstation. The 1/4" Wangtek 5099EQ drive that was in the machine was toast, something on the drive's electronics went POP when it powered on the first time, and it is no longer being recognized by the MT-02 controller. I have documentation on the drive, and will probably look into seeing if I can fix whatever fried, but in the short-term, I have a Wangtek 5150EQ with a good drive wheel, and was wondering if this drive would function with the MT-02 and be useful on the machine. I have a bunch of old (1980's) QIC-24 tapes written with the old 5099EQ drive that I want to look through and archive in a different form.
And yes...I know about the tension band issues with old 1/4" QIC media...I've got a bunch of new tension bands and have become quite adept at replacing them and assuring the proper tension on the tape.
Wishing all a peaceful day,
-Rick
--
Rick Bensene
The Old Calculator Museum
http://oldcalculatormuseum.com
I recently discovered the very excellent website
http://pascal.hansotten.com devoted to all things Wirth.
I sent a message to the author, as detailed below, but I would encourage
anyone to visit the website - you will surely learn something?
Greetings from Windermere in the Lake District, England!
I read with interest your interview with John Reagan. His efforts on the
VAX Pascal Compiler, and more recently (well, in the last few years or
so) my discovery of the very excellent Theo De Klerk book on VAX Pascal
and it's excellent integration with the VMS operating system have
rekindled my love of this excellent implementation of Pascal.
I am the organiser of declegacy.org.uk - a 'mostly' annual event here in
Windermere where collectors of DEC equipment and ex-employees gather to
immerse themselves once again in the excellence of product that was the
result of DEC Engineering. I have tried a couple of times to 'entice'
John to provide a video narrative of his time at DEC - but, thankfully,
he is still a very busy man.
At DEC Legacy this time around for example I was very fortunate to find
myself in the 'programming zone' for a couple of hours - sat at a VT
terminal, trying to determine why my VAX Macro-32 fractal generation
programme would not run successfully on a DEC Alpha via the VAX Macro
Compiler. For those precious moments I could have been sat at a piece of
DEC equipment anywhere in the world. For a programmer this is just
intoxicating and all too rare these days.
I have a long standing interest in the legacy of Wirth - and indeed DEC,
as could be expected. When I was considering a programming language for
my PhD efforts on a DEC 3000/600 AXP running Digital Unix 3.2C in 1994 I
would have been better using Modula-3 and ignoring the C-based Khoros
framework which was the path I eventual took (C was a 'better the devil
you know' option at that point).
On Tue, 11/1/16, Jon Elson <elson at pico-systems.com> wrote:
>? Also, some IBM publications (where I'm more
> familiar with their models) had some photos
> of machines that probably were in-house
> prototypes that were quite different than the
> production version.
Along the same lines, the picture in the original PDP-8
manual was of a machine that had a front panel that
looked more like the PDP-5 panel than the one shipped
on the 8s. Given how close the machines were in
architecture, it wouldn't be surprising for a prototype.
As it turns out, I saw the picture in the manual a few
years before I ever saw a real straight-8. To this day,
the real straight-8s look a little "wrong" to me.
BLS
> From: Don North
> Track 0 is not used by standard DEC software
I wonder why DEC did't use track 0. The thing is small enough (256KB in the
original single-density) that even 1% is a good chunk to throw away. Does
anyone know? (I had a look online, but couldn't turn anything up.)
If I had to _guess_, one possibility would be that track 0 is the innermost
track, where the media is moving the slowest, and as a result it's more
error-prone. Another is that IBM used track 0 for something special, and DEC
tried to conform with that. But those are pure guesses, I would love to know
for sure.
Noel
So, the CHM has an RSTS-11 brochure:
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/DEC/pdp-11/Digital.PDP-11…
which shows in a couple of places (front cover, page 6, 7, 10, 11) an
indicator panel which I haven't been able to identify: it's the one where
there are four full-length light rows on the left, and the lower right row
of lights is broken up in the three groups - small, large, small. (The other
indicator panel is known, it's an an RF11).
I have been searching for these panels for quite a while now, and have a page
for them:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/DECIndicatorPanels.html
_but_ ... I have never seen that panel.
I am quite sure that it is _NOT_ an RK11-C panel; although no image of such
has ever been found (I think because it was never produced - no DEC manual or
print set refers to it), the RK11-C prints show the wiring for the connector
to the indicator panel (which would presumably have been a standard DEC 19" x
5-1/4" panel of the kind documented on the page above), and from that it's
possible to predict what it would look like, as shown here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/RK11-C_inlay.txthttp://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/RK11-C_inlay.pdf
Can anyone shed any light (no pun intended :-) on what this is?
The RF11 engineering drawings list (on page 187/188) all the inserts
available (as of that date) for the standard 19" x 5-1/4" indicator panel,
and I don't have pictures of all of them, so it's possible this is one of
them. (It's clear from the brochure that this wasn't necessarily a working
system, since it appears in a number of different configurations. So maybe
they just grabbed up a random indicator panel and plugged it in to make the
system look cool.)
One possibility is that it's a prototype that was never produced - or perhaps
it was the indicator panel for an earlier RK11 controller (although I can't
find any mention of an RK11-B or RK11-A, and the list above doesn't contain
an RK11 entry).
Anyone have any ideas?
Noel
> From: Steven Malikoff
> I have been looking but not yet found a picture of the DEC-trimmed RC11
> ... If anyone could point me to a photo of the RC11/RS64 DECdisk panel
> to be honest I don't know if it even had one?
I'm not sure it did. The list of available inserts (in the Indicator Panel
Assembly drawings, available in the RF11 prints, pp. 186-190) doesn't list an
RC11 insert, and that list does include the RF11, which is a later controller
than the RC11.
I tried looking online for RC11 engineering drawings, to see if it included
an indicator panel connector (the way the RK11-C does), but I could not find
_anything_ substantial about the RC11 online.
> From: Jon Elson
> These look VERY posed, so don't be sure ANYTHING in the picture was a
> fully working system.
Yeah, I'd come to that conclusion...
> If those panels look like something off a KA10 controller
Well, I'm not sure. Most PDP-10 gear had rows of 36 lights, which is the full
width of these 19" indicator panels (i.e. every light in a row - like the top
row of the RP11 panel, see the page for an image), and I don't see that in
this one. But I suppose I should try and round up images of 19" x 5-1/4"
PDP-10 panels, too (ISTR that there are a few).
Noel
David Bunnell and Bill Machrone of PC Magazine have passed on. They
both were involved in promoting computers in its earliest day. Both
will sadly be missed.
Murray--
I've been wondering about that one myself. ?Very odd. ?That's not the first time I've seen that either. Along with stuff that 'sells' for absurd amounts of money.
At first I though the absurd sales were attempts to manipulate the market.. but it doesn't seem worth the effort or ebay fees. ?I almost kind of wonder with some of them if something more sinister is going on.. like money laundering. ?That'd be a fairly obscure way to do it..
Sent from my Samsung device
-------- Original message --------
From: Corey Cohen <AppleCorey at optonline.net>
Date: 2016-11-01 4:43 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: What the heck is the deal with this eBay item
https://www.ebay.com/itm/272433760795
This Helios II has been "sold" multiple times for varying amounts and then suddenly hours later appears for sale again.? I'm done bidding on this each time it appears, because if I won, who knows what I'd receive or if the seller would cancel the auction.?
corey cohen
u??o? ???o?
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:48:56 -0400
> From: Paul Koning <paulkoning at comcast.net>
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: Re: For sale 128K Core RAM Industrial PDP 11/40 Massbus
> System
> Message-ID: <A0F4A035-0EAA-4343-87DC-86495173458F at comcast.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>> On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:26 AM, william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Given 128K core, wouldn't one be able to save the OS in core, no need to
>> load what would need to "get started" from a diskpak? The data would be on
>> the tape drives, and something on stand by to re-load the OS back into core.
>
> Only if the OS implements the ability to resume from a power failure without reloading from disk or tape. Few do. Perhaps some flavors of RSX, I don't know. RSTS V4A, when built with the power fail handling option, could do so. Later versions do not; they unconditionally reboot (from disk) at powerup.
>
> paul
RSX-11M and M+ did resume from power failures very robustly. I had a PDP-11/44 with batteries for the MOS RAM (and fans to cool it) with RK07 drives. I can remember testing it by pulling the power with a number of applications runnings including editors etc. The disks would yank the heads back and spin down, then when the power was restored and the drives spun up, it was like it never happened. I might see an entry or two in the error log file about a disk retry, and a user might loose a keystroke on the file they were editing but it absolutely was solid. I don't know of a single modern operating system that can do that today.
RSX-11M+ can run TCP/IP today with Johnny Billquist's BQTCP package but it dies require I/D space processors. M+ itself can run on a 11/23+ or 11/24 but it really needs more than 128KW and the lack of I/D space really limits its capabilities.
Mark
I bought one of these on eBay thinking it was the standard 37-pin
D-connector that connects to an ISA floppy controller. No, it's a 25-pin
D-connector. I can't find any references in Google aside from people
selling them. I'm wondering if it might be something like a
printer-port-connected device, in which case I'm probably out of luck
trying to find its driver.... -- Ian
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical
Narrative Through a Design Lens
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 06:39:04 -0400
From: Peter Cetinski <pete at pski.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Imaging Old Disks Advice Needed
> Well, I made a number of these this weekend and I just left the end
open. The hub
> keeps the cookie in place. Thanks to everyone for the input.
>
> So, I was able to image half of the disks without issue. The others all
had a few
> bad tracks. On most of those I don't see any physical damage so I was
wondering
> if there were any other techniques to possibly recover those tracks?
Baking the
> cookie? Is there a good tool to merge tracks from multiple disks if I
find another
> copy of the software that has the missing tracks?
Pete:
I've had pretty good luck during a data restoration project by ensuring the
drive heads are clean and then also cleaning the cookie VERY GENTLY with
good quality rubbing alcohol (I'm using 91%, some say you should use better
stuff) on a cotton ball. My method has been to put the cookie on a clean,
dry, soft surface. The disks I'm working on are Apple ][, so flippy (if
the jacket is punched), otherwise I only need to concentrate on the
"bottom" side of the cookie. Essentially, the side without the hub ring.
I use a very fine-tipped needle top bottle (found it in the baking section
of a local big-name craft store) and apply a reasonable amount of rubbing
alcohol then use a fresh cotton swab and gently clean the surface.
Depending on how it goes, I'll clean it a second time.
Note, some of the disks look just fine, but still have some issue reading.
This cleaning process has been highly successful (maybe 85%?) for me even
with disks that looked clean.
Also, on a few prior attempts I've had inexplicable results in trying
different drives. I don't know if alignments, speeds, magnetic sensitivity
or other factors were at play but it's worth trying as another trick to
have in the collection. Sometimes it worked better, sometimes it was worse.
I am not 100% sure, but I thought the "baking" was for media that was
shedding or at some risk of having a physical issue with delamination, etc.
Also, I can't really help on the merging question. I'd think you could
just cut the resulting images together using a hex editor or similar.
Naturally, you'd have to know where the bad parts were in the file. Maybe
you could start with a 'fc /b filename.bin filename.bin' at a Windows
command prompt, note the offsets of differences between multiple reads and
visually compare those sections in a hex editor?
Good luck with the data restoration! See ya.
-Todd
> From: Philipp Hachtmann
> that one posting sounded a lot like that, sorry.
OK.
> Do you have a source where there are still 30k chips sitting and
> waiting?
It was ~30K a couple of months ago. I checked about a week ago, and it was
down to ~26K (IIRC).
Although, like I said, I doubt they have all 26K in stock themselves; based on
comments they made when we bought a large group, I think that's the total
number available to them across a number of suppliers, in a network which
shares inventory information.
Noel
> From: Don North <north at alum.mit.edu>
> .. the hardware bootstrap reads track 1 sectors 1, 3, 5, 7
Ah, thanks for that. Starting to look at the code, I had missed the
interleave.
So does DEC do anything with track 0, or is it always just empty?
Noel
In a message dated 10/31/2016 2:31:02 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
tmfdmike at gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:15 AM, william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Find a copy of the PDP-11 systems handbook! Say 1978, 80 and 82
versions
>> and
>> see the difference. Never mind the Unibus, Qbus, PRO, and PDT flavors.
>>
>>
>> Allison
>>
>>> thanks Ed Sharpe _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> Here is a thread I posted on my site, with link to the first printing of
> the PDP 11 brochure. The first PDP 11 models had no "/nn" on the front
> panel.. see for yourself.
>
> http://vintagecomputer.net/browse_thread.cfm?id=593
Mine is a very early example - number 636 IIRC - and it just says
'pdp-11' on the front:
http://www.corestore.org/1120-1.jpg
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
'No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for his brother.
Not for millions, not for glory, not for fame.
For one person, in the dark, where no one will ever know or see.'
Mike OK that is a great indicator!
serial# and date wise! Ed#
In a message dated 10/31/2016 6:36:17 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu writes:
> From: Ed Sharpe
> was Unix or C the one developed on the 11/20?
Both. Unix Version 1 was written in PDP-11 assembler, for the -11/20;
although that was a re-write of an earlier version written in PDP-7
assembler. C was developed from B in good part because the word address
model
of B (inherited from its ancestor BCPL) wasn't a good match for the
PDP-11's
byte addressing model. More here:
https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/hist.htmlhttps://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/chist.html
> From: Christian Corti
> I think the IP stack needs separate I/D and more memory
I read that the networking code in 2.x uses Supervisor mode (apparently it
needed more address space than was available with only kernel, even with
split I/D).
Noel
Great History Noel! Many Thanks!
...
I wonder if the pdp-11 was just called pdp-11 at t that point or
was a pdp-11/20 like we have..
I know they are essentially the same at this time point they got
their PDP 11 what did it say on the front panel I wonder?
(figuring all this stuff out for titling up the cards in the 11/20
display we are planning.)
thanks Ed Sharpe _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 10/31/2016 1:41:28 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu writes:
> From: Ed Sharpe
> I wonder if the pdp-11 was just called pdp-11 at t that point or was a
> pdp-11/20 like we have
Others have better info on this than me...
> at this time point they got their PDP 11 what did it say on the front
> panel I wonder?
I'm going to _guess_ that it was the earlier caption; I definitely recall
reading somewhere (maybe that history thing I already provided a link to)
that when the PDP-11/20 first arrived, DEC didn't have a disk drive for it,
and so it sat in a corner for some months (running some chess problem)
until
the disk arrived. So that argues that it was a very early production
machine.
Noel
Noel - OK that is what I also read.... so probably would have said
PDP-11 on the front panel not 11/20 if it was that early if we
subscribe to the theory that the ones labeled 11 only were before the 11/20
I do wonder if there are any photograph of the system they used at
the get go of the PDP-11 use? Need a photo that has definite date
info....
yes, the systems are the same but some of this is important as I
do the display cards for the 11/20 we have here at SMECC
Thx Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 10/31/2016 1:58:29 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
ajp166 at verizon.net writes:
> ...
> I wonder if the pdp-11 was just called pdp-11 at t that point or
> was a pdp-11/20 like we have..
At that time PDP-11 was a general architecture name and 11/mumble was a
specific system.
Keep in mind that new versions of the -11 would evolve soon after
introduction and
continue over time for decades.
Add to that there were both processor naming and system configuration
naming
conventions.
> I know they are essentially the same at this time point they got
> their PDP 11 what did it say on the front panel I wonder?
> (figuring all this stuff out for titling up the cards in the 11/20
> display we are planning.)
Find a copy of the PDP-11 systems handbook! Say 1978, 80 and 82
versions and
see the difference. Never mind the Unibus, Qbus, PRO, and PDT flavors.
Allison
>
OK I have seen both on Panels pdp-11 and pdp 11/20
figured the first issuance would say pdp-11 only on panel
Ed#
> From: Ed Sharpe
> I wonder if the pdp-11 was just called pdp-11 at t that point or was a
> pdp-11/20 like we have
Others have better info on this than me...
> at this time point they got their PDP 11 what did it say on the front
> panel I wonder?
I'm going to _guess_ that it was the earlier caption; I definitely recall
reading somewhere (maybe that history thing I already provided a link to)
that when the PDP-11/20 first arrived, DEC didn't have a disk drive for it,
and so it sat in a corner for some months (running some chess problem) until
the disk arrived. So that argues that it was a very early production machine.
Noel
In a message dated 10/31/2016 12:36:35 P.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
isking at uw.edu writes:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:29 PM, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com> wrote:
>
> ...
> I wonder if the pdp-11 was just called pdp-11 at t that point or
> was a pdp-11/20 like we have..
> I know they are essentially the same at this time point they got
> their PDP 11 what did it say on the front panel I wonder?
> (figuring all this stuff out for titling up the cards in the 11/20
> display we are planning.)
>
I think we had this discussion a while back, but I know that my 11/20 just
says 'PDP-11' on the front panel. I've also seen them with '11/20', which
is almost certainly a later naming as the -11 line grew.
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Dissertation: "Why the Conversation Mattered: Constructing a Sociotechnical
Narrative Through a Design Lens
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."
ok just re-clarifing.... so then w would be safe in reading the unix
history - the 11 they had since when they got it a disk was not avail. (???
REALLY!!?? Hard to believe DEC would ship a processor without disc
i/o??? COMMENTS? ) would have just probably said PDP-11
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org/)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*************? Contact Rick below if interested.? *************--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: Rick Bunker????Contact: rick at bunker.us ????Location: Jenkintown, PA???
I have a computer collection that I have to sell. My wife and I have separated, and the house is being sold, and I have no place to keep the computers in my new apartment.
It is a pretty nice collection. Altair 8800, two IMSAI 8080's, an Apple ][ (not ][+ or e or anything, the first one), a TRS-80 (the real first revision, with no numeric keypad, with the original cassette drive, monitor) an LSI monitor, a KIM-1, an original IBM PC (not an XT -- original 2-floppys, original bios), an SwTPC 6800 box, with no innards. Similarly, a Cromemco box with no innards. A Northstar Horizon.
Some 8-inch drives, a bunch of S-100 boards, a luggable Kaypro portable, an odd and an end or two.
Lots of documentation.
Some old disks which may have readable software on them. I don't power these things up, since they have power supplies that you can weld with, with 40-year-old capacitors on them.
Is there anybody in striking distance of Philadelphia suburbs, who would consider buying and picking up this collection?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
was Unix or C the one developed on the 11/20?
Ed#
In a message dated 10/30/2016 6:15:32 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
elson at pico-systems.com writes:
>>
>> Bill
> Unix? Probably a complete brain fart by me - but I thought Unix
> required a machine with separate I/D spaces and the 11/40 wasn't one
> of them?
>
> If I'm wrong that will be of some assistance to me actually :-)
>
> From: Allison
> Later versions like 2.9 and V7 do want I&D.
V7 is only distributed with pre-built loads for split I+D machines (so you
can't boot a V7 distribution tape on a non-split machine), but it includes
machine-language OS support files for non-split machines. (It's similar
enough to V6 that it makes sense that it runs on non-split machines.)
> From: William Degnan
> Given 128K core, wouldn't one be able to save the OS in core, no need
> to load what would need to "get started" from a diskpak?
To fork a process, Unix swaps the forking process out, and then fiddles
system tables so that one of the two copies (I forget which, without looking
at the code) becomes the child. This includes at startup, when the 'swapping'
process (0) splits and the child (1) is set up to run /etc/init. (I
found this out the hard way, when bringing up V6 under Ersatz-11. :-)
So Unix won't run without a swapping device.
Noel
> From: Philipp Hachtmann
> Very enlightening.
> You're hoarding interface ICs with commercial second thoughts
If you think either Guy, or Dave and I, expect to make much money selling the
QBUS/UNIBUS boards we are working on, you are seriously confused. None of us
are in this as a money-making exercise; there are easier ways to make a lot
more money.
And as to the hoarding, if you'd like to buy up a couple of thousand yourself,
>from that miniscule stockpile of 30K units that Guy and I have left out there
for you all, please let me know, and I'll expidite over a name, phone number,
and email for you to contact.
Noel
Guys,
there's a new release PDP11GUI 1.48.5
Some enhancements:
1. "Disk Image Read/Write":
- Now compression of 2word patterns (32 bit patterns), did reduce
download of a RSX-11 system disk from 40h to 6h.
- Fix for PDP-11/44 console firmware v 3.40: ignore "(Program)" output
after driver start.
2. Terminal windows now beeps on char, necessary for some endless XXDP
diags.
Download from https://github.com/j-hoppe/PDP11GUI/releases/tag/1.48.5
Web: http://retrocmp.com/tools/pdp11gui
Enjoy,
Joerg
> From: Ed Sharpe
> was Unix or C the one developed on the 11/20?
Both. Unix Version 1 was written in PDP-11 assembler, for the -11/20;
although that was a re-write of an earlier version written in PDP-7
assembler. C was developed from B in good part because the word address model
of B (inherited from its ancestor BCPL) wasn't a good match for the PDP-11's
byte addressing model. More here:
https://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/hist.htmlhttps://www.bell-labs.com/usr/dmr/www/chist.html
> From: Christian Corti
> I think the IP stack needs separate I/D and more memory
I read that the networking code in 2.x uses Supervisor mode (apparently it
needed more address space than was available with only kernel, even with
split I/D).
Noel
I've pdf'd half a dozen pages of the 360/40 development manual from IBM British Labs at
Hursley UK, early/mid 60s. I wish I had more but these only survived because dad used
to bring home binders with these single-sided pages for us kids to draw on, and my
parents kept them. They may not even be from the same document, but it's just for
interest's sake.
http://web.aanet.com.au/~malikoff/misc/IBM_360-40_Development_Manual_fragme…
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016, Jon Elson wrote:
>> Thank you for the tips, i will see if i can open it up in someway, the fan
>> is kinda like a laptop blower style, but a bigger version of it :) I think
>> i will need to buy new bearings for it when i have read on google about the
>> fan.
You never know until you try.
Anyway, the Alphaserver 4100 has four midsize muffin fans and I found them
trivial to take apart and trivial to replace the bearings which were a
standard off the shelf part. It was easier to fix the fan than it was to
replace them since DEC had a custom fan with a speed sensor built in that
proved impossible for me to find.
It changes from model to model and generation to generation.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
Hey Jon!
Thank you for the tips, i will see if i can open it up in someway, the
fan is kinda like a laptop blower style, but a bigger version of it :) I
think i will need to buy new bearings for it when i have read on google
about the fan.
/Daniel
Don't be nasty Al!
I was willing to scan the addendum and covers if needed.
I also did not know if others with interest needed...I am glad the book
is scanned already as I do not care to blow mine apart... glue backing
gets pretty brittle on these things. The addendum is a loose pamphlet that
was just with the manual
In a message dated 10/30/2016 11:20:03 A.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
aek at bitsavers.org writes:
BFD
On 10/30/16 11:03 AM, william degnan wrote:
>> I see bitsavers has manual but not pmphlet.Also there is no color
front
>> and back cover
I am sorry Bill...I have no idea what to do to authenticate
help? details? thanks Ed#
In a message dated 10/30/2016 11:03:41 A.M. US Mountain Standard Tim,
billdegnan at gmail.com writes:
Ed,
I have a little 703 and 706 in my library under Raytheon.
Clearing out my spam folder I see your recent messages to cctalk. Here is
why your emails are going into the spam box, see if you can authenticate
your email address.
Bill
*Why is this message in Spam?* It has a from address in aol.com but has
failed aol.com's required tests for authentication.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 11:45 PM, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com> wrote:
> We have in the library:
> "raytheon 706 computer users manual"
> at SMECC.
>
> Wanted to see if it was online somewhere.
>
> Nice shape tight binding with an additional errata and addendum
> pamphlet accompanying it.
>
> I see bitsavers has manual but not pmphlet.Also there is no color
front
> and back cover, which
> if you have the computer is cool artwork for a display. -
>
> Anyone with a 706 out there?
>
> Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
>
>
We have in the library:
"raytheon 706 computer users manual"
at SMECC.
Wanted to see if it was online somewhere.
Nice shape tight binding with an additional errata and addendum
pamphlet accompanying it.
I see bitsavers has manual but not pmphlet.Also there is no color front
and back cover, which
if you have the computer is cool artwork for a display. -
Anyone with a 706 out there?
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
From: Al Kossow <aek at bitsavers.org>
>
> the will probably be 68000
>
> unisoft kernels i've used weren't 010 with the 451
>
Dumb question...did the '451 have a mechanism to work around the
instruction restart issue in the 68000? Or was there some other way
that was handled?
> i'll have to dig around for what bits of the 451 kernel i still
> have around. unisoft kept the mmu parts pretty well isolated since
> the did so many hw ports
I'd be grateful.
KJ