At 7:17 PM +0000 3/13/11, Tony Duell wrote:
On a more genrarl point, why do namy collectors
regard old
printers/plotters/other peripherals as 'junk' while processorts from the
same vintage are 'interesting'? As I've said before, I'm very much a
hardware person, and can find interest in all sorts of odd hardware.
When it comes to plotters I think it's less a case of considering
them junk, and more a case of considering them rather troublesome and
large. :-) There is also the case of some of them using supplies
'Toroublesome and large'... I can think of plenty of classic computers
that applies to as well :-) (No flames, please...)
that really should be stored in a Hazmat locker. I
still have at
least 3 or 4 old printers out in the garage. I also suspect most
collectors don't put as much value on being able to print from these
systems as you do.
Ah no, you misunderstood me. If I seriously wanyt a printout from a
classic computer, I am likely tro use a printer somewhat more mdoern than
the machine. IF the host classic computer can `print' to an RS232 port,
then I'll vcapture the data with something like an HP98LX and transfer it
later to this PC [1] for formatting and printing. Of coruse there are
machines in my collection that really should be used with the
printer/plotter that they were designed to work with, and in that case I
do try to restrore and use the 'right' unit.
[1] If I ever do get a more modern machine, one thing I would insist on,
even more than having full schematicvs, would be an RS232 port and
kermit. It can be an RS232 port on the end of a USB converter or
whatever, but I have som many devices that use that 'standard' that I
would not want to be stuck with a machine that could talk to none of them.
Anyway, the main reason I do this is consumables. Printers do use up
paper and/or ink (toner, ribbons, inkjet cartridges, sparkjet electrdes,
etc), and at least one of those is likely to be hard to obtain for a
classic pritner now.
No, what I was saying is that I find the old printers and plotters
themselves to be interesting in some cases. The motor control circuitry
of an HP7245 -- the accumulator registers, adders, sin/cos look-up table
ROMs, DACs, analogue filtering, etc -- interests me. The timing stat
machine in the Versatec V80 intersts me. The discrte-transisotr
interface, DACs and servo amplifers in an HP9125 pkoiter interest me. The
state machine controller and shift registers to store a line of
characters in the HP9866 interest me.
Perhaps not as much as a similar-technology processor/computer system,
but I would find repaairing/investigating one of the aforementioned hard
copy devices to be a lot more interesting than doing the same to, say, a
typicel 1980s home computer.
It's the same with other peripehrals too. I find some of the older
modems, now totally useless for data communications (even I want
something a little faster than 300 bits per second, and I don't have a
4-wire leased line :-)), to be interesting in design.
-tony