If you were to convert a raster monitor to a
vector one by replacing
the drive electronics there would be no problem at all
Really? I thought vector displays normally use electrostatic
deflection, whereas raster displays normally use magnetic deflection.
Some vector displays use electrostatic deflection, some use magnetic. The
DEC VR14 (and IIRC VR12, VR17) all use magnetic deflection. I think the
HP1311 etc were electrostatic, but I would have to pull covers to check.
Gettting down to smaller units, the Vectrex was certainly magnetic. The
HP9100 calcualtor (if that counts) is electrostatic
If you use magntic deflection, you need to drive the coils from a current
source (since it's the current that determines the magnetic field, which
in turn determines the deflection of the beam), and said current source
needs to have a pretty high output voltage to overcome the back-emf from
said coils when you rapidly change the position of the beam (==change the
current through the coil).
The problem with electrostatic deflection is that you need a special CRT
(A TV tupe doesn't have the defleciton plates) and you have problems
getting a large deflection angle if you want to keep the relationship
between applied volatage and defleciton linear. That means your CRT will
be very long from front to back (think of the typical old 'scope CRT,
where linearity is obviously very important. It's perhaps 18" from base
to screen for a 6" diameter screen).
(And of course no amount of drive electronics work can
add deflection
plates to a tube that doesn't have them.)
-tony