I need a 90 mm summacron for my m2 (drop me a line off list if anyone
has one)
Yes I know the 105 f 2.5 nikkor you speak of great sharp portrait
length lens for the nikon F!
we have a small 105 mm red dot Goertz we used for copy work on 2 1/4
x 3 1/4 in compur shutter
the one on the Robertson process camera I used in the 70s was 18 inch
focal length as I remember.
Ed#
In a message dated 3/9/2016 6:53:06 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
healyzh at
aracnet.com writes:
On Mar 9, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Fred Cisin <cisin at
xenosoft.com> wrote:
>> posters! The lens was a Goerz Red Dot Artar and the sharpest flat
field lens
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Rod Smallwood wrote:
> Thanks,,
> Our cam was fitted with a high grade Ziess lens that cost a fortune
even
then,
Zeiss made a lot of lenses, some of which were great.
Goerz made a few of the greatest lenses ever made.
For personal use, I'm looking for Leitz Summicron in all focal lengths,
and
Nikkor 105mm that was made in mid 1960s.
And, if I can ever get a 4x5 digital back, I want a
Goerz Dagor.
All out of my price range.
Personally I need a nice ASPH 28mm or 35mm Summicron. I have the original
Nikkon 35mm f/2, one of the very first made, it?s been Ai?d, and it?s an
AMAZING lens.
The Goerz Dagor?s are actually pretty cheap at the moment, I?ve been
thinking about them for my 8x10. I?m using a mixture of modern lenses on my
4x5.
Somehow I don?t ever expect a digital 4x5 back to be affordable. I know
one Photographer that has one, and it?s really only useable for reproduction
work, in the studio. Keep in mind that digital backs that can cover 4x5
or larger are scanning backs. Have you considered adapting a scanner as
one? I?ve seen in the past where folks have done that. Personally except for
one project, I shoot B&W film when I?m shooting 4x5 or 8x10, I then
process and print it myself. For the 8x10 (and hopefully eventually 11x14), I
only shoot B&W, and only contact print.
Zane