From: "Jason T": Monday, October 01, 2012 3:30 PM
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, John Many Jars
Fair enough. I prefer it if you have to
subscribe to read the messages.
As would I, all other things being equal. But it would be helpful if
the list archive had a search function of some kind. If not, the only
available search method would be to download all the archive files
locally.
I'm hopeful that there will continue *not* to be a call for action on this
point.
I think the benefit of having the list indexed *far* outweighs the possibility
that one of us will accidentally reveal something personal in public. And I
consider myself a privacy buff.
My experience is that when I want to look up something (often quite obscure)
about my favorite vintage gear, nothing beats the search engines, and nothing
matches so often as cctalk and the archives of the PDP8-Lovers mailing list.
Unfortunately, the PDP8-lovers list is private, and the fact that only 2/89 thru
2/95 are archived and searchable is a great loss. Fortunately, this list has
largely taken up the slack, giving a place where I can find information which
was more recently discussed, and pointers to resources that have some
chance of still existing.
I'd also note that at various times, the "public" PDP8-lovers content from
89-95 has nearly vanished due to being (nearly) single-sourced. As far
as I can tell, the more recent content *has* essentially vanished.
This list has always been public, and I think we all knew that, though it may
have slipped our minds from time to time. I, for one, am glad of it.
I also think that the list has run quite well for a long time this way (thanks
again to Jay and others who make it happen!), without any problems that
I am aware of, related to it's being public. A lot of the bugaboos about
spam and so on just haven't materialized. (Thanks also to Google and
others for the archives themselves and for obscuring our email addresses
in their archives.)
Vince