16 Jan
2006
16 Jan
'06
10:21 p.m.
Does such a thing exist? The peripherals handbook I got with my 11/03
doesn't list such a thing, but I can imagine that there are Q-bus tape
drive controllers that talk to a pertec interface that would work.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>
16 Jan
16 Jan
10:37 p.m.
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 01:21, Richard wrote:
Does such a thing exist? The peripherals handbook I
got with my 11/03
doesn't list such a thing, but I can imagine that there are Q-bus tape
drive controllers that talk to a pertec interface that would work.
Yeah, but I don't think DEC made any.
You'll be looking for third party QBUS cards, made by people like MDB, Dilog,
Emulex, AVIV, etc. Google for QBUS and Pertec for some ideas.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCAC --- http://www.rcac.purdue.edu/
The Computer Refuge --- http://computer-refuge.org
17 Jan
17 Jan
7:37 a.m.
Yes there are indeed QBus cards for the Pertec interface.
The Emulex QT-131 is one of those (dual card type).
I've found 2 of those in a box of misc stuff.
Regards,
Ed
Does such a thing exist? The peripherals handbook I
got with my 11/03
doesn't list such a thing, but I can imagine that there are Q-bus tape
drive controllers that talk to a pertec interface that would work.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>
12:25 p.m.
Does such a thing exist? The peripherals handbook I got with my 11/03
doesn't list such a thing, but I can imagine that there are Q-bus tape
drive controllers that talk to a pertec interface that would work.
DEC probably didn't make one at that time. although IIRC the TSV05 was a
Pertec controller that went with the TS05 magtape (a rebadged Cipher 880)
I am sure there were also third party cards from the likes of Emulex and
Dilog. I can't see why any of them would have problems in an 11/03
machine (modulo the normal problems with odd signals on the top 4 address
lines in some early backplanes).
-tony
18 Jan
18 Jan
12:06 p.m.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:25:47 +0000 (GMT)
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
DEC probably didn't make one at that time.
although IIRC the TSV05 was
a Pertec controller that went with the TS05 magtape (a rebadged Cipher
880)
The DEC TSV05 M7206 / M7206-PA is identical to the Emulex QT13 / QT14.
They look identical and a copy of the Emulex QT13 / QT14 firmware runs
in the DEC TSV05 M7206 / M7206-PA. The benefit of the Emulex firmware is
the ability to switch between TSV05 emulation and TMSCP where the DEC
firmware is castrated to TSV05 only.
--
tsch??,
Jochen
Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/
4:28 p.m.
Jochen Kunz wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:25:47 +0000 (GMT)
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
any chance you could make a copy of the eprom contents available?
(I have a tsv05 :-)
-brad
DEC probably didn't make one at that time.
although IIRC the TSV05 was
a Pertec controller that went with the TS05 magtape (a rebadged Cipher
880)
The DEC TSV05 M7206 / M7206-PA is identical to the Emulex QT13 / QT14.
They look identical and a copy of the Emulex QT13 / QT14 firmware runs
in the DEC TSV05 M7206 / M7206-PA. The benefit of the Emulex firmware is
the ability to switch between TSV05 emulation and TMSCP where the DEC
firmware is castrated to TSV05 only. 
21 Jan
21 Jan
10:35 a.m.
At 03:25 PM 1/17/2006, you wrote:
I was able to get an Emulex TC02 to work on a micropdp11, connected to a
Qualstar drive. (under rt11)
Doug
Does such a thing exist? The peripherals handbook I got with my 11/03
doesn't list such a thing, but I can imagine that there are Q-bus tape
drive controllers that talk to a pertec interface that would work.
DEC probably didn't make one at that time. although IIRC the TSV05 was a
Pertec controller that went with the TS05 magtape (a rebadged Cipher 880)
I am sure there were also third party cards from the likes of Emulex and
Dilog. I can't see why any of them would have problems in an 11/03
machine (modulo the normal problems with odd signals on the top 4 address
lines in some early backplanes).
-tony
6863
days inactive
6867
days old
6 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
ard＠p850ug1.demon.co.uk -
brad＠heeltoe.com -
dj.taylor＠starpower.net -
jkunz＠unixag-kl.fh-kl.de -
legalize＠xmission.com -
pat＠computer-refuge.org -
quapla＠xs4all.nl