2 Jun
2013
2 Jun
'13
7:36 a.m.
Hello to all HP-UX fans.
I got one HP C8000 but my 2003 HP-UX 11i.v1 CD
fails to install.
Can anybody inform me where to get the
proper version?
HP workstations are licensed to run HP-UX
so that should not be an issue as far as I know.
Download of image would be all that is needed.
BR, Matti
From: cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
Subject: cctalk Digest, Vol 118, Issue 2
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 06:28:54 -0500
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: OT: rubber drive belts (Jules Richardson)
2. Re: MSBBC - Re: Next box with 1991 web page(s) password
protected (Liam Proven)
3. Re: UK, Scotalnd, and Ireland reyclers (Sander Reiche)
4. Re: DEC collectors--input needed (Sander Reiche)
5. Re: [cctalk] Re: DEC collectors--input needed (Dave McGuire)
6. Re: DEC collectors--input needed (Philipp Hachtmann)
7. Re: Atari Dump to be excavated? (Martin Goldberg)
8. Re: Still looking for a home - RA81 parts (Alan Perry)
9. Re: Atari Dump to be excavated? (Liam Proven)
10. Re: Atari Dump to be excavated? (mc68010)
11. Casetek 1018 rails wanted (TeoZ)
12. Re: [cctalk] Re: pdp11/93 mod (Jules Richardson)
13. Re: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor (Tony Duell)
14. Re: OT: rubber drive belts (Tony Duell)
15. Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube) (Tony Duell)
16. Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube) (Fred Jan Kraan)
17. RE: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor (Robert Jarratt)
18. Re: OT: rubber drive belts (Chuck Guzis)
19. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Tothwolf)
20. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Jochen Kunz)
21. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Mouse)
22. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Cory Smelosky)
23. Re: Another original Apple I sells for an insane amount
(randy at randy.kindig.name)
24. HP-85A/B display and power supply schematics? (Craig Ruff)
25. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Tothwolf)
26. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Mouse)
27. Re: pdp11/93 mod (Holm Tiffe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:12:12 -0500
From: Jules Richardson <jules.richardson99 at gmail.com>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: rubber drive belts
Message-ID: <51AA1D5C.70908 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
On 05/31/2013 10:29 AM, Rich Cini wrote:
Them's FIGHTIN' WORDS!
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:38:03 +0200
From: Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DEC collectors--input needed
Message-ID: <51AA3F8B.5080505 at hachti.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Am 31.05.2013 19:53, schrieb Tom Gardner:
Run it in a bath of whale oil.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:24:40 +0100 (BST)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor
Message-ID: <m1UirPy-000J4ZC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
Yes, I have it:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/tf20/TFX.zip
Yup...it's very unfortunate. :(
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 16:34:14 -0600
From: Craig Ruff <cruff at ruffspot.net>
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: HP-85A/B display and power supply schematics?
Message-ID: <1ACF2BED-CFA5-443C-BC71-A0EC342FC599 at ruffspot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Has anyone managed to create schematics for the display and power supply for the
HP-85A/B? I don't know yet if Tony's schematics for the 87 are applicable or
possibly close enough for these boards.
I have both an 85A and 85B with identical display issues, which I expect are due to old
capacitors causing poor voltage regulation and/or ripple. The pincushion test looks
pretty good, except for a bit of vertical displacement (think low amplitude waves) on the
horizontal lines. The second issue is when a lot of white is being displayed (i.e.
reverse video), there is a distinct narrowing in the scan line width in the top inch or
so, with the narrowest at the first scan line. Then there is a gradual widening towards
the bottom, with the lowest scan lines ending up off the sides of the phosphor.
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 04:55:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID:
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1306020425590.2493 at brioche.invalid.domain>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Jochen Kunz wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:27:09 -0500 (CDT)
> Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
>> I'm looking more for what a
Linux distribution once was in the late
>> 1990s, with full (advanced) networking support, plus normal network
>> services, and still have a small userspace footprint (and low memory
>> usage). A GUI is non-essential and for both space and security reasons
>> (note all the recent X and X-libraries security bulletins) and I'd
>> prefer to be able to leave it out completely in many applications.
>
> Linux used to be a free Unix for Unix
enthusiasts.
> Today it is a bad Windows (MacOS X) surrugate for point and drool lusers.
> \end{troll}
> ;-)
Meh, I think not. I'm trying to cut down on the number of different
platforms I have to maintain, not add another. ippool also wouldn't really
be a suitable replacement for the way I use ipset, and the idea of trying
to use pf in place of ebtables and iptables for bridge-mode firewalling is
very unappealing. In fact, if I had to switch to something else, I'd
probably go with OpenBSD (which I already use for other stuff) over NetBSD
given OpenBSD's hardware support.
I plan to stick with Linux for most embedded applications, but the
widespread assumption by many userspace "developers" that everyone has 4GB
or 8GB of ram and a 2TB hard drive isn't helping anyone except help
hardware companies sell newer gear year after year.
Right now there seems to be a gap in the market for a Linux distribution
tailored for small/embedded systems which is also easy to maintain/update
with a halfway decent package management system. I have nothing against
pkgsrc, Ports, etc, but when you are dealing with lots of different
systems, and especially those with limited CPU/memory/storage, compiling
everything from scratch (as with Gentoo) just isn't a viable solution.
------------------------------
Message: 26
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 06:40:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID: <201306021040.GAA10348 at Chip.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>Does anyone have
information regarding modifying a pdp11/93 cpu to run
> >>at 20Mhz? It's been mentioned on a couple of web pages, but I
can't
> >>seem to find details.
> >>
> >>Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >There isn't much of detail to tell, simply replace the 18Mhz Xtal
> >against a 20Mhz one, but be warned, the CPU isn't the only limiting
> >factor for the speed, the Gate Arrays and the FPU are also involved.
> >Maybe you toast them while overclocking..
> > >I've changed th 15Mhz
Xtal from an 11/73 CPU to 18Mhz to get a 11/83..
> > >Regards,
> > >Holm
> The biggest thing with that kind of speedup is first its a trivial
> amount and
> the other is if you go too far system reliability will be poor and show
> up as
> unexpected crashes with known solid software (data errors).
>
> That said I've pushed the clock on 11/23 board once too see and the 13mhz
> clock was wound up to 25mhz using a external source. I started seeing
> errors above 18mhz but they were random, seems bus timing and memory
> timing all had to be happy and I was pushing the margins. I eventually
> put in a clock module for 15.8mhz as I had one. For that it was a modest
> speed up as the 11/23 is slower to start with.
>
> Generally overclocking is problematic because the system timing is based
> on it
> and there may be items other than the CPU that have lower limits.
>
> Allison
Yes. In my case I've changed the older J11 to one of the last available
revisions (-09?) to be at least sure that it meets the specifications.
I don't had another FPU Chip so the FPU and the Gate Arrays are the 15Mhz
Versions. Tested the entire Machine with all available Test Programms on
xxdp to be sore the entire system works as expected...no error so far..
Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 118, Issue 2
**************************************
I get my belts at turntableneedles.com. They have
a wide selection of belts and a good cross reference.
Oh, and they carry turntable needles too.
:-) Thanks, they look useful. This is an old Admiral unit (good ol' 70's
styling, and dreadful internal build quality!) and things are hampered by
the fact that they seemed to re-use the model number for a later turntable,
making searches difficult.
Because the drive pulley is crowned I can't use their string method, but
I'll be able to get calipers on the pulleys and work out the belt length
using their diameters and distance between them.
cheers
J.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:14:22 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: MSBBC - Re: Next box with 1991 web page(s) password
protected
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCEQ8NLotH1MAhzHYmVx=LBTYdzZp0N8piMOv4m_rUYP9Q at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 25 May 2013 02:48, Toby Thain <toby at telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
On 24/05/13 9:18 PM, Liam Proven wrote:
True enough, but as you say... :?)
"BBC abandons ?100m digital project"
"John Linwood, the BBC's chief technology officer, has been suspended."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-22651126
Also see:
http://www.cio.co.uk/news/cio-career/bbc-cto-john-linwood-suspended-over-10…
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:21:16 +0200
From: Sander Reiche <sander.reiche at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: UK, Scotalnd, and Ireland reyclers
Message-ID:
<CACStewYDiS1GPpgKbr+z-zzj4bWHT3s+X1fGqatQmp3G=4tbVg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Do you know of any companies like this in the Netherlands that might be
persuaded as well?
Kind regards,
Sander Reiche
the Netherlands
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus <
sales at elecplus.com> wrote:
On 25 May 2013 02:09, Toby Thain<toby at telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
There isn't just one, but that's a start. :)
The BBC has been thoroughly infiltrated by ex-Microsoft executives, in a
very quiet takeover that few Britons have apparently noticed.
I heard - today, actually - that the ex-'Softie boss just got fired.
There's some hope.
For those of you looking for recyclers in the UK
where you might be able to
scrounge, or ask them to save interesting bits, please take a look at this
company. They caught my interest because they exclusively employ
disabled/disadvantaged workers. Nice to see a company that helps others
out!
About Haven Recycle
Haven Recycle is a social enterprise based in Glasgow which runs a Waste
Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE) recycling and asset recovery
operation. We are part of the Rehab Recycle group, servicing a number of
large public and private sector organisations including Dell, Microsoft and
the NHS.
The services we offer include removal and disposal of all waste electrical
equipment, secure data destruction both on and off site, office clearouts,
asset recovery and re-marketing. We will seek to achieve maximum value from
your waste material, with the absolute minimum going to landfill. The aim
being wherever possible to reuse, and recycle all Waste Electrical and
Electronic Equipment. All work undertaken is fully compliant with all
relevant legislation, and carried out to the highest possible standards
demanded by the market.
While operating as a business, Haven Recycle is also a social enterprise;
our unique attribute being that the majority of our highly skilled and
comprehensively trained workforce comprises of disabled and disadvantaged
adults. We carry out ongoing programmes of training and integration to
ensure that all our work is carried out to the highest possible standards
demanded by the market, and our impressive client list is a testament to
this. As such our customers can contribute significantly to their Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) simply by engaging Haven Recycle as a supplier.
Specialties
WEEE Recycling, Asset Recovery, Information Security Management, Corporate
Social Responsibility, Data Destruction - on & off site, CESG Approved Data
Erasure - on & off site, ISO 9001 accredited, ISO 14001 accredited, SEPA
Waste Management License: WML/L/1099035
. Headquarters 6 - 8 Watt Road Hillington Park Glasgow, G52 4RY
United Kingdom
. Website http://www.havenrecycle.co.uk
. Industry Renewables & Environment
. Type Nonprofit
. Company Size 11-50 employees
. Founded 1946
____________________________________________________________________________
______________
Alex Charlie Anthony Money
Director
Reclaim Services
Phone:+44( 0 )162-2236205 / + 44 (0) 1 622 766 300
Fax: 0704 301 8422
Charlie at reclaim-uk.com / amoney at reclaim-uk.com
AOL/ICQ IM: AnthonyLM1
MS IM: Anthony at reclaim-uk
Skype: AnthonyMoney
____________________________________________________________________________
______________
Steven Martin
Sales
Sims Recycling Solutions
Phone: 01387723011
steve.martin at simsmm.com
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________
Grace Spillane
Sales Executive
WiseTek Solutions Ltd.
Skype Online Number: +353 (0)1 4433958
Tel: +353 (0)21 4556940
Tel: +353 (0)21 2353790
Skype Name: gracewisetek
Web: www.wisetek.ie
____________________________________________________________________________
________________
Anthony Watmore
TechniMove Recycles LTD
Phone: 00 44 7949 752252
sales at tmoverecycles.com
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________
A2C Services Ltd.
E mail : rod.neale at a2c.co.uk
MSN IM : rod1111 at hotmail.com
AOL IM : A2C SERVICES
Skype: rodneale
Tel: +44 (0)1730 890232
Fax: +44 (0)1730 890233
A2C Services Ltd, Snatch House, Farnham Road, Liss, Hampshire, England GU33
6JZ
Website Address: www.a2c.co.uk
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6369 - Release Date: 05/30/13
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:28:16 +0200
From: Sander Reiche <sander.reiche at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DEC collectors--input needed
Message-ID:
<CACStewagAo2R5r47VD86Hox=qOcv47OosgPKEs1wYxLgWv16-w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com> wrote:
a really low-end VAXstation 3100
Hey, watch it, buddy! ;)
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:35:17 -0400
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Re: DEC collectors--input needed
Message-ID: <51AA3EE5.9010808 at neurotica.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 06/01/2013 02:28 PM, Sander Reiche wrote:
a really
low-end VAXstation 3100
Hey, watch it, buddy! ;) Not on the list are the RP01, RP02 and/or RPR02
disk drives made by Memorex
for DEC.
Oh: Does anybody have some cartridges for my RP02 and RP03 drives?!?
Regards,
Philipp
--
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Philipp Hachtmann
Buchdruck, Bleisatz, Spezialit?ten
Alemannstr. 21, D-30165 Hannover
Tel. 0511/3522222, Mobil 0171/2632239
Fax. 0511/3500439
hachti at hachti.de
www.tiegeldruck.de
UStdID DE 202668329
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:18:41 -0500
From: Martin Goldberg <wgungfu at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Atari Dump to be excavated?
Message-ID:
<CAE5DTME_YvSkyP4_Qr2LU-q1eB28bXXX+0KkJaZ-z1FV==pWdQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This is a non-issue publicity stunt. We already cleared that up in our
book "Atari Inc. - Business Is Fun" released last fall, going by
direct interviews and actual internal documents.
There were never thousands of ET games buried in Alamorgodo, that's a
myth that sprung up later and was also never once mentioned by the
actual press articles of the time. The dump there was simply a
clearing out of Atari's Texas manufacturing plant as it transitioned
to automated production methods and a focus on personal computer
manufacturing. It had previously been one of the main plants for
manufacturing of game cartridges and other hardware, and game
manufacturing was being moved overseas to China.
As part of the transition the unused cartridge stock of a group of
titles (not just E.T.), console parts and computer parts were all
dumped there in New Mexico. It was covered in detail by the Alamogordo
press at the time as well, and is just such a non-mystery that I'm
surprised by all this.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:46 PM, John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
"This week, Canada-based game developer Fuel Industries got approval
from the city of Alamogordo, New Mexico, to excavate the site of the
so-called Atari Dump -- a desert landfill where the famous video
game manufacturer Atari buried hundreds of tons of broken and
outdated merchandise in 1983."
<http://westerndigs.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-mexicos-atari-dump-midden-of-video.html>http://westerndigs.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-mexicos-atari-dump-midden-of-video.html
- John
--
Marty
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 09:05:11 -0700
From: Alan Perry <aperry at snowmoose.com>
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Still looking for a home - RA81 parts
Message-ID: <51AA1BB7.8080503 at snowmoose.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 5/31/13 6:21 AM, Michael Thompson wrote:
Is the optical sensor still on the bottom of the
HDA?
The RICM has a bunch of RA81 drives that don't generate the pulses from the
spindle sensor.
No, the HDA was stripped bare.
I do have the spindle.
I also have 3 RA82s and another RA81 (that goes to Dave McGuire once we
figure out how to get it there without hurting it (within his budget)).
alan
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:37:32 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Atari Dump to be excavated?
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCEM3O8feL260CWpJyG1AcVjC4QwPJeKE9p+poXgm4J5+w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 1 June 2013 13:18, Martin Goldberg <wgungfu at gmail.com> wrote:
This is a non-issue publicity stunt. We already
cleared that up in our
book "Atari Inc. - Business Is Fun" released last fall, going by
direct interviews and actual internal documents.
There were never thousands of ET games buried in Alamorgodo, that's a
myth that sprung up later and was also never once mentioned by the
actual press articles of the time. The dump there was simply a
clearing out of Atari's Texas manufacturing plant as it transitioned
to automated production methods and a focus on personal computer
manufacturing. It had previously been one of the main plants for
manufacturing of game cartridges and other hardware, and game
manufacturing was being moved overseas to China.
As part of the transition the unused cartridge stock of a group of
titles (not just E.T.), console parts and computer parts were all
dumped there in New Mexico. It was covered in detail by the Alamogordo
press at the time as well, and is just such a non-mystery that I'm
surprised by all this.
Please bottom-quote. It's dead easy in Gmail, even in "new compose" -
just press Ctrl-A to "select all" then trim & reply beneath.
Anyway, reading between the lines, it seems clear where all those ETs
went, anyway.
Area 51.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 12:43:06 -0700
From: mc68010 <mc68010 at gmail.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Atari Dump to be excavated?
Message-ID: <51AA4ECA.4050909 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 6/1/2013 5:18 AM, Martin Goldberg wrote:
This is a non-issue publicity stunt. We already
cleared that up in our
book "Atari Inc. - Business Is Fun" released last fall, going by
direct interviews and actual internal documents.
There were never thousands of ET games buried in Alamorgodo,
<snip>
As part of the transition the unused cartridge stock of a group of
titles (not just E.T.), console parts and computer parts were all
dumped there in New Mexico.
So, there were or there weren't ET cartridges and such dumped there ?
Are you only arguing the number of ET cartridges ?
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:44:20 -0400
From: "TeoZ" <teoz at neo.rr.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Casetek 1018 rails wanted
Message-ID: <68B744A8C55A499AA0E3D73A550A938D at TeoPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Anybody in the US happen to have spare drive rails for a Casetek 1018 case? The 3.5? ones
are model 1018205 and the 5.25? ones are 1018202. If so let me know what you have an how
much you want for them.
Thanks
TZ.
P.S. I hate custom mounting rails in cases.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:50:50 -0500
From: Jules Richardson <jules.richardson99 at gmail.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Re: pdp11/93 mod
Message-ID: <51AA509A.7070307 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
On 05/30/2013 01:25 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
An F11
chipset clocked at 16GHz...it'd turn into a fireball. ;)
Nah. Just cool it with superfluid helium. Don't worry, I wouldn't be so rash as to
short the fuses. I know Farnell
have them but I don't currently have enough to warrant an order from them,
for one of the fuses Farnell only had US stock. I could pop into RS in the
I am suprised about that. I thought the fuses in a Model 33 were all common
types that you coudl get almost anywhere. What is this difficult-to-get one?
morning to save on shipping (can't remember
if they open Saturday morning,
can't check now because their web site seems to be down for maintenance). I
did look at Maplin as well but they did not have what I need. I'll take a
look at Cricklewood too
ricklewood are useful to me becuase they're near enough for me to go
there and pick u pthe bits I need. Very useful when I've run out of
74LS00s or something. I am not sure I;d use them for mail orde -- not
that I don't trunt them, I certainly do, but if I am going to go to the
toruble of making and order nad waiting for it to come I might as well go
to Farnell.
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:57:36 +0100 (BST)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: rubber drive belts
Message-ID: <m1Uirvq-000J4eC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
Because the drive pulley is crowned I can't
use their string method, but
I'll be able to get calipers on the pulleys and work out the belt length
using their diameters and distance between them.
Reminds me of soemthing I wrote i nthe HPCC magazine when I described how
to repair the HP9810/HP9820 internal card reader. The belt on that is a
simpe O-rign running on grooved pulleys
Toe find the size of the O-ring, I said that a practical person would run
a bit of string round the pulleys, mark it and measure it. A calculator
hacker would measure the diameter of the pulleys and the spacing between
the spinles and use the belt length program in the HP67 or HP41
Mechancial Engnieering Pac. As I then went on to say, I am both, so I
did both. Fortuantely the answeres agreed to within the accuracy of the
measurements. Even more fortuately that size of O-ring works in the reader.
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:31:36 +0100 (BST)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
To: fjkraan at xs4all.nl (Fred Jan Kraan)
Cc: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube)
Message-ID: <m1UirWg-000J4cC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
On 2013-05-31 20:50, ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
I asusme you have a dump of the boot ROM? If not I think I can find it.
Have you looked at the hardware and the system tracks on the disk? This
thing, for all it claims to be the disk drive for the HX20, etc, is
actually a full Z80-based computer running something very close to CP/M
(!). I often wonder how hard it would be to use it as such (there's a
second serial port too, if you need it).
Yes. fasinating. I am trying to disassemble it, but started with the
boot ROM. The TFDOS as it is called, will be next. As it has everything; enough RAM, disk
controller, serial port, there
should be no reason why it should not work. I might try it, maybe even
before retirement ;-). With the information in "The Programmer's CP/M
Handbook" it should be no problem.
It should eb fairly easy. There's absolutely nothign custum on there. All
standard chips, easy to get data sheets for them. A schematic exists, so
figurign ot uthe addresses of the I/O devices is not hard either.
I have never looked, there is that second serial port at TTL levels (th
TXDB and RSDB piads on the serial daughterboard). Does anything ever come
out of there in normal operation?
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 23:12:25 +0200
From: Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl>
To: Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
Cc: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube)
Message-ID: <51AA63B9.40203 at xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 2013-06-01 21:31, Tony Duell wrote:
Yes. fasinating. I am trying to disassemble it, but started with the
boot ROM. The TFDOS as it is called, will be next.
I asusme you have a dump of the boot ROM? If not I think I can find it.
It should eb fairly easy. There's absolutely nothign custum on there. All
standard chips, easy to get data sheets for them. A schematic exists, so
figurign ot uthe addresses of the I/O devices is not hard either.
I have never looked, there is that second serial port at TTL levels (th
TXDB and RSDB piads on the serial daughterboard). Does anything ever come
out of there in normal operation?
Only this evening I realized, based on your remark on the extra serial
port, that channel A is used for both host (HX-20) and 2nd TF-20 and
channel B is not used. So connecting my TTL-to-USB to the TXDB and RXDB
and boot the TF-20: alas no output or any reaction to Enter, Esc or Ctrl-C.
By now I know the boot ROM does initialize channel B, but does not write
to it. Apparantly TFDos doesn't either.
-tony
Fred Jan
P.S. The boot ROM disassembly so far:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/tf20/TFX.asm
P.P.S.S. The movie I made of the SD-321 voice coil on the exerciser:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/tf20/sd-321_stepping.mpeg
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:28:17 +0100
From: "Robert Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor
Message-ID: <00d001ce5f0e$f0418650$d0c492f0$(a)ntlworld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Tony Duell
Sent: 01 June 2013 20:25
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor
common
Don't worry, I wouldn't be so rash as to
short the fuses. I know
Farnell have them but I don't currently have enough to warrant an
order from them, for one of the fuses Farnell only had US stock. I
could pop into RS in the
I am suprised about that. I thought the fuses in a Model 33 were all types that you coudl get almost anywhere. What is
this difficult-to-get
one?
I just realised that perhaps Maplin do have some of what I want, it is that
they aren't listed as 32mm, but as 1.1/4. But they don't have the 375mA one
(although my machine actually had a 315ma one, but Maplin don't have that
either), the nearest is 250mA.
Regards
Rob
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:35:32 -0700
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: OT: rubber drive belts
Message-ID: <51AA9354.8080407 at sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
If you're looking for small quantities of replacement belts, check out
the eBay seller "isellprojectorbelts". He's got quite an inventory.
If it's a "price is no object" affair, try
http://www.bpbincorporated.com/about.htm
Their minimum order is about $125, but they can make belts to order.
--Chuck
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:27:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID:
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1306012207170.2493 at brioche.invalid.domain>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Liam Proven wrote:
On 30 May 2013 21:19, Tothwolf <tothwolf at
concentric.net> wrote:
It isn't quite what I'm looking for. I've yet to find a currently
maintained Linux distribution that does what I need and isn't bloated in
userspace. I'm looking more for what a Linux distribution once was in the
late 1990s, with full (advanced) networking support, plus normal network
services, and still have a small userspace footprint (and low memory
usage). A GUI is non-essential and for both space and security reasons
(note all the recent X and X-libraries security bulletins) and I'd prefer
to be able to leave it out completely in many applications.
Are there /any/ currently maintained Linux distributions out there these
days that are geared towards embedded use where they don't blindly assume
multiple GB of memory and drive space? Surely I'm not the only one looking
for something like this?
The lack of i386 support with TC isn't very encouraging, either (they
state i486 as a minimum, which is the same as modern Debian, et al.) I
have boxes upon boxes of i386 stuff and I'd hate to at some point have to
create a separately maintained fork of the Linux kernel just to keep them
supported (everything from Intel 80386SX-16 to AMD 386DX-40, with and
without FPUs). The idea of using either an obsolete (and likely
unmaintained) Linux kernel or MS-DOS on them isn't terribly appealing.
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 09:28:00 +0200
From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID:
<20130602092800.442600524b1bb31be2b5584f at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:27:09 -0500 (CDT)
Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
Memory wise, the kernel isn't /too/ bad, but
userspace stuff, both
memory and disk wise, modern Linux distributions are /terrible/.
Not *all* of them. Have you tried TinyCore?
http://www.tinycorelinux.net/
The base system is about 12MB:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=tinycore
There's a text-only 8MB version:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_Core_Linux I'm looking more for what a Linux
distribution once was in the
late 1990s, with full (advanced) networking support, plus normal network
services, and still have a small userspace footprint (and low memory
usage). A GUI is non-essential and for both space and security reasons
(note all the recent X and X-libraries security bulletins) and I'd prefer
to be able to leave it out completely in many applications.
What you are looking
for is NetBSD.
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
Linux used to be a free Unix for Unix enthusiasts.
Today it is a bad Windows (MacOS X) surrugate for point and drool lusers.
\end{troll}
;-)
--
\end{Jochen}
\ref{http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/}
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 03:59:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID: <201306020759.DAA12793 at Chip.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> I'm looking more for what a Linux
distribution once was in the late
> 1990s, [...]
What you are looking for is NetBSD.
Maybe. In particular, if you want 386 support, you'll be stuck with
older versions. (Mind you, I personally don't see anything wrong with
that; I run 1.4T on those of my machines which don't need something
newer for hardware-support reasons.)
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
Troll indeed. :-)
I'd say it _once was_ the reference etc. It's been headed downhill for
a long time, though; I now see it as trying to take on Linux at its own
game (desktop market share), and, of course, losing - and, in the
process, alienating the user base its former strengths attracted.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 08:04:00 -0000
From: "Cory Smelosky" <b4 at gewt.net>
To: Mouse <mouse at rodents-montreal.org>
Cc: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306020403470.3310 at maelona>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Mouse wrote:
> I'm looking more for what a Linux
distribution once was in the late
> 1990s, [...]
What you are looking for is NetBSD.
Maybe. In particular, if you want 386 support, you'll be stuck with
older versions. (Mind you, I personally don't see anything wrong with
that; I run 1.4T on those of my machines which don't need something
newer for hardware-support reasons.)
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
Troll indeed. :-)
I'd say it _once was_ the reference etc. It's been headed downhill for
a long time, though; I now see it as trying to take on Linux at its own
game (desktop market share), and, of course, losing - and, in the
process, alienating the user base its former strengths attracted.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 17:37:05 -0400
From: randy at randy.kindig.name
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Another original Apple I sells for an insane amount
Message-ID:
<d9aa1ab1717005f12ad09c9c3e411e20.squirrel at mail.randy.kindig.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Unsubscribe please
---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Re: Another original Apple I sells for an insane amount
From: "Brent Hilpert" <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
Date: Sun, May 26, 2013 1:26 pm
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at
classiccmp.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More interesting than the Apple I IMO is the
SCELBI-8H listed on the
same site:
computer-1973
Looks like it was sold on the same auction day.
If anybody sees what
it went for it would be interesting to hear.
What you are looking for is NetBSD.
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
[W]hen you are dealing with lots of different
systems, and especially
those with limited CPU/memory/storage, compiling everything from
scratch (as with Gentoo) just isn't a viable solution.
I don't see why not; it's how I set up my own machines.
...well, I don't know how limited your "limited" is. I have a few
machines too small to self-host; those, I simply don't run a
full-fledged OS on. Perhaps this stance simply reflects a gap in my
computer collection, the sort of thing for which 256K or 512K of RAM is
a reasonable memory load - I don't really have anything between the
really tiny machines with the likes of 256 bytes of RAM and 8K of flash
and full-blown machines with 16 or 32 megs of RAM and at least a few
gigs of disk.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
------------------------------
Message: 27
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 12:42:47 +0200
From: Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: pdp11/93 mod
Message-ID: <20130602104246.GA51212 at beast.freibergnet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
allison wrote:
> On 05/30/2013 03:09 AM, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> >Roe Peterson wrote:
>
3 Jun
3 Jun
6:25 a.m.
New subject: R: HP C8000 HP-UX
Hello,
I don't know if posting here a link is allowed, in this specific case.
Please contact me directly at mazzinia @ tin.it , removing the 2 spaces.
HP-UX v1 is supported from a certain month of 2004 only :)
Alessandro
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] Per
conto di Matti Nummi
Inviato: domenica 2 giugno 2013 16:36
A: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Oggetto: HP C8000 HP-UX
Hello to all HP-UX fans.
I got one HP C8000 but my 2003 HP-UX 11i.v1 CD fails to install.
Can anybody inform me where to get the
proper version?
HP workstations are licensed to run HP-UX so that should not be an issue as
far as I know.
Download of image would be all that is needed.
BR, Matti
noticed.
True enough, but as you say... :?)
"BBC abandons ?100m digital project"
"John Linwood, the BBC's chief technology officer, has been suspended."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-22651126
Also see:
http://www.cio.co.uk/news/cio-career/bbc-cto-john-linwood-suspended-ov
er-100m-failed-digital-project/
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:21:16 +0200
From: Sander Reiche <sander.reiche at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: UK, Scotalnd, and Ireland reyclers
Message-ID:
<CACStewYDiS1GPpgKbr+z-zzj4bWHT3s+X1fGqatQmp3G=4tbVg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Do you know of any companies like this in the Netherlands that might
be persuaded as well?
Kind regards,
Sander Reiche
the Netherlands
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus <
sales at elecplus.com> wrote:
> For those of you looking for recyclers in the UK where you might be
> able to scrounge, or ask them to save interesting bits, please take
> a look at this company. They caught my interest because they
> exclusively employ disabled/disadvantaged workers. Nice to see a
> company that helps others out!
>
> About Haven Recycle
> Haven Recycle is a social enterprise based in Glasgow which runs a
> Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE) recycling and asset
> recovery operation. We are part of the Rehab Recycle group,
> servicing a number of large public and private sector organisations
> including Dell, Microsoft and the NHS.
>
> The services we offer include removal and disposal of all waste
> electrical equipment, secure data destruction both on and off site,
> office clearouts, asset recovery and re-marketing. We will seek to
> achieve maximum value from your waste material, with the absolute
> minimum going to landfill. The aim being wherever possible to reuse,
> and recycle all Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. All work
> undertaken is fully compliant with all relevant legislation, and
> carried out to the highest possible standards demanded by the market.
>
> While operating as a business, Haven Recycle is also a social
> enterprise; our unique attribute being that the majority of our
> highly skilled and comprehensively trained workforce comprises of
> disabled and disadvantaged adults. We carry out ongoing programmes
> of training and integration to ensure that all our work is carried
> out to the highest possible standards demanded by the market, and
> our impressive client list is a testament to this. As such our
> customers can contribute significantly to their Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) simply by engaging Haven Recycle as a supplier.
wrote:
Them's FIGHTIN' WORDS!
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:38:03 +0200
From: Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DEC collectors--input needed
Message-ID: <51AA3F8B.5080505 at hachti.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Am 31.05.2013 19:53, schrieb Tom Gardner:
case? The
3.5? ones are model 1018205 and the 5.25? ones are 1018202. If so
let me know what you have an how much you want for them.
works in the
reader.
Ctrl-C.
just
isn't a viable solution.
specifications.
From: cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
Subject: cctalk Digest, Vol 118, Issue 2
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 06:28:54 -0500
Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
cctalk at classiccmp.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cctalk-request at classiccmp.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cctalk-owner at classiccmp.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: OT: rubber drive belts (Jules Richardson)
2. Re: MSBBC - Re: Next box with 1991 web page(s) password
protected (Liam Proven)
3. Re: UK, Scotalnd, and Ireland reyclers (Sander Reiche)
4. Re: DEC collectors--input needed (Sander Reiche)
5. Re: [cctalk] Re: DEC collectors--input needed (Dave McGuire)
6. Re: DEC collectors--input needed (Philipp Hachtmann)
7. Re: Atari Dump to be excavated? (Martin Goldberg)
8. Re: Still looking for a home - RA81 parts (Alan Perry)
9. Re: Atari Dump to be excavated? (Liam Proven)
10. Re: Atari Dump to be excavated? (mc68010)
11. Casetek 1018 rails wanted (TeoZ)
12. Re: [cctalk] Re: pdp11/93 mod (Jules Richardson)
13. Re: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor (Tony Duell)
14. Re: OT: rubber drive belts (Tony Duell)
15. Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube) (Tony Duell)
16. Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube) (Fred Jan Kraan)
17. RE: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor (Robert Jarratt)
18. Re: OT: rubber drive belts (Chuck Guzis)
19. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Tothwolf)
20. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Jochen Kunz)
21. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Mouse)
22. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Cory Smelosky)
23. Re: Another original Apple I sells for an insane amount
(randy at randy.kindig.name)
24. HP-85A/B display and power supply schematics? (Craig Ruff)
25. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Tothwolf)
26. Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems (Mouse)
27. Re: pdp11/93 mod (Holm Tiffe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:12:12 -0500
From: Jules Richardson <jules.richardson99 at gmail.com>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: rubber drive belts
Message-ID: <51AA1D5C.70908 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
On 05/31/2013 10:29 AM, Rich Cini wrote:
> I get my belts at turntableneedles.com. They have a wide selection of
belts
and a good cross reference.
Oh, and they carry turntable needles too.
:-) Thanks, they look useful. This is an old Admiral unit (good ol'
70's styling, and dreadful internal build quality!) and things are
hampered by the fact that they seemed to re-use the model number for a
later turntable, making searches difficult.
Because the drive pulley is crowned I can't use their string method,
but I'll be able to get calipers on the pulleys and work out the belt
length using their diameters and distance between them.
cheers
J.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 18:14:22 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: MSBBC - Re: Next box with 1991 web page(s) password
protected
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCEQ8NLotH1MAhzHYmVx=LBTYdzZp0N8piMOv4m_rUYP9Q at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 25 May 2013 02:48, Toby Thain <toby at telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
> On 24/05/13 9:18 PM, Liam Proven wrote:
>>
>> On 25 May 2013 02:09, Toby Thain<toby at telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> The BBC has been thoroughly infiltrated by ex-Microsoft
>>> executives, in a very quiet takeover that few Britons have apparently
I heard - today, actually - that the ex-'Softie boss just got fired.
There's some hope.
There isn't just one, but that's a start. :) Specialties
WEEE Recycling, Asset Recovery, Information Security Management,
Corporate Social Responsibility, Data Destruction - on & off site,
CESG Approved Data Erasure - on & off site, ISO 9001 accredited, ISO
14001 accredited, SEPA Waste Management License: WML/L/1099035
. Headquarters 6 - 8 Watt Road Hillington Park Glasgow, G52 4RY
United Kingdom
. Website http://www.havenrecycle.co.uk
. Industry Renewables & Environment
. Type Nonprofit
. Company Size 11-50 employees
. Founded 1946
____________________________________________________________________
________
______________
Alex Charlie Anthony Money
Director
Reclaim Services
Phone:+44( 0 )162-2236205 / + 44 (0) 1 622 766 300
Fax: 0704 301 8422
Charlie at reclaim-uk.com / amoney at reclaim-uk.com AOL/ICQ IM:
AnthonyLM1 MS IM: Anthony at reclaim-uk
Skype: AnthonyMoney
____________________________________________________________________
________
______________
Steven Martin
Sales
Sims Recycling Solutions
Phone: 01387723011
steve.martin at simsmm.com
____________________________________________________________________
________
_______________
Grace Spillane
Sales Executive
WiseTek Solutions Ltd.
Skype Online Number: +353 (0)1 4433958
Tel: +353 (0)21 4556940
Tel: +353 (0)21 2353790
Skype Name: gracewisetek
Web: www.wisetek.ie
____________________________________________________________________
________
________________
Anthony Watmore
TechniMove Recycles LTD
Phone: 00 44 7949 752252
sales at tmoverecycles.com
____________________________________________________________________
________
_______________
A2C Services Ltd.
E mail : rod.neale at a2c.co.uk
MSN IM : rod1111 at hotmail.com
AOL IM : A2C SERVICES
Skype: rodneale
Tel: +44 (0)1730 890232
Fax: +44 (0)1730 890233
A2C Services Ltd, Snatch House, Farnham Road, Liss, Hampshire,
England GU33 6JZ Website Address: www.a2c.co.uk
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3343 / Virus Database: 3184/6369 - Release Date:
05/30/13
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:28:16 +0200
From: Sander Reiche <sander.reiche at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: DEC collectors--input needed
Message-ID:
<CACStewagAo2R5r47VD86Hox=qOcv47OosgPKEs1wYxLgWv16-w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Zane H. Healy <healyzh at aracnet.com>
a really low-end VAXstation 3100
Hey, watch it, buddy! ;)
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:35:17 -0400
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Re: DEC collectors--input needed
Message-ID: <51AA3EE5.9010808 at neurotica.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 06/01/2013 02:28 PM, Sander Reiche wrote:
a really
low-end VAXstation 3100
Hey, watch it, buddy! ;) Not on the list are the RP01, RP02 and/or RPR02
disk drives made by
Memorex for DEC.
Oh: Does anybody have some cartridges for my RP02 and RP03 drives?!?
Regards,
Philipp
--
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Philipp Hachtmann
Buchdruck, Bleisatz, Spezialit?ten
Alemannstr. 21, D-30165 Hannover
Tel. 0511/3522222, Mobil 0171/2632239
Fax. 0511/3500439
hachti at hachti.de
www.tiegeldruck.de
UStdID DE 202668329
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:18:41 -0500
From: Martin Goldberg <wgungfu at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Atari Dump to be excavated?
Message-ID:
<CAE5DTME_YvSkyP4_Qr2LU-q1eB28bXXX+0KkJaZ-z1FV==pWdQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
This is a non-issue publicity stunt. We already cleared that up in our
book "Atari Inc. - Business Is Fun" released last fall, going by
direct interviews and actual internal documents.
There were never thousands of ET games buried in Alamorgodo, that's a
myth that sprung up later and was also never once mentioned by the
actual press articles of the time. The dump there was simply a
clearing out of Atari's Texas manufacturing plant as it transitioned
to automated production methods and a focus on personal computer
manufacturing. It had previously been one of the main plants for
manufacturing of game cartridges and other hardware, and game
manufacturing was being moved overseas to China.
As part of the transition the unused cartridge stock of a group of
titles (not just E.T.), console parts and computer parts were all
dumped there in New Mexico. It was covered in detail by the Alamogordo
press at the time as well, and is just such a non-mystery that I'm
surprised by all this.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:46 PM, John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com> wrote:
"This week, Canada-based game developer Fuel Industries got approval
from the city of Alamogordo, New Mexico, to excavate the site of the
so-called Atari Dump -- a desert landfill where the famous video
game manufacturer Atari buried hundreds of tons of broken and
outdated merchandise in 1983."
<http://westerndigs.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-mexicos-atari-dump-midd
en-of-video.html>http://westerndigs.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-mexicos
-atari-dump-midden-of-video.html
- John
--
Marty
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 09:05:11 -0700
From: Alan Perry <aperry at snowmoose.com>
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Still looking for a home - RA81 parts
Message-ID: <51AA1BB7.8080503 at snowmoose.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 5/31/13 6:21 AM, Michael Thompson wrote:
Is the optical sensor still on the bottom of the
HDA?
The RICM has a bunch of RA81 drives that don't generate the pulses
from the spindle sensor.
No, the HDA was stripped bare.
I do have the spindle.
I also have 3 RA82s and another RA81 (that goes to Dave McGuire once
we figure out how to get it there without hurting it (within his budget)).
alan
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:37:32 +0100
From: Liam Proven <lproven at gmail.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Atari Dump to be excavated?
Message-ID:
<CAMTenCEM3O8feL260CWpJyG1AcVjC4QwPJeKE9p+poXgm4J5+w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On 1 June 2013 13:18, Martin Goldberg <wgungfu at gmail.com> wrote:
This is a non-issue publicity stunt. We already
cleared that up in
our book "Atari Inc. - Business Is Fun" released last fall, going by
direct interviews and actual internal documents.
There were never thousands of ET games buried in Alamorgodo, that's
a myth that sprung up later and was also never once mentioned by the
actual press articles of the time. The dump there was simply a
clearing out of Atari's Texas manufacturing plant as it transitioned
to automated production methods and a focus on personal computer
manufacturing. It had previously been one of the main plants for
manufacturing of game cartridges and other hardware, and game
manufacturing was being moved overseas to China.
As part of the transition the unused cartridge stock of a group of
titles (not just E.T.), console parts and computer parts were all
dumped there in New Mexico. It was covered in detail by the
Alamogordo press at the time as well, and is just such a non-mystery
that I'm surprised by all this.
Please bottom-quote. It's dead easy in Gmail, even in "new compose" -
just press Ctrl-A to "select all" then trim & reply beneath.
Anyway, reading between the lines, it seems clear where all those ETs
went, anyway.
Area 51.
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 12:43:06 -0700
From: mc68010 <mc68010 at gmail.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Atari Dump to be excavated?
Message-ID: <51AA4ECA.4050909 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 6/1/2013 5:18 AM, Martin Goldberg wrote:
This is a non-issue publicity stunt. We already
cleared that up in
our book "Atari Inc. - Business Is Fun" released last fall, going by
direct interviews and actual internal documents.
There were never thousands of ET games buried in Alamorgodo,
<snip>
As part of the transition the unused cartridge stock of a group of
titles (not just E.T.), console parts and computer parts were all
dumped there in New Mexico.
So, there were or there weren't ET cartridges and such dumped there ?
Are you only arguing the number of ET cartridges ?
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 15:44:20 -0400
From: "TeoZ" <teoz at neo.rr.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Casetek 1018 rails wanted
Message-ID: <68B744A8C55A499AA0E3D73A550A938D at TeoPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Anybody in the US happen to have spare drive rails for a Casetek 1018
Thanks
TZ.
P.S. I hate custom mounting rails in cases.
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:50:50 -0500
From: Jules Richardson <jules.richardson99 at gmail.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Re: pdp11/93 mod
Message-ID: <51AA509A.7070307 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
On 05/30/2013 01:25 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Run it in a bath of whale oil.
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:24:40 +0100 (BST)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor
Message-ID: <m1UirPy-000J4ZC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
difficult-to-get
one?
An F11
chipset clocked at 16GHz...it'd turn into a fireball. ;)
Nah. Just cool it with superfluid helium. Don't worry, I wouldn't be so rash as to
short the fuses. I know
Farnell have them but I don't currently have enough to warrant an
order from them, for one of the fuses Farnell only had US stock. I
could pop into RS in the
I am suprised about that. I thought the fuses in a Model 33 were all
common types that you coudl get almost anywhere. What is this morning to save on shipping (can't remember
if they open Saturday
morning, can't check now because their web site seems to be down for
maintenance). I did look at Maplin as well but they did not have
what I need. I'll take a look at Cricklewood too
ricklewood are useful to me becuase they're near enough for me to go
there and pick u pthe bits I need. Very useful when I've run out of
74LS00s or something. I am not sure I;d use them for mail orde -- not
that I don't trunt them, I certainly do, but if I am going to go to
the toruble of making and order nad waiting for it to come I might as
well go to Farnell.
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:57:36 +0100 (BST)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: rubber drive belts
Message-ID: <m1Uirvq-000J4eC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
Because the drive pulley is crowned I can't
use their string method,
but I'll be able to get calipers on the pulleys and work out the
belt length using their diameters and distance between them.
Reminds me of soemthing I wrote i nthe HPCC magazine when I described
how to repair the HP9810/HP9820 internal card reader. The belt on that
is a simpe O-rign running on grooved pulleys
Toe find the size of the O-ring, I said that a practical person would
run a bit of string round the pulleys, mark it and measure it. A
calculator hacker would measure the diameter of the pulleys and the
spacing between the spinles and use the belt length program in the
HP67 or HP41 Mechancial Engnieering Pac. As I then went on to say, I
am both, so I did both. Fortuantely the answeres agreed to within the
accuracy of the measurements. Even more fortuately that size of O-ring
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 20:31:36 +0100 (BST)
From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
To: fjkraan at xs4all.nl (Fred Jan Kraan)
Cc: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube)
Message-ID: <m1UirWg-000J4cC at p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
either.
On 2013-05-31 20:50, ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
I asusme you have a dump of the boot ROM? If not I think I can find it.
Have you looked at the hardware and the system tracks on the disk?
This thing, for all it claims to be the disk drive for the HX20,
etc, is actually a full Z80-based computer running something very
close to CP/M (!). I often wonder how hard it would be to use it
as such (there's a second serial port too, if you need it).
Yes. fasinating. I am trying to disassemble it, but started with the
boot ROM. The TFDOS as it is called, will be next. As it has everything; enough RAM, disk
controller, serial port,
there should be no reason why it should not work. I might try it,
maybe even before retirement ;-). With the information in "The
Programmer's CP/M Handbook" it should be no problem.
It should eb fairly easy. There's absolutely nothign custum on there.
All standard chips, easy to get data sheets for them. A schematic
exists, so figurign ot uthe addresses of the I/O devices is not hard
I have never looked, there is that second serial port at TTL levels
(th TXDB and RSDB piads on the serial daughterboard). Does anything
ever come out of there in normal operation?
-tony
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 23:12:25 +0200
From: Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan at xs4all.nl>
To: Tony Duell <ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
Cc: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: My Epson TF-20 booting (but not on YouTube)
Message-ID: <51AA63B9.40203 at xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 2013-06-01 21:31, Tony Duell wrote:
Yes, I have it:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/tf20/TFX.zip
>
> It should eb fairly easy. There's absolutely nothign custum on
> there. All standard chips, easy to get data sheets for them. A
> schematic exists, so figurign ot uthe addresses of the I/O devices is
not hard
either.
Yes. fasinating. I am trying to disassemble it, but started with
the boot ROM. The TFDOS as it is called, will be next.
I asusme you have a dump of the boot ROM? If not I think I can find it.
I have never looked, there is that second serial port at TTL levels
(th TXDB and RSDB piads on the serial daughterboard). Does anything
ever come out of there in normal operation?
Only this evening I realized, based on your remark on the extra serial
port, that channel A is used for both host (HX-20) and 2nd TF-20 and
channel B is not used. So connecting my TTL-to-USB to the TXDB and
RXDB and boot the TF-20: alas no output or any reaction to Enter, Esc or By now I know the boot ROM does initialize channel B,
but does not
write to it. Apparantly TFDos doesn't either.
applications.
-tony
Fred Jan
P.S. The boot ROM disassembly so far:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/tf20/TFX.asm
P.P.S.S. The movie I made of the SD-321 voice coil on the exerciser:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/comp/tf20/sd-321_stepping.mpeg
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:28:17 +0100
From: "Robert Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor
Message-ID: <00d001ce5f0e$f0418650$d0c492f0$(a)ntlworld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Tony Duell
Sent: 01 June 2013 20:25
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Spec of Motorola 7339 Transistor
common
Don't worry, I wouldn't be so rash as to
short the fuses. I know
Farnell have them but I don't currently have enough to warrant an
order from them, for one of the fuses Farnell only had US stock. I
could pop into RS in the
I am suprised about that. I thought the fuses in a Model 33 were all types that you coudl get almost anywhere. What is
this
difficult-to-get
one?
I just realised that perhaps Maplin do have some of what I want, it is
that they aren't listed as 32mm, but as 1.1/4. But they don't have the
375mA one (although my machine actually had a 315ma one, but Maplin
don't have that either), the nearest is 250mA.
Regards
Rob
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 17:35:32 -0700
From: Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: OT: rubber drive belts
Message-ID: <51AA9354.8080407 at sydex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
If you're looking for small quantities of replacement belts, check out
the eBay seller "isellprojectorbelts". He's got quite an inventory.
If it's a "price is no object" affair, try
http://www.bpbincorporated.com/about.htm
Their minimum order is about $125, but they can make belts to order.
--Chuck
------------------------------
Message: 19
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:27:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID:
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1306012207170.2493 at brioche.invalid.domain>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Liam Proven wrote:
On 30 May 2013 21:19, Tothwolf <tothwolf at
concentric.net> wrote:
It isn't quite what I'm looking for. I've yet to find a currently
maintained Linux distribution that does what I need and isn't bloated
in userspace. I'm looking more for what a Linux distribution once was
in the late 1990s, with full (advanced) networking support, plus
normal network services, and still have a small userspace footprint
(and low memory usage). A GUI is non-essential and for both space and
security reasons (note all the recent X and X-libraries security
bulletins) and I'd prefer to be able to leave it out completely in many
Memory wise, the kernel isn't /too/ bad, but
userspace stuff, both
memory and disk wise, modern Linux distributions are /terrible/.
Not *all* of them. Have you tried TinyCore?
http://www.tinycorelinux.net/
The base system is about 12MB:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=tinycore
There's a text-only 8MB version:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiny_Core_Linux
Are there /any/ currently maintained Linux distributions out there
these days that are geared towards embedded use where they don't
blindly assume multiple GB of memory and drive space? Surely I'm not
the only one looking for something like this?
The lack of i386 support with TC isn't very encouraging, either (they
state i486 as a minimum, which is the same as modern Debian, et al.) I
have boxes upon boxes of i386 stuff and I'd hate to at some point have
to create a separately maintained fork of the Linux kernel just to
keep them supported (everything from Intel 80386SX-16 to AMD 386DX-40,
with and without FPUs). The idea of using either an obsolete (and
likely
unmaintained) Linux kernel or MS-DOS on them isn't terribly appealing.
------------------------------
Message: 20
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 09:28:00 +0200
From: Jochen Kunz <jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID:
<20130602092800.442600524b1bb31be2b5584f at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:27:09 -0500 (CDT) Tothwolf
<tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
> I'm looking more for what a Linux distribution once was in the late
> 1990s, with full (advanced) networking support, plus normal network
> services, and still have a small userspace footprint (and low memory
> usage). A GUI is non-essential and for both space and security
> reasons (note all the recent X and X-libraries security bulletins)
> and I'd prefer to be able to leave it out completely in many
applications.
What you are looking for is NetBSD.
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
Linux used to be a free Unix for Unix enthusiasts.
Today it is a bad Windows (MacOS X) surrugate for point and drool lusers.
\end{troll}
;-)
--
\end{Jochen}
\ref{http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/}
------------------------------
Message: 21
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 03:59:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID: <201306020759.DAA12793 at Chip.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Yup...it's very unfortunate. :(
------------------------------
Message: 24
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 16:34:14 -0600
From: Craig Ruff <cruff at ruffspot.net>
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: HP-85A/B display and power supply schematics?
Message-ID: <1ACF2BED-CFA5-443C-BC71-A0EC342FC599 at ruffspot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Has anyone managed to create schematics for the display and power supply
for the
HP-85A/B? I don't know yet if Tony's schematics for the 87 are
applicable or possibly close enough for these boards.
> I'm looking more for what a Linux
distribution once was in the late
> 1990s, [...]
What you are looking for is NetBSD.
Maybe. In particular, if you want 386 support, you'll be stuck with
older versions. (Mind you, I personally don't see anything wrong with
that; I run 1.4T on those of my machines which don't need something
newer for hardware-support reasons.)
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
Troll indeed. :-)
I'd say it _once was_ the reference etc. It's been headed downhill
for a long time, though; I now see it as trying to take on Linux at
its own game (desktop market share), and, of course, losing - and, in
the process, alienating the user base its former strengths attracted.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
------------------------------
Message: 22
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 08:04:00 -0000
From: "Cory Smelosky" <b4 at gewt.net>
To: Mouse <mouse at rodents-montreal.org>
Cc: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306020403470.3310 at maelona>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Mouse wrote:
> I'm looking more for what a Linux
distribution once was in the
> late 1990s, [...]
What you are looking for is NetBSD.
Maybe. In particular, if you want 386 support, you'll be stuck with
older versions. (Mind you, I personally don't see anything wrong
with that; I run 1.4T on those of my machines which don't need
something newer for hardware-support reasons.)
\begin{troll}
NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
Troll indeed. :-)
I'd say it _once was_ the reference etc. It's been headed downhill
for a long time, though; I now see it as trying to take on Linux at
its own game (desktop market share), and, of course, losing - and,
in the process, alienating the user base its former strengths attracted.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
------------------------------
Message: 23
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 17:37:05 -0400
From: randy at randy.kindig.name
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
Cc: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Another original Apple I sells for an insane amount
Message-ID:
<d9aa1ab1717005f12ad09c9c3e411e20.squirrel at mail.randy.kindig.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Unsubscribe please
---------------------------- Original Message
----------------------------
Subject: Re: Another original Apple I sells for an insane amount
From: "Brent Hilpert" <hilpert at cs.ubc.ca>
Date: Sun, May 26, 2013 1:26 pm
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
More interesting than the Apple I IMO is the
SCELBI-8H listed on the
same site:
computer-1973
Looks like it was sold on the same auction day.
If anybody sees what
it went for it would be interesting to hear.
I have both an 85A and 85B with identical display issues, which I expect
are due to
old capacitors causing poor voltage regulation and/or ripple.
The pincushion test looks pretty good, except for a bit of vertical
displacement (think low amplitude waves) on the horizontal lines. The
second issue is when a lot of white is being displayed (i.e. reverse video),
there is a distinct narrowing in the scan line width in the top inch or so,
with the narrowest at the first scan line. Then there is a gradual widening
towards the bottom, with the lowest scan lines ending up off the sides of
the phosphor.
------------------------------
Message: 25
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 04:55:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID:
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1306020425590.2493 at brioche.invalid.domain>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Jochen Kunz wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:27:09 -0500 (CDT) Tothwolf
> <tothwolf at concentric.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking more for what a Linux distribution once was in the late
>> 1990s, with full (advanced) networking support, plus normal network
>> services, and still have a small userspace footprint (and low
>> memory usage). A GUI is non-essential and for both space and
>> security reasons (note all the recent X and X-libraries security
>> bulletins) and I'd prefer to be able to leave it out completely in many
applications.
>
> What you are looking for is NetBSD.
> \begin{troll}
> NetBSD is the reference implementation of The Unix Paradigm.
>
> Linux used to be a free Unix for Unix enthusiasts.
> Today it is a bad Windows (MacOS X) surrugate for point and drool
lusers.
\end{troll}
;-)
Meh, I think not. I'm trying to cut down on the number of different
platforms I have to maintain, not add another. ippool also wouldn't
really be a suitable replacement for the way I use ipset, and the idea
of trying to use pf in place of ebtables and iptables for bridge-mode
firewalling is very unappealing. In fact, if I had to switch to
something else, I'd probably go with OpenBSD (which I already use for
other stuff) over NetBSD given OpenBSD's hardware support.
I plan to stick with Linux for most embedded applications, but the
widespread assumption by many userspace "developers" that everyone has
4GB or 8GB of ram and a 2TB hard drive isn't helping anyone except
help hardware companies sell newer gear year after year.
Right now there seems to be a gap in the market for a Linux
distribution tailored for small/embedded systems which is also easy to
maintain/update with a halfway decent package management system. I
have nothing against pkgsrc, Ports, etc, but when you are dealing with
lots of different systems, and especially those with limited
CPU/memory/storage, compiling everything from scratch (as with Gentoo)
------------------------------
Message: 26
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 06:40:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: [cctalk] Old UNIX Systems
Message-ID: <201306021040.GAA10348 at Chip.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
with.
[W]hen you are dealing with lots of different
systems, and
especially those with limited CPU/memory/storage, compiling
everything from scratch (as with Gentoo) just isn't a viable solution.
I don't see why not; it's how I set up my own machines.
...well, I don't know how limited your "limited" is. I have a few
machines too small to self-host; those, I simply don't run a
full-fledged OS on. Perhaps this stance simply reflects a gap in my
computer collection, the sort of thing for which 256K or 512K of RAM
is a reasonable memory load - I don't really have anything between the
really tiny machines with the likes of 256 bytes of RAM and 8K of
flash and full-blown machines with 16 or 32 megs of RAM and at least a
few gigs of disk.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
------------------------------
Message: 27
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 12:42:47 +0200
From: Holm Tiffe <holm at freibergnet.de>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: pdp11/93 mod
Message-ID: <20130602104246.GA51212 at beast.freibergnet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
allison wrote:
> On 05/30/2013 03:09 AM, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> >Roe Peterson wrote:
> >
> >>Does anyone have information regarding modifying a pdp11/93 cpu to
> >>run at 20Mhz? It's been mentioned on a couple of web pages, but I
> >>can't seem to find details.
> >>
> >>Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >There isn't much of detail to tell, simply replace the 18Mhz Xtal
> >against a 20Mhz one, but be warned, the CPU isn't the only limiting
> >factor for the speed, the Gate Arrays and the FPU are also involved.
> >Maybe you toast them while overclocking..
> >
> >I've changed th 15Mhz Xtal from an 11/73 CPU to 18Mhz to get a 11/83..
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Holm
> The biggest thing with that kind of speedup is first its a trivial
> amount and the other is if you go too far system reliability will be
> poor and show up as unexpected crashes with known solid software
> (data errors).
>
> That said I've pushed the clock on 11/23 board once too see and the
> 13mhz clock was wound up to 25mhz using a external source. I
> started seeing errors above 18mhz but they were random, seems bus
> timing and memory timing all had to be happy and I was pushing the
> margins. I eventually put in a clock module for 15.8mhz as I had
> one. For that it was a modest speed up as the 11/23 is slower to start
Generally overclocking is problematic because the system timing is
based on it and there may be items other than the CPU that have
lower limits.
Allison
Yes. In my case I've changed the older J11 to one of the last
available revisions (-09?) to be at least sure that it meets the I don't had another FPU Chip so the FPU and the
Gate Arrays are the
15Mhz Versions. Tested the entire Machine with all available Test
Programms on xxdp to be sore the entire system works as expected...no
error so
far..
Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe,
Freiberger Stra?e 42, 09600 Obersch?na, USt-Id: DE253710583
www.tsht.de, info at tsht.de, Fax +49 3731 74200, Mobil: 0172 8790 741
End of cctalk Digest, Vol 118, Issue 2
**************************************
=
4220
days inactive
4221
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
mazzinia＠tin.it -
mnusa2＠hotmail.com