On 2/3/2011 7:29 PM, Philip Pemberton wrote:
On 03/02/11 23:44, Fred Cisin wrote:
This is why it is a mistake to sign on to
"services" that hijack your
address book!
LinkedIn especially is pretty pointless...
I think linkedin is fantastic. The majority of the people that are in
my field, in my city, have accounts. It's a small world, and having a
personal contact inside other companies is absolutely invaluable when
searching for a job. Not only does it give you access to information
that you couldn't learn elsewhere, but just the ability of someone to
hand your resume to the hiring manager is useful. Separates your resume
from the pile.
There are job opportunities that the companies post themselves. You can
also track companies, and learn about the number of
hires/departures/etc. Do research on the people you'll be interviewing
with, and so on.
Yes, I understand that there are associated privacy risks. Obviously
you can choose how much or what to include in your profile.
"You need to sign up for a subscription, and buy
messaging points to
send a message to this user!"
Right. You can't message someone you don't know for free, or don't have
a connection to. I think this is reasonable. They can't just have
people messaging people willy nilly without turning it into a spamfest.
You can pay for the ability to send someone a message (from outside your
network) --- but this usage is carefully tracked, and the cost per
message is way too high to be abused.
You can message everyone within your network for free, and I don't know
offhand how many levels (aka degrees of separation) you can do this.
It's at least direct connections, and their connections. Maybe it's
three levels.
The point is this: no one normally pays for linkedin, and most features
that most people use are free.
I had a technical recruiter from a company contact me through their
"paid messaging" option. She read part of my profile summary, and
thought I would be a good match. I have an interview Wednesday. :)
Linkedin seems valuable to me.
Keith