On 10/20/2012 05:10 PM, js at
cimmeri.com wrote:
...
Me I planed ahead and kept all the small drives that people didn't
want but still ran from older
MFM and IDE to SCSI. That and old boards even if flagged dead..
they can be fixed or used for parts.
Allison
Hey, A. How are you keeping the bearings in your MFM drives lubed
(if you are)? Most of my MFM drives still work, but the bearings are
drying out. As the motors work harder to turn, the motor controllers
run hotter and will burn out there first unless a way can be found to
apply lube to the motors. Lou Ernst and I have been mulling over this
issue.
- John S.
If the lube is failing so are the bearings and times up. Repair is
unlikely for the 5.25 and
smaller drives.
Since I'm playing with ST506 and later MFM lube is not easily possible
as they are sealed.
I've not had any issues to date and they seem to run fine when I pull
them out. I can say
the older Oxide coated drives are know for Stiction and that seems to
get worse with age.
I have my first ST506 (ca 1981) that needs a rotational twist (inertia)
to start because of that
but that drive did that since about 1985. My St225s, D540s, 1325s and
RD54s are still going
fine along with all the RZ series I have. I use the RZs for fast
backups plug them in, boot
stand alone backup, do image copy, shutdown and disconnect. That way if
the system
drive pukes (and I assume it will someday) it's a swap and that is two
levels deep.
The key was collecting when cheap or free was common for that type
everything and
anything, careful storage (no garage or out in the wide temp range shed)
and use
even if infrequent (backups). Also bad drives were taken as the HDA or
board were
salvageable as its rare both fail at the same time. I was hot for any
1325 as often
the problem was the head was simply stuck, open, unstick, use for years
after.
At the other extreme drive known to have high failure rate were marked
as use for
replacement or for parts swap. Some were avoided or given away while
working
like ST250s as they would fail and were known to be very bad.
The IDE collection runs from from small 40mb stuff to a box load of ST3660A
(500MB later version that had a great track record, same for 4.3MB WD).
Then again I have CDC 20mb SCSI that everyone said was the worst drive
for failure thats still
going (CP/M machine using Micromint SB180) and a Quantum Bigfoot 1gb IDE
that is
supposed to be also terrible and mine was gotten free and still runs a
backup 486DX box.
Same for my SYQUEST 270Mb cartridge drive and disks that still work with
the Parallel port
to IDE adaptor they sold it with. So I may be the exception or just
treated them better.
However, MMC, SD, USB flash, CF and IDE/SATA based solid state drives
are also collected
and used as well even old very small USB and CF. They often are a good
solution rather
than running an older IDE drive.
Then again I've upgraded my S100 to run IDE and the IDE of choice is CF
then. Floppy is usually
3.5 (save for NS* hard sector) as they are common still and so is media.
So the need for
drives and their heat, power and cooling needs are much reduced making
it easier to
keep the old boxes going.
In the end it's what the system requires that dictates how old I go on
disks and spares for them.
the DEC systems had OS and Controller dependencies that mean keeping MFM
drives handy
and a VS2000 to format them. Also since I have drives, RQDXn
controllers are good for me
to use and since the drives are scarce often the controller is cheap
it's just easier. Fortunately
I do have a few CMD controllers for the QBUS uVAXen so that solves the
large disk problem for
them. the small uVAXen (3100 family) run SCSI and when people were
chucking
200M/400M/600M/1gb/4gb drive I grabbed them for spares. Problems are
avoided then.
Allison