Al Kossow wrote:
I'd still like to make up some web pages with
a proper machine definition.
Getting the 1946 documentation set would be a good start. CHM had the first
volume, which had a partial transcription on the chip web site which I've
scanned and put up under
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/univOfPennsylvania/eniac
Thanks, that's far more info and detail than I've seen anywhere else to date.
Looks like it may be most of what one needs for a machine definition, but have
to study it more to see if one can derive 'everything' from it.
Then the question becomes, with the machine being so abstruse, can one come
up with anything much more concise than the manual itself.
.. onto the list, too many fun things to do ..