On 7/17/20 7:07 PM, Paul Koning wrote:
Yes, if you define it that way then clearly I agree.
The thing is
that in most people's definition, "drive failure" means "the drive
is a door stop".
Ya.... I've had too many "but the drive isn't a brick ... how could it
be the failure" experiences to use that as my benchmark. Now, if the
drive is not doing what it's supposed to do in any (reproducible)
manner, I consider it a failure. Well ... almost any reproducible manner.
And in fact, hard read errors are normal. Every drive
has a spec for
the probability of that happening, and given the per-sector failure
probability and the sector count, the probability of SOME sector
failing to read when you read the whole drive is nowadays somewhere
around 1.
Ya. That's where the reproducibility of any given failure comes into play.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die