everything in the computer world gets "cheaper". That means different
Yes, unfortunately. I am not objecting to the fact hat I can buy a cheap
(and lower quality) product, but that I _have to_.I'd like the choice
between being able to buy, say, a poorly made calcualtor for 99p (and
yes, I've seen them that cheap) and a properly made, repariaable,
documetned, calcualtor for \pounds 500.00 Seriously.
things in different instances. Toshiba makes an
extremely reliable
product (laptops anyway) for as low a price as you can get. They don't
last forever, but what could you really expect for 300$ or so (Mind you
OK, but where can I buy a laptop that will ''last forever'.
I'm not a die hard Japanese anything fan. I still
think the best value
I have no particular love of any countries products. Ask me which 35mm
rangefinder camera I prefer, and I'll say a Contax II (german). (sorry
Leicaphiles, I do think the Contax is a better vamewra). But ask the same
question about 35mm SLRs, and I'll pick the Nikon F (Japanese).
For home computers, the BBC micro (English). For classic workstations,
the PERQ (American/British). For the machine that started my interest,
the Philips P850 (Dutch). For calculators, handheld and desktop, it has
to be HP (American). And so on
in cars is American (uh, prior to 08 anyway ;). As
long as it isn't
can't afFord or Crys(is)ler. My mother's Honda isn't anymore reliable
then the *'s I've owned through the years. Not at all). Was HPs quality
sustainable? They started off awfully small. In the beginning
undoubtedly there business was a labor of love.
My view is thst there was a big change around 1987 when they went from a
high-end test equipment company that happend to make computers to a
mass-market PC/printer company, Of course the test equipment division
became agilent, which has led several of us in HPCC to observe that what
we really want are Agilent calculators. Mind you, I don't think some of
the modern Agilent stuff is as well made as the classic HP gear.
But even befgore that qualtiy was foing down. I do not like the
heat-staked, unrepairable cases (started with the 18C). I don't think
that even the HP41 was as well amde as an HP67, say. And of course the
95LX (thier first palmtop PC) didn't have dual shot moulded keys...
[...]
I'm finally finding time to play w/my HP calcs.
Nothing historic
really, my 49g and 50g. I love them both unconditionally. Wouldn't mind
I had the misfortune to buy a 49G. My view is that that machine, as it
was first sold, was not of merchantable quality. The firmware didn't
implement some advertised features, there were also vert serious bugs.
And the docuemtation was quite honestly a joke.
Yes, I did send in the card to get the full manaul. And never received
one. I also wrote 2 letters to HP, the second one including international
reply coupons. I never got a reply. For that reason I will never buy
another new HP product.
at all picking up a 41CX (any condition - e-mail me).
Kind of got a
My exepreince is thst the CBV is a lot easier to find than a CX. However,
there are features in the CX that cannot be addred to the CV with any
available plug-in moduels (a CX is more than a CV with time module and
extended functions module built in).
hankering for a 48GX too, but that was when there
quality was going
I regard the 48s (and the 49, now that the firmware is usable) as being
my workhorse machines. I love the large stack, and the fact yuo can push
any object onto it. Using a 4-level numerical-only stack is a pain.
down. I bought my father a 20B or something while he
was still alive.
Damned thing didn't hold up for a year. I looooved my old 20S. Left it
on top of the car though, unfortunately, and forgot I did.
I am suprised. I didn't thin kthe 20S was RPN, which is one feature I
find essential in a handheld calcualtor.
-tony