8080 Complier Recommendation - test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

22 Feb 2001

Dick:

	Indeed. I'd prefer to stick with the Intel nemonics since the source
files that I have to compile, er, assemble, use the Intel nemonics.

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick@idcomm.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:39 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: 8080 Complier Recommendation

The mnemonics are quite different for the Z80, though.  I think he wants to
stick with the Intel mnemonics, which are quite different from Zilog's and
which
some folks find somewhat easier to decipher.

Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Edwin P. Groot" &lt;epgroot(a)ucdavis.edu&gt;
To: &lt;classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org&gt;
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: 8080 Complier Recommendation

...
       Are you talking about an ::assembler::? If so,
Z-80 doesn't matter as
 an assembler for the 8080, since Z-80 is a superset of 8080. Just don't use
...
  the Z-80 - specific opcodes.  TASM reminds me of
Borland Turbo Assembler.
     With regards to a higher-level language compiler, there might be
 directives to specify 8080 or Z-80 opcodes in the object file.

 Edwin

 At 16:02 2/22/01 -0500, you wrote:
 >Hello, all:
 >
 > Does anyone have a "favorite" compiler recommendation for the 8080?
 >I have TASM, which I like for the 6502, but it only does the Z80, which has
...
  different
opcodes. Thanks.

Rich Cini 