On 6/26/07, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Serially
connecting would rot though...
Yeah, kinda.
I was just reading some old list threads about PDP-8s and TU58s and
emulators - transfer speed aside, the real problem was that most
pre-OMNIBUS PDP-8s didn't have a spare serial port (just the console
TTY), and that the serial hardware needs to be able to send a Break to
the TU-58 to properly initialize and reset the controller in the
TU-58, and unmodified PDP-8 hardware can't do that. I did run across
a bunch of old 12-bit SIG newsletters from when the TU-58 was new, and
all the gyrations folks went through to be able to use them, since at
the time, they were about the cheapest mass storage you could get from
DEC. One entire aspect of the project was how to mod M706/M707 or
KL8E serial interfaces to generate a break. Another aspect was trying
to wedge a driver into a couple of pages of code.
If all PDP-8s had a spare serial port, it might make sense to have a
serially-attached modern mass storage peripheral. Since that's
nowhere near universal, it frequently comes down to deciding on which
models to support. One of the few disadvantages of the PDP-8 spanning
1965 to 1994 (PDP-8 to DECmate III) is that there's a huge variety of
hardware that all runs the same instruction set (give or take a couple
instructions), but with an equally huge variety of default peripherals
and expansion options. An RX01/RX02-attached device, at least, will
work with OMNIBUS machines as well as the VT78 and DECmate I - overall
not a bad range to cover.
-ethan