-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-
bounces at
classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Evan Koblentz
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 2:42 PM
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Byte magazine is making a comeback
We'll see about that ..... so far they hired one "personality" and they
haven't said a single word about how
Byte.com will be different from
any
other gadget site. My guess is they're out of new ideas to be
competitive, so they're throwing poop at a wall to see what sticks.
It's such a strange feeling to find myself agreeing with Evan :-) but I can't see
anything but an attempt to spray-paint a once venerable name onto a fresh turd. By the
time Byte died, it was a mercy killing; as has been stated elsewhere, most of the computer
magazines, and Byte in particular, had transmogrified into PC magazines, despite the fact
there wasn't that much "there" there.
While there has been a lot of conversation as to why - some of it laced with various
conspiracy theories - I opine that it's simply that the general marketplace had moved
on from the heady early days of computing and, like it or not, publishers need to appeal
to that "general marketplace" in order to make money and stay in business. I
will acknowledge and embrace one conspiracy theory, namely that the Intel hegemony wiped
out a lot of meaningful discourse about computing because, well, if it wasn't x86 it
wasn't... happening. (I am so glad to see how ARM processors are creating a
competitive marketplace again.)
Wired has devolved to being little but a commanding presence in the gadget magazine genre
- to the point that I've allowed my subscription to expire, as I don't find their
content interesting (or accurate, in many cases, or readable, given their
"interesting" typeface and color choices). I really wonder how the folks hoping
to "revive" Byte can think they will find a market. -- Ian