25 Mar
2018
25 Mar
'18
7:07 a.m.
Sorry to keep bothering you all with RL02 questions. I think I am nearly
there.
It seems my head cleaning in a warm bath of isopropyl alcohol was a
success. I bought a tested RL02 pack and loaded it - no bad sounds, I
can extend the heads all the way. So that's good. I have supposedly a
working RL02K pack, and seemingly good heads.
After I load a pack however, it goes into fault mode. Checking through
the test points on my scope, there is no survo burst data until I push
the heads 3-5mm further forward. So it seems to me that the heads are
not loading far enough into the pack.
I loosened the head alignment screws to move the heads all the way
forward, tightened them back up, and tried loading the pack again. It
stopped again, 3-5mm short of track 0. So moving the heads forward
didn't seem to make any difference.
I have tried a different control board, and read/write amplifier board,
with no success.
Has anyone else experienced this? Is there some sensor which I am not
seeing?
Thanks,
Aaron.
--
Aaron Jackson
PhD Student, Computer Vision Laboratory, Uni of Nottingham
http://aaronsplace.co.uk
30 Mar
30 Mar
6:26 a.m.
I think I have made some progress. I bought a new scope (TDS420A) and
now I can actually measure things. My old scope was far too slow. It
turns out the radial alignment was *very* off, so I have corrected
this. If I disable the seek timeout error, the heads load onto track 0
and the READY lamp is stable. This is as opposed to before, where the
READY lamp would flash while the heads try to remain locked onto
track. So, that's good. However, the drive will not accept commands
while the seek timeout error is disabled. And without SKTO the heads
don't load even make it to the outer guard track.
Since this is a timeout error, I am beginning to wonder if the heads are
failing load fast enough.
Is it possible (or even likely) that the carriage survo is a bit sticky?
I have a couple of these survos spare, but don't really want to mess
with the carriage unless I have to.
If anyone is interested, I have screen caps of some of the alignments
and checks from the manual here:
http://aaronsplace.co.uk/blog/2018-03-29-rl02-possible-problem.html
Thanks,
Aaron.
Aaron Jackson via cctalk writes:
Sorry to keep bothering you all with RL02 questions. I
think I am nearly
there.
It seems my head cleaning in a warm bath of isopropyl alcohol was a
success. I bought a tested RL02 pack and loaded it - no bad sounds, I
can extend the heads all the way. So that's good. I have supposedly a
working RL02K pack, and seemingly good heads.
After I load a pack however, it goes into fault mode. Checking through
the test points on my scope, there is no survo burst data until I push
the heads 3-5mm further forward. So it seems to me that the heads are
not loading far enough into the pack.
I loosened the head alignment screws to move the heads all the way
forward, tightened them back up, and tried loading the pack again. It
stopped again, 3-5mm short of track 0. So moving the heads forward
didn't seem to make any difference.
I have tried a different control board, and read/write amplifier board,
with no success.
Has anyone else experienced this? Is there some sensor which I am not
seeing?
Thanks,
Aaron.
--
Aaron Jackson
PhD Student, Computer Vision Laboratory, Uni of Nottingham
http://aaronsplace.co.uk
8:59 a.m.
On 03/30/2018 08:26 AM, Aaron Jackson via cctalk wrote:
Is it possible (or even likely) that the carriage survo is a bit sticky?
I have a couple of these survos spare, but don't really want to mess
with the carriage unless I have to.
It is also possible that a capacitor has deteriorated in the
timeout one-shot and is timing out too fast.
Jon
9:10 a.m.
On 03/30/2018 08:26 AM, Aaron Jackson via cctalk
wrote:
I was beginning to wonder if it was a capacitor. I ended up trying a
different carriage (and servo motor) with no improvement. I'll try to
figure out which cap it is and check it. Thanks!
Aaron
Is it possible (or even likely) that the carriage survo is a bit sticky?
I have a couple of these survos spare, but don't really want to mess
with the carriage unless I have to.
It is also possible that a capacitor has deteriorated in the
timeout one-shot and is timing out too fast.
Jon 
10 a.m.
It is also
possible that a capacitor has deteriorated in the
timeout one-shot
I was beginning to wonder if it was a capacitor
10:05 a.m.
It is also possible that a capacitor has deteriorated
in the
timeout one-shot
I was beginning to wonder if it was a capacitor
10:32 a.m.
It is also possible that a capacitor has deteriorated
in the
timeout one-shot
I was beginning to wonder if it was a capacitor
2228
days inactive
2233
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
aaron＠aaronsplace.co.uk -
elson＠pico-systems.com -
fritzm＠fritzm.org