On 4 January 2013 19:11, Rich Alderson <RichA at vulcan.com> wrote:
I have nothing to add regarding the technical
discussion. I just want
to point out that there is no such Latin word as "virii".
Latin o-stems ("masculines ending in -us in the nominative singular and
neuters ending in -um in the nominative and accusative singular", for
the classically trained) form their nominative plural with the ending
-i. *Only* those o-stems in which an -i- precedes the ending, such as
the _gens_ ("family name") _Cornelius_, show a final -ii. (You would
refer to all the members of the Cornelius family as the _Cornelii_.)
_virus_ is an oddity. It is an o-stem, but it is a neuter, not a
masculine (that is, we would expect "virum" if it followed the usual
formation rule). Furthermore, it is a mass noun, meaning "slime,
poison", rather than a count noun.
(Cf. English "milk" vs. "goat"--although it is possible in English
to
form a plural of a mass noun like "milk", the meaning of "milks" is
"kinds of milk, milk from different sources", and Latin does not permit
this formation.)
So in Latin, _virus_ only occurs in the singular.
Now, *in English*, the word "virus" has been borrowed from Latin but is
treated by the grammar of English as an ordinary count noun, and the
plural is "viruses".
I have no objection the formation of a Latinate plural "viri" or
"virii",
I simply want those making such to do so knowingly. ;-)
We now return you to your regularly scheduled topic drift.
I inferred the poster of that one within about 2sec without looking at
the headers. :?)
Now, for entertainment value - correct plurals of:
* index
* forum
* penis
* octopus
* rhinoceros
:?D
--
Liam Proven ? Profile:
http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at
hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884