On Nov 18, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Steven Hirsch <snhirsch at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Peter Coghlan wrote:
> I have three Alphaserver 1000A machines all of which have problems.
...
> I've had so much grief with mine I've lost
interest in trying to fix them.
> Opinions of the 1000A do not seem to be very high. I think the main
> difference between it and the 1000 is that the 1000 has more (E)ISA slots and
> the 1000A has more PCI slots. I don't know if they suffer from similar
> reliability problems.
I have a 1000 here and it works fine. My problem has been one of finding
disks that don't conk out quickly.
On the 1000A, the additional PCI slots (after the 3 primary ones) are
behind a bridge, so you lose some performance (mostly due to latency) on
them and SRM doesn't always know how to probe boot devices on the
secondary bus. All the EISA slots on both models are on the same bus
(after a PCI-EISA bridge, of course).
My 2100A has an interesting issue, though. It wouldn't boot with the
512MB board that I received it with (earlier this year), but when I
bought 3 more 512MB boards and stuck the original one at the end, it
boots happily with all 4. Go figure.
If anyone has a 5/266 board for the 2100/2100A that they're willing to
part with for less than an arm and a leg, though, I'd like to make this
an SMP machine.
Several of my Alphas were developing flaky behavior by
the time I bequeathed them to another collector. I always attributed it to
electromigration issues. That effect was not always modeled well during the period of
time Digital was fabbing semiconductors. My UP2000+ was progressively losing the ability
to drive multiple banks of memory and wouldn't boot with more than 512M installed at
the end.
Yeah, electromigration is a known problem, especially with earlier
Alphas (can't remember if it plagued 21064 or 21164 more). I hope mine
last long enough for me to have fun with them.
- Dave