27 Mar
2012
27 Mar
'12
10:30 p.m.
Because when the environment has been destroyed and there's no place that the
"damn" trees will grow then you can't plant them successfully.
You guys are pathetic.? As I said before, is it so difficult to think about where
materials come from?
Regards, Jim
28 Mar
28 Mar
12:41 a.m.
In article <1332901817.29541.YahooMailNeo at web31901.mail.mud.yahoo.com>,
James Gessling <jgessling at yahoo.com> writes:
Because when the environment has been destroyed and
there's no place that
the "damn" trees will grow [...]
I think you really have no idea how difficult it is to destroy the
environment to the extent that you propose.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 version available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
1:05 a.m.
Because when
the environment has been destroyed and there's no place
that the "damn" trees will grow [...]
I think you really have no idea
how difficult it is to destroy the
environment to the extent that you propose. 
3:17 a.m.
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Mouse wrote:
Quite easy; indeed, it's almost been done, or the things wouldn't be
endangered.
Remember, "environment" means the whole environment, including (eg)
humans, not just things like weather and soil with all the other issues
wished away. To put it another way, trees grow very poorly in the
presence of humans who consider survival of the trees as a species of
small value compared to having the land cleared.
To be fair, trees seem to come back just fine when an area is left to
nature. The Chernobyl area is a testament to that.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Because when the environment has been destroyed and
there's no place
that the "damn" trees will grow [...]
I think you really have no idea
how difficult it is to destroy the
environment to the extent that you propose. 
1:15 a.m.
On 28/03/12 12:41 AM, Richard wrote:
In article<1332901817.29541.YahooMailNeo at
web31901.mail.mud.yahoo.com>,
James Gessling<jgessling at yahoo.com> writes:
We're almost there. Do some research.
--T
Because when the environment has been destroyed
and there's no place that
the "damn" trees will grow [...]
I think you really have no idea how difficult it is to destroy the
environment to the extent that you propose. 
12:44 a.m.
On 03/27/2012 10:30 PM, James Gessling wrote:
Because when the environment has been destroyed and
there's no place that the "damn" trees will grow then you can't plant
them successfully.
You guys are pathetic. As I said before, is it so difficult to think about where
materials come from?
I think this particular instance has redefined "pathetic". This is
by far the most ridiculous crap I've seen on this list. Whining about
fucking recycled wood from old furniture.
Get a grip. Or a life. Or SOMETHING.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
4501
days inactive
4501
days old
5 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
dgriffi＠cs.csubak.edu -
jgessling＠yahoo.com -
legalize＠xmission.com -
mcguire＠neurotica.com -
mouse＠Rodents-Montreal.ORG -
toby＠telegraphics.com.au