@Tony
I've not encountered that particular piece, but it sure sounds neat.. and
I didn't know what it could really do until I got it. But I guessed it
would do what I needed (it does, and more)...
really complex. The Viking unit gets by with a single
PIC micro (I think
it's a 16C84) and a set of 8 DIP switches.
RIght. I guessed the cheap commercial units would be a microcontroller
and not much else. I started to design soemthign using a simple state
machine, it would use mroe ICs than a single-chip micro, but probalby
fewer transistors, if you see what I mean. The cost was comparable (the
major cost was for thigns like the PSU, particularly the AC ringign supply).
Depending on DIP settings, the last digit of the number you dial on one
port determines the behavior of the "network" and the other port - do you
ring-through normally, with a distinctive ring, with / without Caller ID,
get a busy, get a reorder tone (howler), SIT tones, etc.
Right. The unit I have doesn't so caller ID, which is a pity, it does
handle busy, etc (if you try to call the extension and it's off-hook...
There may be more it can do, as I mentioend it has a comptuer itnerfce
(GPIB and RS232), but Iv'e not figured out how to sue them
I would gues the thing I have is md-late 1980s by the ICs in it. 8085
microprocessors, a few PALs, and lots and lots of TTL, DACs, a couple
of ADCs, etc. As I said, it's totla overkil lfor what I _eeed_, that is
interconencting a couple of modems or old telephones (another of my
interests), but it was as cheap s the more modern unit, a lto better
made, and IMHO easier to leep running.
When I got it it wouldn't even power up. This was due to the fact that
somebody had treid to remvoe the main chassis plate first (and had lost
all the screws, thus leaving the stack of the 3 main PCBs supported by
the cables only.). THis had manglesd the mains switch, which is a
latching pushbutton moutned a the back, operated by a pushrod from the
button on the fdront. I couldn't get a repalcement swithc, so I took the
old one apart, and used a hot air gun to soften the actuator so I could
straighten it. After doign that, the swithc would at least work. I found
a roudn button that would fit the actuator in my junk box and drileld it
to take the pushrod. Now the pushrod can't jump off the ned of the actuator..
After that,, as I said, it was a matter of reseatign the socketed ICs.
Ithen wort-of worked, but thought both lines were always off-hook. The
line currnet is detected by a circuit based round an LM311 comparator
(one fore ech line,), tyese were probably OK, byt the LM337 that provided
the -ve supply to them wasn't. Ireplaced all those ICs and the unit was
fine. Oh, yes, the LM337 was in a TO5 can,that version is hard to find
and very expensive. I jsut formed the leads of the normal TO220 poackaged
version to fit the PCB and had no problems...
As I said, if you just want to dmonstrate a couple of modems (as I did),
then the VIking unit is probalby fine (although I have never used it).
But whne I see a high-end piece of test gear selling for peanuts, which
will do just what I want, I tend to buy it, even if it is described as
non-working...
-tony