24 Jan
2012
24 Jan
'12
8:20 p.m.
And yes that does render them vintage dag nabbit!
I'm not too proud to accept donations (I'll pay the media rate postage of course).
PO could give you a hard time (ooh they contain advertising, can't claim media rate.
Kindly explain that 22 year old advertising doesn't count). I could pay a buck or so
per though (except the real oldies, I'm sure I could do better). Just no onesies or
twosies. I'll go barkrupt trying to complete my set.?
1:58 p.m.
________________________________
From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Chris M wrote:
And yes that does render them vintage dag nabbit!
Well, SOME of those issues are vintage.? But, after August 1981, the
amount of vintage content per issue declined rapidly!? :-)
C: I agree. A decade at best and it was all over. It was all downhill after IBM put the pc
on the front page of Time and whatnot. Egads.
I shouldn't be startled at such a response though. Largely vintage to me means what
was current when I was in my teens and early twenties. Much the same w/Fred I guess.
Difference is I was using a keyboard and he was using toggle switches. Then graduated up
to a numeric keypad.
4667
days inactive
4667
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
chrism3667＠yahoo.com -
cisin＠xenosoft.com