25 Nov
2008
25 Nov
'08
10:16 a.m.
That claim of some drums operating at 75,000rpm has to
be a typo...
I can believe 7500 - but 75,000? Ouch!
Eckert once made the claim that, ?laboratory models have been operated in excess of 75,000
rpm.? That's probably where they got that.
12:30 p.m.
William Blair wrote:
... but the gas turbine proved uneconomic to run.
Gordon
That claim of
some drums operating at 75,000rpm has to be a typo...
I can believe 7500 - but 75,000? Ouch!
Eckert once made the claim that, ?laboratory models have been operated in excess of
75,000 rpm.? That's probably where they got that. 
12:53 p.m.
William Blair wrote:
God help them if a drum comes apart at that speed. I doubt the casing
would hold together.
Peace... Sridhar
That claim of
some drums operating at 75,000rpm has to be a typo...
I can believe 7500 - but 75,000? Ouch!
Eckert once made the claim that, ?laboratory models have been operated in excess of
75,000 rpm.? That's probably where they got that.
5871
days inactive
5871
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
gordonjcp＠gjcp.net -
ploopster＠gmail.com -
wbblair3＠yahoo.com -
wdonzelli＠gmail.com