As primarily a
buyer, however, this is lousy. This means that if you
don't like what you get from a seller, you are virtually guaranteed to
get negative feedback from an unscrupulous one if you are forced to
act first.
So, just don't bother leaving feedback, if you don't want to risk getting
negative feedback.
The problem then is that you (the buyer) don't get feedback either.
As a seller, I think that it's completely illogical to leave feedback for
someone before the transaction is over. It's generally not safe to
assume that the party on the buying (or selling end for that matter[0])
is completely reasonable. This is ebay, not civilized society. :)
I have suggested before that E-bay should keep feedback (from either
party) secret until both parties have submitted their feedback, and only
then reveal it. It would help to stop the 'you left me a -ve, so I'm
leaving you one' type of activity.
[0] I normally wouldn't single out someone, but beware of the ebay
seller "classic.computers". I've been waiting almost 4 weeks for him to
ship me something[2], because he refused to let me come and pick it up.
There are people who would simply turn up at his home along with a
couple of large freidns and 'persuade' him to hand over the property that
they've paid for :-)
[1] There was a thread a couple months ago on here
about a seller doing
this. From my perspective, a functional device is much more important
than worrying about the "damage" from putting a label on an old piece of
cardboard.
There are people who like to have the origianl boxes (I am not one of
them, but...). IMHO, if the item was advertised as 'in origianl box' or
similar, then that box shouldn't be used as the outer shipping container,
and shouldn't have more labels stuck to it. If no mention was made of the
box, then the buyer has no reason to moan if said box was used as the
shiping container, the box was not claimed to be included so you have no
reason to expect to get an undamaged on.
-tony