No, I am grateful to J?rg for his work and his willingness to share it with
us. But I actually bought (cheap used) box to run Win7, for those rare
occasions when I want/need to run something that only runs on Windows.
It's always been a pain, especially since every time I fire it up it wants
to spend a half-hour or more fixing things they didn't code right the first
time. WinXP was pretty much the pinnacle of Windows development IMHO, and
it's been a fast toboggan ride into the sewer ever since.
But I'd forgotten about Wine - I usually run Mac OS X these days unless I'm
running something 'interesting'. (I've been playing with Plan 9 again
lately, and of course VMS.) Maybe that Win7 machine will get converted to
some Linux flavor?. -- Ian
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Steven M Jones <classiccmp at crash.com> wrote:
On 05/03/2015 07:44 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
All true. However, in which way is Windows on a
virtual machine any
different than on a physical machine? It's just as much
windows in either
case.
On the one hand, that's kind of my point - it should work just as well.
On the other, perhaps limiting the "contagion" to a VM, or not having to
add a machine to run it, is a win. Or gets people to focus on the fact
that Joerg shared something nice, even if it requires something that isn't.
It's probably all just reflexive whinging about MSFT, and I shouldn't
have bothered wasting everybody's bandwidth on a response. Let alone two.
Oh well.
--S.
--
Ian S. King, MSIS, MSCS, Ph.D. Candidate
The Information School <http://ischool.uw.edu>
Archivist, Voices From the Rwanda Tribunal <http://tribunalvoices.org>
Value Sensitive Design Research Lab <http://vsdesign.org>
University of Washington
There is an old Vulcan saying: "Only Nixon could go to China."