8 Apr
2013
8 Apr
'13
11:59 a.m.
Does anybody know anything about this machine?
Not even a keyboard or monitor port on it!
Pics are here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/106111250846948401252/albums/5864544551344799
681?banner=pwa
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6232 - Release Date: 04/08/13
8 Apr
8 Apr
12:38 p.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:00 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: Intergraph Interserve 200
Does anybody know anything about this machine?
Not even a keyboard or monitor port on it!
Pics are here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/106111250846948401252/albums/5864544551344799
681?banner=pwa
Just had a VERY nice conversation with Tom from Intergraph tech support.
Needless to say, this has been obsolete for many years. It was a plotter
server, ran Clix (proprietary version of Unix), the largest hdd it would
take was a 600mb 68-pin SCSI. It does have a 360kb floppy. Communication
is through the RS-232 port in VT-220 mode only.
IF he can find the keys, software, and docs for this old beast, he will
email me back.
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6232 - Release Date: 04/08/13
8:42 p.m.
On 4/8/13 1:38 PM, Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:00 PM
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: Intergraph Interserve 200
Does anybody know anything about this machine?
Not even a keyboard or monitor port on it!
Pics are here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/106111250846948401252/albums/5864544551344799
681?banner=pwa
Just had a VERY nice conversation with Tom from Intergraph tech support.
Needless to say, this has been obsolete for many years. It was a plotter
server, ran Clix (proprietary version of Unix), the largest hdd it would
take was a 600mb 68-pin SCSI. It does have a 360kb floppy. Communication
is through the RS-232 port in VT-220 mode only.
IF he can find the keys, software, and docs for this old beast, he will
email me back.
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6232 - Release Date: 04/08/13
Would be interesting to see if it still works. Hope that guy can score
some software for you. ;)
--
Dave Land
Land Computer Service
Check out my site at http://www.landcomp.net
12:59 p.m.
On 8-apr-2013 20:59, Cindy Croxton Electronics Plus wrote:
Does anybody know anything about this machine?
Not even a keyboard or monitor port on it!
Pics are here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/106111250846948401252/albums/5864544551344799
681?banner=pwa
The exterior design reminds me a bit of an Intergraph CLIPPER
UNIX ("CLIX") system I used to have (and regret having parted
with, unknowingly, as a teen running out of space).
- MG
1:53 p.m.
I wish there was an Intergraph wiki or short summary of models with
specs. Maybe I would even choose what I would like to want, if any.
--
Ola Hughson
2:28 p.m.
I wish there was an Intergraph wiki or short summary
of models with
specs. Maybe I would even choose what I would like to want, if any.
Intergraphs are the great forgotten workstations using the great
forget microprocessor.
But then, Intergraph has been complete dicks about being hobbyist friendly.
--
Will
2:43 p.m.
I have a fellow co-worker who used to work for Intergraph during its
heyday. I asked him about it so we'll see what he has to say.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:28 PM, William Donzelli <wdonzelli at gmail.com>wrote:
I wish there
was an Intergraph wiki or short summary of models with
specs. Maybe I would even choose what I would like to want, if any.
Intergraphs are the great forgotten workstations using the great
forget microprocessor.
But then, Intergraph has been complete dicks about being hobbyist friendly.
--
Will
3:38 p.m.
<http://books.google.com/books?id=3UuWcPxTGDIC&lpg=PT63&pg=PT63#v=onepage&q&f=fa
lse>
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book
<http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
2:58 p.m.
On 8-apr-2013 23:28, William Donzelli wrote:
Intergraphs are the great forgotten workstations using
the great
forget microprocessor.
But then, Intergraph has been complete dicks about being hobbyist
friendly.
That I remember too well, back in the 1990s, which certainly must
have contributed to me parting with my CLIPPER back then...
- MG
10:59 p.m.
----- Original Message ----
From: William Donzelli <wdonzelli at gmail.com>
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Mon, April 8, 2013 2:38:47 PM
Subject: Re: IntergraphInterserve 200
I wish there was an Intergraphwiki or short summary of
models with
specs. Maybe I would even choose what I would like to want, if any.
Intergraphs are the great forgotten workstations using the great
forget microprocessor.
But then, Intergraph has been complete dicks about being hobbyist friendly.
--
Will
They did have a closed door policy to everyone except those with deep pockets
and a need for their software.
Some of the their workstations where Sun SPARC's and later they built their
own Intel based desk top systems. These where very nice systems. Had all for
the latest Video, SCSI, Dual Processors, at that time. They ran NT with their
software. I still have 2 running at work. They will probably out live me.
(None with their software) TD-30 and TDZ-300. The latter is a Dual Pentium
PRO.
- Jerry
9 Apr
9 Apr
4:51 a.m.
On 9-apr-2013 7:59, Jerry Wright wrote:
Some of the their workstations where Sun SPARC's
and later they built their
own Intel based desk top systems.
This one is likely not one of either, but CLIPPER (look it up).
These where very nice systems. Had all for the latest
Video, SCSI, Dual
Processors, at that time. They ran NT with their software. I still have
2 running at work. They will probably out live me. (None with their
software) TD-30 and TDZ-300. The latter is a Dual Pentium
PRO.
You're thinking of different systems now. (Those came later.)
- MG
6:24 a.m.
Here's what my friend has to say about the machine:
A very low end clipper based server for graphics and other uses even
numbers in other languages work.
It was a 5 mips Clipper C 100 processor( a lot for 1989) with a Intel 80186
io processor with 8 or 16 MB of memory. Probably used the same card set as
the low end workstation with out the graphics. It probably ran System V
Unix. Collectors of obscure computer may be interested. I think I have a
processor card for it. If it had graphics it would be called an Interpro
200. You may have trouble filling up the 166MB drive. About 5x faster than
a VAX780. I had a very similar machine for a home machine for quite a few
years. Vern had a C100 as a home machine also. Where did you run across it?
http://www.cc-computerarchiv.de/CC-Archiv/edv-alt/ge-intg/ge-intg-6_89.html
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 AM, MG <marcogb at xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 9-apr-2013 7:59, Jerry Wright wrote:
Some of the their workstations where Sun
SPARC's and later they built
their
own Intel based desk top systems.
This one is likely not one of either, but CLIPPER (look it up).
These where very nice systems. Had all for the latest Video, SCSI, Dual
Processors, at that time. They ran NT with their
software. I still have
2 running at work. They will probably out live me. (None with their
software) TD-30 and TDZ-300. The latter is a Dual Pentium
PRO.
You're thinking of different systems now. (Those came later.)
- MG
7:05 a.m.
This one came with a batch of plotters from US military surplus years ago.
Cindy Croxton
Here's what my friend has to say about the machine:
A very low end clipper based server for graphics and other uses even numbers
in other languages work.
It was a 5 mips Clipper C 100 processor( a lot for 1989) with a Intel 80186
io processor with 8 or 16 MB of memory. Probably used the same card set as
the low end workstation with out the graphics. It probably ran System V
Unix. Collectors of obscure computer may be interested. I think I have a
processor card for it. If it had graphics it would be called an Interpro
200. You may have trouble filling up the 166MB drive. About 5x faster than
a VAX780. I had a very similar machine for a home machine for quite a few
years. Vern had a C100 as a home machine also. Where did you run across it?
http://www.cc-computerarchiv.de/CC-Archiv/edv-alt/ge-intg/ge-intg-6_89.html
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6234 - Release Date: 04/09/13
13 Apr
13 Apr
9:07 p.m.
In article <516400C5.3070603 at xs4all.nl>,
MG <marcogb at xs4all.nl> writes:
On 9-apr-2013 7:59, Jerry Wright wrote:
Both wrong. The InterServe 200 is an 80186 according to their ads.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book
<http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
Some of the their workstations where Sun
SPARC's and later they built their
own Intel based desk top systems.
This one is likely not one of either, but CLIPPER (look it up). 
14 Apr
14 Apr
6:57 a.m.
New subject: adm3 terminal on latest doctor who (cold war) episode
the subject says it all, just saw it about 12 minutes into the
episode, so i'm looking forward to what else there will be...
7:39 a.m.
New subject: adm3 terminal on latest doctor who (cold war) episode
On 4/14/2013 7:57 AM, Tom Uban wrote:
Ben.
PS. The fist 10 minutes was the only good part.
the subject says it all, just saw it about 12 minutes
into the
episode, so i'm looking forward to what else there will be...
I saw that too. If they got rid of that prop, I think it would have given
a better cold war feel.
9:21 a.m.
New subject: adm3 terminal on latest doctor who (cold war) episode
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:39:41AM -0600, ben wrote:
Ben.
PS. The fist 10 minutes was the only good part.
- Diane
--
- db at FreeBSD.org db at db.net http://www.db.net/~db
On 4/14/2013 7:57 AM, Tom Uban wrote:
Just looking at that now. Wow. What is it sitting on?
the subject says it all, just saw it about 12
minutes into the
episode, so i'm looking forward to what else there will be...
I saw that too. If they got rid of that prop, I think it would have given
a better cold war feel. 
9:34 a.m.
New subject: adm3 terminal on latest doctor who (cold war) episode
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Tom Uban <uban at ubanproductions.com> wrote:
the subject says it all, just saw it about 12 minutes
into the
episode, so i'm looking forward to what else there will be...
Yep, saw that too yesterday and also thought it looked like an ADM-3A.
But didn't the one on the show have a keypad? More like an ADM-5?
I'll have to go back and look at the show again.
11:14 a.m.
New subject: adm3 terminal on latest doctor who (cold war) episode
On 4/14/13 11:34 AM, Glen Slick wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Tom Uban <uban at
ubanproductions.com> wrote:
An ADM-5 it is. Missing the keypad's ENTER (return?) key.
the subject says it all, just saw it about 12
minutes into the
episode, so i'm looking forward to what else there will be...
Yep, saw that too yesterday and also thought it looked like an ADM-3A.
But didn't the one on the show have a keypad? More like an ADM-5?
I'll have to go back and look at the show again.
6:25 p.m.
New subject: adm3 terminal on latest doctor who (cold war) episode
<http://news.thedoctorwhosite.co.uk/images/cold-war-promo5a.jpg>
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book
<http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
9 Apr
9 Apr
5:27 p.m.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Jerry Wright <g-wright at att.net> wrote:
Some of the their workstations where Sun SPARC's
and later they built their
own Intel based desk top systems. These where very nice systems. Had all for
the latest Video, SCSI, Dual Processors, at that time. They ran NT with their
software. I still have 2 running at work. They will probably out live me.
(None with their software) TD-30 and TDZ-300. The latter is a Dual Pentium
PRO.
I once worked in a lab that had an Intergraph x86/NT machine for 3D
modelling -- from what I remember, it supposedly had a very
complete/performant implementation of OpenGL compared to other
machines of the era. The hardware itself seemed robust and well put
together.
It was around this time (late 90's-ish) that SGI made a devil's
bargain with Microsoft to adopt Windows NT and co-develop a new
graphics API ("Fahrenheit"), which marked the beginning of their rapid
decline into irrelevance.
-Andy
10 Apr
10 Apr
5:02 a.m.
On 10-apr-2013 2:27, Andrew Hoerter wrote:
It was around this time (late 90's-ish) that SGI
made a devil's
bargain with Microsoft to adopt Windows NT and co-develop a new
graphics API ("Fahrenheit"), which marked the beginning of their rapid
decline into irrelevance.
Oh yes, that was without much doubt the most idiotic thing SGI ever
did. DEC made the same mistake(s).
- MG
4269
days inactive
4276
days old
22 comments
13 participants
participants (13)
-
amh＠POBOX.COM -
bfranchuk＠jetnet.ab.ca -
db＠db.net -
f.helyanvy＠gmail.com -
g-wright＠att.net -
glen.slick＠gmail.com -
legalize＠xmission.com -
marcogb＠xs4all.nl -
oltmansg＠gmail.com -
sales＠elecplus.com -
uban＠ubanproductions.com -
wdonzelli＠gmail.com -
xmechanic＠landcomp.net