This is the most nonsensical thing I've ever read in my life...
When information is only stored electronically, those
who cannot afford
electronics are disenfranchised with respect to that information.
So... somehow, a person with NO access to electronics
is going to magically know that a paper copy of a document exists somewhere
and somehow get it and copy it, all without electronics of any kind?
not having an electronic copy in some form is a severe barrier to access.
what are you smoking? i want some.
When information is only stored electronically, the
free flow of that
information is far more easily disrupted, both by intent (consider the
actions of commercial networks in the U. S., or of hostile governments)
and by accident (the point raised in the Rosetta Stone paper I referenced
earlier).
ohhhh so now it's a HUGE conspiracy theory, that the government somehow wants
to keep you from accessing some old 70's fortran printout... REALLY?!?
yeah, like the govt is such a HUGE barrier to documentation,
somehow you can get it all on PAPER but you can't find it anywhere online?
what?!?
The whole
point is to make it "easy to preserve" and "freely share".
Everything that goes against that just suppresses knowledge and information.
Absolutely. Agree completely.
Your attitude of denying electronic copies goes against this 100%
I simply believe that the new technologies currently
in use have been
convincingly shown not to scale as well as the older one they are attempting
to replace.
what the hell are you talking about?
You mean, it's easier and scales better to copy a bound book in BOUND form
than it is to copy an electronic document? REALLY?!?
Please tell me where I have cheap, easy access to book copying and binding services
that don't cost a fortune... I'd love to hear it.
Yes, there are people working to improve same, as Ian
points out, but they
are nowhere near the end of the task they have taken on, and things have to
be preserved until then.
of course not, it takes time to build stuff, but that's not a reason to throw up your
hands and go
"oh well, its not perfect, so nobody gets a copy of my precious documents!"
The best way
to preserve something is to:
1. make it as easy to get a hold of as possible
2. make it available in an easy to replicate format
3. ensure as many people as possible can get a copy if they need/want one
All true. Now, what's your issue with paper?
paper contradicts almost all of the above...
1. right, like paper is sooo easy to get ahold of a copy, with people hording documents...
uh huh
and paper is soo much cheaper to copy than an electronic copy
2. like paper is soo easy to replicate, a bound book takes forever in a day, costs a
fortune and is difficult
3. how does paper do this? how do I find it if its only on paper?
In the end,
having it in a universally available format (PDF for example)
and available on the web would be best.
Until everyone can have access to the PDF, it is no better than a piece of
paper, and it is at least as fragile.
BS! PDF is not even close to being as fragile as paper.
when you horde your document, as the only copy, you tear it, pour coffee on it, lose it,
etc
with a PDF or other type, it can be copied around readily, you lose your copy, no problem,
lots of others around.
and you missed the point, everyone CAN have access to PDF, public libraries have free
computers to use, as do others.
Can someone
explain why "hording" documentation and keeping it private on
a "degradable" media like paper is a better idea?
Please point out to us where anyone advocated the hoarding of documentation.
You just did, and so did the previous message.
Please point out how paper (which can last for 2000
years) is more degradable
than a CDROM that uses a dye technology with an expected shelf life of less
than 30. Or than disk drives which are subject to mechanical as well as
electronic failures in a far shorter time span.
hahaha... 2000 years... ahahaha... funny.
riiight....
and you missed a media. the internet. which has an infinite shelf life.
beat that.
Please explain what the use of silly scare quotes does
for your question.
it wasn't a question, it was a response, to the person who said hording was better
than sharing...
Dan.
_________________________________________________________________
Save up to 84% on Windows 7 until Jan 3?eligible CDN College & University students
only. Hurry?buy it now for $39.99!
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691635