On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Paul Koning <Paul_Koning at dell.com> wrote:
>>>> "Ethan" == Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> writes:
?Ethan> ...and I don't know if a uVAX-I can keep a TK50
?Ethan> busy, ...
I should hope so, given that a modest PDP-11 could do so easily.
I wouldn't be so certain - my experience is that the the way the TK50
works, you can store *up to* 95MB per tape *if* you can keep the silos
full. A MicroVAX-I is a slooooow beasty. There's no problem with the
Qbus itself, but my concern would be that system overhead, interrupt
latency, RQDX performance, etc., could be bad enough that the OS just
couldn't fill tape buffers fast enough. Of course, trying to back up
30 MB onto a 95MB tape doesn't require perfect performance.
Thinking about it, perhaps it's worth the effort to use Standalone
Backup - that should minimize any OS effects on backup speeds. Once
the tape is written, ISTR the TK50 will back the tape up as necessary
to extract what's on it. It's writing that you _must_ optimize.
Comments from others with TK50 experience welcome, but that's how I
remember it from c. 1986.
-ethan