20 Apr
2006
20 Apr
'06
4:35 p.m.
In article <444808BC.3050209 at gmail.com>,
Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> writes:
Richard wrote:
Oh, OK, wrong again about IBM equipment :-). I confess that I really
know next to nothing about IBM gear.
I see from a followup message that the 5100 did not have graphics
capability, only character display.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>
In article <20060420135155.J1180 at
shell.lmi.net>,
Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> writes:
Much earlier than that. It was based on a 16-bit processor called the PALM. BUT!
The 5100 was not the IBM PC line.
Is the 5100 the RT RISC-based one? I remember seeing one of those at
udel in the 82-86 time frame and I recall it had windowing, bitmap
graphics, etc.