Jeffrey l Kaneko wrote:
/most of rant deleted
Isn't it odd, how "True historical
preservationists" always seem to
have the *deepest* pockets?
Isn't it also odd how the people with these "deep pockets" also seem to get
a lot accomplished? You might want to look at that correlation and see what
it means.
> *afford*. You're damned f'ing right I want to pay 'as little as
> possible'.
> That's the only way I'm going to be able to stay in this . . . .
> I was priced out of stamp collecting in
the 70's. I was priced out of
> numismatics in the early 80's. I'll be goddamned if I'm going to stand
> idly by, to watch this happen again.
Take a look at my prior comment. A book you might want to look at (but
probably won't) is "The Richest Man in Babylon" by George S. Clason.
> > Why else all the complaining about eBay and the prices?
> Because alot of us won't be able to
participate if the prices get
> too high, or are you so wealthy that this is too difficult for you
> to comprehend?!?!
See comment #1.
> > Our goal, if I understand it correctly, is the preservation of our
> > computer technology for posterity.
> Yes. Preservation. Restoring and owning a
truly historic computer is a
> worthwhile and uplifting endeavour. Unfortunately, the way things are
> going, it will soon be an endeavour for the privledged few.
See comment #1. Those "priviledged few" are generally the people that get
things done and manage their resources wisely. Personally, I would not want
someone without the ability to manage having any control over my collection.