>
'fiddle until it seems to work' designing,
That's not what I'm talking about. [...]
[...], I didn;'t think you
would do something like that...
I have done it, actually, though I think without
the "no real
understanding of why" part. For example, [...manually tweaking gain
until an RC phase-shift oscillator just barely oscillates...]
I feele this is
actually a poor deisgn, in that the gain from the
op-amp (and thus the exact value of the resistor you are tweking)
that you need depends on Wein bridge network components how well
balanaced they are, for example).
Exactly why I used a variable resistor there. I don't see how this
makes it a poor design.
It may work on the breadboard while you're
watching it, but it could
drift one way or the other with temperature changes, etc. It's not
somethign I'd do in anything I wxpected to keep on working.
Ah. It's a poor design under certain assumptions about its intended
(anticipated, whatever) use.
Yes, it is. Fortunately, the kind of use you appear to be assuming was
not the kind of use I put it to. Indeed, it would almost be fair to
say I didn't put it to _any_ use per se; it was not done because I
needed an oscillator for some other use, but rather was done as an
experiment, to see if I understood RC phase-shift oscillators well
enough to toss one together and have it work. As such, it did a good
job in its intended use: because of it, I (think I) have a
significantly better handle on the benefits and problems of such things
than I did before I built and played with it. (I doubtless could have
even better knowledge if I'd muddled about with it and its kin more.
If I seemed likely to need such knowledge, I would; what I did has, for
now at least, satisfied the desire that led me to do it.)
IIRC mo purely linear system can produce stable
oscillations (any
small change will either cause said oscilaltiosn to colalpse to zero
or to grow ithout limit (or more practically untyil the signal hits
the supply rails).
On the one hand, that feels right.
On the other, I'm considering an AGC circuit that doesn't use a bulb,
but instead uses a FET as a variable resistor, and trying to figure out
where it's got anything nonlinear in it (assuming the amplifier is
running class A).
I am sure we all know the stroy of Fred Terman and a
certain research
student.
Doesn't sound familiar to me, for what that may be worth.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at
rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B